Preservation of the Tibial Remnant in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction May Improve Postoperative Proprioceptive Function

Younger age, longer delay to surgery and meniscal tears are associated with a smaller ACL remnant: An analysis from the registry of the Francophone Arthroscopic Society

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate which preoperative patient, injury or clinical factors were associated with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant volume in patients undergoing ACL surgery. It was hypothesized that the main factors determining an insufficient ACL remnant volume at the time of surgery were younger age and longer time to surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry was conducted, including 1565 patients with an ACL lesion underdoing a primary ACL surgery (reconstruction or repair) between June 2020 and June 2023. Patients were excluded in case of revision surgery and incomplete data. Preoperative factors-including patient demographics, delay to surgery, preoperative laxity and the presence of meniscal tears or cartilage lesions-were analysed to determine their influence on ACL remnant volume (estimated by the surgeon as the percentage of residual volume). Univariate, multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to explore these relationships.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses demonstrated that younger age (<20 years and 20-30 years compared to ≥40, p = 0.02), higher time from injury to surgery (≥12 months compared to <3 months, p = 0.01) and the presence of a medial (p = 0.01) or a lateral meniscal tear (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of an ACL remnant volume ≤ 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age (under 30 years of age), a time from injury to surgery above 12 months and the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears are associated with higher odds of observing a smaller ACL remnant volume at the time of the ACL surgery. These factors should be considered when planning ACL remnant preservation techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction

Background

ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomechanics and decrease in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in metrics of knee joint loading during a single limb squat task between individuals following a primary ACL-r versus those who underwent a standard ACL-R with a patella bone-tendon-bone autograft.

Study type

Case Control Study.

Methods

The ACL-r group [n: 15, age(yrs): 38.8±13.9] sustained a proximal ACL disruption that was amenable to repair, while the ACL-R group [n: 15, age(yrs): 25.60±1.7] underwent primary reconstruction with patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. At 12-weeks post-operation, both groups completed the IKDC questionnaire and biomechanical testing during performance of the single limb squat. Bilateral peak knee extension moment and total knee joint power as a measure of eccentric loading (contraction) during the descent phase of the squat were calculated on the surgical and non-surgical limb and averaged across the middle three of five trials. Participants also completed quadriceps strength testing on both limbs three months after surgery on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec. LSI (Limb Strength Index) was calculated for all variables. Separate ANCOVAs were performed on each biomechanical variable to examine differences between groups.

Results

The ACL-r had a significantly greater peak knee extension moment LSI (ACL-r: 78.46±5.79%; ACL-R: 56.86±5.79%; p=0.019, ηp2=.186) and total knee joint power LSI (ACL-r: 72.47±7.39%; ACL-R: 39.70±7.39%, p=0.006, ηp2=.245) than the ACL-R group. The ACL-r also had a significantly greater quadriceps LSI than the ACL-R group (ACL-r: 66.318±4.61%, ACL-R: 48.03±4.61%, p=0.013, ηp2=.206).

Conclusions

Individuals following ACL-r demonstrate increased knee joint loading symmetry during a single leg squat task and greater quadriceps strength symmetry at 12 weeks post-surgery compared to those who underwent ACL-R.

Level of Evidence

3.

Clinical and arthroscopic outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with ligament augmentation and reconstruction systems compared with four-strand hamstring tendon grafts alone

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical, radiological, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a four-strand hamstring tendon graft (hamstring group) either without augmentation or with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) augmentation (LARS augmentation group).

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2019, patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were undertaken pre-operatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Arthroscopic evaluation was performed focusing on the morphology of the graft based on graft tension, graft tear, and synovial coverage.

RESULTS

A total of 178 consecutive patients received single-bundle ACL reconstruction, 89 patients in each group, and 20 patients were lost to follow-up in the first two years. At the three month follow-up, the LARS augmentation group had significantly higher Lysholm scores, IKDC scores, and KOS-ADLS scores than the hamstring group (P < 0.001). At the three, six and 12-month follow-ups, there were significantly higher Tegner scores and ACL-RSI scores in the LARS augmentation group than in the hamstring group (P < 0.05). At the three and six month follow-ups, the LARS augmentation group had significantly higher rates of return to sports and return to sports at their preinjury level (P < 0.05). There were no between-group differences in other outcomes, including arthroscopic outcomes, graft signal intensity, post-operative complications or rerupture rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous hamstring augmented with the LARS augmentation technique provides good and realistic clinical and functional results during the early post-operative period with high levels of satisfaction of patients, including participation in sports and physical activity, and high rates of return to sports at the preinjury level, without any apparent complications compared with hamstring ACL reconstruction alone. No increases in complication, reinjury rates, or increased lateral laxity were observed at the 12-month or 24-month follow-up.

