Limited Medial and Lateral Approaches to Treat Stiff Elbows

Surgical arthrolysis of the stiff elbow: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Stiffness after elbow injuries can severely limit daily life. If adequate conservative treatment does not result in satisfactory improvement of elbow function, surgical intervention should be considered. Whether an open or arthroscopic procedure is preferable is still a topic of debate and a systematic review of functional outcomes is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and EMBASE, for studies published between 2013 and 2021. Primary objective was to compare open and arthroscopic arthrolysis' functional outcomes, respectively, especially ROM and MEPS, as well as the accompanied complications. The PRISMA guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

27 studies comprising 1666 patients were included. 1059 patients (63.6%) were treated with open arthrolysis, and 607 patients (36.4%) were treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis. The results presented indicate satisfactory outcomes in open and arthroscopic arthrolysis with regard to functional outcome parameters. Treatment success, defined as excellent or good results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, among the patients treated with an open procedure was 88.8%; 6.3% required revision whereas 18.1% had complications without the need for revision surgery. Within the cohort of arthroscopically treated patients, treatment success was 91.8%. Revisions and complications without further surgical intervention were significantly less frequent than in the open cohort, at 1.6% and 9.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both open and arthroscopic arthrolysis provide good to excellent functional outcomes. Since the number of complications and revision increases with the invasiveness of the treatment, an arthroscopic procedure might be favored if feasible by indication. The role of forearm rotation and the use of a hinged external fixator remains of interest.

STUDY DESIGN

Level IV; Systematic review.

Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation.

CONCLUSION

Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients

BACKGROUND

Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF_I, tethers alone; EF_II, tethers with blocks; EF_III, articular malformation; and EF_IV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR_I, contracture alone; FR_II, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR_III, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF_I patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF_IV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF_III patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR_I patients (142°), followed by FR_II patients (118°), and worst in FR_III patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR_III patients (82°), followed by FR_II patients (64°), and least in FR_I patients (37°).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.

What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?

BACKGROUND

The elbow is more susceptible to loss of motion after trauma than any other joint. Open arthrolysis often is performed for posttraumatic elbow stiffness if the stiffness does not improve with nonsurgical treatment, but the midterm results of this procedure and factors that may limit recovery have not been widely studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed patients who had undergone open arthrolysis with hinged external fixator for severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness (ROM ≤ 60°) with a minimum of 5 years followup to (1) analyze ROM gains; (2) assess functional improvement with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and DASH, quality of life with the SF-36, pain with VAS, and ulnar nerve function with the Amadio rating scale and Dellon classification; and (3) identify complications and risk factors that might hinder mid-term elbow motion recovery after this procedure.

METHODS

Between March 2011 and December 2012, we generally offered patients with elbow stiffness an open arthrolysis procedure when function did not improve with 6 months of nonoperative therapy, and no contraindications such as immature heterotopic ossification or complete destruction of articular cartilage were present. During that time, 161 patients underwent open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness at our institution; 49 of them satisfied the study inclusion criteria (adults with elbow ROM ≤ 60° as a result of trauma) and exclusion criteria (stiffness caused by burns or central nervous system injuries, causative trauma associated with nonunion or malunion of the elbow, severe articular damage that would have necessitated joint arthroplasty, or prior elbow release). In general, a combined medial-lateral approach to the elbow was performed to address the soft tissue tethers and any blocks to elbow motion, and a hinged external fixator was applied for 6 weeks to maintain elbow stability and improve the efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation. These patients were evaluated retrospectively at a mean followup period of 69 months (range, 62-83 months), and demographics, disease characteristics, arthrolysis details, pre- and postoutcome measures as noted, and complications were recorded via an electronic database. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM recovery.

RESULTS

At final followup, total ROM increased from a preoperative mean of 27 ± 20° to a postoperative mean of 131 ± 11° (mean difference, 104°; 95% CI, 98°-111°; p < 0.001), and 98% (48 of 49) of patients achieved a functional ROM of 30° to 130°. Improvements were also found in functional scores (MEPI: 54 ± 12 to 95 ± 7, mean difference, 41 points; DASH: 48 ± 17 to 8 ± 8, mean difference, 40 points; both p < 0.001), life quality (physical SF-36: 46 ± 11 to 81 ± 12, mean difference, 35 points; mental SF-36: 43 ± 14 to 80 ± 9, mean difference, 37 points; both p < .001), pain (VAS: 2.5 ± 2.4 to 0.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 2.0 points; p < 0.001), and ulnar nerve function (Amadio score: 7.8 ± 1.9 to 8.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 0.6 points; p = 0.004). A total of 18% (nine of 49 patients) developed complications, including new-onset or exacerbated nerve symptoms (four patients), recurrent heterotopic ossification (two patients), and pin-related infections (three patients). No patients underwent subsequent surgery for any of the above complications. Lastly, the medium-term ROM was divided into ROM ≤ 120° (n = 9) and ROM > 120° (n = 40). After controlling for potential confounding variables such as duration of stiffness and tobacco use, we found that tobacco use was the only independent risk factor examined (odds ratio, 9; 95% CI, 2-47; p = 0.009) associated with recovery of ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory medium-term results were found for open arthrolysis with hinged external fixation with our protocol in patients who had severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness. Appropriate and sufficient releases of tethered soft tissues and correction of any blocks that affect elbow motion intraoperatively, a dedicated team approach, and an aggressive and systematic postoperative rehabilitation program are the core steps for this procedure. Additionally, the importance of preoperative discontinuation of tobacco use should be emphasized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Application of distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator in complete open release for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Radical release for severe stiff elbows may lead to instability. Hinged external fixation is used to treat unstable elbows. We hypothesized that extensive open release combined with a distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator would have good performance and low complications rate in treating severe elbow stiffness. Thus, the efficacy and security of this technique were assessed in this study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 38 post-traumatic elbows with severe stiffness that underwent arthrolysis between February 2011 and February 2014. All patients were assessed as having elbow instability after complete arthrolysis. Ligament repair was combined with implantation of a hinged external fixator (fixed to the humerus and distal radius) to maintain elbow stability. Flexion arc, forearm rotation, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, elbow stability, and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 31 months. Significant improvement was noted in flexion-extension arc (from 27° to 126°), forearm rotation (from 148° to 153°), and mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (from 68 points to 96 points). Mean pronation arc decreased from 66° preoperatively to 6° at 1.5 months of follow-up and showed a transient reduction during first 6 months postoperatively. Pin-related infection occurred in 2 patients, which was cured with conservative treatment. Two patients had moderate instability after removal of the fixator and regained stability at the 12-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, complications included ulnar nerve paralysis in 3, recurrence of heterotopic ossification in 1, and moderate pain in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete open release combined with a distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator is an effective treatment for severe stiff elbows. This technique had a low complication rate.