Factors Associated With Loss to Follow-up During the First Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Missed Short-term Follow-up After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery: Analysis of Surgical and Demographic Factors

INTRODUCTION

Few current studies have examined loss to follow-up after rotator cuff-related shoulder arthroscopy. Understanding the demographic and surgical factors for missed follow-up would help identify patients most at risk and potentially mitigate the onset of complications while maximizing clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive rotator cuff arthroscopic procedures with a minimum of 12-month follow-up done by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon was undertaken from February 2016 through January 2022. Demographic patient and surgical data, including age, sex, marital status, self-identified race, and body mass index, were collected. Follow-up at ≤3, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months was determined. Patient-related and surgical predictors for missed short-term follow-up, defined as nonattendance at the 6 and 12-month postoperative visits, were identified.

RESULTS

There were 449 cases included, of which 248 (55%) were women. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51 to 62). Patients with commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.64; P < 0.001) or workers' compensation (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.43; P < 0.001) were less likely to miss the 6-month follow-up compared with patients with Medicare, whereas increased socioeconomic deprivation (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97, P = 0.015) was associated with decreased odds of missing that visit. Patients who missed the ≤3 weeks (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.74, P = 0.010) and 3-month (OR, 8.55; 95% CI, 4.33 to 16.86; P < 0.001) follow-ups were more likely to miss the 6-month follow-up. Use of a patient contact system (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87, P = 0.01) and increased number of preoperative visits (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99, P = 0.033) were associated with decreased odds of missing the 12-month follow-up. Patients who missed the 6-month follow-up were more likely to miss the 12-month follow-up (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 3.45 to 8.40; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Implementing an electronic patient contact system while increasing focus on patients with few preoperative visits and who miss the 6-month follow-up can reduce the risk of missed follow-up at 12 months after shoulder arthroscopy.

Challenging the Status Quo: Debunking the Necessity of 5-Year to 10-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

In the current shift toward value-based healthcare, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become essential to assess the effectiveness of medical interventions. However, elucidation of the optimal timeframe for PROMs evaluation remains crucial. This study aimed to (1) determine the proportion of patients who experienced clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs scores at each follow-up visit after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and (2) calculate and apply the clinical relevance ratio (CRR) for these long-term PROM collections postoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 12 independent studies reporting THA (n = 8 studies) and TKA (n = 4 studies) postoperative PROM data with up to 10 years of follow-up in Europe or the United States were aggregated. A distribution-based minimal clinically important difference threshold and CRR were used to determine which patients had clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs at 1, 5, and 10 years.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients who had clinically meaningful improvements in PROM scores stabilized after 1 year following both THA and TKA. Overall, the CRR decreased over time for all PROMs, with the CRR beginning to decrease at 1-year follow-up, bringing into question the robustness and clinical relevance of long-term PROMs data.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study challenges the utility of requiring PROMs with a minimum follow-up of 2 years for THA and TKA. Research efforts should be focused on registries evaluating implant survivorship at longer-term follow-up, while PROMs should be better assessed up to 1-year follow-up. Reconsidering the long-term PROMs assessment would lead to more efficient and cost-effective research in orthopedic outcomes, without compromising data quality.

Patient Adherence Following Knee Surgery: Evidence-Based Practices to Equip Patients for Success

Patient adherence with postoperative wound care, activity restrictions, rehabilitation, medication, and follow-up protocols is paramount to achieving optimal outcomes following knee surgery. However, the ability to adhere to prescribed postoperative protocols is dependent on multiple factors both in and out of the patient's control. The goals of this review article are (1) to outline key factors contributing to patient nonadherence with treatment protocols following knee surgery and (2) to synthesize current management strategies and tools for optimizing patient adherence in order to facilitate efficient and effective implementation by orthopaedic health care teams. Patient adherence is commonly impacted by both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors, including health literacy, social determinants of health, patient fear/stigma associated with nonadherence, surgical indication (elective vs. traumatic), and distrust of physicians or the health care system. In addition, health care team factors, such as poor communication strategies or failure to follow internal protocols, and health system factors, such as prior authorization delays, staffing shortages, or complex record management systems, impact patient's ability to be adherent. Because the majority of factors found to impact patient adherence are nonmodifiable, it is paramount that health care teams adjust to better equip patients for success. For health care teams to successfully optimize patient adherence, focus should be paid to education strategies, individualized protocols that consider patient enablers and barriers to adherence, and consistent communication methodologies for both team and patient-facing communication.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Missed Short-term Follow-up After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The importance of consistent postoperative follow-up has been established for collecting patient-reported outcomes and surveilling for potential complications. Despite this, the prevalence of and risk factors for missed short-term follow-up after elective shoulder arthroplasty remain limited.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty cases with a minimum of 12-month follow-up performed by a single, fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon was undertaken from January 2015 to December 2021. Demographic patient and surgical data, including age, sex, marital status, self-identified race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery and/or contralateral arthroplasty, distance from home to clinic, smoking status, and hospital length of stay, were collected. The follow-up at 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months and beyond was determined. Patient-related and surgical predictors for missing the 12-month and 24-month follow-up were identified.

RESULTS

There were 295 cases included (168 aTSA and 127 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty), of whom 199 (67%) were women. Of the total cases, 261 (86%) were eligible for 24-month follow-up. Patients undergoing aTSA, those of younger age, those of male sex, and those who missed their 6-week and 6-month follow-up were significantly more likely to miss the 12-month follow-up visit. Following multivariable analysis, a missed 6-month follow-up (OR 10.10, 95% CI 5.32 to 19.16, P < 0.001) was associated with 12-month visit nonattendance, and increasing age (per year) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.99, P = 0.011) was associated with improved 12-month follow-up. Not having a surgical complication within 6 months postoperatively, not undergoing ipsilateral revision arthroplasty, and missing the 1-week and 12-month follow-up were significantly associated with missing the 24-month follow-up. After multivariable analysis, missing the 1-week (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.12 to 8.41, P = 0.029) and 12-month (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.11 to 6.99, P < 0.001) follow-ups was associated with missing the 24-month visit, whereas having a postoperative complication was associated with increased attendance at 24 months (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.99, P = 0.047).

DISCUSSION

Strategies for preventing missed short-term follow-up should be focused on ensuring that patients undergoing TSA attend the 6-month and 12-month visit, particularly among younger patients and those with an uneventful postoperative course.