Soft-tissue balance in short and straight stem total hip arthroplasty

Cementless Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Chances and Limits

In recent decades, a large number of cementless short stems have been introduced to the market. The concept aims at saving soft tissue using minimally invasive surgery and at the same time preserving as much bone as possible. In particular, the latest generation of short stems, which are implanted using a calcar-guided round-the-corner technique, are attracting increasing attention. An individualised resection level allows individual stem alignment and thus an ideal reconstruction of the hip anatomy. The early clinical results of short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) are promising and have led to an expansion of the indications and limitations for the use of short stems. In particular, the individual positioning in valgus or varus and the resulting individual metaphyseal or metadiaphyseal anchorage offers various possibilities to reconstruct even abnormal joint morphologies. Consequently, short stems are increasingly used in patients with complex anatomical variations or in cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. In some various cases, they can also be used in revision or conversion arthroplasty. In some patients, short stems can also be used after femoral neck fracture. Currently, scientific data on those areas of indication of short-stem THA is scarce.

Hip resurfacing generates a more physiological gait than total hip replacement: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Restoration of the constitutional joint anatomy after hip replacement favours physiological peri-articular soft-tissue tension and kinematics, and is likely to be functionally beneficial. Hip resurfacing (HR) and conventional total hip replacement (THR) are two different options for replacing degenerated hips, and are likely to result in different anatomical reconstruction. We initiated this study to investigate the differences in gait performance between these two prosthetic options, and aimed to answer the following questions: (1) does HR result in better restoration of the frontal hip anatomical parameters, (2) and generate a more physiological gait compared to THR? (3) Does the quality of the anatomical restoration after THR influence gait performance?

HYPOTHESES

Our hypothesis was that a better anatomical restoration using HR versus THR would produce more physiological (symmetric) gait.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients who had unilateral primary osteoarthritis successfully treated by replacement (40 THRs and 12 HRs). Hip anatomical parameters were measured on standing pelvic radiographs on both the prosthetic and the contralateral healthy hips. Patients undertook gait assessment under both normal and stress conditions at a mean follow-up of 14 months (7 to 16 months). Gait performances were compared between HR and THR, and the relationship between gait performances and quality of frontal anatomical restoration (estimated on radiograph) were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared to the native contralateral side, the HR procedure tended to decrease all independent anatomical radiographic parameters with the exception of the vertical centre of rotation offset, whilst the THR procedure tended to increase them; the difference between HR and THR was only statistically significant for femoral offset and global horizontal offset (increased after THR while reduced after HR). Only 50% of THR and 25% of HR procedures closely anatomically (±15%) recreated both global horizontal offset and global vertical offset. Under normal conditions (normal walking speed and flat ramp), the gait was fairly symmetric for both the HR and the THR patients with a symmetry index of 0.62% and 3.14% respectively. At high walking speed (stress conditions), the symmetry index degraded for both groups, but the gait remained more symmetric in the HR group (2.09%), compared to the THR group (5.74%); nevertheless, the difference remained not statistically significant (p=0.159). We were unable to detect any significant relationship between gait performances and radiographically measured hip frontal anatomical parameters.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

HR procedure is more consistent than conventional THR in generating a more physiological gait under stress conditions. Radiographic estimation of the quality of the frontal anatomical hip restoration is of poor value to predict gait performances of THR patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III - retrospective case-control study with prospective data collection.

Long-term results of an anatomically implanted hip arthroplasty with a short stem prosthesis (MiniHipTM)

AIM

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome nine and ten years after short-stemmed, bone preserving and anatomical hip arthroplasty with the MiniHip^TM system.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 186 patients underwent hip arthroplasty with a partial neck preserving short stem (MiniHip^TM, Corin). Elderly patients were not excluded from this study, thus the mean age at the time of surgery was 59.3 years (range 32 to 82 years). Surgery and the follow-up assessments were performed at two Centers. Up until now, the mean follow-up was 112.5 ± 8.2 mo. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Hip Dysfunction Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (HOOS) was assessed pre- and each year after surgery. The clinical follow-up was accompanied by standardized a.p. and axial radiological examinations. Periprosthetic lucencies, hypertrophies within the Gruen zones one to fourteen were assessed. A subsidence of the stem was investigated according to Morray and heterotopic ossifications were assessed according to Brooker.

