Screening for Psychiatric Distress and Low Self-esteem in Patients Presenting for Excimer Laser Surgery for Myopia

Refractive outcomes using Barrett formulas and patient characteristics of cataract surgery patients with and without prior LASIK/PRK

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to describe characteristics of cataract surgery patients who previously underwent laser in situ keratomileusis/photorefractive keratectomy (LASIK/PRK) in comparison to non-LASIK/PRK cataract surgery patients including psychiatric comorbidities, as well as describe refractive prediction error after cataract surgery while accounting for axial length (AL) using the Barrett True-K and Barrett Universal II formulas.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients from the University of Colorado Cataract Outcomes Registry. The primary outcomes were refraction prediction error (RPE), mean absolute RPE, and median absolute RPE. Outcomes were stratified by five axial length groups. Univariate and multivariate models for RPE were stratified by the AL group.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-one eyes with prior LASIK/PRK and 3101 eyes without are included in the study. Patients with prior LASIK/PRK were significantly younger: 67.0 vs 69.9 years, p < 0.0001. The LASIK/PRK group had significantly better mean pre-operative BCVA in comparison to the non-LASIK group, logMAR 0.204 vs logMAR 0.288, p = 0.003. The LASIK/PRK group had significantly lower rates of cardiovascular disease (18.5% vs 29.3%, p < 0.001), hypertension (49.1% vs 59.3%, p < 0.012), and type 2 diabetes (10.7% vs 26.0%, p < 0.001), and no significant difference in psychiatric disease. The absolute RPE was higher for the LASIK group for all ALs, but only significantly higher for eyes with AL less than 25 mm.

CONCLUSION

Patient eyes with prior LASIK/PRK surgery undergoing cataract surgery were significantly younger, had significantly less comorbidities, and a significantly better pre-operative BCVA. Using the Barrett formulas, absolute prediction error for eyes with longer ALs was not significantly worse for LASIK/PRK eyes than those without and the difference was smaller for eyes with longer AL.

IMI Impact of Myopia

The global burden of myopia is growing. Myopia affected nearly 30% of the world population in 2020 and this number is expected to rise to 50% by 2050. This review aims to analyze the impact of myopia on individuals and society; summarizing the evidence for recent research on the prevalence of myopia and high myopia, lifetime pathological manifestations of myopia, direct health expenditure, and indirect costs such as lost productivity and reduced quality of life (QOL). The principal trends are a rising prevalence of myopia and high myopia, with a disproportionately greater increase in the prevalence of high myopia. This forecasts a future increase in vision loss due to uncorrected myopia as well as high myopia-related complications such as myopic macular degeneration. QOL is affected for those with uncorrected myopia, high myopia, or complications of high myopia. Overall the current global cost estimates related to direct health expenditure and lost productivity are in the billions. Health expenditure is greater in adults, reflecting the added costs due to myopia-related complications. Unless the current trajectory for the rising prevalence of myopia and high myopia change, the costs will continue to grow. The past few decades have seen the emergence of several novel approaches to prevent and slow myopia. Further work is needed to understand the life-long impact of myopia on an individual and the cost-effectiveness of the various novel approaches in reducing the burden.

Patient-reported Outcomes for Assessment of Quality of Life in Refractive Error: A Systematic Review

SIGNIFICANCE

This review has identified the best existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in refractive error. The article highlights the limitations of the existing instruments and discusses the way forward.

PURPOSE

A systematic review was conducted to identify the types of PROs used in refractive error, to determine the quality of the existing PRO instruments in terms of their psychometric properties, and to determine the limitations in the content of the existing PRO instruments.

METHODS

Articles describing a PRO instrument measuring 1 or more domains of quality of life in people with refractive error were identified by electronic searches on the MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The information on content development, psychometric properties, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of those PRO instruments was extracted from the selected articles. The analysis was done based on a comprehensive set of assessment criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight articles describing 47 PRO instruments in refractive error were included in the review. Most of the articles (99 [66.9%]) used refractive error-specific PRO instruments. The PRO instruments comprised 19 refractive, 12 vision but nonrefractive, and 16 generic PRO instruments. Only 17 PRO instruments were validated in refractive error populations; six of them were developed using Rasch analysis. None of the PRO instruments has items across all domains of quality of life. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction, the Quality of Vision, and the Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life have comparatively better quality with some limitations, compared with the other PRO instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

This review describes the PRO instruments and informs the choice of an appropriate measure in refractive error. We identified need of a comprehensive and scientifically robust refractive error-specific PRO instrument. Item banking and computer-adaptive testing system can be the way to provide such an instrument.

What do kids think about kids in eyeglasses?

