Comparison of 18% Ethanol and Mechanical Debridement for Epithelial Removal Before Photorefractive Keratectomy

The Effectiveness of Corneal Epithelial Debridement Performed with an Alcohol-Impregnated Sponge

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent corneal surgery with debridement of epithelium by localised application of an alcohol-impregnated sponge instead of the usual alcohol reservoir method.

DESIGN

This study retrospectively included 52 eyes of 27 patients who underwent LASEK (laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy) and CXL (cross-linking) surgery after application of this alcohol-assisted debridement method between January 2019 and April 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four patients who underwent LASEK and three patients who underwent CXL surgery were included in this study, which comprised a total of 52 eye operations.

METHODS

Epithelial debridement was performed after placing a 20% ethanol-impregnated sponge on the cornea for 20 seconds.

RESULTS

The mean pachymetry value was 509.40 ± 30.37 µm, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent was - 2.14 ± 1.02 dioptres, and the highest myopia and astigmatism values were - 4.25 dioptres and - 2.75 dioptres, respectively. It was seen that the corneal epithelium was completely and easily debrided in a size identical to that of the applied sponge.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete debridement of the corneal epithelium can be performed quickly, safely, and easily with this specially prepared sponge.

Surface ablation techniques

The ongoing quest for a safe, simple, effective, minimally invasive, and stable refractive surgical procedure to correct refractive errors has stimulated the development of surface ablation techniques and laser in situ keratomileusis. In this review, we describe the history, patient assessment, techniques, outcomes, and complications of surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy, laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy, epithelial laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) and compare the results of various surface techniques. Surface ablation procedures will continue to evolve, with potential improvements in outcomes accompanying future sophisticated ablation profiles and laser technology.

Efficacy of surface ablation retreatments using mitomycin C

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual and refractive results and the incidence of complications after laser subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) enhancement using mitomycin C (MMC) after a previous LASEK procedure with MMC.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

METHODS

Setting was Vissum Santa Hortensia, Madrid, Spain. We performed a retrospective study of LASEK-treated eyes that received intraoperative MMC for 30 seconds and that needed an enhancement procedure. LASEK retreatment with MMC 0.02%, applied for 60 seconds, was performed 3 to 6 months after the initial surgery. We measured the visual and refractive results 3 months after the enhancement and the incidence of complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-two eyes were included in the study. The preoperative data were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) 1.08 +/- 0.19, sphere -4.68 +/- 2.8 diopters (D), and cylinder -1.30 +/- 1.20 D. Three to 6 months postoperatively, before enhancement, the uncorrected VA (UCVA) was 0.59 +/- 0.2; the BSCVA, 0.976 +/- 0.2; the residual sphere, +0.17 +/- 0.7 D, and the cylinder, -0.39 +/- 0.5 D. Three months after retreatment, the UCVA was 0.93 +/- 0.1; the BSCVA, 0.977 +/- 0.1; the residual sphere, 0.09 +/- 0.3 D; and the residual cylinder, -0.2 +/- 0.3 D. The safety index after retreatment was 1.01 +/- 0.1, and the efficacy index was 0.96 +/- 0.1. No haze, no delay in epithelial healing, and no case of endothelial decompensation were detected.

CONCLUSION

Surface ablation retreatment using MMC seems to be effective to correct residual refractive errors after an initial surgery with MMC.

Mitomycin C in corneal refractive surgery

Mitomycin C has played a deciding role in the current revival of excimer laser surface ablation techniques. We review the literature regarding mechanism of action of mitomycin C, histological effects on the cornea, and indications, dose, exposure time, and toxicity of mitomycin C in corneal refractive surgery. Mitomycin C is an alkylating agent with cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects that reduces the myofibroblast repopulation after laser surface ablation and, therefore, reduces the risk of postoperative corneal haze. It is used prophylactically to avoid haze after primary surface ablation and therapeutically to treat pre-existing haze. There is no definite evidence that establishes an exact diopter limit or ablation depth at which to apply prophylactic mitomycin C. It is usually applied at a concentration of 0.2mg/ml (0.02%) for 12 to 120 seconds over the ablated stroma, although some studies suggest that lower concentrations (0.01%, 0.002%) could also be effective in preventing haze when treating low to moderate myopia. This dose of mitomycin C has not been associated with any clinically relevant epithelial corneal toxicity. Its effect on the endothelium is more controversial: two studies report a decrease in endothelial cell density, but the majority of reports suggest that the endothelium is not altered. Regarding mitomycin C's effect on keratocyte population, although animal studies report keratocyte depletion after its use, longer follow-up suggested that the initial keratocyte depletion does not persist over time.