Effect of a new remnant-preserving technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on MRI-based graft maturity: a comparison cohort study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of a new remnant-preserving double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique, focused on avoiding remnant damage and preserving continuity of remnants, on graft maturity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 169 patients were divided into three groups: 41 in the preservation group, 70 in the resection group, and 58 in the absent group. In the preservation group, rather than passing the graft through the remnant tissue, the graft was reconstructed such that the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles sandwiched the remnant to avoid damage to the remnant and maintain its continuity. Based on 1-year postoperative MRI, the grafts were divided into three regions: distal, middle, and proximal. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of each region of interest was calculated to evaluate the signal intensity of the graft and was compared among the three groups. Additionally, to identify factors influencing graft maturity, a multiple regression analysis was performed with SNQ as the dependent variable and patient demographics, bone morphology, and surgical factors as independent variables.

RESULTS

In a three-group comparison of mean SNQs, the distal region was 3.3 ± 3.4, 8.9 ± 8.3, and 9.0 ± 8.6 (p < 0.001), the middle region was 5.3 ± 3.7, 10.9 ± 11.1, and 11.3 ± 10.2 (p < 0.001), and the proximal region was 6.8 ± 4.5, 11.1 ± 8.8, and 11.7 ± 10.8 (p = 0.017), in order of the preservation, resection, and absent groups, respectively. That indicated that the remnant-preserving ACLR was more hypointense than ACLR with remnant resection or absent in all three regions. Multiple regression analysis showed that remnant preservation remained the relevant factor affecting SNQ of the graft at the distal and middle levels.

CONCLUSION

The new remnant-preserving anatomic double-bundle ACLR had significantly better graft maturity, measured by SNQ on MRI, than the remnant resection and absent groups. The remnant procedure was the relevant factor affecting graft maturity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Remnant preservation may improve proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Aim

Our aim was to evaluate the literature investigating proprioception improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and test the hypothesis that ACL tibial remnant-preserving reconstruction (ACLR-R) is more beneficial than standard technique (ACLR-S) in terms of postoperative proprioceptive function with various reported tests, including joint position sense (JPS) and threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM).

Methods

An online search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases before 5 October 2020, on the basis of the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Key terms [(‘ACLR’ or ‘ACL-R’ or ‘anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction’) AND (‘remnant’ or ‘stump’) AND (‘proprioception’ or ‘proprioceptive’)] were used. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and The McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies were used for quality assessment. In total, four articles comparing proprioceptive functions between ACLR-R and ACLR-S were included, two of which were randomized clinical trials rated as level of evidence II, and two were retrospective cohort studies rated as level of evidence III. The outcomes were then compared. Evaluation of proprioception involved joint position sense (JPS) [reproduction of active positioning (RAP) and reproduction of passive positioning (RPP)] and threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) tests.

Results

Only four studies were included, with a total of 234 patients (119 ACLR-R patients and 115 ACLR-S patients). High heterogeneity in characteristics and outcome measurements was observed among the studies. Three studies performed sparing technique, and one performed tensioning technique. One study tested RAP and reported better results at an average of 7 months follow-up in ACLR-R (P < 0.05). Three studies tested RPP, one of which measured RPP within 12 months after surgery and reported better results in ACLR-R than in ACLR-S (P < 0.05). The other two studies reported similar results; however, the findings of one study were statistically insignificant. TTDPM was tested in one study, with no statistically significant difference found.

Conclusion

The current literature, although limited, reported proprioception improvement after ACLR-R (compared with ACLR-S) in terms of JPS. However, owing to the heterogeneity of the relevant studies, further research is required to determine remnant preservation effect on knee proprioceptive restoration.

Level of evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies.

Does remnant tissue preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction influence the creation of the rectangular femoral tunnel?

PURPOSE

We have previously described anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel created using a rounded rectangular dilator designed to enable a more anatomical and wider tendon-bone junction. However, the influence of remnant tissue preservation on the creation of the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of remnant tissue preservation on the creation of the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel.

