Vascular Injury in Orthopedic Trauma

Frailty is a predictor of immediate postoperative complications following surgical management of knee dislocations

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of frailty in predicting outcomes following surgical intervention for KDs.

METHODS

The NIS database was queried for non-congenital knee dislocations from 2015 to 2019 that underwent ligament repair or surgical reduction. Patients were assigned frailty scores using the mFI-11, and outcomes were compared. Multivariate regression and ROC curve analysis were used to assess the independent association of obesity, frailty, VI, and age with adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 3797 patients who underwent surgical management were included. Frailty was associated with extended LOS (OR 1.353, 95% CI 1.212-1.510, p < 0.001), adverse discharge (OR 1.716, 95% CI 1.515-1.946, p < 0.001), and complications (OR 1.449, 95% CI 1.352-1.553, p < 0.001). Severely frailty was associated with extended LOS (OR 1.838, 95% CI 1.611-2.097, p < 0.001), adverse discharge (OR 2.756, 95% CI 2.394-3.171, p < 0.001), and complications (OR 1.603, 95% CI 1.453-1.768, p < 0.001). Additionally, VI was a risk factor for extended LOS (OR 7.647 (6.442-9.076) p < 0.001), complications (OR 2.065 (1.810-2.341) p < 0.001), and adverse discharge (OR 1.825 (1.606-2.075), p < 0.001). Obesity was a risk factor for extended LOS (OR 1.599 (1.470-1.739), p < 0.001) and complications (OR 1.235 (1.108-1.377), p < 0.001). AUC analysis showed that frailty was the most accurate predictor of all outcomes when compared to VI, obesity, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is superior to age and obesity, and comparable to VI, at predicting adverse outcomes following surgical management of KDs. These findings suggest that frailty assessment might play a role in risk stratification and preoperative planning for KD patients that require surgical intervention.

Management of Suspected Peripheral Vascular Injuries in Orthopedic Trauma

OBJECTIVE

In orthopedic trauma, identification of extremity trauma combined with vascular injury is challenging. Missed diagnosis may result in amputation or even death. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether physical examination combined with handheld vascular ultrasound Doppler examination could be an effective method of screening for peripheral vascular injury and to explore the characteristics of vascular injuries in orthopedic trauma patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients in the emergency department of orthopedic trauma in our hospital from January 2022 to October 2023. Physical examination combined with handheld vascular ultrasound Doppler examination was used as a screening method for suspected vascular injuries. Patients with suspected vascular injury would undergo further angiography and receive multidisciplinary treatment. Angiography was used as the gold standard for diagnosing vascular injuries. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, location and type of injury, angiographic results, surgical notes, and early treatment outcome data were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 55 cases (58 limb injuries) with suspected vascular injury were ultimately included. Angiography revealed that 53 cases (55 limbs, positive rate 94.8%) were considered to have confirmed vascular injuries. Forty-three were male (81.1%) and 10 were female (18.9%), with mean age 44.1 ± 16.6 years. The main mechanism of injury was traffic accident (30, 56.7%). Most common site of vascular injuries was knee joint (30/55, 54.5%), and popliteal artery (23, 47.9%) was the most commonly injured blood vessel. After multidisciplinary collaborative treatment, overall patient mortality was 3.8% (2/53), and limb survival rate among surviving patients was 81.1% (43/53) in our study.

CONCLUSION

In orthopedic trauma, "Hard signs" and "soft signs" combined with handheld vascular ultrasound Doppler examination were effective ways to screen for suspected vascular injuries. Most limbs had associated fractures or dislocations at the site of vascular injury. Collaboration of vascular surgery, microsurgery and orthopedic trauma may help improve patients' prognosis.

