Bilateral Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Debridement and Lavage for Lumbar Pyogenic Spondylitis

Bilateral Endoscopic Debridement Combined with Local Antituberculosis Drugs for Thoracic Tuberculosis with Large Paravertebral Abscess: A Multicenter Study with 4-year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Paravertebral abscess represents a prevalent manifestation of thoracic tuberculosis, often necessitating surgical intervention. In this study, we introduced a novel approach by employing bilateral endoscopic debridement (BED) to address large Paravertebral abscesses associated with thoracic tuberculosis, a method not previously proposed in the literature. The clinical efficacy was examined through a comprehensive 4-year follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients diagnosed with thoracic tuberculosis and paravertebral abscess who underwent BED combined with local antituberculosis drugs (BED + LAD) between February 2015 and February 2019. A total of 29 eligible patients (12 males and 17 females) with a median (interquartile ranges) of 59.0(16.5) years were included in the study. All patients received the BED + LAD treatment. After the surgery, the patients were treated with a 4-drug antituberculosis therapy (Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, and Ethambutol). All relevant indicators were meticulously recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The surgical procedures were successfully completed for all subjects, with an average intraoperative bleeding volume of (25.2 ± 8.9) ml, an average surgical time of (68.4 ± 14.0) minutes, an average fluoroscopy frequency of (21.7 ± 8.2) times, an average hospital stay of (14.2 ± 4.3) days, and an average medication period of (42.1 ± 9.6) weeks. All subjects completed at least a 4-year follow-up period. At the final follow-up, ESR and CRP levels returned to normal, and there was no significant increase in the Cobb angle (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of BED + LAD in the treatment of thoracic tuberculosis and paravertebral abscess proved to be a safe, effective, and feasible approach.

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracolumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Despite advances, the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with spondylodiscitis remains high, with an increasing incidence worldwide. Although conservative therapy has progressed, several cases require surgical intervention. However, the indication and opportunities for surgical treatment are still disputable.

METHODS

In a joint consensus, the members of the 'Spondylodiscitis' working group of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery considered current literature, particularly the newly published S2k guideline of the AWMF, and examined the surgical indications and treatment strategies for thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis.

RESULTS

Surgical intervention for spondylodiscitis is only required in a small percentage of patients. In studies comparing conservative and surgical therapies, most patients benefitted from surgery, regardless of the surgical technique selected. Presently, the standard procedure is a combined dorsoventral approach, in which a monolateral attempt should always be made. The choice of material (PEEK, titanium) for ventral support does not influence the clinical result.

Outcome of one-stage percutaneous endoscopic debridement and lavage combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the therapeutic effect of one-stage percutaneous endoscopic debridement and lavage (PEDL) combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

From March 2017 to October 2019, 51 patients diagnosed with pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent PPSF followed by PEDL in our department. Biopsy specimens were examined for microorganisms and evaluated histopathologically. Clinical outcomes were assessed by physical examination, routine serological testing, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and imaging studies.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled patients, the operation time ranged from 90 min to 114 min every level with an average of 102 min, and the average drainage time ranged from 6 days to 10 days with an average of 7.4 days. All patients who complained of lower back pain symptoms were more relieved than before surgery. Causative pathogens were identified in 20 of 51 biopsy specimens; Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent. However, there were eight patients with postoperative complications. The mean follow-up was 25.0 ± 3.8 (range: 20-32) months. Inflammatory markers showed that infection was controlled. The VAS and ODI improved significantly. At the last follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging showed that the infected lesions had disappeared.

CONCLUSION

PEDL supplementing PPSF may be useful for patients with single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis, as it is minimally invasive, especially for patients who cannot undergo conventional open surgery due to poor health or advanced age.

Minimally invasive spine surgery as treatment for persistent infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistant infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) can cause significant morbidity for patients. Open surgical techniques were previously the only option for patients who failed antibiotic therapy. However, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques may provide a new alternative for some patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to identify studies that reported inflammatory [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and functional outcomes [visual analog scale (VAS)] for patients with antibiotic resistant IS treated with either minimally invasive or open surgery. Searches were preformed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from January 2015 to June 2021. Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria. One study was a Level III evidence study and the other 13 included studies were Level IV.

RESULTS

The minimally invasive surgery group showed significantly lower post-operative CRP and VAS pain scores and significantly higher post-operative ESR levels than the open group. All studies included were measured by the Downs and Black tool for potential bias.

DISCUSSION

This study showed that minimally invasive surgery is efficacious in the treatment of antibiotic resistant IS. These outcomes support minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as an effective alternative to previous open surgery techniques in certain patients after failed trails of antibiotic therapy.