METHODS

A total of 198 patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were categorized into a remnant preservation group (group P) and a non-preservation group (group N). Computed tomography images taken 1 week postoperatively were analyzed. The location of the rounded rectangular femoral tunnel evaluated using the quadrant method, its rotation angle, and the graft bending angle were compared between the two groups. The differences and the variance in femoral tunnel assessment were compared using the two-sample t-test and Levene's test.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in the location of femoral tunnel for the deep/shallow direction along the Blumensaat's line (difference, p = .326; variances, p = .970), the tunnel was significantly lower in group P than in group N, with no variances (difference, p = .001; variances, p = .326). There were no significant differences and no variances in the tunnel rotation angle and the graft bending angle (difference, p = .727 and 0.514, respectively; variances, p = .827 and .445, respectively). Blow out of the posterior wall of the medial aspect of the femoral lateral condyle was an intraoperative complication that occurred in one case in group N.

CONCLUSION

The remnant preservation approach creates a lower femoral tunnel compared to the non-preservation technique. However, a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel can be created safely and is reproducible with remnant tissue preservation.

Remnant preservation with tensioning can improve the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Many studies exist about remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, concern remains for development of a cyclops lesion during remnant preservation. To prevent this, a tensioning method has been suggested. Current study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of remnant preservation in ACL reconstruction with tensioning compared to classical ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

From January 2016 to June 2017, ACL reconstruction patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2 years postoperatively were enrolled. For comparison, all participants were divided in two groups: remnant preservation with tensioning (group R) and controls (group C). Clinically, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm scores, and incidence of symptomatic cyclops lesions were evaluated. Radiologically, signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) and size of the synovium on MRI as well as anterior instability in Telos stress radiographs were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were enrolled (42 in group R and 22 in group C). The IKDC score in group R (70) was better than that in group C (62; p < 0.05). One patient in group R had a cyclops lesion with clinical symptoms and arthroscopic excision was recommended. Radiologically, the SNQ, synovium area, and anterior instability on Telos radiography showed no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Remnant preservation with tensioning is a good option for ACL reconstruction without the development of a cyclops lesion.

Proprioceptive and Clinical Outcomes after Remnant Preserved Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Assessment with Minimal Confounding Factors

Objective

To evaluate the proprioceptive and clinical function of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with various amounts of remnant preserved with as few confounding factors as possible.

Methods

This retrospective study included 46 patients who underwent ACLR with remnant preservation between March 2013 and February 2019. These patients had less than 6 months injury‐to‐surgery interval and no concomitant injuries. The researchers divided these subjects into two groups based on the length of the remnant preserved after ACLR, with group A defined as having more than 1/3 of the original length preserved and group B defined as less than 1/3 of the original length preserved. Clinical scores were obtained using the Lysholm knee scoring scale and the Tegner activity scale. The Lysholm score was calculated preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and at the last follow up. The Tegner score was calculated preoperatively, at 12 months postoperatively and at the last follow up. Anterior laxity was measured using the KT2000 arthrometer preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Proprioceptive function was evaluated through reproduction of passive positioning (RPP) and threshold to detection of passive motion (TDPM). Both RPP and TDPM were measured at the angle of 15° at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Unpaired t‐tests were performed to investigate the difference in each parameters between the two groups.

Results

In the present study, 20 patients were classified into group A and 26 into group B. All patients were followed up for an average of 34.70 ± 12.79 months. All 46 patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and no complications were reported at the end of the study. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the Lysholm score and anterior laxity by KT2000 at all time points. The Tegner score was significantly higher in group A at 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow‐up. In addition, group A's RPP was significantly better than that of group B's when tested at the angles of 15° and 30° at 3 months postoperatively, and at the angle of 15° at 6 months postoperatively. Group A's TDPM was also significantly better than that of group B's at all three tested angles at 3 months postoperatively, and at the angle of 15° at 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

Patients with ACLR with more than 1/3 of the original length preserved demonstrated a higher activity level 12 months postoperatively and better proprioceptive function at 15° of extension at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Using the Remnant Anterior Cruciate Ligament to Improve Knee Stability: Biomechanical Analysis Using a Cadaveric Model

Background:

Injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tissue retains proprioceptive nerve fibers, vascularity, and biomechanical properties. For these reasons, remnant ACL tissue is often preserved during the treatment of ACL injuries.

