Refractive versus Corneal Changes After Photorefracive Keratectomy for Astigmatism

Corneal limbal marking in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser

PURPOSE

To determine whether preoperative marking of the limbal cornea improves treatment of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser.

METHODS

Retrospective study on 108 eyes with myopic astigmatism that underwent LASIK or laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) with the Technolas 217 (Bausch & Lomb) excimer laser. Preoperative limbal marking was performed in 47 eyes (marked group). The 12-month results were used for refractive and visual analysis.

RESULTS

The achieved cylinder reduction, spherical reduction, and refractive predictability were similar for the marked and unmarked groups in the overall study collective, in the LASIK and LASEK subgroup analysis, and in a higher astigmatism (> 1.25 diopters) subgroup analysis. Limbal marking showed no influence on the refractive results, and vector analysis showed no significant difference in angle of error among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal limbal marking failed to improve the refractive outcome in LASIK and LASEK for myopic astigmatism.

Correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism by femtosecond laser compared with mechanized astigmatic keratotomy

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of arcuate keratotomy (AK) performed with a femtosecond laser (FSL) or Hanna keratome (Moria, Anthony, France) for correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

METHODS

This clinical study included 20 eyes. Two groups of 10 eyes underwent AK using an FLS or keratome. Refractive and keratometric astigmatism were evaluated before surgery and 6 months after surgery. The astigmatic changes in the 2 groups were measured through arithmetic and vector analysis (Alpins method).

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, the mean uncorrected and corrected visual acuities did not change significantly. The mean preoperative refractive cylinder was 8.6 +/- 3.0 diopters (D) and 6.7 +/- 2.1 D, decreasing to 3.9 +/- 2.4 D and 4.7 +/- 2.4 D after laser AK and mechanized AK, respectively. The mean arithmetic change was significantly higher after laser AK, with a decrease of -55.4 +/- 20.7% (P = .011). Vector analysis showed a systematic undercorrection of astigmatism in both groups with a refractive correction index of 0.82 and 0.90 after laser AK and mechanized AK, respectively. Although no statistically significant differences were detected, a wider spread of angle of error and an almost significant difference of mean absolute angle of error (P = .052) suggest a larger misalignment of treatment during mechanized AK. All cases were uncomplicated after laser AK, 1 microperforation occurred and 1 case with off-center incisions occurred after mechanized AK.

CONCLUSIONS

AK performed with the femtosecond laser was effective in reducing postkeratoplasty astigmatism and has some advantages over conventional techniques. However, efficacy could be improved by a more accurate nomogram and alignment of treatment.

Arcuate Relaxing Incisions Guided by Corneal Topography for Postkeratoplasty Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To determine if using corneal topography for planning arcuate relaxing incision placement for postkeratoplasty astigmatism improves clinical results.

METHODS

Twenty-six eyes with high levels (> 5 diopters [D]) of postkeratoplasty astigmatism were studied in a nonrandomized, retrospective, observational case series. Relaxing incisions were placed in the peripheral graft in each steep topographic hemimeridian. The following data were measured: keratometric, topographic, and refractive vector analysis; nonvector astigmatism reduction; surface regularity and asymmetry (surface regularity index and surface asymmetry index); topography patterns; surgical design; and visual acuity.

RESULTS

Topographic analysis changed some aspect of the surgery in 51/52 incisions with a 15.7 degrees mean change in incision location. The mean vector correction index (CI) was 0.89 to 0.92 for keratometric, topographic, and refractive indices. Sixty-five percent of eyes had surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) values within 2 D of the surgical goal. Eighty-one percent of eyes had at least a 50% reduction in net astigmatism and 85% had < or = 3-D residual refractive cylinder. The mean logMAR visual acuity increased 2 lines. The preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent showed a high correlation (rho = 0.914, P = 0.000). The correlation between SIA and targeted induced astigmatism (TIA) was 0.56 (P = 0.003). There was a significant improvement in surface regularity index (P = 0.000) and surface asymmetry index (P = 0.05) values. No statistically significant correlations were found between total incision length and SIA or TIA, or between TIA and correction index. All patients had symmetric (58%) or asymmetric (42%) bowtie topographic patterns preoperatively with 35% achieving round/oval patterns postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Topography-guided relaxing incision offers an easy method to plan surgery and has some limited advantages over conventional techniques.