RESULTS

The OHS and HOOS improved from 18 ± 3.3 to 46 ± 2.0 and from 30 ± 8.3 to 95 ± 4.6 points, P < 0.001 respectively. There were no differences regarding age, etiology, friction pairings, etc., (P > 0.05). Two stems were revised due to a symptomatic subsidence four and twelve months postoperatively. Thus, the survivorship for aseptic loosening at nine to ten years was 98.66%. Including one stem revision due to a symptomatic exostosis, bursitis and thigh pain as well as one revision because of a septic stem loosening, the overall survival for the stem with revision for any reason was 97.32%. Besides one asymptomatic patient, radiological signs of a proximal stress-shielding, such as bone resorptions within the proximal Gruen zones, were not noticed. Findings suggesting a distal loading, e.g., bony hypertrophies or bone appositions of more than 2 mm, were also not detected.

CONCLUSION

Regarding these first long-term results on the MiniHip^TM, the implant performed exceedingly well with a high rate of survivorship for aseptic loosening. Our radiological results within the Gruen zones support the design rationale of the Minihip to provide a reliable metaphyseal anchoring with the expected proximal, more physiological load transfer. This might minimize or exclude a stress shielding which might be associated with thigh pain, proximal bone loss and an increased risk of aseptic loosening. The MiniHip^TM is a reliable partial-neck retaining prosthesis with good a clinical long-term outcome in younger as well as elderly patients.

Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery has shown dramatic changes in terms of increased number of procedures and of technical development in recent years. It has been described as “the operation of the 20^th century” for the excellent results, the high satisfaction of the patients and the improvement of the quality of life.

A lot of variations have been introduced over the last few decades in THA especially in terms of indications (both in younger and older patients), techniques and devices (approaches, tissue preservation, biomaterials and industrial finishing), per-operative management (blood loss and pain control) and post-operative protocols (the so called “fast track” surgery). Looking at all these advances the emerging question is: have all of them been justified both in terms of improvement of the results for the patients and of the cost/benefit ratio from an economical point of view?

The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the advantages and the disadvantages of the theoretically proposed “advances in hip arthroplasty” and attempt to understand which are justified of such “advances” nowadays, based on the international and the European perspective with a focus on the author’s personal clinical experience.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008. Originally published online at www.efortopenreviews.org

Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior of human dysplastic hip joints: a systematic review

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common condition predisposing to osteoarthritis (OA). Especially since DDH is best identified and treated in infancy before bones ossify, there is surprisingly a near-complete absence of literature examining mechanical behavior of infant dysplastic hips. We sought to identify current practice in finite element modeling (FEM) of DDH, to inform future modeling of infant dysplastic hips. We performed multi-database systematic review using PRISMA criteria. Abstracts (n = 126) fulfilling inclusion criteria were screened for methodological quality, and results were analyzed and summarized for eligible articles (n = 12). The majority of the studies modeled human adult dysplastic hips. Two studies focused on etiology of DDH through simulating mechanobiological growth of prenatal hips; we found no FEM-based studies in infants or children. Finite element models used either patient-specific geometry or idealized average geometry. Diversities in choice of material properties, boundary conditions, and loading scenarios were found in the finite-element models. FEM of adult dysplastic hips demonstrated generally smaller cartilage contact area in dysplastic hips than in normal joints. Contact pressure (CP) may be higher or lower in dysplastic hips depending on joint geometry and mechanical contribution of labrum (Lb). FEM of mechanobiological growth of prenatal hip joints revealed evidence for effects of the joint mechanical environment on formation of coxa valga, asymmetrically shallow acetabulum and malformed femoral head associated with DDH. Future modeling informed by the results of this review may yield valuable insights into optimal treatment of DDH, and into how and why OA develops early in DDH.