Endoscopic treatment of spondylodiscitis: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Spondylodiscitis is a severe condition where standalone antibiotic therapy resolves most cases. In refractory infections, open surgery may aid with infection debulking. However, significant morbidity can occur. Nowadays, endoscopic approaches are emerging as an alternative. However, until now, only small-scale studies exist. Being so, we carried the first systematic review on spondylodiscitis endoscopic debridement indications, technique details, and outcomes.

METHODS

Search for all English written original studies approaching the spondylodiscitis endoscopic treatment was performed using PubMed and EBSCO host. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and a pre-specified protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020183657).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 342 participants were included for analysis. Data overall quality was fair. Indications for the endoscopic approach were poorly defined. The most consensual indication was refractory infection to conservative treatment. Spinal instability or neurological deficits were common exclusion criteria. All authors described similar techniques, and despite the frequent severe co-morbidities, procedure morbidity was low. Re-interventions were common. Microorganism identification varied from 54.2 to 90.4%. Treatment failure among studies ranged from 0 to 33%. Pain, functional status, and neurological deficits had satisfactory improvement after procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic debridement of spondylodiscitis seems to be an effective and safe approach for refractory spondylodiscitis. A novel approach with initial endoscopic infection debulking and antibiotic therapy could improve the success of spondylodiscitis treatment.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Interbody Debridement and Fusion for Pyogenic Lumbar Spondylodiskitis: Surgical Technique and the Comparison With Percutaneous Endoscopic Drainage and Debridement

Objective

Surgical treatment of severe infectious spondylodiskitis remains challenging. Although minimally invasive percutaneous endoscopic drainage and debridement (PEDD) may yield good results in complicated cases, outcomes of patients with extensive structural damage and mechanical instability may be unsatisfactory. To address severe infectious spondylodiskitis, we have developed a surgical technique called percutaneous endoscopic interbody debridement and fusion (PEIDF), which comprises endoscopic debridement, bonegraft interbody fusion, and percutaneous posterior instrumentation.

Methods

Outcomes of PEIDF in 12 patients and PEDD in 15 patients with infectious spondylodiskitis from April 2014 to July 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcome were compared between 2 kinds of surgical procedures.

Results

Patients in PEIDF group had significantly lower rate of revision surgery (8.3% vs. 58.3%), better kyphosis angle (-5.73°±8.74 vs. 1.07°±2.70 in postoperative; 7.09°±7.23 vs. 0.79°±4.08 in kyphosis correction at 1 year), and higher fusion rate (83.3% vs. 46.7%) than those who received PEDD.

Conclusion

PEIDF is an effective approach for treating infectious spondylodiskitis, especially in patients with spinal instability and multiple medical comorbidities.

Treatment of single-segment suppurative spondylitis with the transforaminal endoscopic focal cleaning and drainage

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of the transforaminal endoscopic focal cleaning and drainage for suppurative spondylitis.Design: Retrospective study.Participants: Twenty-one patients with single-segment suppurative spondylitis.Interventions: All patients were treated with the transforaminal endoscopic focal cleaning and drainage.Outcome Measures: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before and after the operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the relief of pain symptoms. Neurological function American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade was used to evaluate the recovery of neurological function. The postoperative clinical efficacy of the patients was evaluated using the Kirkaldy-Willis functional scoring criteria. The stability of the spine and the recurrence of infection were evaluated by imaging data.Results: Postoperative bacteriological culture results showed positive in 15 cases and no bacteria growth in 6 cases. Besides, 16 cases were pathologically diagnosed. The ESR, CRP, and VAS scores at 2 weeks postoperatively and at the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those at pre-operation. At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome was excellent in 17 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case, according to the Kirkaldy-Willis functional scoring criteria; and the ASIA grade returned to normal. There was no significant difference in the Cobb angle between the last follow-up and the pre-operation. There was no recurrence of infection during the follow-up period.Conclusion: The transforaminal endoscopic focal cleaning and drainage is a minimally invasive, effective and safe surgical procedure for suppurative spondylitis.

Unilateral or Bilateral Percutaneous Endoscopic Debridement and Lavage Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcome between bilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and lavage (PEDL) and unilateral PEDL treatment for lumbar spine tuberculosis (LST).

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with LST who underwent either bilateral PEDL (group A) or unilateral PEDL (group B) were reviewed. Perioperative parameters were assessed by operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and days of postoperative continuous irrigation and vacuum drainage. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). All patients were followed-up for at least 18 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The average operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy time were increased in group A compared with those in group B. There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups in postoperative continuous irrigation and vacuum drainage days. The ESR and CRP curves in the 2 groups showed a similar trend during 18-month follow-up. The VAS and ODI in the 2 groups significantly decreased 6 and 18 months postsurgery. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complication between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Two procedures yielded comparable and satisfactory results. Unilateral PEDL showed shorter operative time and decreased intraoperative fluoroscopy times compared with bilateral PEDL. We suggest the use of unilateral PEDL rather than bilateral PEDL in the treatment of LST.

