Modular hip implant fracture at the stem-sleeve interface

An Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Is Necessary for the Removal of Broken Modular Metaphyseal Engaging Femoral Stems

BACKGROUND

Modular metaphyseal engaging (MME) femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) allow optimized femoral length, offset, and anteversion and are useful in patients with unusual proximal femoral anatomy. Fretting, corrosion, and stem fractures above the modular sleeve are complications associated with these implants. The purpose of this study was to identify failure mechanisms of retrieved MME femoral components at our institution, identify all broken stem cases, and evaluate how often an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was required for removal.

METHODS

All consecutively retrieved MME femoral components from September 2002 to May 2023 were reviewed. Patient demographics, procedure information, component specifications, indications for removal, and requirements for further revision surgery were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were calculated for variables of interest.

RESULTS

There were 131 retrieved MME components. The mean age at surgery was 59 years (range, 28 to 75), 49% were women, mean body mass index was 29.4 (range, 20.7 to 33.3), and mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.4 ± 0.5. There were 102 (78%) stems of 1 design (stem A), and 29 (22%) stems of a different design (stem B). Of 131 components, 10 (7.6%) failed secondary to stem fracture proximal to the modular sleeve. Four of 102 (4%) of stem A and 6 of 29 (21% of stem B) fractured. All broken stems required additional intervention for removal during revision THA, using an ETO (N = 9) or cortical window (N = 1) in which an intraoperative proximal femoral fracture occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Broken MME stems present a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons during revision THA. When a stem fracture occurs above the ingrown sleeve, the distal splines may have osseous interdigitation into the clothespin. Thus, when revising a broken MME stem, an ETO should be performed, and the segment should be long enough to allow distal access.

Characteristics and risk factors of UCS fracture subtypes in periprosthetic fractures around the hip

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) following hip arthroplasty are complex injuries. This study evaluates patient demographic characteristics, management, outcomes, and risk factors associated with PPF subtypes over a decade.

Methods

Using a multicentre collaborative study design, independent of registry data, we identified adults from 29 centres with PPFs around the hip between January 2010 and December 2019. Radiographs were assessed for the Unified Classification System (UCS) grade. Patient and injury characteristics, management, and outcomes were compared between UCS grades. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to estimate relative risk ratios (RRR) of variables on UCS grade.

Results

A total of 1,104 patients were included. The majority were female (57.9%; n = 639), ethnically white (88.5%; n = 977), used mobility aids (67%; n = 743), and had a median age of 82 years (interquartile range (IQR) 74 to 87). A total of 77 (7%) had pain prior to the PPF. The most common UCS grade was B2 (33%; n = 368). UCS type D fractures had the longest length of stay (median 19 days (IQR 11 to 26)), highest readmission to hospital (21%; n = 9), and highest rate of discharge to step-down care (52%; n = 23). Multinomial regression suggests that uncemented femoral stems are associated with a reduced risk of UCS C (RRR 0.36 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 0.7); p = 0.002) and increased risk of UCS A (RRR 3.3 (95% CI 1.9 to 5.7); p < 0.001), compared to UCS B fracture.

Conclusion

The most common PPF type in elderly frail patients is UCS B2. Uncemented stems have a lower risk of UCS C fractures compared to cemented stems. A national PPF database is needed to further identify correlation between implants and fracture subtypes.

Breakage of Tapered Junctions of Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty—High Incidence in a Consecutive Series of a Single Institution