Response of the Cornea for up to Four Years After Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia

PURPOSE

To analyze the long-term corneal topographic changes 4 years after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This study comprised 15 patients (30 eyes) who had PRK surgery with a scanning-spot excimer laser (Chiron Technolas 217C; Bausch & Lomb, Dornach, Germany) and were followed up to 4 years after surgery. The eyes were subdivided into three groups according to the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction. Corneal topographic maps were obtained for all eyes with a Placido disc topographer. Preoperative and follow-up topographical data were imported into a custom software program, which computed the average composite corneal maps and difference maps for each study group to quantify the anterior corneal changes following laser ablation. The software delineated three concentric zones of the corneal surface to characterize the regional corneal remodeling following the surgery.

RESULTS

A significant central corneal steepening (approximately 0.25 D, P < .001) was calculated between the 1- and 4-year postoperative maps in all study groups. A significant steepening (P < .001) of the corneal periphery was also noted for the lower myopic ablations whereas a peripheral flattening (P < .001) was observed for the deeper ablations between 1 and 4 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The anterior corneal surface was observed to remodel for up to 4 years after surface ablation, steepening a mean of approximately 0.25 D.

Practical astigmatism analysis for refractive outcomes in cataract and refractive surgery

The fundamental concepts underpinning the vectorial analysis of astigmatism are straightforward and intuitive, easily understood by employing a simple golf-putting analogy. The Alpins methodology utilizes three principal vectors and the various ratios between them to provide an aggregate analysis for astigmatic change with parallel indices for spherical correction. A comparative analysis employing both arithmetic and vectorial means together with necessary nomogram adjustments for refining both spherical and astigmatic treatments can also be derived. These advanced techniques, together with their suitability for statistical analysis, comprehensively address the outcome analysis requirements of the entire cornea and the eye's refractive correction, for the purpose of examining success in cataract and refractive surgery.

Scraping and Mitomycin C to Treat Haze and Regression After Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of therapeutic scraping and application of a diluted 0.02% mitomycin C solution to treat haze and regression after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia.

METHODS

We performed a non-comparative, non-randomized retrospective study of 35 eyes of 30 patients who had previously undergone PRK for myopia and developed haze and regression after treatment. The range of refractive error after regression was -0.75 to -5.50 D (mean -2.92 D). Haze, ranging from grade 3 to 4 (scale: 0 to 4) caused a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity loss of 1 to 6 Snellen lines. All eyes were treated 6 to 12 months after PRK by scraping the stromal surface and application of a 0.02% mitomycin C solution for 2 minutes using a soaked merocel sponge. No laser ablation was performed. Corneal transparency, refractive error, and visual outcomes were evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

All eyes had significant improvement in corneal transparency. Thirty-one eyes had haze grades lower than 1, which were maintained over time. Only four eyes showed haze grades 1 to 2 and two of them needed further treatment using the same technique. At 12 months after treatment, all eyes were within +/-1.50 of original intended correction (mean 0.04 +/- 0.63 D). BSCVA improved in all eyes. No toxic effects were observed during re-epithelialization or during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Single application of diluted mitomycin C 0.02% solution following scraping of the corneal surface was effective and safe in treating haze and regression after PRK.

Evaluation of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for medium and high myopia in eyes that were not good candidates for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Carones Ophthalmology Center, Milan, Italy.

