Attitudes of Successful Contact Lens Wearers Toward Refractive Surgery

The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: Evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling

The psychometric properties of the Refractive Status and Vision Profile (RSVP) questionnaire were evaluated using Rasch analysis. Ninety-one myopic patients from a refractive surgery clinic and general optometric practice completed the RSVP. Rasch analysis of the RSVP ordinal data was performed to examine for unidimensionality and item reduction. The traditional Likert-scoring system was compared with a Rasch-scored RSVP and a reduced item Rasch-scored RSVP. Rasch analysis of the original RSVP showed poor targeting of item difficulty to patient quality of life, items with a ceiling effect and underutilized response categories. Combining the underutilized response scales and removal of redundant and misfitting items improved the internal consistency and targeting of the RSVP, and the reduced 20-item Rasch scored RSVP showed greater relative precision over standard Likert scoring in discriminating between the two subject groups. A Rasch scaled quality of life questionnaire is recommended for use in refractive outcomes research.

Factors influencing patient choice of refractive surgery or contact lenses and choice of centre

PURPOSE

To explore patient demographics and motivations in choosing refractive surgery (RS) or contact lenses (CL) and factors influencing their choice of practice.

METHODS

A questionnaire was presented to 212 RS and 115 CL patients at four RS centres and three CL centres, respectively. The authors, with consent from the clinics and patients, collected all data. No patient or clinic refused to participate in the study.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between RS and CL groups for gender (p = 0.28), although in both groups more females presented than males. The mean age of RS patients was 39.2 +/- 10.6 years and for CL patients was 32.0 +/- 12.4 years (p < 0.0001). The occupational differences between RS and CL patients were found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Primary motivations for RS or CL were cosmesis and inconvenience of CL and spectacles. The main reason why RS patients did not choose CL was due to the inconvenience; there was little difference in this whether patients had previously worn CL or not. CL patients did not choose refractive surgery due to lack of information and apprehension. RS and CL patients selected their respective centres primarily due to reputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive surgery appears increasingly to be a lifestyle choice, possibly based on perceptions and psychological aspects that need to be investigated. The popularity of cosmesis as a highly popular factor for RS and CL patients, together with a few patients citing minor contact lens complications suggests that contact lens clinicians may be able to hold onto patients through better management.

Changes in quality of life after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

PURPOSE

To measure quality of life (QoL) outcome in prepresbyopic myopic patients having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) refractive surgery using the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire and to compare the QoL of preoperative patients with a sample of spectacle and contact lens wearers not considering refractive surgery.

SETTING

Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, and Ultralase, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

METHODS

The validated QIRC questionnaire was prospectively completed by 66 patients before and 3 months after LASIK. Patients had myopia greater than 0.50 diopters (D) (range --0.75 to --10.50 D) and were aged 16 to 39 years. Patients were also directly asked to evaluate their QoL after surgery.

RESULTS

Overall QIRC scores improved after LASIK from a mean of 40.07+/- 4.30 (SD) to 53.09+/- 5.25 (F(1,130)=172.65, P<.001). Greater improvements occurred in women (53.83+/- 5.46) than in men (49.39+/- 5.94; F(1,64)=9.37, P<.005). Overall, 15 of the 20 questions (especially convenience, health concerns, and well-being questions) showed significantly improved scores (P<.05). Patients who "strongly agreed" (53.96+/- 4.91, n=33) or "agreed" (51.78+/- 6.19, n=23) had improved QoL and had significantly higher QIRC scores than those who "neither agreed nor disagreed" (44.36+/- 4.97, n=5) or "strongly disagreed" (42.82, n=1) (F(1,60)=11.24, P<.001). The matched group not contemplating LASIK scored 42.41 +/- 3.89 on QIRC overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Large improvements in QIRC QoL scores were found after LASIK for myopia in the majority of patients, with greater improvements in women. A small number of patients (4.5%) had decreased QIRC QoL scores, and these were associated with complications. People presenting for LASIK scored measurably poorer than matched patients not contemplating refractive surgery.

Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to review the literature and find characteristics that lead to improved patient satisfaction and better quality of vision.

RECENT FINDINGS

Flatter preoperative corneal curvature is a risk factor for starbursts after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Pupil size has not been found to be correlated with night vision symptoms. Wavefront-guided ablations reduce higher-order aberrations in comparison with traditional LASIK. Night vision symptoms are correlated with younger age, greater correction/increased ablation depth, enhancement, and decreased ablation diameter. Contrast sensitivity has been found to initially decrease after LASIK, returning to baseline 6 to 12 months postoperatively.

SUMMARY

LASIK has quickly become the refractive procedure of choice around the world. Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK can be difficult to assess because of the many variables that must be considered to accurately measure these endpoints. Preoperative characteristics such as: increased patient age, decreased corneal toricity, or increased pupil size reduce patient satisfaction. Intraoperative factors like decentration, ablation-zone size, active eye tracking, and wavefront guided ablations affect quality of vision. Finally, postoperative factors such as night vision symptoms, reduced contrast sensitivity, and re-treatment can lead to a decline in patient satisfaction. Eliminating or limiting these variables may lead to increased patient satisfaction and higher quality of vision after LASIK.