Background: Modularity in revision THA (RTHA) has become accepted during the last three decades. Nevertheless, specific risks of modularity of current revision devices such as breakage of taper junctions occur during follow-up. Data reporting failure rates are predominantly given by the manufacturers but independent data acquisition is missing so far. Questions/Purposes: 1. What time-related risk of breakage of taper junction between neck and body of an established modular revision device can be expected in a consecutive single institutional series and a mid-term follow-up? 2. Are there specific factors influencing breakage in this cohort? Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of a consecutive series of 89 cases after femoral revision using a tapered modular revision stem. Mean follow-up period was 7.1 (range: 3.0–13.7) years. Breakage of stem as failure criteria of the implant was investigated with a Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Breakage of taper junctions occurred in four patients during follow-up showing a time-depending implant survival of 94.2 (95% CI: 88.6–100%) after 13.7 years. Implant survival of stems with lateralized necks of 87.4 (95% CI: 75.6–100%) after 13.7 years was significantly lower compared to the standard offset variant with 100% after 13.5 years (log rank test p = 0.0283). Chi square test also revealed a significantly higher risk of breakage of lateralized necks compared to standard offset pieces (p = 0.0141). Three of four patients were obese with a mean BMI of 37.9 kg/m2. Grade of obesity (grade 1 or higher) had significant influence on risk of breakage. Survival of the implant was significantly lower in obese patients with at least grade 1 obesity compared to patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (82.9 (95% CI: 64.9–100%) after 11.6 years vs. 98.4 (95% CI: 95.3–100%) after 13.7 years; log-rank p = 0.0327). Conclusions: Cumulative risk for failure of taper junctions was high in this consecutive single institutional cohort and may further increase during follow-up. As independent data acquisition in registries is missing, failure rate may be higher than reported data of the manufacturers. The use of lateralized offset necks in obese patients of at least grade 1 obesity showed a significantly higher risk of breakage. The use of monobloc revision devices may be an option, but randomized control trials are currently missing to establish standardized treatment protocols considering individual risks for both monobloc and/or modular implants.

Midterm results of titanium conical Wagner stem with challenging femoral anatomy: Survivorship and unique bone remodeling

BACKGROUND

Complex anatomy of the proximal femur makes total hip arthroplasty (THA) more challenging. Short, straight, fluted and conical titanium stem like the Wagner Cone can be helpful to address small femoral canal, increased femoral neck version, important leg length discrepancy or proximal femoral deformity. The outcome in these patients is less assured and associated with high rate of complications. Therefore, we did a retrospective study aiming to answer: 1) can the Wagner Cone stem provide acceptable mid- to long-term implant survivorship; 2) help minimizing perioperative adverse events; 3) produce favorable clinical outcome measured by WOMAC score; and 4) be associated with a favorable radiographic femoral bone remodeling at the last follow-up?

HYPOTHESIS

Wagner Cone stem is an advantageous solution for the distorted proximal femur in complex THA.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Our cohort was derived from the patient registries where medical records of 88 patients (103 hips) who underwent primary THA using the Wagner prosthesis were retrospectively reviewed. Then, data was analyzed for patients' demographics and surgical data, and comparing preoperative, immediate postoperative and last follow-up data. Eleven patients (12 hips) were excluded (7 hips followed up less than 2 years or lost to follow-up, 3 hips that had the Wagner stem for revision and 2 Wagner stems inserted for periprosthetic fracture). This left 77 patients (91 hips) with Wagner cone stems implanted for more than 2 years between March 2003 and February 2017 by 7 surgeons in 3 academic hospitals. Implant revision, reoperations, WOMAC score and radiographic analyses were recorded at last follow-up.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 7.8 (range, 2.0-16.2) years, Wagner stem survivorship was 98.9% (95% CI: 94 to 100%) with one (1.1%) stem revision for failure of osteointegration. Five (5.5%) acetabular revisions, one for aseptic loosening, 2 for adverse reaction to metal debris and 2 for infection. One (1.1%) sciatic neuropathy and 4 (4.4%) intraoperative fractures were encountered. The mean WOMAC score was 90.5±11.4 (59-100). Radiographic analysis showed clear signs of stem osseointegration and hypertrophic bone remodeling in 82 cases (92.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Used in complex cases with proximal distorted femurs, the Wagner Cone stem demonstrated a low complication rate, a high-rate consistent adaptive bone remodeling, excellent clinical results, and midterm survival. It is a safe, reliable and advantageous option in complex primary THA. However, the contribution of the underlying cause of the secondary osteoarthritis on the long-term survival of the stem remains to be demonstrated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Fracture of a Sivash-Range of Motion Femoral Stem at the Diaphyseal Spline

We discuss one of the four reported cases involving the fracture of a spline of the Sivash-range of motion (S-ROM) femoral prosthesis. It occurred in a 71-year-old female patient and was fully discovered during stem extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The fractured spline was successfully removed using a reverse curette and fluoroscopic guidance. The placement of a new S-ROM femoral prosthesis was successful, and there were no other orthopedic complications.

