Current Trends in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures

A simple tool for volar tilt restoration during volar plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fracture: A technical note

Anatomical restoration of volar tilt is a technical challenge in a displaced distal radius fracture with a dorsally angulated fracture pattern accompanied by dorsal metaphyseal comminution. We adopted a reduction technique using a mini-Hohmann retractor, to accomplish the desired volar tilt in a controlled fashion. We would like to present this technical note through a case example describing the technique specifics along with one-year postoperative outcomes.

The distal-medial pilot hole: A simple way to ease volar plate positioning in extra-articular distal radius fractures

Volar plating is one of the most used surgical treatments for dorsally displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures. However, the reduction of the dorsal tilt can be difficult. It usually requires a flexion maneuver of the wrist while maintaining and screwing the plate, which is cumbersome. Plate positioning also is a crucial step and is sometimes difficult because of the large size of the plate relative to the width of the distal radius. We use an epiphysis-first technique. We place all the epiphyseal screws before reduction, and then we take advantage of the anatomical shape of a locking plate to automatically reduce the dorsal tilt by fixing the proximal radius to the plate with cortical compression screws. To ensure easy and accurate positioning of the plate, we drill a distal medial pilot hole in a free-hand fashion 10 mm proximal to the watershed line and 10 mm lateral to the medial rim of the radius, without positioning the plate. This allows a clear view of the location of this first hole. The locking plate is then applied to the distal radius with help of a monocortical non-locking screw, and it is controlled under fluoroscopy. When this medial pilot hole is properly positioned and the plate correctly tilted on the anteroposterior view, the remaining epiphyseal holes are filled with locking screws. Then the plate is fixed on the proximal radius with bicortical compression screws, allowing an automatic reduction of the epiphyseal dorsal tilt. We believe this technique is a safe and reproducible way to position volar plates and to reduce anatomically the dorsal tilt in extra-articular posteriorly displaced distal radius fractures (AO A2 and A3). Furthermore, the automatic fracture reduction provided by this technique decreases operation time and radiation.

The Necessity of Restoration of Radiologic Parameters by Closed Reduction in Elderly Patients with Distal Radius Fractures

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of distal radius fractures (DRFs) malalignment on the treatment outcomes in patients over age 65 years.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records on fresh DRFs treated with closed reduction from December 2014 to January 2018. After treatment, patients were evaluated for the determination of grip strength, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during wrist movement, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, the appearance satisfaction, and active wrist range of motion (ROM).

Results

A total of 96 patients with complete data were included in our study. During follow-up, there were 75 patients (78.1%) with acceptable reduction and 21 patients (21.9%) with unacceptable reduction. Compared with those having acceptable alignment in the distal radius, patients with unacceptable alignment had weak grip strength, were unsatisfied appearance, and had severe flexion as well as ulnar deviation limitation at 6-month follow-up. A significant correlation was found between ulnar positive variance and grip strength (r=−0.35, P=0.03), as well as dorsal angulation and flexion movement (r=−0.31, P=0.02).

Conclusions

Conservative treatment should be used differently, even in elderly patients. For low-demand patients, it is not necessary to restore all anatomic radiographic parameters, as malalignment does not increase disability or pain score. However, for patients who are still healthy and active, satisfactory reduction is the first choice, as malalignment can lead to decreased grip strength, dissatisfaction with appearance, and certain wrist limitations.

Solitary ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures: experience of a centre in the UK and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomies can be used to treat ulnocarpal abutment secondary to radial shortening following distal radius fractures. Given the increase of fragility distal radius fractures awareness of treating the sequelae of distal radius fractures is important. We present the largest reported case series in the UK of ulnar shortening osteotomies for this indication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with previous distal radial fractures were included, who presented with wrist pain and radiologically evident positive ulnar variance secondary to malunion of the distal radius with no significant intercalated instability. Patients were treated with a short oblique ulnar shortening osteotomy, using a Stanley jig and small AO compression plate system. Pre- and postoperative radiographical measurements of inclination, dorsal/volar angulation and ulnar variance were made. Patients were scored pre- and postoperatively using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores by two orthopaedic surgeons. Mean follow-up was 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Radiographical analysis revealed a change in the ulnar variance with an average reduction of 5.74 mm. Mean preoperative scores were 61.1 (range 25-95.5) for QuickDASH and 70.4 (range 33-92) for Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. At the latest follow-up, mean postoperative QuickDASH scores were 10.6 (range 0-43.2) and 17.2 (range 0-44) for Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. Differences in scores after surgery for both QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation were statistically significant (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ulnar shortening osteotomy is a relatively simple procedure compared with corrective radial osteotomy, with a lower complication profile. In our series, patients showed significant improvement in pain and function by correcting the ulnar variance thus preventing ulna-carpal impaction.