Staged treatment with arterial reconstruction and flap transplantation for ischemic mangled extremity: An observational study

Patients with traumatic ischemic mangled extremities first undergo arterial reconstruction using autogenous vein grafts, followed by flap transplantation as a staged treatment for soft tissue reconstruction. This study aimed to report the outcomes of such a staged treatment. Thirteen patients underwent arterial reconstruction between February 2015 and April 2017 due to damage to the major blood vessels by the traumatic mangled extremities. Of them, 6 patients (5 males and 1 female with a mean age of 51 years, age range: 36-60 years) who underwent soft tissue reconstruction due to necrosis were retrospectively analyzed. The average Mangled Extremity Severity Score was 7.2 (range, 6-8). Injuries were found in the lower leg (4 cases), foot (1 case), and wrist and hand (1 case). Arterial reconstruction was performed using autologous venous grafts. The reconstructed arteries included the posterior tibial artery (3 cases), anterior tibial artery (1 case), dorsalis pedis artery (1 case), and radial artery (1 case). The blood circulation status of the reconstructed blood vessels was assessed using computed tomography angiography at an average of 5 weeks (range, 4-6 weeks) after arterial reconstruction. For some necrotic soft tissues, debridement and flap transplantation were performed an average of 7 weeks (range, 6-8 weeks) after arterial reconstruction. Soft tissue reconstruction was performed with an anterolateral thigh free flap in 4 cases, a local flap in 1 case, and a muscle flap in 1 case. In 5 out of 6 cases, blood circulation was maintained in the reconstructed blood vessels, resulting in the salvaging of the extremities. All the patients who underwent flap surgery survived. Notably, there were no special complications during a follow-up visit conducted at an average of 19 months post-reconstruction. To treat an ischemic mangled extremity, the limbs should first be salvaged with arterial reconstruction, followed by subsequent appropriate flap surgery when soft tissue necrosis occurs at the mangled site as a staged treatment.

Acute compartment syndrome of the thigh complicated with a pseudoaneurysm of the arteria profunda femoris

Compartment syndrome of the thigh and a pseudoaneurysm of the arteria profunda femoris are rare entities that usually occur independently. Untreated, both can lead to life-threatening complications making prompt diagnosis and management mandatory. The diagnosis of an acute compartment syndrome can be suspected clinically, and subsequently needs to be confirmed by intra-compartmental pressure measurement. Treatment should be done by urgent fasciotomy within 6 hours. A pseudoaneurysm can also be suspected clinically. Various imaging modalities exist to confirm the diagnosis, with duplex ultrasound being the diagnostic test of choice. Treatment is depending on the importance of clinical symptoms and on the size of the pseudoaneurysm. We present the first case in which an acute compartment syndrome of the thigh was complicated by a pseudoaneurysm of the arteria profunda femoris. The pseudoaneurysm was subsequently complicated by hemorrhage and infection.

Current advancements in therapeutic approaches in orthopedic surgery: a review of recent trends

Recent advancements in orthopedic surgery have greatly improved the management of musculoskeletal disorders and injuries. This review discusses the latest therapeutic approaches that have emerged in orthopedics. We examine the use of regenerative medicine, including stem cell therapy and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, to accelerate healing and promote tissue regeneration. Additionally, we explore the application of robotic-assisted surgery, which provides greater precision and accuracy during surgical procedures. We also delve into the emergence of personalized medicine, which tailors treatments to individual patients based on their unique genetic and environmental factors. Furthermore, we discuss telemedicine and remote patient monitoring as methods for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. Finally, we examine the growing interest in using artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthopedics, particularly in diagnosis and treatment planning. Overall, these advancements in therapeutic approaches have significantly improved patient outcomes, reduced recovery times, and enhanced the overall quality of care in orthopedic surgery.

Contemporary management and time to revascularization in upper extremity arterial injury

INTRODUCTION

Upper extremity arterial injury is associated with significant morbidity and mortality for trauma patients, but there is a paucity of data to guide the clinician in the management of these injuries. The goals of this review were to characterize the demographics, presentation, clinical management, and outcomes, and to evaluate how time to intervention associates with outcomes in trauma patients with upper extremity vascular injuries.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Research Data Set for the years 2007-2016 was queried in order to identify adult patients (age ≥ 18) with an upper extremity arterial injury. Patients with brachiocephalic, subclavian, axillary, or brachial artery injury using the 1998 and 2005 versions of the Abbreviated Injury Scale were included. Patients with non-survivable injuries to the brain, traumatic amputation, or other major arterial injuries to the torso or lower extremities were excluded.