Modular prosthesis fracture in a patient with developmental dysplasia of the hip: a case report and literature review

Background

Modular prosthesis fracture, especially distal femoral fracture, is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is catastrophic, and may have a serious impact on the patients. A distal femoral prosthesis fracture in a patient with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with nonunion at the subtrochanteric osteotomy site has not yet been reported in any literature. This report presents the first such case, with a purpose of analyzing the causes of modular prosthesis fractures and nonunion of the osteotomy area, so as to provide orthopedic surgeons with experience and lessons.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 52-year-old woman with the distal femoral prosthesis fracture after THA and subtrochanteric osteotomy for Crowe type IV DDH. The patient had severe pain in the left thigh and her activities were limited. Plain radiographs revealed fracture of the left distal femoral prosthesis and nonunion in the subtrochanteric osteotomy region of the left femur. After a revision of the THA, the patient’s symptoms were resolved.

Conclusions

A prosthesis fracture combined with nonunion at the subtrochanteric osteotomy site is a rare complication. Modular THA combined with a subtrochanteric osteotomy in the treatment of Crowe type IV DDH should reduce the damage to blood supply and avoid further nonunion of the osteotomy area, which may otherwise lead to modular prosthesis fractures. A detailed preoperative plan and suitable rehabilitation program may help minimize the occurrence of subtrochanteric osteotomy nonunion and reduce complications, including femoral prosthesis fractures, in patients with DDH.

Femoral Stem Fracture in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review of the Real-World Evidence

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents as an excellent treatment for the osteoarthritic hip, demonstrating good survival rates. However, aseptic loosening and infection are the main causes of operative revision. The methods used in revision surgery are non-modular or modular THA implants. In addition to the abovementioned revision reasons for THA, this treatment could be associated with the possibility of femoral stem fracture, especially in the modular system. The topic of material failure has been focused on in the public media. The question arises as to how such media reports correlate with the published literature. The observed mentioned number of cases concerning a femoral stem fracture vary between one single case and up to 18.5% within a clinical study, thus presenting an inhomogeneous data situation with a large span. The specific aim of this systematic review is to establish facts and clarify the number of unforeseen events of a femoral stem fracture based on peer review articles and registry data. This clarification is important to us, as these media reports have led to uncertainty among patients.

Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Peer review articles in English and German, presenting original articles, meta-analyses, or case reports, were searched from the turn of the millennium up to December 2019. Only articles that reported a femoral stem component fracture, with content of clinical data as well as register data, were included. Relevant papers published after the defined research time frame were taken into account within the discussion.

Results In total, 218 fractures of a femoral stem (141 primary and 77 revision THA) component could be identified within the selected literature. Most cases of a femoral stem fracture occurred in the modular THA implants compared to the non-modular stems. Regarding revision THA, in summary, 77 implants, presenting 23 non-modular and 54 modular implants, failed by means of femoral stem fracture. A review of 11 National Joint Registries shows a revision rate between 0.04 and 0.05% in only 2 registers according to the specific subject of a femoral stem fracture. For the remaining 9 registers, however, detailed information is lacking and only nonspecific information such as a generic “implant failure” or “other reason” (which can cover a multitude of causes) is supplied.

Conclusion A femoral stem fracture presents a devastating complication for the patient, the surgeon as well as for the manufacturer of the implant. Modular THA implants play an increasingly valuable role concerning restoration of individual anatomy in modern THA revision surgery, especially within complex cases. Regarding revision procedures, data suggests a lower risk of femoral stem fracture for modular implants compared to primary procedures, while the risk of fracture for non-modular implants seems to increase during revision. Ultimately, it cannot be proven whether this is actually applicable, since the absolute number of implanted prosthesis systems is not known. Various implant-, patient-, and surgeon-related factors may lead to these reported femoral stem fractures. However, this systematic review suggests that this is, in general, a rare complication.

[Total hip arthroplasty with Wagner Cone stem and subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in treatment of Crowe developmental dysplasia of hip in adults]

Objective

To investigate the short-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty with Wagner Cone stem combined with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy for adult patients with Crowe Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

A clinical data of 18 patients (20 hips) with Crowe Ⅳ DDH between January 2015 and June 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males (6 hips) and 13 females (14 hips), with an average age of 42 years (range, 20-67 years). There were 18 cases with unilateral DDH and 2 cases with bilateral DDHs. The "4" sign and Trendelenburg sign of affected hip were positive. Preoperative Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were 41.95±6.90 and 5.05±1.15, respectively. The length discrepancy was (4.76±2.59) cm in patients with unilateral DDH. And the lengths of bilateral lower limbs in patients with bilateral DDH were equal. The acetabular anteversion angle, femoral anteversion angle, and combined anteversion angle were (32.82±2.79), (46.18±6.80), and (79.01±7.54) °, respectively. All patients were treated by total hip arthroplasty with Wagner Cone stem and subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. The length of osteotomy ranged from 2.0 to 3.5 cm (mean, 2.38 cm).

