Linear–long incisions with a small optical zone for the correction of astigmatism in older patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of astigmatic keratotomy (AK) by paired linear (transverse)-long incisions within a small optical zone in older patients with 3.00 diopters (D) or more of astigmatism who are intolerant of contact lenses, spectacles, or both.

DESIGN

Prospective, noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one eyes (20 patients; age range, 58-87 years) treated at clinics of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital were included in this study.

METHODS

Paired linear incisions (90 degrees in length) with a central optical zone (OZ) of 4.5 mm were made to correct high astigmatism in older patients. The incisions were 80% of the corneal thickness and parallel to the axis of the steepest cylinder.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Refraction, keratometry, corneal topography, and visual acuity with and without correction were measured as the outcome indicators.

RESULTS

The mean course of the stabilization of corneal curvature was 1.8 months. Significant improvement from a preoperative corneal astigmatism of 4.52+/-1.39 D to a postoperative value of 1.82+/-0.88 D (P<0.0001) was shown. Marked axis deviations of more than 30 degrees were observed in 5 cases and corneal perforation was observed in 1 case. When the corneal curvature stabilized, uncorrected visual acuity was improved by 2 lines or more in 15 eyes (71.4%). Spherical equivalents and best-corrected visual acuity did not change significantly. Postoperative glare was absent in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that AK by linear-long incisions extending from a small OZ is effective and safe for correcting astigmatism.

Effect of astigmatic keratotomy on spherical equivalent: results of the Astigmatism Reduction Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of astigmatic keratotomy on spherical equivalent, as measured by the coupling ratio and a new quantity, coupling constant.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, subjects underwent arcuate keratotomy at a 7-mm optical zone by means of the Lindstrom nomogram for correction of astigmatism. One hundred fifty-seven eyes of 95 patients who had a follow-up examination 1 month postoperatively were studied. Mean preoperative refractive cylinder +/- SEM was 2.82 +/- 1.17 diopters. Coupling ratio was defined as the ratio of the flattening of the incised meridian to the steepening of the opposite meridian. Coupling constant was defined as the ratio of the change in spherical equivalent to the magnitude of the vector change in astigmatism. Coupling ratio, coupling constant, and change in spherical equivalent were calculated on the basis of change in refraction and keratometry.

RESULTS

On the basis of change in refraction, coupling ratio was 0.95 +/- 0.10 (mean +/- SEM) and coupling constant was -0.01 +/- 0.03, consistent with a minor shift in the spherical equivalent of -0.03 +/- 0.07 diopter. On the basis of change in keratometry, coupling ratio was 0.84 +/- 0.05 and coupling constant was -0.04 +/- 0.02, consistent with minor postoperative keratometric steepening of -0.10 +/- 0.04 diopter. Coupling ratio based on change in refraction was not statistically different from the coupling ratio predicted by the Gauss' law for inelastic domes (P = .370). Incision length and number, amount of achieved cylinder correction, age, and sex had no statistically significant effect on coupling ratio, coupling constant, and change in spherical equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

Cornea behaved as an inelastic surface in response to arcuate keratotomy performed with the Astigmatism Reduction Clinical Trial study nomogram. On average, astigmatic keratotomy had a minimal effect on spherical equivalent refraction. There was variability, however, in coupling ratio, coupling constant, and change in spherical equivalent from eye to eye after astigmatic keratotomy. Caution is therefore advised when simultaneous correction of cylinder and spherical equivalent is planned.

Analysis of astigmatic keratotomy with a 5.0-mm optical clear zone

PURPOSE

To investigate the surgically induced refractive change after astigmatic keratotomy with a 5.0-mm optical clear zone in patients with severe naturally occurring astigmatism.

METHODS

We analyzed surgically induced refractive change in 40 consecutive eyes undergoing astigmatic keratotomy with a 5.0-mm optical clear zone. The surgically induced refractive change was calculated according to the method of Holladay, Cravy, and Koch with some modifications. Eyes were divided into two groups: Group I included eyes with mixed astigmatism and a maximum preoperative spherical equivalent of +1.25 diopters that underwent arcuate keratotomy, and Group II included eyes with compound myopic or simple myopic astigmatism (maximum preoperative spherical equivalent of -3.00 diopters) or mixed astigmatism with low minus spherical equivalent that underwent four-incision radial keratotomy and arcuate keratotomy.

RESULTS

After refractive surgery, all eyes experienced a reduction of astigmatism when examined three months or more after surgery. Only one eye from each group was overcorrected. The magnitude of refractive astigmatism of surgically induced refractive change was 3.25 +/- 0.90 diopters for eyes in Group I and 3.25 +/- 0.80 diopters for eyes in Group II. There was minimal axis deviation. Eyes in Group I had more flattening with the wound than steepening against the wound, with a coupling ratio of -0.86 +/- 0.36, whereas in Group II, there was flattening both with the wound and against the wound. The net effect of surgery (sum of the primary and secondary effects) was more flattening than steepening in Group I eyes, and flattening of the circumference of the eye in Group II. A decrease of one line of best-corrected visual acuity was observed in one (6.6%) of 15 eyes in Group I and in two (8%) of 25 eyes in Group II.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5.0-mm optical clear zone arcuate keratotomy is an effective method for correcting moderate to severe naturally occurring astigmatism. Further investigation of this optical clear zone size on glare and contrast sensitivity testing is necessary and is underway.