RESULTS

The data from 7908 patients with upper extremity arterial injuries was reviewed. Of those, 5407 (68.4%) underwent repair of the injured artery. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 10 (IQR = 7-18), and 7.7% of patients had a severe ISS (≥ 25). Median time to repair was 120 min (IQR = 60-240 min). Management was open repair in 52.3%, endovascular repair in 7.3%, and combined open and endovascular repairs in 8.8%; amputation occurred in 1.8% and non-operative management was used in 31.6% of patients. Blunt mechanism of injury, crush injury, concomitant fractures/dislocations, and nerve injuries were associated with amputation, whereas simultaneous venous injury was not. There was a significant decrease in the rate of amputation when patients undergoing surgical revascularization did so within 90 min of injury (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Injuries to arteries of the upper extremity are managed with open repair, endovascular repair, and, rarely, amputation. Expeditious transport to the operating room for revascularization is the key for limb salvage.

Vascular Injury After Knee Dislocation: A Meta-Analysis Update

INTRODUCTION

Multisystem injuries affecting vasculature and nerves can be detrimental sequelae of knee dislocations (KDs). The purpose of this study was to provide an update of the current literature since the conducted search used in the publication of Medina et al on May 3, 2013, to evaluate (1) the frequency of vascular and neurologic injury after KD, (2) the frequency with which surgical intervention was conducted for vascular injury in this setting, and (3) the frequency with which each imaging modality was used to detect vascular injury.

METHODS

A two-author screening process was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the MEDLINE database. Frequency of vascular injury, surgical intervention, and amputation after KD were analyzed. Diagnostic modalities used in the acute-care setting were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were analyzed for a total of 37,087 KDs. Of these, 10.7% sustained vascular injuries and 19.6% sustained nerve injuries. Overall, 62.2% of patients with vascular injury underwent surgical repair and 2.2% limbs resulted in amputation. Angiography was the most frequently used diagnostic modality (91.7%).

DISCUSSION

This review updates our understanding on the clinical implications of KDs including frequency of vascular injury (10.7%), amputation (2.2%), and nerve injuries (19.6%). Compared with prior literature, there was an increased prevalence of KD1 (32.4%) and lateral KDs (80.4%). Most vascular injuries after KD undergo surgical repair (62.2%).

Using Arterial Pressure Index to Predict Arterial Injuries in Penetrating Trauma to the Upper Extremities

BACKGROUND

Upper extremity (UE) vascular injuries account for 18.4% of all traumatic vascular injuries. Arterial pressure index (API) use in lower extremity injuries to determine the need for further investigations is well established. However, due to collateral circulation in UEs, it is unclear if the same algorithm can be applied. The purpose of this study was to determine if APIs can be used to determine the need for computed tomography angiogram (CTA) in penetrating UE trauma.

METHODS

All adult trauma patients with penetrating UE trauma and APIs from 2006 to 2016 were identified at 3 urban US level 1 trauma centers. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of APIs <.9 in detecting UE arterial injuries were calculated.

RESULTS

During the 11-year study period, 218 patients met our inclusion criteria. Gunshot wounds comprised 76.6% and stab wounds 17.9%. Median injury severity score and API were 9 and 1, respectively. Seventy-two of our patients underwent evaluation with CTA. Of the injuries, the most common were thrombus or occlusion (46.7%), transection (23.1%), and dissection (15.4%), radiographically. Ultimately, 32 patients underwent surgical.

Update in combined musculoskeletal and vascular injuries of the extremities

Combined musculoskeletal and vascular injuries of the extremities are conditions in which a multidisciplinary approach is a sine qua non to ensure life initially and limb viability secondarily. Vascular injuries as part of musculoskeletal trauma are usually the result of the release of a high energy load in the wound site so that the prognosis is determined by the degree of soft-tissue damage, duration of limb ischemia, patient’s medical status and presence of associated injuries. The management of these injuries is challenging and requires a specific algorithm of action, because they are usually characterized by increased morbidity, amputation rate, infection, neurological and functional deficits, and they could be life threatening. Although vascular injuries are rare and occur either isolated or in the context of major combined musculoskeletal trauma, the high index of suspicion, imaging control, and timely referral of the patient to organized trauma centers ensure the best functional outcome of the extremity in such challenging cases. Even after a successful initial treatment of a combined trauma pattern, long-term follow-up is crucial to prevent and detect early possible complications. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an update on diagnosis and treatment of combined musculoskeletal and vascular injuries of the extremities, from an orthopedic point of view.