METHODS

This prospective randomized masked study comprised 60 consecutive eyes (60 patients). The inclusion criteria were a spherical equivalent correction between -6.00 and -10.00 diopters (D) and inadequate corneal thickness to allow a LASIK procedure with a residual stromal thickness of more than 250 microm. The eyes were divided into 2 groups according to the randomization protocol. After PRK, the study group eyes were treated with a single intraoperative dose of mitomycin-C (0.2 mg/mL), applied topically with a soaked microsponge placed over the ablated area and maintained for 2 minutes. The control eyes did not receive this treatment. Refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and slitlamp evidence of corneal opacity (haze) or other visible complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

No toxic or side effects were encountered postoperatively. No study group eye had a haze rate higher than 1 during the 6-month follow-up; 19 eyes (63%) in the control group did (P =.01). At 6 months, the between-group difference in the refractive outcome was statistically significant (P =.05), with 26 study group eyes (87%) and 14 control eyes (47%) within +/-0.50 D of the attempted correction. No study group eye had a BCVA loss during the follow-up; 7 control eyes had lost 1 to 3 lines at 6 months (P =.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic use of a diluted mitomycin-C 0.02% solution applied intraoperatively in a single dose after PRK produced lower haze rates, better UCVA and BCVA results, and more accurate refractive outcomes than those achieved in the control group.

Corneal astigmatic change after photorefractive keratectomy and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 70 eyes were treated for myopia and 70 eyes were treated for myopic astigmatism. Refraction, corneal topography, slitlamp findings, and visual acuity in the 2 groups at 1, 3, and 6 months were evaluated and compared. Vector analysis was performed to determine the SIA in both groups.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the PRK and PARK groups was -6.06 diopters (D) and -7.18 D, respectively. At 6 months, the mean reduction in astigmatism in the PARK group was 61.0%. Predictability was within +/-1.0 D in 85.2% of eyes in the PRK group and 62.5% in the PARK group. An uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 91.8% and 83.9% of eyes, respectively. The mean SIA was 0.64 D in the PRK group, with a general with-the-rule axis shift. The results of vector analysis were more favorable when calculated from refractive values than from Sim-K corneal topography values. The mean astigmatism correction index and index of success calculated from refractive data were 0.75 and 0.38 in the PARK group. The mean magnitude and angle of error were 0.22 +/- 0.52 D and -2.13 +/- 24.41 degrees, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy and PARK were effective and safe procedures for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. However, SIA occurred with spherical myopic treatments. This small SIA may be a confounding factor in low astigmatic treatments.

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 69 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopia and 74 eyes that had LASIK to correct myopic astigmatism. The excimer laser keratectomy was performed using a Summit Apex Plus machine. Refraction, visual acuity, and computerized corneal videokeratography data from the preoperative and postoperative examinations were collected. The astigmatic change was calculated by the Alpins vector analysis method.

RESULTS

The preoperative spherical equivalent at the glasses plane in the myopia and myopic astigmatism groups was -8.08 diopters (D) and -9.73 D, respectively. At 6 months, the spherical equivalent and residual corneal astigmatism were -0.25 D and 0.85 D, respectively, in the myopia group and -0.71 D and 0.82 D, respectively, in the myopic astigmatism group. In the myopia group, 88% of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the intended myopia correction and in the myopic astigmatism group, 85% were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted spherical equivalent and 90% were within +/-1.0 D of the intended astigmatism correction. The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94.1% of eyes in the myopia group and 92.5% of eyes in the myopic astigmatism group. The SIA magnitude was 0.66 D with the axis randomly distributed in the myopia group. The mean astigmatism correction index was 0.97, the mean magnitude of error was 0.13 D +/- 0.62 (SD), and the mean angle of error was -3.70 +/- 13.73 degrees in the myopic astigmatism group.

CONCLUSION

Laser in situ keratomileusis had similar predictability, safety, and efficacy in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. The astigmatism correction was effective, but the results suggest that subjective astigmatism of less than 1.0 D need not be treated with the Summit Apex Plus laser.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for the Correction of Hyperopia From +1.25 to +5.00 Diopters With the Technolas Keracor 117C Laser

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with hyperopia and to evaluate the visual and refractive results of the procedure.