Results

The operation time was 116-161 minutes (mean, 138.4 minutes); the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 600-1 200 mL (mean, 795 mL); the volume of drainage after operation was 100-630 mL (mean, 252 mL). All incisions healed by first intention. The symptom of sciatic nerve injury occurred in 1 case and relieved after symptomatic treatment. All patients were followed up 12-29 months (mean, 18.4 months). The "4" sign and Trendelenburg sign of affected hip were negative. The Harris score and VAS score at last follow-up were 87.50±5.06 and 0.75±0.85, respectively. The acetabular anteversion angle, femoral anteversion angle, and combined anteversion angle were (16.21±4.84), (18.99±2.55), and (35.20±5.80)°, respectively. There were significant differences in above indexes between pre- and post-operation ( P<0.05). The length discrepancy was (0.72±0.70) cm in patients with unilateral DDH, which was significant shorter than the preoperative value ( t=7.751, P=0.000). And the lengths of bilateral lower limbs in patients with bilateral DDH were equal. X-ray films showed that the osteotomy of femur healed at 3-6 months (mean, 4.1 months) without the signs of loosening, sinking, osteolysis, and dislocation.

Conclusion

Total hip arthroplasty with Wagner Cone stem and subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy can obviously improve the hip joint function and restore the length of lower limb. The short-term effectiveness is satisfactory, but the long-term effectiveness and survival rate of prosthesis need to be further observed.

Fracture of an S-ROM stem at the sleeve-stem junction

Fracture of a well-ingrown femoral component is a rare and often challenging complication. Modular junctions and sleeve interfaces have been identified as one potential point of weakness with corrosion and fretting being contributing factors to ultimate femoral component fracture. Stem fractures at the sleeve interface were reported occasionally for the proximal ingrowth modular Emperion System (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN). However, this failure mechanism has been reported infrequently, often associated with corrosion at the modular junction, for the similarly designed S-ROM system (DePuy Orthopedics Inc., Warsaw, IN). We present the case of a 52-year-old patient, with a body weight of 84 kg (185 lbs) and a body mass index of 30.6 kg/m², who suffered a fatigue fracture of a 14 × 09 × 130 mm S-ROM stem 42 months after implantation. The present study presents the results of the surface analysis, discusses possible failure mechanisms, provides treatment guidelines, and a review of the literature revealing 15 cases of failure at the level of the stem-sleeve junction. In particular, modifiable risk factors for potential stem failure, including stem diameter, stem offset, and the resulting cantilever bending forces on the proximal sleeve-stem junction, are discussed in detail.

Modular Stems: Advantages and Current Role in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Using modular femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty enables surgeons to make fine adjustments to individual joints and offers intraoperative flexibility. The concept of modularity has been developed in numerous shapes, resulting in a vast range of options. Among them, the greatest achievement has been made for prostheses with modular proximal sleeves. The use of these implants has resulted in excellent mid- to long-term results in a number of cases. Although the use of tapered stems with a broaching technique is gaining popularity in straightforward primary surgeries, modular femoral implants are still associated with a number of potential challenges (e.g., developmental dysplasia of the hip, infection sequelae, and skeletal dysplasia). Based on published results, it is advisable to consider it as an option for complicated cases where the proximal femur is severely deformed.

Comparative Analysis of the Reconstruction of Individual Hip Anatomy Using 3 Different Cementless Stem Designs in Patients With Primary Hip Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

We questioned whether there was a radiographic difference in hip geometry reconstruction and implant fixation between 3 different cementless stem design concepts in patients with primary end-stage hip osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the preoperative and postoperative radiographs by 2 independent and blinded reviewers in a series of 264 consecutive patients who had received either a straight double-tapered stem with 3 offset options (group A), a straight double-tapered stem with 2 shape options and modular necks (group B), and a bone-preserving curved tapered stem with 4 offset options (group C). The following parameters were assessed: acetabular, femoral and hip offset (HO), center of rotation height, leg length difference (LLD), and the endosteal fit of stem in the proximal femur (canal fill index). Group comparisons were performed using a one-way analysis of variance and subsequent pairwise comparisons (t-test).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, HO could be equally restored with all 3 stem designs (P = .079). The postoperative LLD was smaller in group C compared to group A (0.8 mm [standard deviation, 3.2] vs 2.6 mm [standard deviation, 4.5], P = .002). Best combined reconstruction of HO and LLD could be achieved with the short curved stem by junior and senior surgeons (HO: -2.0 and -2.1 mm; LLD: 1.9 and 0.7 mm, respectively). The proximal and mid-height canal fill indexes were higher in groups B and C compared to group A, indicating a better metaphyseal and diaphyseal fit in the proximal femur (both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