Assessment and Interventions for Vascular Injuries Associated With Fractures

Vascular injuries associated with fractures are limb-threatening injuries with notable morbidity. The prompt and thorough evaluation of these patients is imperative to diagnose vascular injuries, and coordinated multidisciplinary care is needed to provide optimal outcomes. The initial assessment includes a detailed physical examination assessing for hard and soft signs of arterial injury, and the arterial pressure index can be used to reliably identify vascular compromise and the need for additional assessment or intervention. Advanced imaging in the form of CT angiography is highly sensitive in additional characterization of the potential injury and can be obtained in an expedient manner. The optimal treatment of fractures with vascular injuries includes providing skeletal stability and confirming or reestablishing adequate distal perfusion as soon as possible. Options for vascular intervention include observation, ligation, direct arterial repair, vascular bypass grafting, endovascular intervention, and staged temporary shunting, followed by bypass grafting. Although the optimal sequence of surgical intervention remains an incompletely answered question, the orthopaedic role in the care of patients with these injuries is to provide mechanical stability to the injured limb to protect the vascular repair and surrounding soft-tissue envelope.

Die Gefäßverletzung – eine unterschätzte Entität?

Hintergrund

In der Traumatologie sind Gefäße eher selten betroffen und isolierte vaskuläre Traumata (VT) sind rar. Es existieren daher wenig belastbare und aktuelle Zahlen zu Inzidenz und Mortalität.

Fragestellung

Es wird anhand ausgewählter Referenzen sowie eigener abgeschlossener und laufender Studien aus Registerdaten des TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) zum VT im Rahmen der Schwerverletztenversorgung in Deutschland berichtet.

Material und Methode

Pointierte Literaturübersicht und Bericht über 2 retrospektive Auswertungen von Datensätzen des TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU): Daten mit moderatem bis schwerem VT im Verletzungsmuster werden mit Daten ohne VT (non-VT) bei gleicher Verletzungsschwere verglichen. Zielgrößen sind Morbidität, Mortalität sowie Verlaufs- und Prognoseparameter.

Ergebnisse

In der Auswertung 2002–2012 (TR-DGU Projekt-ID 2013-011) zeichnete sich der Einfluss von Allokation und Versorgungsstufe der Traumazentren auf erwartete (EM) und beobachtete Mortalität (OM) von 2961 Fällen mit VT unter 42.326 Schwerverletzten (7 %) ab: Die Differenz von OM zu EM bei VT beträgt + 3,4 % vs. ± 0,1 % bei non-VT. Aufgrund der OM bei schwerem VT von 33,8 % vs. 16,4 % bei non-VT mit gleicher Verletzungsschwere wurde 2018 eine Folgeauswertung veranlasst (2008–2017; TR-DGU Projekt-ID 2018-045). Hier kann die Substratifizierung von isoliertem, führendem und begleitendem VT in der Versorgungsrealität signifikante Effekte von Versorgungsstufe, Allokation und Transport auf die OM zeigen. Nur bei VT zeigt sich eine relevante Nichtübereinstimmung von OM zu EM. Im Mittel etwa + 2 % und in Hochrisikokonstellationen mit VT bis zu + 29 % als Maß für die Relevanz von VT in der Traumaversorgung.

Schlussfolgerungen

Diese Ergebnisse legen eine weitere Optimierung der Schwerverletztenversorgung bei VT nahe, da sich VT-Vigilanz, Allokation, Transport und eine niedrigschwellige Frühverlegung als Ansatzpunkte ableiten lassen.

