Prophylaxis for Heterotopic Ossification Following Distal Biceps Tendon Repair

A postoperative heterotopic ossification leading to radial palsy

We report the case of a 58-year-old man who developed radial palsy three months after surgical reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii through a single anterior approach. Radiographs and ultrasound examinations revealed heterotopic ossification compressing the deep branch of the radial nerve. Surgical excision and neurolysis were performed. At the two-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic. Practitioners and orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the risk of heterotopic ossification after distal biceps reinsertion and its possible atypical clinical presentation.

Heterotopic Ossification around the Elbow Revisited

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the process of ectopic bone formation in the periarticular soft tissues and is usually formed in the elbow, hip and knee joint as a complication of trauma, burns, brain injury or surgical procedures. The development of HO around the elbow joint can cause a severe limitation of range of motion (ROM) and may affect daily activities of the patient. Treatment of ectopic bone formation around the elbow is a challenge for many surgeons. Non-operative treatment usually fails to restore the ROM of the elbow joint; thus, surgery is necessary to restore the function of the joint. In the past, many surgeons suggested that a delayed excision of HO, until maturation of the ectopic bone, is the best option in order to avoid any possible recurrence. However, many authors now suggest that this delay may lead to complications such as muscular atrophy and formation of soft tissue contractures that can cause a greater impairment of elbow function; thus, early excision is a better option and can better restore the elbow ROM. We performed a literature research of articles that investigated which is the best time of HO excision and we also evaluated if the tethering effect of HO can lead to a greater impairment of the elbow function. We found numerous studies suggesting that a limitation in ROM of the elbow can appear from the tethering of the ectopic bone formation and not only from primary HO. Concerning the HO excision, there were no significant differences between patients who underwent delayed and early excision, concerning the recurrence rate of HO around the elbow. Patients who underwent early excision had better restoration of elbow ROM; thus, early excision, combined with a rehabilitation program, is reported to be the best option for these patients.

Prevalence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after distal biceps tendon repair

Complete distal biceps tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon. Conservative treatment may result in persistent pain and weakness. Therefore, surgical repair is usually indicated in order to restore strength. Different surgical techniques and fixation methods have been described. The most reported complications after surgery are iatrogenic nerve damage, heterotopic ossification (HO) and re-rupture. Heterotopic ossification can be variable in size. Significant HO can limit range of motion while minor HO often remains asymptomatic. The overall presence of HO is likely underreported in literature, as imaging is reserved for symptomatic patients. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after surgical repair of the distal biceps tendon. This retrospective study assessed the prevalence and clinical relevance of postoperative HO after distal biceps tendon repair. CT-scans were used to evaluate size and location of the HO. VAS scores, DASH scores, MEPI, and range of motion (ROM) were assessed to evaluate pain, patient satisfaction and elbow function. HO was observed on CT images of 19 out of 35 patients (54%). The use of interference screws, timing of surgery after rupture and timing of radiographic assessment postoperatively did not influence the prevalence of HO. The presence of HO had no statistically significant impact on the VAS scores, ROM measurements and MEPI and DASH scores. According to our findings, the overall incidence of HO is higher than previously reported but there are no differences in clinical outcomes when compared to patients without HO.

Primary repair of acute versus chronic ruptures of the distal biceps tendon. Comparison of functional results in a case-control study

BACKGROUND

In the event of a rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii, most authors recommend early reinsertion to recover optimal elbow function. However, these ruptures are not always diagnosed or promptly referred to surgeons, thus creating a delay in treatment. Studies reporting functional results in cases of chronic repair (greater than 21 days) of the distal biceps brachii tendon show an increased rate of complications.

HYPOTHESIS

Primary repairs of chronic ruptures (treatment delayed for more than 21 days) and acute ruptures of the distal biceps give the same functional results and the same rate of complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study between January 2017 and December 2021 comparing chronic primary repair of the distal biceps at the elbow (experimental group, comprising 75 patients) and acute (control group, comprising 135 patients) by endobutton. We analyzed the time between trauma and surgery, and assessed short- and long-term functional recovery by measuring residual pain (VAS), a collection of the following functional scores: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), as well as a measure of strength (as a percentage of the healthy side). We evaluated the rate of complications and radiographically analyzed the rate of heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

The mean time between trauma and surgery was 73±66 days (experimental group) versus 11.2±5 days (control group). In the short-term (4.79±2.09 months), there was no significant difference in the MEPS, Q-DASH and PREE functional scores between the two groups (p=0.354, p=0.412 and p=0.958, respectively). In the long-term (28.9±17.9 months), the functional evolution remained similar. The recovery of strength in flexion and supination was 89.19±13.43% and 77.48±16.68%, respectively, and similar in the two cohorts (p=0.476 and p=0.395). There was no difference in the rate of complications; however, the rate of heterotopic ossification was higher in the control group (p=0.006).

DISCUSSION

The functional results and the recovery of strength did not change according to the time until surgery. Although the overall complication rate was similar, repairs of the biceps in less than 21 days led to more heterotopic ossification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective case-control study.