Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Hyperopia and Hyperopic Astigmatism With the Nidek EC-5000 Excimer Laser

Femtosecond-LASIK outcomes using the VisuMax®-MEL® 80 platform for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism refractive surgery

The present study evaluated the efficacy, the safety and the predictability of the Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK) procedure for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative 12-month evolution of 593 eyes with hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism that underwent Femto-LASIK treatment. The procedure was predictable and effective. No eye lost 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), demonstrating a safety profile of the procedure. Nine percent of the eyes gained at least one line of CDVA. The accuracy of the spherical equivalent after 12 months was 74% within ±1.0 diopter (D) of emmetropia. The refractive outcomes were stable during the follow-up period. There were no significant complications during the procedure. Femto-LASIK using the VisuMax^®-MEL^® 80 platform was demonstrated to be a suitable option to correct selected cases of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. A longer follow-up period is required to better assess the refractive results and to detect any further regression.

Role of percent peripheral tissue ablated on refractive outcomes following hyperopic LASIK

Objectives

To determine the effect of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (H-LASIK) on corneal integrity, by investigating relationships between proportionate corneal tissue ablated and refractive outcomes at 3 months.

Methods

18 eyes of 18 subjects treated with H-LASIK by Technolas 217c Excimer Laser were included in the study. Orbscan II Topography System was used to determine corneal volume and pachymetry 3mm temporally (3T). The volume of corneal tissue ablated was determined from the laser nomogram. Univariate associations between age, treatment, corneal volume, overall proportion of tissue removed, proportion of tissue removed at 3T, residual bed thickness at 3T and refractive outcomes 3 months post-LASIK were examined and independent factors associated with refractive outcomes determined using linear regression models.

Results

At 3 months post-LASIK, the mean difference to expected refractive outcome was -0.20 ± 0.64 (Range -2.00 to +1.00). In univariate analysis, difference to expected refractive outcome was associated with proportion of tissue removed at 3T (P<0.01, r = -0.605) and total number of pulses (P< 0.05, r = -0.574). In multivariable analysis, difference to expected refractive outcome was associated with the proportion of tissue removed at 3T only.

Conclusion

Subjects undergoing H-LASIK, may present as either over or under-corrected at 3 months. The proportion of tissue removed at 3T was the single significant determinant of this outcome, suggesting unexpected biomechanical alterations resulting in corneal steepening. Future hyperopic LASIK procedures could consider proportionate volume of corneal tissue removed at 3T in addition to laser nomograms to achieve improved refractive outcomes.

Topography-guided hyperopic LASIK with and without high irradiance collagen cross-linking: initial comparative clinical findings in a contralateral eye study of 34 consecutive patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrastromally applied collagen cross-linking (CXL) in a comparative contralateral eye study of topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted hyperopic LASIK.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients with hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism elected to have bilateral topography-guided LASIK and were randomized to receive a single drop of 0.1% sodium phosphate riboflavin solution under the flap followed by 3-minute exposure of 10 mW/cm2 ultraviolet A (UVA) light with the flap realigned in one eye (CXL group) and no intrastromal CXL in the contralateral eye (no CXL group). All eyes were treated with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser and WaveLight EX500 excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories Inc). Refractive error and keratometric, topographic, and tomographic measurements were evaluated over mean follow-up of 23 months.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was +3.15 +/- 1.46 diopters (D) and +3.40 +/- 1.78 D with a mean cylinder of 1.20 +/- 1.18 D and 1.40 +/- 1.80 D and mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (decimal) of 0.1 +/- 0.26 and 0.1 +/-0.25 in the CXL and no CXL groups, respectively. At 2 years postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.20 +/- 0.56 D and +0.20 +/- 0.40 D with mean cylinder of 0.65 +/- 0.56 D and 0.76 +/- 0.72 D and mean UDVA of 0.95 +/- 0.15 and 0.85 +/- 0.23 in the CXL and no CXL groups, respectively. Eyes with CXL demonstrated a mean regression from treatment of +0.22 +/- 0.31 D, whereas eyes without CXL showed a statistically significant greater regression of +0.72 +/- 0.19 D (P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Topography-guided hyperopic LASIK with or without intrastromal CXL is safe and effective, with greater long-term efficacy (less regression) in eyes with CXL. Our data suggest that the regression seen with hyperopic LASIK may be related to biomechanical changes in corneal shape over time.