Degree of Soft Tissue Injury is a Major Determinant of Successful Arterial Repair in the Extremity: A New Classification of Extremity Arterial Injury?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate outcomes after extremity arterial injury repair and examined the association between outcomes and the degree of soft tissue injury and vascular repair methods.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 106 patients (108 cases) who underwent emergent microsurgical repair of extremity arterial injury due to trauma and non-perfusion of the affected extremity. The cases were divided into three groups by degree of associated soft tissue injuries: (A) adequate soft tissue coverage over the injured major vessels after radical debridement, (B) inadequate soft tissue coverage over the injured major vessels after radical debridement, and (C) radical debridement was not feasible due to unclear extent of injured soft tissue. Differences in vascular repair methods and outcomes among the three groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

In Group A (n = 61), microvascular suture and vessel graft achieved 95.1% and 85.0% successful limb reperfusion, respectively. In Group B (n = 31), vessel reconstruction with flap coverage achieved 100% successful reperfusion. Vessel graft achieved 28.6% successful limb reperfusion, while there were no cases of successful reperfusion using microvascular sutures. In Group C (n = 16), no vascular repair method achieved successful reperfusion. There were significant differences among the three groups in successful reperfusion (p < 0.001) and limb salvage (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The extent of associated soft tissue injury was associated with different vascular repair methods and outcomes. We propose a new system for classifying these injuries according to the degree of associated soft tissue injury.

Endovascular management of pelvic trauma

Traumatic pelvic injuries are an important group of acquired pathologies given their frequent association with significant vascular compromise. Potentially fatal as a consequence of rapid hemorrhage, achievement of early hemostasis is a priority; endovascular management of traumatic pelvic arterial injuries is an important potential option for treatment. Precipitated by any number of mechanisms of trauma, pelvic vascular injury necessitates timely patient assessment. Variable patterns of arterial injury may result from blunt, penetrating or iatrogenic trauma. Selection of the most appropriate imaging modality is a priority, ensuring streamlined access to treatment. In the case of CT, this is complemented by acquisition of the most appropriate phase of imaging; review of both arterial and delayed phase imaging improves the accuracy of detection of low-flow hemorrhage. In cases where surgical intervention is not deemed appropriate, endovascular treatment provides an alternative means for cessation of hemorrhage associated with pelvic injuries. This may be achieved in a selective or nonselective manner depending on the patient's clinical status and time constraints. Consequently, a detailed understanding of vascular anatomy is essential, including an appreciation of the normal variant anatomy between males and females. Additional consideration must be given to variant anatomy which may co-exist in both sexes. This review article aims to provide a synopsis of endovascular management of pelvic vascular injury. Through case examples, available treatment options will be discussed, including thrombin injection and transcatheter arterial embolization. Furthermore, potential adverse complications of pelvic arterial embolization will be highlighted. Finally, in view of the potential severity of these injuries, a brief overview of initial management of the hemodynamically unstable patient is provided.

Outcomes of Revascularization and Factors Associated With Major Amputation in Patients With Lower Limb Arterial Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Objective To identify the amputation rates and causative factors for failed revascularization leading to amputation in patients undergoing primary limb salvage procedures for lower-extremity vascular injuries. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at the vascular surgery department, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto (SMBB) Institute of Trauma, Karachi, Pakistan. The data were collected from hospital record using the non-probability sampling technique. Patients aged 17-70 years, undergoing primary revascularization during April 2016 to March 2021, were included in the study. Patients with crush injuries/non-salvageable limbs underwent primary amputation, isolated deep femoral artery or crural arteries (non-limb threatening) injuries, and non-traumatic injuries like intravenous drug-induced or iatrogenic injuries were excluded. The data analysis is done using SPSS Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered as significant. Results This study includes 56 patients of mean age 30.82 ± 9.29 years with male gender four times more affected than their counterpart. About 32% of patients were smokers, while 58% of patients had no co-morbidities. All patients presented with a mean time of 7.66 ± 1.69 hours of injury with an average of 1.14 arterial segments involved. The most frequent artery involved was popliteal artery (both above and below the knee), followed by superficial femoral artery injury constituting 50% and 26%, respectively, with arterial laceration and transection being common findings on exploration. Out of 56 patients, 27 (48.2%) had open fractures, 21 (37.5% ) closed fractures, and eight patients (14.3 % ) presented with dislocation as associated injuries. Following the procedure, secondary amputation was recorded in 18 (32.1%) patients. Thrombosis and infection were the leading causes of revascularization failure. Type of injury, segment of arterial injury, and associated bony injuries were associated with limb amputation. Conclusion Type and site of injury along with concomitant bony injuries are associated with major amputations after revascularization in lower-extremity arterial injuries.