METHODS

LASIK was performed on 85 eyes of 53 patients for correction of hyperopia, with a preoperative mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of +3.31 +/- 0.69 D (range, +1.25 to +5.00 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of +0.91 +/- 1.06 D (range, 0 to +3.00 D). The Carriazo-Barraquer (Moria) manual microkeratome was used to create the corneal flap, and laser ablation was performed using the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser with an ablation zone diameter of 6.0 mm and a transition zone diameter to 9.0 mm. Follow-up was 12 months for all patients.

RESULTS

Refraction was stable by 3 months after surgery. At 1 year after LASIK, the mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +0.43 +/- 0.57 D (range, -1.25 to +2.00 D) and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 0.36 +/- 0.30 D (range, 0 to 1.00 D). Fifty-two eyes (61.2%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia, and 76 eyes (89.4%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 21 eyes (24.7%) and 20/40 or better in 79 eyes (92.9%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was reduced by two lines in one eye (1.2%) and improved by two lines in five eyes (5.9%). There were no significant complications.

CONCLUSION

LASIK was an effective, safe, and predictable procedure for the correction of hyperopia up to +5.00 D and hyperopic astigmatism up to +3.00 D with the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser. The large size of the corneal flap obtained by the Carriazo-Barraquer (Moria) manual microkeratome facilitated laser ablation entirely in the exposed corneal stromal bed.

Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of correcting astigmatism by laser refractive surgery by a vectorial astigmatism outcome analysis that uses 3 fundamental vectors: target induced astigmatism vector (TIA), surgically induced astigmatism vector, and difference vector, as described by the Alpins method.

METHODS

A data set of 100 eyes that had laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and astigmatism (minimum preoperative refractive astigmatism 0.75 diopter) was analyzed. The data included preoperative and 3 month postoperative values for manifest refraction and standard keratometry. Using the ASSORT or VectrAK analysis program, individual and aggregate data analyses were performed using simple, polar, and vector analysis of astigmatism and an analysis of spherical change. Statistical analysis of the results was used for means and confidence limits, as well as to examine the differences between corneal and refractive astigmatism outcomes.

RESULTS

At an individual patient level, the angle of error was found to be significant, suggesting variable factors at work, such as healing or alignment. A systematic error of undercorrection of astigmatism is prevalent in the treatment of these 100 patients by a factor of between 15% and 30%, depending on whether refractive or corneal values are examined. Spherical correction showed systematic undercorrection of 11%, and parallel indices demonstrated it to be more effective than the astigmatic correction.

CONCLUSION

This method of astigmatism analysis enables the examination of results of astigmatism treatment measured by both refractive and corneal measurements using vector analysis. By examining individual vector relationships to the TIA (ie, the correction index, index of success, and flattening index), a comprehensive astigmatism analysis is completed. Each index provides information necessary for understanding any astigmatic change. Astigmatic outcome parameters are more favorable when measured by subjective refractive than objective corneal methods.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Correction of High Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, and to assess the refractive results and predictability of the procedure.

METHODS

LASIK was performed on 19 patients (19 eyes) with high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. The amount of preoperative refractive astigmatism ranged from 6.50 to 14.50 D (mean, 9.21 +/- 1.95 D) and the spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -7.00 to +1.25 D (mean, -2.14 +/- 2.11 D). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

RESULTS

Refraction was stable after 3 months. At 1 year after LASIK, the amount of refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 1.09 +/- 0.33 D (range, 0.50 to 1.75 D), with 57.9% of the eyes within +/- 1.00 D of refractive astigmatism. The mean percent reduction of astigmatism was 87.9 +/- 3.7%. The postoperative spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -1.00 to +1.75 D with a mean of +0.43 +/- 0.82 D. Vector analysis showed that the mean amount of axis deviation was 1.1 +/- 1.3 degrees and the mean percent correction of preoperative astigmatism was 92.6 +/- 8.4%. There were no intraoperative complications. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye, and improved by 2 or more lines in 42.1% of eyes after LASIK.

CONCLUSION

LASIK with the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser was effective for correction of both astigmatism and myopia after penetrating keratoplasty. The procedure proved to be safe and gave fairly predictable and stable refractive results.