All 3 cementless stem designs allowed for good hip geometry reconstruction. Multiple shape and offset options allowed for a better metaphyseal stem fit and offered minor clinical advantages for leg length reconstruction. Modular necks did not provide reconstructive advantages in patients with primary hip osteoarthritis.

Alarmingly High Rate of Implant Fractures in One Modular Femoral Stem Design: A Comparison of Two Implants

BACKGROUND

Reports of implant fracture at the modular junction have been seen in modular neck designs, stem-sleeve modular femoral stems, and diaphyseal engaging bi-body modular stems. To date, however, there has never been a direct comparison between 2 different implant designs from the same modular family. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of implant failure of 2 such stem-sleeve modular femoral stem designs, the S-ROM and Emperion, to further identify factors which increase the risk of this mode of failure.

METHODS

A retrospective, single surgeon, review of our institutional database was performed to compare the 2 groups of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1168 total hip arthroplasty procedures were included in our analysis, 547 (47%) with Emperion and 621 (53%) with S-ROM. Eight (1.5%) fractures in 7 patients occurred in the Emperion group compared to 1 (0.2%) fracture in the S-ROM group (P = .015).

CONCLUSION

The precise cause of the stem fractures in our study remains unknown and is likely multifactorial. Given the unexpectedly high rate of catastrophic implant failures in the form of stem fracture at the stem-sleeve junction, we recommend more judicious use of modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Developmental hip dysplasia treated by total hip arthroplasty using a cementless Wagner cone stem in young adult patients with a small physique

BACKGROUND

Developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) may lead to severe acetabular and femoral abnormalities that can render total hip arthroplasty (THA) challenging, especially in DDH patients with a small physique. Most conventional cemented or cementless femoral components are often difficult to implant in the narrow femoral canal and require slight version correction during surgery. The aim of this study was to present the mid-term results of THA in the treatment of DDH patients with a small physique using a cementless Wagner cone prosthesis (Zimmer®, US).

METHODS

Between January 2006 and March 2010, we retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who were treated at our center. A total of 50 patients (52 hips; 45 women, five men; mean age 32.5 years; range 27 to 38 years) who underwent THA were observed. The mean femoral medullary canal dimension at the isthmus was 7.6 mm (range 6.0 to 8.7). According to the Crowe classification, 19 hips presented dysplasia of grade I, while 33 presented dysplasia of grade II. All patients were treated with THA using a cementless Wagner cone prosthesis. Clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed on all patients.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 7.7 years (range 5.4 to 10.5). The Harris hip score (HHS) improved from 63 ± 9 (range 55 to 70) pre-operatively to 92 ± 8 (range 88 to 100) at the last follow-up. The HHS at the most recent follow-up was excellent in 66% of patients (34 hips), good in 26% (14 hips), fair in 6% (3 hips), and poor in 2% (1 hip). Radiographic evaluation demonstrated excellent osteointegration of the implants. Stem subsidence was present in three stems, and the range of stem subsidence was 2 mm in two stems (3.9%) and 3 mm in one stem (1.9%). Femoral osteolysis was observed in nine hips (18%) in the proximal zones, and no distal osteolysis was noted. Heterotopic ossification was observed in three hips (5.8%); of these, two were classified as Brooker's grade 1, and one was classified as Brooker's grade 2 at the most recent follow-up. None of the implants were revised.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the tapered shape and free setting of anteversion, the Wagner cone femoral stem facilitates its implantation in dysplastic hips. Therefore, this series of short stems with a smaller diameter can ensure safe implantation in narrow medullary canals, especially in young DDH patients with a small physique.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration Number: ChiCTR-ORC-17011181 . Reg Date: 2017-04-19 00:44:59 Retrospective registration.