Reliability of capillary refill time for evaluation of tissue perfusion in simulated vascular occluded limbs

PURPOSE

No standardized execution or evidence demonstrates the area of the digit giving the most accurate capillary refill time (CRT). This study investigated the reliability and validity of CRT, and the relative merits of areas where the test could be performed.

METHODS

In all, 127 healthy volunteers were assessed for normal CRT at the fingernail, lateral paronychia, and proximal and distal pulps of the index finger. The predictive validity of the CRT for the diagnosis of compromised vascular perfusion was also investigated on 24 subjects, using an inflated tourniquet. Three raters assessed interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

The mean fingernail, lateral paronychia, proximal pulp, and distal pulp CRTs were 1.93, 1.78, 1.70, and 1.57 s, respectively. The tourniquet and non-tourniquet results demonstrated significant mean differences; however, the fingernail showed a subtle difference (1.22 s) compared with the proximal pulp (4.46 s). The CRT interobserver reliability was fair at the fingernail (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.51), but very poor in occluded limbs (ICC = 0.13). At the lateral paronychia and finger pulp, the interobserver reliability was reasonable (ICC = 0.75-0.81 [non-tourniquet] vs 0.62-0.68 [tourniquet]). In a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the proximal pulp demonstrated better discrimination (area under the curve = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97, p  < 0.0001); the best cutoff point was calculated to be 3 s at the proximal pulp.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT use at appropriate areas is reliable. The most dependable site is the finger pulp, and the proposed cutoff is 3 s.

Reliability of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score in the Management of Peripheral Vascular Injuries in Children: A Retrospective Review

This study was aimed to evaluate different management modalities for peripheral vascular trauma in children, with the aid of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS). A single-center retrospective analysis took place between 2010 and 2017 at University Hospitals, having emergencies and critical care centers. Different types of vascular repair were adopted by skillful vascular experts and highly trained pediatric surgeons. Patients were divided into three different age groups. Group I included those children between 5 and 10 years; group II involved pediatrics between 11 and 15 years; while children between 16 and 21 years participated in group III. We recruited 183 children with peripheral vascular injuries. They were 87% males and 13% females, with the mean age of 14.72 ± 04. Arteriorrhaphy was performed in 32%; end-to-end anastomosis and natural vein graft were adopted in 18% and 29% respectively. On the other hand, 20% underwent bypass surgery. The age groups I and II are highly susceptible to penetrating trauma ( p  = 0.001), while patients with an extreme age (i.e., group III) are more susceptible to blunt injury ( p  = 0.001). The MESS has a significant correlation to both age groups I and II ( p  = 0.001). Vein patch angioplasty and end-to-end primary repair should be adopted as the main treatment options for the repair of extremity vascular injuries in children. Moreover, other treatment modalities, such as repair with autologous vein graft/bypass surgery, may be adopted whenever possible. They are cost-effective, reliable, and simple techniques with fewer postoperative complication, especially in poor/limited resources.

Surgical management of peripheral artery pseudoaneurysm following orthopedic trauma: a report of 14 cases

PURPOSE

Purpose of this study was to report the etiology, diagnosis, surgical management, and outcome of pseudoaneurysm associated with orthopedic trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma center between 2013 and 2019. Clinical records were reviewed for the mechanism of primary injury, associated fracture pattern, time of presentation, site of involvement, etiology of the pseudoaneurysm, diagnosis, management, and complications. We identified 14 patients with pseudoaneurysm of peripheral arteries following orthopedic trauma.

