Chronic Antiplatelet Use Associated With Increased Blood Loss in Lumbar Spinal Surgery Despite Adherence to Protocols

Impact of Perioperative Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) Administration on Postoperative Intracranial Hemorrhage (pICH) and Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Intracranial Meningiomas

Background: In routine medical practice, patients are increasingly using ASA for primary and secondary prevention. Although many of these patients discontinue ASA prior to elective intracranial surgery, there are limited data to support whether perioperative ASA use raises the risk of postoperative hemorrhage. This study aimed to investigate the implications of continuing or stopping ASA around the time of surgery in patients with intracranial meningiomas, focusing on postoperative hemorrhage and thromboembolic events. Methods: For this purpose, medical records and radiological images of 1862 patients who underwent cranial neurosurgical procedures for brain tumors over a decade at our neurosurgical institute were retrospectively analyzed. The risk of postoperative hemorrhage was evaluated by comparing meningioma patients who received ASA treatment with those who did not. Furthermore, we investigated other factors that influence postoperative hemorrhage and thromboembolic events, particularly in patients receiving ASA treatment. Results: A total of 422 patients diagnosed with meningiomas underwent surgical intervention. Among the patients who received ASA preoperatively, 4 out of 46 (8.69%) experienced postoperative hemorrhage requiring surgical intervention, whereas the same complication occurred in only 4 out of 376 patients (1.06%) in the non-ASA group (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of thromboembolic events between the two groups. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed an increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage in patients using ASA.

The Impact of Preoperative Antithrombotic Therapy on the Risks for Thrombo-ischemic Events and Bleeding among Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched analysis.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of antithrombotic drug therapy on the rates of thrombo-ischemic or bleeding events 90 days following elective spine surgery.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Thrombo-ischemic and bleeding complications in patients undergoing spine surgery are major causes of morbidity. Many patients who pursue elective spine surgery are concurrently receiving antithrombotic therapy for unrelated conditions; however, at this time, the effects of preoperative antithrombotic use on postoperative bleeding and thrombosis are unclear.

METHODS

Using an all-payer claims database, patients who underwent elective cervical and lumbar spine interventions between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2018, were identified. Individuals were categorized into groups taking and not taking antithrombotics. A 1:1 analysis was constructed based on comorbidities found to be independently associated with bleeding or ischemic complications using logistic regression models. The primary outcomes were the rates of thrombo-ischemic events and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

A total of 660,866 patients were eligible for inclusion. Following the matching procedure, 56,476 patient records were analyzed, with 28,238 in each group. The antithrombotic agent group had significantly greater odds of developing any 90-day thromboischemic event after surgery: deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.06-4.25), pulmonary embolism (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 3.34-4.62), myocardial infarction (OR, 6.20; 95% CI, 5.69-6.76), and ischemic stroke (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 3.31-4.27). In addition, the antithrombotic agent group had an increased likelihood of experiencing hematoma (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.35-1.76) and need for transfusion (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.29-2.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients taking antithrombotic medications before elective surgery of the cervical and lumbar spine had increased risks of both ischemic and bleeding events. Spine surgeons should carefully consider these implications when appraising patients for surgery, given the lack of guidelines on perioperative management of antithrombotic agents.

Symptomatic Postoperative Epidural Hematoma in the Lumbar Spine

A symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma (SPEH) in the lumbar spine is a complication with variable presentation and the potential to rapidly cause an irrecoverable neurological injury. Significant heterogeneity exists among current case series reporting SPEH in the literature. This review attempts to clarify the known incidence, risk factors, and management pearls. Currently, literature does not support the efficacy of subfascial drains in reducing the incidence of SPEHs and possibly suggests that medication for thromboembolism prophylaxis may increase risk. Acute back pain and progressing lower extremity motor weakness are the most common presenting symptoms of SPEH. Magnetic resonance imaging is the mainstay of diagnostic imaging necessary to confirm the diagnosis, but if not acutely available, an immediate return to the operative theater for exploration without advanced imaging is justified. Treatment of a SPEH consists of emergent hematoma evacuation as a delay in repeat surgery has a deleterious effect on neurological recovery. Outcomes are poorly defined, though a significant portion of patients will have lasting neurological impairments even when appropriately recognized and managed.