Continuous Epidural Irrigation and Drainage Combined with Posterior Debridement and Posterior Lumbar Inter-Body Fusion for the Management of Single-Segment Lumbar Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Purpose: To observe the clinical curative effect of continuous epidural irrigation combined with posterior debridement and posterior lumbar inter-body fusion with instrumentation for the therapy of single-segment lumbar pyogenic spongdylodiscitis. Methods: From June 2010 to November 2013, surgical treatment was performed in 18 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The surgical indications were progressive biomechanical instability, epidural abscesses, deterioration of neurologic status, and intractable back pain. All these patients received posterior decompression with posterior instrumentation, debridement of infected tissue, and inter-body fusion. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were used to assess clinical outcomes. The neural function was evaluated by the Frankel grading system. Laboratory and radiologic results were recorded during clinical follow-up for at least one year. Results: The average follow-up period was 18 months after the operation. The VAS scores decreased from an average of 7.1 points before the procedure to 2.6 points after operation. The neurologic deficits of all the patients were recovered to Frankel grade E. All of the examined laboratory parameters were normalized gradually. Imaging-documented fusion was achieved in each patient, and no implants failure was noted. No patients showed any evidence of recurrence or persistence of infection. Conclusion: In carefully selected patients, single-segment lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis can be cured successfully with continuous epidural irrigation and drainage combined with posterior debridement and posterior lumbar inter-body fusion. Instrumentation could provide immediate stability and reconstruction of the spine column, and the presence of instrumentation did not result in any persistence or recurrence of infection. Continuous epidural irrigation and drainage is an effective method facilitating the elimination of residual infection.

Unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for lumbar infectious spondylitis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis is controversial. In this study, we attempted to demonstrate that unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement with physiologic saline and negative pressure drainage postoperatively may achieve a satisfactory result in lumbar infectious spondylitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 17 patients with lumbar infectious spondylitis who underwent percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (PEDD) through a posterolateral transforaminal approach. Each biopsy specimen was submitted without delay after surgery and examined for microorganisms and evaluated histopathologically. Patients were assessed by careful physical examination, MacNab criteria, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), regular serological tests, imaging studies for clinical function, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients, 14 (82.4%) had satisfactory relief of their back pain according to MacNab criteria at 1 week after PEDD. Three patients (17.6%) who had advanced infections with multilevel involvement and paraspinal abscesses underwent anterior debridement and autograft interbody fusion with instrumentation within 2 weeks. However, there were no other severe surgery-related complications. Causative bacteria were identified in most cases, and Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent strain.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral PEDD with physiological saline or empirical antibiotics did not disrupt lumbar stability and avoided the important intraspinal structures such as the dural sac and nerve roots. It not only had a high rate of identification of the causative pathogen, but also provided effective infection control and pain relief. PEDD may be a useful technique for treatment of lumbar infectious spondylodiscitis patients who have no severe deformities and are unable to undergo the conventional anterior surgery due to poor health or advanced age.

Percutaneous endoscopic debridement and irrigation for thoracic infections

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and irrigation for thoracic infections and to make an appropriate choice according to the patient's condition.

METHODS.

Thirty patients with thoracic infections who received surgical treatment from August 2014 to December2016 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 16 males and 14 females, aged from 41 to 90 years, with an average of 64.4 years. A total of 9 cases were treated with percutaneous endoscopic debridement and irrigation (minimal group), and 21 cases were treated with open debridement in combination with pedicle screw fixation (conventional group). Patients underwent follow-up for 1 month. General condition, operative index, laboratory results, and imaging features were recorded.

RESULTS.

Compared with the conventional group, there were more comorbidities in patients in the minimal group (8 cases in the minimal group, 10 cases in the conventional group, P=0.049), shorter hospital stay (10.1 + 2.26 days in the minimal group, 16.1 + 6.81 days in the conventional group, P=0.016), less bleeding volume (383.3 + 229.86ml in the minimal group, 90 + 11.18ml in the conventional group, P=0.000), lower VAS score at discharge (2.9 + 0.93 in the minimal group, 3.9 + 0.91 in the conventional group, P=0.013). There was no spinal instability case in the minimal group, 10 cases in the conventional group, P=0.013. There were significant differences. The C reaction protein prior to operation in the minimal group was 28.4±7.50mg/L. Compared with 45.1 + 15.78mg/L in the conventional group, P=0.005, it was lower.

CONCLUSIONS.

Percutaneous endoscopic debridement and irrigation are an effective surgery for treatment of thoracic infections, especially suitable for patients with comorbidities and poor general condition. However, for severe infection and spinal instability, we tend to choose open surgery in combination with fixation.