RESULTS

The mean interval between primary injury and the manifestation of clinical symptoms was 88.5 days (range, 16-304 days). There were 3 upper limb injuries and 11 lower limb injuries. The presenting symptoms were pain associated with excessive extremity swelling in most of the patients. A significant drop in hemoglobin (mean fall- 2.9 g/dL) was noted in nine patients. Most common artery involved was the superficial branch of femoral artery and posterior tibial artery followed by the brachial artery. Fractured bone spike was the cause of injury in eight patients and iatrogenic injury in six patients. Diagnosis was confirmed by CT angiography with duplex scan in eight patients, duplex scan alone in one patient, MRI along with duplex scan in one patient. The remaining four patients were diagnosed intraoperatively. Excision of the pseudoaneurysm and ligation of the involved minor arteries was done in eight patients. Surgical repair of the major artery with critical vascular injury was done in six patients. One patient underwent secondary amputation following the anastomotic blowout.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm requires knowledge and a high index of suspicion. Surgical reconstruction of major arteries should always be done and ligation of major vessels can lead to catastrophes. Excision of pseudoaneurysm can be done when minor arteries are involved with the presence of good collateral circulation.

LEVEL OF STUDY

Level IV Study.

Neurovascular Bundle Entrapment and Through Knee Amputation After Cerclage Cabling of Distal Femoral Peri-implant Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

We report the case of an 82-year-old woman with diabetes, arteriosclerosis, chronic heart failure, and hypertension treated with an anatomical locking plate and multiple cables for a spiral-wedged periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur which was complicated by direct occlusion of the femoral artery and crush of the sciatic nerve, resulting in leg necrosis and, ultimately, through-knee disarticulation despite early recognition and arterial repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurovascular injury is a potential complication of cerclage cables placement around the femoral shaft during complex fracture fixation. Devastating complications cannot always be corrected despite early vascular intervention.

Penetrating Extremity Trauma Endovascular versus Open Repair?

Penetrating extremity trauma (PET) accounts for an estimated 5-15% of trauma with vascular injury and these injuries are accountable for a significant percentage of trauma-related deaths. Historically, vascular injuries were best treated by open repair. While a defined selection criteria and a comprehensive algorithm have not been validated, the advancement of endovascular techniques, embolotherapy, and stent grafting have become viable options for the treatment of penetrating arterial extremity trauma in select patients. Advantages endovascular repair offers include decreasing mortality and morbidity associated with open repair, decreasing blood loss, decreasing iatrogenic injury such as nerve injury, and lower rate of wound infection. Patients stability, type of vascular injury, and lesion location are main factors help deciding between endovascular and open repair. Patient selection between endovascular and open repair should be determined by on a case-by-case situation, individual hospital guidelines, a multidisciplinary approach, and technical expertise.

Thoracic Visceral Compression-A Useful Technique for Demonstrating Small Bleeding Points in the Dissected Neck at Autopsy

A 29-year-old man died at the scene of an altercation from a stab wound to the left side of the neck. At autopsy, careful in situ examination of the common carotid artery did not reveal any evidence of hemorrhage or apparent vascular injury. However, applying pressure to the chest wall and underlying thoracic viscera (lungs and heart) resulted in filling of the collapsed vessel with blood causing hemorrhage from a small incision on the medial aspect of the common carotid artery. Release of pressure and drying of the dissection field enabled the artery to be opened and the small defect to be identified. This technique may be used to temporarily restore blood to a vessel to help identify a small bleeding point that may otherwise be difficult to detect.

[Neurovascular complications in fractures of the extremities, part 1 : Vascular lesions]

Neurovascular injuries in fractures threaten at least the function of extremities. The timely interaction between diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries helps to avoid a poor outcome or even fatal complications. An important parameter is to "think about it" for injuries under strain. An ankle-brachial index (ABI) of <0.9 is an indicator. Massive bleeding, manifest and long-lasting peripheral ischemia and a rapidly expanding hematoma necessitate an immediate surgical intervention. Endovascular techniques are recommended on the extremities of stable patients with circumscribed vascular lesions. The debate about the sequence of repair (vascular vs. osseous) has to be decided on an individual basis; however, when in doubt vascular repair should be given priority. Vessel reconstructions should be performed without tension and must be covered by vital soft tissues, the indications for fasciotomy should be liberally interpreted. The prognosis with respect to preservation of the extremity and long-term functional outcome substantially depends on the quality of treatment of accompanying injuries.