PURPOSE

Previous studies have examined how people feel about others who wear glasses, but no studies of children have been published on the subject. We conducted the Children's Attitudes about Kids in Eyeglasses (CAKE) study to determine how children feel about other children who wear glasses.

METHODS

Subjects compared a series of 24 picture pairs and answered six questions regarding which child ...he or she would rather play with, looks better at playing sports, appears smarter (more intelligent), appears nicer, looks more shy and looks more honest. The children in each pair of pictures differed by gender, ethnicity and spectacle wear. Logistic regression was performed to determine the probability and confidence interval that a subject would pick a particular child.

RESULTS

Eighty subjects between the ages of 6 and 10 years participated. The average (+/-SD) age of the subjects was 8.3 +/- 1.3 years, 42 (53%) were females, 51 (64%) were whites, 21 (26%) were blacks, and 30 (38%) wore glasses. The spectacle wearer appeared smarter (0.66, CI = 0.60-0.71) and more honest (0.57, CI = 0.50-0.64), and children who wore glasses looked smarter regardless of whether the child picking wore glasses. Both boys (0.66, CI = 0.68-0.79) and girls (0.77, CI = 0.71-0.82) thought that boys looked better at playing sports.

DISCUSSION

The old adage 'Boys never make passes at lasses who wear glasses' may be outmoded, but glasses may tend to make children look smarter and slightly more honest to their peers.

Factors influencing patient choice of refractive surgery or contact lenses and choice of centre

PURPOSE

To explore patient demographics and motivations in choosing refractive surgery (RS) or contact lenses (CL) and factors influencing their choice of practice.

METHODS

A questionnaire was presented to 212 RS and 115 CL patients at four RS centres and three CL centres, respectively. The authors, with consent from the clinics and patients, collected all data. No patient or clinic refused to participate in the study.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between RS and CL groups for gender (p = 0.28), although in both groups more females presented than males. The mean age of RS patients was 39.2 +/- 10.6 years and for CL patients was 32.0 +/- 12.4 years (p < 0.0001). The occupational differences between RS and CL patients were found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Primary motivations for RS or CL were cosmesis and inconvenience of CL and spectacles. The main reason why RS patients did not choose CL was due to the inconvenience; there was little difference in this whether patients had previously worn CL or not. CL patients did not choose refractive surgery due to lack of information and apprehension. RS and CL patients selected their respective centres primarily due to reputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive surgery appears increasingly to be a lifestyle choice, possibly based on perceptions and psychological aspects that need to be investigated. The popularity of cosmesis as a highly popular factor for RS and CL patients, together with a few patients citing minor contact lens complications suggests that contact lens clinicians may be able to hold onto patients through better management.

Defining the content of patient questionnaires: reasons for seeking laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

PURPOSE

To determine the relative importance of patients' motives for having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

SETTING

The Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.

METHODS

Twenty-one cards printed with potential reasons for having LASIK and 3 blank cards for respondents to include additional motives were posted to 71 patients who had myopic LASIK. The cards were ranked by each respondent in order of personal importance and returned for analysis.

RESULTS

The response rate was 77.5%. The mean age of the 19 male and 37 female respondents was 41.7 years +/- 9.3 (SD) and the mean preoperative spherical equivalent, -9.26 +/- 4.58 diopters. The primary reasons for seeking treatment (percentage of respondents ranking topic within the top 5) were improvement of unaided social vision (69.1%), intolerance to spectacles/contact lenses (65.5%), and freedom from spectacles/contact lenses (61.8%). Almost 70% of respondents ranked 1 of these reasons as the most important. General inconvenience of spectacles/contact lenses and the desire to pursue sports and leisure activities also ranked high (52.7% and 36.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous work, better unaided vision, combined with the inconvenience of or intolerance to spectacles or contact lenses, provided the main incentives to have LASIK for myopia, while improved cosmesis was relatively unimportant (29.1%). The results of this study will allow the design of satisfaction questionnaires that are better directed toward establishing satisfaction of specific, relevant functional and psychological aspects of refractive surgery that are important to patients.

An optometrist's personal perspective of aspects of refractive surgery

The latter part of the last century has seen significant evolution in the area of refractive surgery, such that is has become a viable alternative to contact lenses, or spectacles, for an increasing number of patients. The developments of the principal techniques, in this ever-expanding field, are reviewed, and the increasing rôle of the optometrist in the pre-, intra- and post-operative management of the refractive surgery patient is described, based upon the author's personal experience within a non-profit, refractive surgery setting. In addition to highlighting pertinent features of the objective evaluation of patients, the importance of subjective assessment, pre- and postoperatively, is discussed, in terms of maximising post-surgery patient satisfaction. The scope for future research in this dynamic area is also considered.

Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 1: development and validation of a survey questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a valid, reliable, and easy-to-administer instrument to assess patient satisfaction and perceived outcome after bilateral excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

DESIGN

Development and validation of a psychometric questionnaire.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients who underwent bilateral excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy from May 1994 through May 1997 by 12 surgeons from four collaborating centers. To be eligible, a minimum of 4 months since the last surgery and a maximum of 30 months since the first surgery was required.

METHODS

The new instrument was derived in part from the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study 10-year psychometric questionnaire and the Visual Functional Index (VF-14), an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Questions were grouped in seven scales, each covering a specific aspect of quality of vision. These included global satisfaction, quality of uncorrected vision, quality of corrected vision, quality of night vision, glare, daytime driving, and night driving.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Acceptability, reliability, validity, and interpretability of the instrument, as well as its ease of administration.

RESULTS

The instrument scale structure was examined and scale scores were created. Item-discriminant validity ensured that questions belonged to their hypothesized scale, based on multitrait correlation analysis. The instrument was shown to be reliable by a high level of internal consistency, and all Cronbach's alpha coefficients were superior or equal to 0.83. Construct-related validity and interpretability were assessed based on correlations between scale scores and clinically recognized success criteria such as visual acuity and refraction. Respondent burden was shown to be minimal. Acceptability of the instrument was shown to be very good, with a participation rate of 74.3% (690 of 929 patients). The instrument is available in English and in French and the translation was shown to be reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

The acceptability, reliability, and interpretability of the instrument, as well as its ease of administration, were shown to be adequate. This questionnaire appears clinically useful to document patient satisfaction after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia

PURPOSE

To identify factors that motivate patients to seek laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment for myopia and establish subjective levels of functional improvement and satisfaction across a range of indices after LASIK surgery.

SETTING

The Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.

METHODS

In this questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study, an anonymous 34-item questionnaire was forwarded to 50 consecutive patients in a prospective study who had had LASIK for high myopia by a single surgeon at a single center. The questionnaire used visual analog scales, anchored at each end by an adjectival descriptor. The mean preoperative myopia was -10.7 diopters +/- 4.4 (SD). Seventy-six percent of eyes (83% of patients) achieved post-LASIK uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 6/12 or better; 1 eye lost 2 lines of corrected Snellen visual acuity.

RESULTS

A 98% reply rate was achieved. The most common motivating factor for pursuing LASIK was to improve UCVA (88%); only 21% rated improved cosmesis as an important motive. Most patients (81% to 100%) reported functional improvement across the spectrum of visual tasks assessed, although 8.8% reported difficulty with nighttime driving. Ninety-six percent felt their UCVA was as good as anticipated, 97.9% were satisfied with the speed of visual improvement, 93.8% achieved the goals for which they had surgery, 97.9% reported an improved quality of life, and 97.9% were satisfied with the overall outcome of LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an anonymous, wide-ranging questionnaire, high levels of functional improvement and satisfaction with the speed of visual recovery and outcome were reported by patients after LASIK for high myopia. Nighttime driving symptoms of variable severity were, however, noted by 8.8% of patients, despite high levels of satisfaction with other aspects of visual function.

Factors that influence patient choice of an excimer laser treatment center

PURPOSE

To identify the factors that most influenced patient choice of an excimer laser treatment center and those most likely to deter patients from selecting a particular center.

SETTING

A National Health Service (NHS) excimer laser unit in the northeast of England.

METHODS

An anonymous 24-item questionnaire was constructed. Each question had a visual analogue scale, anchored at each end with an adjectival description. Patients were asked to mark their response to the related question on the scale. Using the database of over 300 patients treated by excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) at Sunderland Eye infirmary between May 1993 and December 1995, the first 140 consecutive patients were identified. Questionnaires were sent to them and returned between August 1 and October 31, 1995.

RESULTS

A 64.3% reply rate (90 patients) was achieved. Overall, the results suggest that patients considered many factors to be important in their selection of a treatment center for PRK correction of myopia. Over 95% said that treatment and review by a consultant ophthalmologist, comprehensive follow-up appointments, professional attitude by staff, and reputation of the hospital were important factors in their selection of the center. Ninety to 95% said confidence in the clinical reputation and skills of the ophthalmic surgeons performing the treatment was important, as was having follow-up by only one or two staff members. Slightly more than 50% said that being treated in an NHS hospital setting (51.7%) or that expense of the treatment (50.5%) were important factors in their decision.

CONCLUSION

Patients who chose to have excimer laser PRK based their choice of a unit on reputation of the staff and hospital but also on having care and follow-up by a consultant ophthalmic surgeon, high standards of equipment, continuity of care, and a comprehensive review system backed up by ready accessibility to staff members. Although proximity of a unit was important, cost appeared less important than the other factors.