Impact of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on postoperative hemorrhage in spinal lumbar surgery: Should preoperative ASA be discontinued for elective surgery?

OBJECTIVE

The application of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) represents high evidence in the aging society due to primary and secondary prevention in cardiovascular disease and stroke. However, this presents a challenge for neurosurgeons in terms of preoperative and postoperative management of care. This study aimed to analyze the risk of bleeding by applying ASA before lumbar spinal surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of medical records of 3051 patients was performed from 2008 to 2018 who underwent lumbar surgery at our institution. The risk of postoperative hemorrhage was compared in patients treated with ASA versus patients without ASA treatment. Additionally, the relationship between discontinuation of ASA preoperatively (≥7 days) or no previous history of ASA versus continuation with ASA (<7 days) on postoperative hemorrhage was analyzed.

RESULTS

Postoperative hemorrhagic were observed in 2.1% (n = 63) of all lumbar operations. In 421 patients, the effect of ASA (<7 days) was still persistent at the time of surgery (ASA impact group). Of these, 12 (2.85%) patients had a hemorrhage. No significant differences were found in comparison to the No ASA impact group (p = 0.272). Sex (p = 0.003), hypertension (p = 0.015), recurrent surgery (p = 0.001) and use of hemostatic agents (p = 0.023) had a significant impact on postoperative hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

The continuation of ASA medication is not associated with increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage after spinal surgery. However, sex, hypertension, recurrent surgery and the use of hemostatic agents under continued ASA treatment were found to be associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage.

Effect of perioperative aspirin use on hemorrhagic complications in elective craniotomy for brain tumors: results of a single-center, retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

In daily practice, neurosurgeons face increasing numbers of patients using aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA). While many of these patients discontinue ASA 7-10 days prior to elective intracranial surgery, there are limited data to support whether or not perioperative ASA use heightens the risk of hemorrhagic complications. In this study the authors retrospectively evaluated the safety of perioperative ASA use in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors in the largest elective cranial surgery cohort reported to date.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 1291 patients who underwent elective intracranial tumor surgery by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2017. The patients were divided into three groups based on their perioperative ASA status: 1) group 1, no ASA; 2) group 2, stopped ASA (low cardiovascular risk); and 3) group 3, continued ASA (high cardiovascular risk). Data collected included demographic information, perioperative ASA status, tumor characteristics, extent of resection (EOR), operative blood loss, any hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications, and any other complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1291 patients underwent 1346 operations. The no-ASA group included 1068 patients (1112 operations), the stopped-ASA group had 104 patients (108 operations), and the continued-ASA group had 119 patients (126 operations). The no-ASA patients were significantly younger (mean age 53.3 years) than those in the stopped- and continued-ASA groups (mean 64.8 and 64.0 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Sex distribution was similar across all groups (p = 0.272). Tumor locations and pathologies were also similar across the groups, except for deep tumors and schwannomas that were relatively less frequent in the continued-ASA group. There were no differences in the EOR between groups. Operative blood loss was not significantly different between the stopped- (186 ml) and continued- (220 ml) ASA groups (p = 0.183). Most importantly, neither hemorrhagic (0.6%, 0.9%, and 0.8%, respectively; p = 0.921) nor thromboembolic (1.3%, 1.9%, and 0.8%; p = 0.779) complication rates were significantly different between the groups, respectively. In addition, the multivariate model revealed no statistically significant predictor of hemorrhagic complications, whereas male sex (odds ratio [OR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-20.5, p = 0.005) and deep-extraaxial-benign ("skull base") tumors (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-9.7, p = 0.011) were found to be independent predictors of thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, perioperative ASA use was not associated with the increased rate of hemorrhagic complications following intracranial tumor surgery. In patients at high cardiovascular risk, ASA can safely be continued during elective brain tumor surgery to prevent potential life-threatening thromboembolic complications. Randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to achieve a greater statistical power.