Femoral artery entrapment after cerclage wiring of distal femoral shaft fracture: A case report

Femoral artery injury after femoral fracture fixation is a rare complication. Previous literature studies focused mostly on proximal femur fracture. We described a case of superficial femoral artery entrapment after internal fixation augmented with cerclage wire. An 80-year-old female underwent fixation with distal femur locking compression plate augmented with cerclage wire. Six hours after the operation, she developed pulseless limb and computed tomography angiogram showed femoral artery entrapped by cerclage wire. After vascular exploration and cerclage wire removal, the femoral artery returned to normal flow without further complication. We review available literature studies on vascular injury after cerclage wiring especially in the distal part of the femur, the so-called safe zone, for the great care needed before cerclage wiring and the importance of immediate diagnosis and treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment of traumatic vascular injury of limbs in military and emergency medicine: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Traumatic vascular injury is caused by explosions and projectiles (bullets and shrapnel); it may affect the arteries and veins of the limbs, and is common in wartime, triggering bleeding, and ischemia. The increasing use of high-energy weapons in modern warfare is associated with severe vascular injuries.

METHODS

To summarize the current evidence of diagnosis and treatment for traumatic vascular injury of limbs, for saving limbs and lives, and put forward some new insights, we comprehensively consulted literatures and analyzed progress in injury diagnosis and wound treatment, summarized the advanced treatments now available, especially in wartime, and explored the principal factors in play in an effort to optimize clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Extremity vascular trauma poses several difficult dilemmas in diagnosis and treatment. The increasing use of high-energy weapons in modern warfare is associated with severe vascular injuries. Any delay in treatment may lead to loss of limbs or death. The development of diagnose and treat vascular injury of extremities are the clinical significance to the tip of military medicine, such as the use of fast, cheap, low invasive diagnostic methods, repairing severe vascular injury as soon as possible, using related technologies actively (fasciotomy, etc).

CONCLUSION

We point out the frontier of the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic vascular injury, also with a new model of wartime injury treatment in American (forward surgical teams and combat support hospitals), French military surgeons regarding management of war-related vascular wounds and Chinese military ("3 districts and 7 grades" model). Many issues remain to be resolved by further experience and investigation.

Arterial Injury in the Upper Extremity: Evaluation, Strategies, and Anticoagulation Management

Trauma to the upper extremity can present with an associated arterial injury. After patient stabilization, thorough assessment with physical examination and various imaging modalities allows accurate diagnosis of the specific arterial injury. After diagnosis, efficient treatment is necessary to allow limb salvage. Treatment options include ligation, primary repair, graft reconstruction, endovascular repair, and amputation. The final treatment rendered is frequently dependent on injury location and mechanism. With any of the treatment options, complications may occur, including thrombosis. Currently, no validated anticoagulation protocol has been established for managing arterial injuries in the upper extremity.

Outcomes of Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Traumatic Lower Extremity Fractures with Compromised Vascularity

Traumatic lower extremity fractures with compromised arterial flow are limb-threatening injuries. A retrospective review of 158 lower extremities with traumatic fractures, including 26 extremities with arterial injuries, was performed to determine the effects of vascular compromise on flap survival, successful limb salvage and complication rates. Patients with arterial injuries had a larger average flap surface area (255.1 vs 144.6 cm2, P = 0.02) and a greater number of operations (4.7 vs 3.8, P = 0.01) than patients without vascular compromise. Patients presenting with vascular injury were also more likely to require fasciotomy [odds ratio (OR): 6.5, confidence interval (CI): 2.3–18.2] and to have a nerve deficit (OR: 16.6, CI: 3.9–70.0), fracture of the distal third of the leg (OR: 2.9, CI: 1.15–7.1) and intracranial hemorrhage (OR: 3.84, CI: 1.1–12.9). After soft tissue reconstruction, patients with arterial injuries had a higher rate of amputation (OR: 8.5, CI: 1.3–53.6) and flap failure requiring a return to the operating room (OR: 4.5, CI: 1.5–13.2). Arterial injury did not correlate with infection or overall complication rate. In conclusion, arterial injuries resulted in significant complications for patients with lower extremity fractures requiring flap coverage, although limb salvage was still effective in most cases.