Early Postoperative Pain Following Epi-LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective, Comparative, Bilateral Study

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative pain associated with epi-LASIK versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This prospective observer-masked randomized study included 40 eyes of 20 patients with myopia and astigmatism who received epi-LASIK (Moria Epi-K) in one eye and PRK in the contralateral eye. Corneal ablation was done using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. Patients were seen at days 1, 3, and 6 to rate their pain via three measuring tools: 1) a global subjective rating, 2) a 10-cm visual analog scale, and 3) an 11-point numeric scale of pain.

RESULTS

On postoperative day 1, 19 of 20 patients reported pain in both eyes. Using the global subjective rating scale, patients reported more pain for those eyes treated by PRK. Although clinically relevant, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .56). Based on the 11-point numeric scale of pain and visual analog scale, mean pain scores were similar for both groups. On day 3, using the global subjective rating scale, 11 of 12 patients who had pain reported more in the epi-LASIK treated eye (P = .0005). In addition, epi-LASIK eyes demonstrated higher mean pain scores based on the other two scales (visual analog scale, P = .045 and 11-point numeric scale of pain, P = .023). Only 6 patients reported minimal pain on day 6. It was more frequently reported and slightly more marked in epi-LASIK eyes, but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Epi-LASIK and PRK have similar pain on postoperative day 1, but epi-LASIK demonstrated statistically more pain than PRK on days 3 and 6.

Comparison of postoperative pain in patients following photorefractive keratectomy versus advanced surface ablation

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative pain associated with advanced surface ablation versus traditional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SETTING

Codet-Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico.

METHODS

This prospective double-masked randomized study included 56 eyes of 28 myopic patients who received traditional PRK in 1 eye and advanced surface ablation in the contralateral eye. For advanced surface ablation, removal of corneal epithelium was performed by incubating the cornea with 18% ethanol. Subsequently, the epithelium was removed by a surgical microsponge. For eyes treated by PRK, mechanical debridement of corneal epithelium was performed with a surgical blade. Excimer laser corneal ablation was performed using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser in all eyes. On postoperative days 1 and 3, patients were instructed to rate their pain via 3 pain measuring tools: (1) a global subjective rating; (2) a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS); and (3) an 11-point numerical rating scale.

RESULTS

All 28 patients completed postoperative questionnaires on day 1 and day 3. On postoperative day 1, all reported pain in both eyes. Using the global assessment rating, patients reported statistically significant more pain in eyes treated by advanced surface ablation (P = .0037; confidence interval [CI], 59%-92%). Furthermore, based on the 11-point numerical rating scale, mean pain scores were significantly higher in the advanced surface ablation treated eyes (P = .0121), while the VAS mean pain scores were marginally significantly higher (P = .0822). On postoperative day 3, 23 patients reported the presence of some pain, at least in 1 eye. Using the global assessment rating, 70% of the those who had pain reported more pain in the advanced surface ablation-treated eye (advanced surface ablation 16/23 versus PRK 7/23) (P = .0931; 95% CI, 47%-87%). In addition, on postoperative day 3, advanced surface ablation-treated eyes demonstrated slightly higher mean pain scores based on the 11-point numerical rating scale and on the VAS; however, mean differences were not statistically significant (P = .3494 and P = .3337, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced surface ablation was associated with statistically significantly more postoperative pain than PRK on postoperative day 1. A greater percentage of patients reported more pain in the advanced surface ablation-treated eyes on day 3. Refractive surgeons should consider the postoperative pain associated with advanced surface ablation when deciding on the type of epithelial debridement for their patients.

Safety, efficacy, and stability indices of LASEK correction in moderate myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcomes and complications in low to moderate levels of myopia and astigmatism treated with laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) with a focus on postoperative recovery.