Modular neck total hip arthroplasty - a perfect storm

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to highlight neck notching as a potential cause of failure in modular neck total hip arthroplasty. It aimed to identify both the combination of modular components that place patients at greatest risk of failure and the potential mechanism for failure.

METHODS

This study involved a retrospective review of 301 total hip arthroplasties (THA) using Kinectiv modular neck Technology (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana). The primary outcome was the presence of neck notching requiring revision. Patient records, operative notes and postoperative radiographs were reviewed. A statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 301 THA were performed on 290 patients. There were 7 failures (2.3%). All 7 failures involved a modular combination of an anteverted neck, extended offset and length code -8 (failure rate of 36.8%, p&lt;0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified femoral neck notching as a potential cause of failure in modular neck THA. The combination of an anteverted neck, extended offset and length code -8 was associated with a high rate of neck notching using the Kinectiv modular neck Technology (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana). Based on our experience with this prosthesis we advise caution when using this particular combination of implants.

Spontaneous Fractures of a Modern Modular Uncemented Femoral Stem

BACKGROUND

Femoral stem fracture following total hip arthroplasty is an uncommon event that requires immediate revision surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We report on four patients who experienced stem fractures of one design and a review of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reports on this design.

METHODS

Fracture surfaces of four EMPERION™ (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) femoral stems were analyzed under optical and scanning electron microscopy. A search of the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) that reports on all EMPERION™ adverse events was completed.

RESULTS

Fracture surfaces exhibited characteristics consistent with a fatigue fracture mechanism. Sixteen MAUDE reports claimed stem fracture or breakage of EMPERION™ stems.

CONCLUSION

The four cases of EMPERION™ stem fractures were likely driven by small stem diameter, high offset, and high patient weight. Modular stem-sleeve femoral systems are susceptible to fatigue failure under high stress and should only be used in appropriate patients, whom are not considered obese.

Fracture of a spline of the femoral stem in an ingrown modular hip implant

INTRODUCTION

Physiologic strain patterns of the femur are altered by the bending stiffness of the implant as well as the loading pattern of the implant itself. The Savish Range of Motion (S-ROM) femoral stem has been designed with flutes (to decrease distal material) and with a coronal slot (to decrease stiffness).

MATERIALS

The purpose of this case report is to briefly discuss design characteristics of femoral stems and their relationship to thigh pain as well as to describe the only report in the literature of a fracture of the anterior spline of a S-ROM prosthesis at the coronal slot.

RESULTS

The femoral stem fractured at the coronal slot due to multiple bending moments in a small diameter stem.

CONCLUSIONS

The proximal metaphyseal sleeve remains well fixed and the patient is functioning well without pain nearly a year after the identification of the fracture on routine follow-up.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Modular Cementless Stem Prostheses and Coated Cementless Long-Stem Prostheses on Bone Defect in Hip Revision Arthroplasty

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of modular cementless stem and coated cementless long-stem prostheses in hip revision arthroplasty.

Material/Methods

Sixty-five patients with complete hip revision surgery data during January 2005 to March 2015 were selected from the People’s Hospital of Linyi City and randomly divided into a S-ROM group (implanted with cementless modular stem prostheses, n=32) and a SLR-PLUS group (implanted with cementless coated long-stem prostheses, n=33). Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function of the patients in order to measure the clinical efficacy of the prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and lateral pelvic radiographs were taken and each patient’s hip arthroplasty condition was recorded. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to compare the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate between the 2 prostheses and log-rank method was used to inspect the statistical data.

Results

The Harris scores of both the S-ROM group and the SLR-PLUS group were significantly higher at 12 months after the operation than those before the operation (both P<0.05). The Harris scores of the patients with type I/II bone defects in the S-ROM group were not significantly different from those of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group at all time points (all P>0.05), while the Harris scores of the patients with type IIIA/IIIB in the S-ROM group were both significantly higher than those of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the operation (all P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate between the type I/II patients in the S-ROM group (92.31%) and the patients of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group (85.71%) (P>0.05). However, the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate of the type IIIA/IIIB patients in the S-ROM group (89.47%) was significantly different from the patients of the same types in the SLR-PLUS group (42.11%) (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The modular stem prostheses in hip revision arthroplasty were clinically more effective in the treatment of type IIIA and IIIB bone defects than the coated long-stem prostheses according to the Harris score and the cumulative 5-year non-revision rate.