Visual manifestations of craniofrontonasal dysplasia

Craniofrontonasal dysplasia: hypertelorism correction in late presenting patients

BACKGROUND

Craniofrontonasal dysplasia (CFND) is a rare congenital craniofacial syndrome characterized by single suture synostosis, hypertelorism, other clinical facial features, and abnormalities in the upper extremities. There are only a few studies in the applicable literature that address hypertelorism management for CFND patients and outcomes and complication rates.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on consecutive late presenting CFND patients referred to our hospital with substantially completed craniofacial skeleton growth, who underwent hypertelorism correction between 2007 and 2019 following intracranial pressure screening, and who received at least 1 year of follow-up care. None of the patients in this study underwent prior craniofacial surgery. Only those patients with a confirmed mutation of the EFNB1 gene were included in this study. All patients in this study underwent hypertelorism correction by facial bipartition or box osteotomy.

RESULTS

A total of ten late presenting CFND patients (all female) were treated at our hospital during the study period. None of the patients presented signs of elevated intracranial pressure. The average patient age at hypertelorism correction was 13.4 ± 7.68 years of age. Major complications, defined as complications requiring a return to the operating room, were limited to infection of the frontal bone, which required partial bone removal, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, which was completely resolved by insertion of a lumbar shunt for a 7-day period.

CONCLUSION

The absence of elevated intracranial pressure enables hypertelorism correction in late presenting CFND patients via facial bipartition or box osteotomy without the need for additional operations that provide for cranial expansion.

Strabismus in craniosynostosis

Strabismus is common in craniosynostosis, with rates from 39% to 90.9% in Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes. This article reviews the epidemiology of strabismus in these disorders and discusses competing theories of the mechanism, including absent muscles, excyclorotation of muscles, and instability of muscle pulleys. The authors then review options for surgical treatment of the often complex ocular misalignment in these disorders.

Need for standard outcome reporting systems in craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. When a cranial suture fuses prematurely, skull growth is altered and the head takes on a characteristic pathological shape determined by the suture(s) that fuses. Numerous treatment options have been proposed, but until recently there were no parameters or guidelines of care. Establishing such parameters was an important step forward in the treatment of patients with craniosynostosis, but results are still assessed using radiographic measurements, complication rates, and ad hoc reporting scales. Therefore, clinical outcome reporting in the treatment of craniosynostosis is inconsistent and lacks methodological rigor.

Today, most reported evidence in the treatment of craniosynostosis is level 5 (expert opinion) or level 4 (case series) data. Challenges in obtaining higher quality level 1 or level 2 data include randomizing patients in a clinical trial as well as selecting the appropriate outcome measure for the trial. Therefore, determining core outcome sets that are important to both patients and health care professionals is an essential step in the evolution of caring for patients with craniosynostosis.

Traditional clinical outcomes will remain important, but patient-reported outcomes, such as satisfaction, body image, functional results, and aesthetic outcomes, must also be incorporated if the selected outcomes are to be valuable to patients and families making decisions about treatment. In this article, the authors review the most commonly used tools to assess craniosynostosis outcomes and propose a list of longitudinal parameters of care that should be considered in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment evaluation of a patient with craniosynostosis.