SETTING

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a case series of eyes treated with LASEK from 1996 to July 2002 with a follow-up of 2 years was performed. The LASEK technique involved creating an epithelial flap with 25 to 45 seconds of exposure to 20% alcohol, ablating the corneal surface using 3 different excimer lasers and nomogram adjustment, and repositioning the flap and applying a bandage contact lens. The main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), efficacy index, manifest refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), safety index, retreatment rate, and complications.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one eyes (85 right eyes and 86 left eyes) of 105 patients were studied. Preoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent was -2.99 diopters (D) +/- 1.43 (SD) (range -0.38 to -7.75 D) and the mean cylinder, -0.78 +/- 0.73 D. The UCVA ranged from 20/800 to 20/32, and the BSCVA ranged from 20/63 to 20/16; the median was 20/20. One week postoperatively, 96% of eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better but definitive visual recovery took more than 4 weeks in some eyes. Approximately 95% of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia after 4 to 52 weeks; the remaining 5% did not show major deviations. At 4 to 52 weeks, only 1 eye was overcorrected by more than 1.0 D of manifest refraction. The safety index remained close to 1.0 for the follow-up after 4 weeks. The efficacy index displayed a plateau at 0.9 from 1 month to 1 year. No serious complication (including recurrent erosion syndrome) was encountered. The mean follow-up was 31 weeks, and the retreatment rate was 2.9% up to 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term safety and effectiveness of LASEK for the correction of low to moderate myopia and astigmatism were demonstrated. The treatment effect stabilized after 4 weeks.

Epi-LASIK: comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol-assisted epithelial separation

To compare the effect of mechanical and alcohol-assisted excision on the histological ultrastructure of epithelial disks from human corneas. Vardinoyiannion Eye Institute of Crete, University of Crete, Medical School, Crete, Greece. Ten eyes of 10 patients were deepithelialized by 1 of 2 two techniques. In 6 eyes, a customized instrument was used to mechanically separate the epithelial layer. In 4 eyes, the epithelial disks were obtained using the conventional laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) technique; that is, with alcohol concentrations of 15% and 20%. All specimens were assessed by light and electron microscopy, and the histological findings of the 2 methods were compared. Transmission electron microscopy showed that when the epithelial disks were excised by mechanical separation, the lamina densa and lamina lucida were preserved and the hemidesmosomes had normal morphology along almost the entire length of the basement membrane. The basal epithelial cells of the separated epithelial disks showed minimal trauma and edema. Specimens obtained using 15% and 20% alcohol concentrations showed formation of cytoplasmic fragments of the basal epithelial cells, enlargement of the intercellular spaces, and extensive discontinuities in the basement membrane, which was excised at the level of the lamina lucida. Mechanical separation did not affect the normal cell morphology of the excised epithelial disks. Transmission electron microscopy of the specimens proved the manual technique is less invasive to epithelial integrity than LASEK using either alcohol concentration.

Vitality of epithelial cells after alcohol exposure during laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy flap preparation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the vitality of epithelial cells after various exposure times to 20% ethanol and epithelial flap preparation in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) using the trypan blue dye test.

SETTING

University Eye Clinic Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, and the Rayne Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

METHODS

Five human cadaver eyes were exposed to 20% ethanol for 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 seconds, respectively. After an epithelial flap (as in LASEK) was prepared, the flap was deliberately cut off. The flaps were soaked in a trypan blue 0.1% solution at 37 degrees C. After 3 washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the specimens were reincubated for 30 minutes in culture medium containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37 degrees C. After an additional wash with PBS, the cells were observed with a standard inverted light microscope.

RESULTS

After 15- and 30-second exposure to 20% ethanol, most epithelial cells were vital. This changed substantially after 45 seconds, when vital and dead cells were approximately equal. Longer exposure times (60 seconds and 120 seconds) showed predominantly dead epithelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to 20% ethanol should be 20 to 30 seconds as the number of vital epithelial cells rapidly decreased after that. Vitality of the epithelial flap is probably a crucial factor in the dampened wound response in LASEK compared to that in photorefractive keratectomy.

Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness, safety, and stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), a modified photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) technique, with those of conventional PRK for low to moderate myopia.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 27 patients with a manifest refraction of -3.00 to -6.50 diopters were treated and followed for 3 months. In each case, PRK was performed in 1 eye and LASEK in the other eye. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Postoperative pain, epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, corneal haze, and surgical preference were examined in PRK- and LASEK-treated eyes.

RESULTS

During the 3 month follow-up, there were no significant between-eye differences in epithelial healing time, UCVA, or refractive error. However, LASEK-treated eyes had lower postoperative pain scores (P =.047) and corneal haze scores (1 month; P =.02) than PRK-treated eyes. Seventeen patients (63%) preferred the LASEK procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser epithelial keratomileusis safely and effectively treated eyes with low to moderate myopia. It reduced the incidence of significant postoperative pain and corneal haze and may prevent the flap- and interface-related problems of laser in situ keratomileusis.