Management of irregular astigmatism

Using a liberal definition of corneal irregularity, modern videokeratoscopy may define approximately 40% of normal corneas with a toric refractive error as possessing primary irregular astigmatism. The causes of secondary forms of irregular astigmatism include corneal surgery, trauma, dystrophies, and infections. Internal refractive surface and media irregularity or noncorneal astigmatism (ocular residual astigmatism) contribute to irregular astigmatism of the entire refractive path of which crystaline lenticular astigmatism is usually the principal contributing component. Treatment options have increased in recent years, particularly, though not exclusively, through the advent of tailored corneal excimer laser ablations. However, discussion continues concerning the systematic approach necessary to enable treatment to achieve an optimal optical surface for the eye. Discussion also continues as to what constitutes the optimal corneal shape. Some refractive procedures may increase higher order aberrations in the attempt to neutralize refractive astigmatism. The way to further refinement of the commonly performed refractive techniques will ultimately lie in the integrated inclusion of a trio of technologies: topographic analysis of the corneal surface, wavefront analysis of ocular refractive aberrations, and vector planning to enable the appropriate balance in emphasis between these two diagnostic modalities. For the uncommon, irregularly roughened corneas, the ablatable polymer techniques show some promise.

Effect of a standard paired arcuate incision and augmentation sutures on postkeratoplasty astigmatism

To analyze the efficacy of a standardized paired arcuate incision and augmentation suture technique in the treatment of various levels of post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) astigmatism. Lions Eye Institute, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia, and University of Dundee Department of Ophthalmology, Dundee, United Kingdom.A standardized paired arcuate incision and paired augmentation suture technique was used to treat 34 eyes with post-PKP astigmatism ranging from -3.50 to -20.00 diopters (D) at the spectacle plane. The technique consisted of paired arcuate incisions of 3 clock hours, 480 microm deep in the graft-host junction, and 2 pairs of augmentation 10-0 nylon sutures. The mean preoperative cylinder was -9.14 D +/- 4.38 (SD) and the mean postoperative cylinder, -3.59 +/- 1.92 D at the corneal plane after a mean follow-up of 50 +/- 43 weeks. This represents an empirical reduction in mean cylinder of 5. 55 D (60.7%). The Alpins correction index (surgically induced astigmatism [SIA] divided by target induced astigmatism) was calculated for each case, and the mean was 1.01 +/- 0.34, with a median of 0.91. Approximately 53.1% of cases achieved a correction index between 0.80 and 1.20, and the correction index correlated poorly with the initial magnitude of cylinder. A direct numerical relationship between SIA and the initial magnitude of cylinder was observed, although a standard surgical procedure was used in all cases.A simple standardized technique using paired arcuate incisions in the graft-host junction with paired augmentation sutures reduces the amount of cylinder in proportion to the magnitude of the preoperative cylinder and effectively reduces post-PKP astigmatism.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Ametropia After Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty.

METHODS

Eight eyes underwent LASIK after a mean 71 months (SD 60) following the initial penetrating keratoplasty. A full ophthalmic assessment was performed before LASIK and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Mean follow-up was 8.6 months (SD 3.2).

RESULTS

No eyes lost any Snellen lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at the latest follow-up. Mean reduction in spherical equivalent refraction was 91% from -6.79 D (SD 4.17) to -0.64 D (SD 1.92) and mean reduction of cylinder was 72% from -6.79 D (SD 3.28) to -1.93 D (SD 1.17) at 6 months. Mean surgically induced astigmatism was 5.50 D (SD 2.42) and the index of surgically induced astigmatism divided by the initial cylinder expressed as a percentage was 81%. Mean outcome indices were: correction index 0.87, index of success 0.31, and angle of error 0.95 degrees. Three eyes (43%) achieved a spherical equivalent refraction of +/-0.50 D and 4 eyes (57%) achieved a spherical equivalent refraction of +/-1.00 D of emmetropia.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty was good compared to incisional or surface based excimer laser methods and has the advantage of reducing the myopic spherical equivalent refraction in addition to astigmatism, thus improving the uncorrected visual acuities.