1
|
Puccetti VLYA, de Miranda FL, de Figueiredo CCN, Medeiros KADA, Leonhardt MDC, Silva JDS, Kojima KE. RISK FACTORS AT NON-UNION OF TIBIAL FRACTURE TREATED WITH INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL. ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA 2024; 32:e278581. [PMID: 38933358 PMCID: PMC11197954 DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220243202e278581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Objective Identify the predictors associated with delayed union at 6 months and non-union at 12 months in tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN). Methods This retrospective longitudinal study included a cohort of 218 patients who sustained tibial shaft fractures and received IMN between January 2015 and March 2022. We gathered data on a range of risk factors, including patient demographics, trauma intensity, associated injuries, fracture characteristics, soft tissue injuries, comorbidities, addictions, and treatment-specific factors. We employed logistic bivariate regression analysis to explore the factors predictive of delayed union and non-union. Results At the 6-month follow-up, the incidence of delayed union was 28.9%. Predictors for delayed union included flap coverage, high-energy trauma, open fractures, the use of external fixation as a staged treatment, the percentage of cortical contact in simple type fractures, RUST score, and postoperative infection. After 12 months, the non-union rate was 15.6%. Conclusion the main predictors for non-union after IMN of tibial shaft fractures are related to the trauma energy. Furthermore, the initial treatment involving external fixation and postoperative infection also correlated with non-union. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vitor Lorens Yulta Abe Puccetti
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fernando Loureiro de Miranda
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caio Cesar Nogueira de Figueiredo
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Kayo Augusto de Almeida Medeiros
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Marcos de Camargo Leonhardt
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Jorge dos Santos Silva
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Kodi Edson Kojima
- Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas (HC-FMUSP), Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farhat T, Moussally K, Nahouli H, Hamad SA, Qaraya KA, Abdul-Sater Z, El Sheikh WG, Jawad N, Al Sedawi K, Obaid M, AbuKhoussa H, Nyaruhirira I, Tamim H, Hettiaratchy S, Bull AMJ, Abu-Sittah G. The integration of ortho-plastic limb salvage teams in the humanitarian response to violence-related open tibial fractures: evaluating outcomes in the Gaza Strip. Confl Health 2024; 18:35. [PMID: 38658929 PMCID: PMC11040898 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-024-00596-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limb salvage by ortho-plastic teams is the standard protocol for treating open tibial fractures in high-income countries, but there's limited research on this in conflict settings like the Gaza Strip. This study assessed the clinical impact of gunshot-related open tibial fractures, compared patient management by orthopedic and ortho-plastic teams, and identified the risk factors for bone non-union in this context. METHODS A retrospective review of medical records was conducted on Gaza Strip patients with gunshot-induced-open tibial fractures from March 2018 to October 2020. Data included patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes, with at least one year of follow-up. Primary outcomes were union, non-union, infection, and amputation. RESULTS The study included 244 injured individuals, predominantly young adult males (99.2%) with nearly half (48.9%) having Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures and more than half (66.8%) with over 1 cm of bone loss. Most patients required surgery, including rotational flaps and bone grafts with a median of 3 admissions and 9 surgeries. Ortho-plastic teams managed more severe muscle and skin injuries, cases with bone loss > 1 cm, and performed less debridement compared to other groups, though these differences were not statistically significant. Non-union occurred in 53% of the cases, with the ortho-plastic team having the highest rate at 63.6%. Infection rates were high (92.5%), but no significant differences in bone or infection outcomes were observed among the different groups. Logistic regression analysis identified bone loss > 1 cm, vascular injury, and the use of a definitive fixator at the first application as predictors of non-union. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the severity and complexity of such injuries, emphasizing their significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Ortho-plastic teams appeared to play a crucial role in managing severe cases. However, further research is still needed to enhance our understanding of how to effectively manage these injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Farhat
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Gefinor Center Block D, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Krystel Moussally
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Lebanon Branch Office, Middle East Medical Unit, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hasan Nahouli
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Shahd Abu Hamad
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Gefinor Center Block D, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Khulood Abul Qaraya
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Gefinor Center Block D, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Zahi Abdul-Sater
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Gefinor Center Block D, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Walaa G El Sheikh
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nadine Jawad
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Gefinor Center Block D, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Khouloud Al Sedawi