An Informal Satisfaction Survey of 200 Patients After Laser in situ Keratomileusis

PURPOSE

Patient satisfaction following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly reported as high. This paper reviews the outcome of LASIK both in terms of visual results and satisfaction.

METHODS

Two-hundred patients were surveyed telephonically to establish their degree of satisfaction with LASIK and to enquire about postoperative use of glasses, and symptoms of light sensitivity and of night vision problems. Patient anonymity was assured.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (95%) never wore distance glasses after LASIK. Reading glasses were used by 49 (24.5%), related to age and presbyopia. Light sensitivity was not a problem or was unchanged from baseline in 73% of patients; 27% said they were worse; a few (5.5%) said their symptoms were better. Night vision was not a problem or was unchanged from baseline in 76% of patients; 24% said they were worse; 17% said their symptoms were better. One hundred ninety-five patients (97.5%) were extremely happy with their results and 197 (98.5%) would have the procedure again.

CONCLUSION

After LASIK, 95% of 200 patients wore no distance optical correction; 99% would have the procedure again; and light sensitivity and night vision problems bothered a significant number of patients.

Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia

PURPOSE

To identify factors that motivate patients to seek laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment for myopia and establish subjective levels of functional improvement and satisfaction across a range of indices after LASIK surgery.

SETTING

The Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.

METHODS

In this questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study, an anonymous 34-item questionnaire was forwarded to 50 consecutive patients in a prospective study who had had LASIK for high myopia by a single surgeon at a single center. The questionnaire used visual analog scales, anchored at each end by an adjectival descriptor. The mean preoperative myopia was -10.7 diopters +/- 4.4 (SD). Seventy-six percent of eyes (83% of patients) achieved post-LASIK uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 6/12 or better; 1 eye lost 2 lines of corrected Snellen visual acuity.

RESULTS

A 98% reply rate was achieved. The most common motivating factor for pursuing LASIK was to improve UCVA (88%); only 21% rated improved cosmesis as an important motive. Most patients (81% to 100%) reported functional improvement across the spectrum of visual tasks assessed, although 8.8% reported difficulty with nighttime driving. Ninety-six percent felt their UCVA was as good as anticipated, 97.9% were satisfied with the speed of visual improvement, 93.8% achieved the goals for which they had surgery, 97.9% reported an improved quality of life, and 97.9% were satisfied with the overall outcome of LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an anonymous, wide-ranging questionnaire, high levels of functional improvement and satisfaction with the speed of visual recovery and outcome were reported by patients after LASIK for high myopia. Nighttime driving symptoms of variable severity were, however, noted by 8.8% of patients, despite high levels of satisfaction with other aspects of visual function.

Patient expectations and recollection of information about photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the expectations of surgical result and recollection of a standardized information briefing by patients having photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lübeck, Germany.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients were asked to complete a multiple-choice questionnaire immediately after standardized information briefings and 1 month after PRK to establish their comprehension of the information briefing, what they remembered of it, and what they expected from the refractive procedure.

RESULTS

Although the estimated intelligence quotient of the patients was above average (115 +/- 7.23) and almost all rated the information briefings as being comprehensible, only simple, basic facts about PRK were remembered immediately after the briefing as well as 1 month postoperatively. Of 12 possible undesired consequences, 6.4 were remembered before surgery and 3.9 after surgery. The latter were mainly side effects the patients experienced themselves.

CONCLUSION

As most patients rejected the possibility of serious complications, for medicolegal reasons, careful, accurate documentation of the contents of and patients' satisfaction with the information briefing is necessary.

Corneal Optical Aberrations Induced by Photorefractive Keratectomy

BACKGROUND

Photorefractive keratectomy causes marked alteration to anterior corneal topography, and is likely to induce major changes to the optical aberrations of the eye.

METHODS

Six diopters (D) of myopia correction was attempted on one eye of 50 patients, randomly allocated to one of three different treatments: 5-mm or 6-mm single ablation zone, or a double ablation (multizone; -5.00 D correction over 4.6 mm and -1.00 D over 6 mm). Topographic data was used to estimate corneal aberration coefficients. These were compared for effect of ablation zone, before and 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy. The coefficients were used to derive modulation transfer functions for the anterior corneal surface.

RESULTS

Corneal spherical aberrations and coma-like aberrations both increased significantly following photorefractive keratectomy (p < 0.001). The mean spherical aberration coefficient increased from 0.36 +/- 0.11 before, to 0.91 +/- 0.37 after treatment, while the mean coma-like aberration coefficient changed from 0.28 +/- 0.16 before, to 0.60 +/- 0.31 after treatment. Ablation zone form had a significant effect on spherical aberration (p = 0.030), but not for coma (p = 0.96). The spherical aberration coefficient increased least for the 6-mm ablation (by 0.38 +/- 0.17), compared with the 5-mm ablation (0.69 +/- 0.45) and the multizone (0.62 +/- 0.38). Corneal modulation transfer functions were reduced significantly following the photorefractive procedure. The effect was greatest for large pupil diameters and for spatial frequencies between 2 and 15 cycles per degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal modulation transfer function calculations suggest that a significant loss of visual performance should be anticipated following photorefractive keratectomy, the effect being greatest for large pupil diameters. Results for three ablation zones show that induced aberrations are least for the largest (6 mm) ablation zone.