Anticoagulation and Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative management of therapeutic anticoagulation in spine surgery is critical to minimize risk of thromboembolic events yet prevent postsurgical complications. Limited research is available, and most guidelines are based on drug half-lives. We aim to clarify current guidelines and available evidence for safe practice of spine surgery in this patient population.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed was done encompassing comprehensive search terms to locate published literature on anticoagulation and spine surgery. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and data extraction was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles met the final inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 articles were retrospective chart reviews, 3 were prospective observational studies, and 2 were systematic reviews. Current practice suggests holding warfarin until international normalized ratio <1.4, anti-Xa drugs for 48 to 72 hours, 12 to 24 hours for low-molecular-weight heparin, and 4 to 24 hours for heparin, before surgery. Antiplatelet agents can be stopped for 1 to 3 days prior to operation (81-500 mg) but must be stopped for 1 week for doses >1 g/d. For Plavix, 5 to 7 days of discontinuation advised to prevent complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an overview of main anticoagulation agents seen in preoperative setting for spine patients. Although data is mixed and no true randomized control trials are available, there is growing evidence suggesting the aforementioned guidelines are needed to optimize anticoagulation in setting of spine surgery. Further studies are needed to elucidate risk of complications while operating under therapeutic levels of anticoagulation for a variety of comorbid conditions.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Need for Elective Primary Posterior Lumbar Fusion in A High-Volume Center for Spine Surgery

(1) Background: This study evaluated the perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion need and determined predictors for transfusion in patients undergoing elective primary lumbar posterior spine fusion in a high-volume center for spine surgery. (2) Methods: Data from all patients undergoing spine surgery between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016 were reviewed. Patients’ demographics and comorbidities, perioperative laboratory results, and operative time were analyzed in relation to RBC transfusion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of transfusion. (3) Results: A total of 874 elective surgeries for primary spine fusion were performed over the three years. Only 54 cases (6%) required RBC transfusion. Compared to the non-transfused patients, transfused patients were mainly female (p = 0.0008), significantly older, with a higher ASA grade (p = 0.0002), and with lower pre-surgery hemoglobin (HB) level and hematocrit (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate logistic regression, a lower pre-surgery HB (OR (95% CI) 2.84 (2.11–3.82)), a higher ASA class (1.77 (1.03–3.05)) and a longer operative time (1.02 (1.01–1.02)) were independently associated with RBC transfusion. (4) Conclusions: In the instance of elective surgery for primary posterior lumbar fusion in a high-volume center for spine surgery, the need for RBC transfusion is low. Factors anticipating transfusion should be taken into consideration in the patient’s pre-surgery preparation.

Aspirin therapy discontinuation and intraoperative blood loss in spinal surgery: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of aspirin therapy discontinuation on intraoperative blood loss in spinal surgery. We searched Medline and Google Scholar 1946 to January 2017 inclusive for case-control studies, cohort studies, and controlled trials reporting intraoperative blood loss during spinal surgery in patients on pre-operative aspirin. Other outcome measures reported in the eligible studies were collected as secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from each study. Five retrospective cohort and two case-control studies were eligible for inclusion. Of the 1173 patients identified, 587 patients were never on aspirin (Ax), 416 patients had aspirin discontinued before surgery (Ad), ranging from 3 to 10 days, and 170 patients had aspirin continued until surgery (Ac). Six out of seven studies reported no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss irrespective of aspirin discontinuation. Meta-analysis was not possible due to high risk of bias. Of the secondary outcome measures, operative time and postoperative complications were most commonly reported. One of six studies evaluating operative time reported a significantly longer operative time in the Ad group compared with the Ac group. The overall risk of postoperative haematoma in Ax, Ad, and Ac groups is 0.2% (n/N = 1/587), 0.2% (n/N = 1/416), and 1.2% (n/N = 2/170), respectively. No study reported a statistically significant difference in postoperative complications. There is no strong evidence demonstrating a difference in intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and postoperative complications, irrespective of aspirin discontinuation. This is, however, based on a limited number of studies and higher-quality research is required to answer this question with a higher degree of confidence.