- Operational Centre Brussels, Gaza mission, Médecins Sans Frontières, Gaza, Palestine
| | - Mohammed Obaid
- Operational Centre Brussels, Gaza mission, Médecins Sans Frontières, Gaza, Palestine
| | - Hafez AbuKhoussa
- Operational Centre Brussels, Gaza mission, Médecins Sans Frontières, Gaza, Palestine
| | - Innocent Nyaruhirira
- Operational Centre Brussels, Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hani Tamim
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shehan Hettiaratchy
- Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anthony M J Bull
- Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ghassan Abu-Sittah
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Gefinor Center Block D, 3rd floor, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li W, Wang Y, Zhou S, Liu S, Di L, Chen W, Lv H. Development and validation of predictive nomogram for postoperative non-union of closed femoral shaft fracture. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3543. [PMID: 38347044 PMCID: PMC10861573 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53356-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Closed femoral shaft fracture is caused by high-energy injuries, and non-union exists after operation, which can significantly damage patients' body and mind. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing postoperative non-union of closed femoral shaft fractures and establish a predictive nomogram. Patients with closed femoral shaft fractures treated at Hebei Medical University Third Hospital between January 2015 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 729 patients met the inclusion criteria; of them, those treated in 2015-2019 comprised the training cohort (n = 617), while those treated in 2020-2021 comprised the external validation cohort (n = 112). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, complex fractures, bone defects, smoking, and postoperative infection were independent risk factors. Based on the factors, a predictive nomogram was constructed and validated. The C-indices in training and external validation cohorts were 0.818 and 0.781, respectively; and the C-index of internal validation via bootstrap resampling was 0.804. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good fit of the nomogram (P > 0.05) consistent with the calibration plot results. The clinical effectiveness was best at a threshold probability of 0.10-0.40 in decision curve analysis. The risk prediction for patients with fractures using this nomogram may aid targeted prevention and rehabilitation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Li
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, No.361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, No.361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Shuai Zhou
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, No.361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Shihang Liu
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
- School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, No.361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Luqin Di
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
| | - Hongzhi Lv
- Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Hebei Orthopaedic Research Institute, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
- School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, No.361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, China.
- Trauma Emergency Center, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang J, Lu V, Zhou AK, Stevenson A, Thahir A, Krkovic M. Predictors for infection severity for open tibial fractures: major trauma centre perspective. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:6579-6587. [PMID: 37418004 PMCID: PMC10541339 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04956-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Open diaphyseal tibial fractures are the most common long-bone fractures and require a rapid approach to prevent devastating complications. Current literature reports the outcomes of open tibial fractures. However, there is no robust, up-to-date research on the predictive indicators of infection severity in a large open tibial fracture patient cohort. This study investigated the predictive factors of superficial infections and osteomyelitis in open tibial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of the tibial fracture database was carried out from 2014 to 2020. Criteria for inclusion was any tibial fracture including tibial plateau, shaft, pilon or ankle, with an open wound at the fracture site. Exclusion criteria included patients with a follow-up period of less than 12 months and who are deceased. A total of 235 patients were included in our study, of which 154 (65.6%), 42 (17.9%), and 39 (16.6%) developed no infection, superficial infection, or osteomyelitis, respectively. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, fracture characteristics, infection status and management details were collected for all patients. RESULTS On multivariate modelling, patients with BMI > 30 (OR = 2.078, 95%CI [1.145-6.317], p = 0.025), Gustilo-Anderson (GA) type III (OR = 6.120, 95%CI [1.995-18.767], p = 0.001), longer time to soft tissue cover (p = 0.006) were more likely to develop a superficial infection, and patients with wound contamination (OR = 3.152, 95%CI [1.079-9.207], p = 0.036), GA-3 (OR = 3.387,95%CI [1.103-10.405], p = 0.026), longer to soft tissue cover (p = 0.007) were more likely to develop osteomyelitis. Univariate analysis also determined that risk factors for superficial infection were: BMI > 35 (OR = 6.107, 95%CI [2.283-16.332], p = 0.003) and wound contamination (OR = 2.249, 95%CI [1.015-5.135], p = 0.047); whilst currently smoking (OR = 2.298, 95%CI [1.087-4.856], p = 0.025), polytrauma (OR = 3.212, 95%CI [1.556-6.629], p = 0.001), longer time to definitive fixation (p = 0.023) were for osteomyelitis. However, none of these reached significance in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Higher GA classification is a significant risk factor for developing superficial infection and osteomyelitis, with a stronger association with osteomyelitis, especially GA 3C fractures. Predictors for superficial infection included BMI and time to soft tissue closure. Time to definitive fixation, time to soft tissue closure, and wound contamination were associated with osteomyelitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Zhang
- Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsAddenbrooke’s Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SP UK
| | - Victor Lu
- Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsAddenbrooke’s Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SP UK
| | - Andrew Kailin Zhou
- Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsAddenbrooke’s Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SP UK
| | - Anna Stevenson
- Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsAddenbrooke’s Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SP UK
| | - Azeem Thahir
- Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsAddenbrooke’s Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matija Krkovic
- Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsAddenbrooke’s Major Trauma Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ganse B, Orth M, Roland M, Diebels S, Motzki P, Seelecke S, Kirsch SM, Welsch F, Andres A, Wickert K, Braun BJ, Pohlemann T. Concepts and clinical aspects of active implants for the treatment of bone fractures. Acta Biomater 2022; 146:1-9. [PMID: 35537678 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Nonunion is a complication of long bone fractures that leads to disability, morbidity and high costs. Early detection is difficult and treatment through external stimulation and revision surgery is often a lengthy process. Therefore, alternative diagnostic and therapeutic options are currently being explored, including the use of external and internal sensors. Apart from monitoring fracture stiffness and displacement directly at the fracture site, it would be desirable if an implant could also vary its stiffness and apply an intervention to promote healing, if needed. This could be achieved either by a predetermined protocol, by remote control, or even by processing data and triggering the intervention itself (self-regulated 'intelligent' or 'smart' implant). So-called active or smart materials like shape memory alloys (SMA) have opened up opportunities to build active implants. For example, implants could stimulate fracture healing by active shortening and lengthening via SMA actuator wires; by emitting pulses, waves, or electromagnetic fields. However, it remains undefined which modes of application, forces, frequencies, force directions, time durations and periods, or other stimuli such implants should ideally deliver for the best result. The present paper reviews the literature on active implants and interventions for nonunion, discusses possible mechanisms of active implants and points out where further research and development are needed to build an active implant that applies the most ideal intervention. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Early detection of delays during fracture healing and timely intervention are difficult due to limitations of the current diagnostic strategies. New diagnostic options are under evaluation, including the use of external and internal sensors. In addition, it would be desirable if an implant could actively facilitate healing ('Intelligent' or 'smart' implant). Implants could stimulate fracture healing via active shortening and lengthening; by emitting pulses, waves, or electromagnetic fields. No such implants exist to date, but new composite materials and alloys have opened up opportunities to build such active implants, and several groups across the globe are currently working on their development. The present paper is the first review on this topic to date.
Collapse
|
6
|
Reeh FM, Sachse S, Wedekind L, Hofmann GO, Lenz M. Nonunions and Their Operative Treatment. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:869-875. [PMID: 36352531 PMCID: PMC9989962 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonunions, which arise as a complication of fractures, are an impor - tant medical and socio-economic problem. The goal of this study was to analyze nonunions in Germany with respect to the patients' age and sex, the anatomical site of the lesions, and their operative treatment. METHODS The study was performed on the basis of DRG (diagnosis-related group) data acquired for billing purposes and collected by the German Federal Statistical Office. The administrative frequencies of nonunions and fractures treated in the inpatient setting, broken down by sex and age group, were calculated from the documentation of ICD codes. An investigation was also made of surgical treatments for nonunion, as they were categorized by the German procedure classification (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel, OPS). RESULTS The administrative frequency of nonunion was 14.84 per 100 000 persons per year, with a 2% decline in case numbers over the period 2007-2019. Nonunions develop in 2% of fractures. Nonunions affect men more often than women (58% vs. 42%). In men, their incidence as a function of age is highest under age 30; in women, it rises steadily with increasing age. The most common type of surgical treatment is a combination of resection, bone transplantation, and osteosynthesis. CONCLUSION This is the first detailed nationwide study of diagnoses of nonunions in Germany and their surgical treatment. Despite a slow decline in their incidence, nonunions remain an important problem in the inpatient setting. The risk profile for nonunions is sex-, age-, and site-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freya M Reeh
- Department for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, FriedrichSchiller University of Jena; Institute for Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, University Hospital of Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|