Purpose:

To assess through a cadaveric model whether reorienting and retensioning the residual ACL via an osteotomy improves knee stability after partial ACL tear, with substantial remnant tissue and intact femoral and tibial attachments.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

In 8 adult cadaveric knees, we measured anterior tibial translation and rotational laxity at 30° and 90° of flexion with the ACL in its native state and in 3 conditions: partial tear, retensioned, and ACL-deficient. The partial-tear state consisted of a sectioned anteromedial ACL bundle.

Results:

In the native state, the translation was 10 ± 2.7 mm (mean ± SD) at 30° of flexion and 8.4 ± 3.6 mm at 90° of flexion. Anterior translation of the knees in the partial-tear state (14 ± 2.7 mm at 30° and 12 ± 2.7 mm at 90°) was significantly greater than baseline (P < .001 for both). Translation in the ACL-retensioned state (9.2 ± 1.7 mm at 30° and 7.2 ± 2.1 mm at 90°) was significantly less than in the ACL-deficient state (P < .001 for both), and translation was not significantly different from that of the intact state. For ACL-deficient knees, translation (20 ± 4.3 mm at 30° and 16 ± 4.4 mm at 90°) was significantly greater than all other states (P < .001 for all). Although rotational testing demonstrated the least laxity at 30° and 90° of flexion in the retensioned and intact states and the most laxity in the ACL-deficient state, rotation was not significantly different among any of the experimental states.

Conclusion:

In a cadaveric model of an incomplete ACL tear, a reorienting and retensioning core osteotomy at the tibial insertion of the remnant ACL improved anteroposterior translation of the knee without compromising its rotational laxity.

Clinical Relevance:

The findings of this study support the concept of ACL tissue reorienting and retensioning in the treatment of ACL laxity as an area for future investigation.

Remnant preservation does not affect accuracy of tibial tunnel positioning in single-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Remnant preservation, in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, has potential biological advantages. However, graft positioning remains vital to functional outcome and the prevention of failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of tibial tunnel positioning in remnant preservation single-bundle hamstring reconstruction.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive adult patients, with isolated ACL rupture, were recruited to a prospective study. Remnant preservation was performed in all cases where > 25% of the native ACL was present. Three-dimensional computer tomography was preformed 3-6 months post-operatively to assess tibial tunnel position (using a grid-based measurement). Accuracy and precision of this technique were assessed against published anatomical data in direct comparison with the group where remnant preservation could not be performed.

RESULTS

Two patients withdrew following surgery. In the remaining groups (31 remnant preservation; 17 non-remnant preservation), no difference was demonstrated in tunnel position (40.4 ± 6.7% (anterior-to-posterior) and 47.4 ± 1.5% (medial-to-lateral) vs. 38.8 ± 4.9% and 46.7 ± 1.5%, respectively; n.s.), accuracy (6.1% vs. 4.8%; n.s.) or precision (3.9% vs. 2.8%; n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Remnant preservation can be safely performed without compromising tunnel position. Therefore, the potential benefits of this technique can be utilised, in clinical practice, without sacrificing the ability to optimize tibial tunnel positioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical Outcome of Remnant-Preserving and I.D.E.A.L. Femoral Tunnel Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Objective

To assess the clinical results of the remnant‐preserving and I.D.E.A.L. femoral tunnel technique in the arthroscopic treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

Methods

This was a retrospective single‐center, single‐surgeon study reviewing data from November 2016 to March 2019. Based on our inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 31 patients (18 males, 13 females; mean age, 23.6 years) who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with the remnant preservation and I.D.E.A.L. femoral tunnel technique were recruited and had a minimum follow‐up of 12 months. Clinical data and status of knee stability were recorded. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale were collected both preoperatively and at a minimum of 1‐year follow‐up.

Results

Statistically significant differences were detected between the preoperative and postoperative values for Lachman test and pivot‐shift test (P < 0.01). The mean postoperative Lysholm score was 89.6 ± 9.4, whereas the mean preoperative Lysholm score was 47.3 ± 12.8 (P < 0.01). The mean Tegner activity score was significantly higher at postoperative evaluation than at preoperative evaluation (6.5 ± 2.1 vs 2.6 ± 1.8; P < 0.01). The mean IKDC score was significantly improved from 49.5 ± 10.6 preoperatively to 88.2 ± 10.7 postoperatively (P < 0.01). No case of infection was reported. No radiograph showed any joint space narrowing or degenerative change at the last postsurgical follow‐up.

Conclusion

The anatomical remnant‐preserving and I.D.E.A.L. femoral tunnel technique achieves a satisfactory clinical outcome and provides an effective option for the treatment of ACL injuries.