Surgical Correction of Hyperopia

Surgical attempts to correct hyperopia have yielded varying results over the last 130 years. These techniques include the reshaping of the cornea through incisions, burns, or lamellar cuts with removal of peripheral tissue; the addition of central inlays; laser ablations; and the replacement of the crystalline lens. By examining the success of each surgical technique, the refractive surgeon may be able to make an informed decision on its indications and limitations, based on the specific patient's characteristics. Reporting the outcomes and complications of hyperopic surgery will help refine our approach to the management of an increasingly hyperopic and presbyopic population.

Two-year follow-up of conductive keratoplasty for the treatment of hyperopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of conductive keratoplasty (CK) for the treatment of hyperopic astigmatism.

SETTING

University of Crete Medical School, Vardinoyannion Eye Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

METHODS

In this prospective nonrandomized noncontrolled single-center study, 47 eyes of 34 patients (15 women and 19 men) were treated for hyperopic astigmatism (up to + 3.50 diopters [D]) with a Refractec ViewPoint CK system and followed for 24 months +/- 0.6 (SD). The treatment consisted of 4 to 36 spots applied to the periphery of the cornea. Mean age was 48.5 years +/- 9.7 years, range 25 to 68 years. All the treated eyes were analyzed for safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 48.5 +/- 9.7 years (range 25 to 68 years). Preoperatively, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was +2.11 +/- 0.88 D (range -0.50 to + 4.13 D); at 12 months, it was -0.52 +/- 0.73 D and at 24 months, -0.50 +/- 0.77 D. At 24 months, the mean MRSE was within +/-0.50 D in 61% of eyes, within +/-1.00 D in 83%, and within +/-2.00 D in all eyes. At 24 months, the uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 37% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 97%. By the end of the follow-up period, no eye had lost > or =2 Snellen lines or had an induced cylinder > or =1.50 D.

CONCLUSIONS

Conductive keratoplasty for low hyperopic astigmatism was a safe, effective, and stable procedure. Nomogram adjustments and careful patient selection should contribute to higher levels of predictability when treating hyperopic astigmatism.

LASIK for Hyperopia With the WaveLight Excimer Laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser system (WaveLight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany) in LASIK for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism.

METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive LASIK cases for hyperopia with or without astigmatism treated with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser were prospectively evaluated up to 12 months postoperatively. Patients were allocated into three groups according to their refractive sphere and cylinder: a low hyperopia group, with up to +3.00 diopters (D) sphere and astigmatism < or = +1.00 D (n = 52); a moderate hyperopia group with +3.25 to +5.00 D sphere and astigmatism of < or = +1.00 D (n = 45); and a high hyperopia/toric group with sphere > or = +5.25 D or cylinder > or = +1.25.D (n = 23). Flaps were created with the Moria M2 microkeratome (Moria, Antony, France). Parameters evaluated were pre- and postoperative refractive error, uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), higher order aberration change, and contrast sensitivity.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve eyes (93%) were available for follow-up at 12 months. Of the eyes in the low hyperopia group, 92% were within +/- 0.50 D of the refractive goal. For the moderate sphere group and the high hyperopia/toric group, 79% and 71% of eyes, respectively, were within +/- 0.50 D of the refractive goal. No eye lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA. An increase in higher order aberrations was noted in the high hyperopia/toric group from 0.47 microm (+/- 0.096) to 0.94 microm (+/- 0.167) (P < .001). No significant changes in higher order aberrations were noted in the low and moderate hyperopia groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopic LASIK using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE excimer laser appears to be safe and effective in the correction of low, moderate, and high hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism.

5-year follow-up of LASIK for hyperopia

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term efficacy and stability of LASIK for hyperopia (+0.75 to +7.00 diopters [D]).

DESIGN

Retrospective follow-up study of a previous phase III multicenter clinical trial (unpublished data).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who had been treated for hyperopia (33 individuals, 47 eyes) attended follow-up 5 years after surgery. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent at the spectacle plane was +3.58 D (range, +0.75 to 7.00 D), and the attempted mean spherical correction at the corneal plane was +3.18 D (range, +1.00 to +6.00 D).

INTERVENTION

Treatments were performed using a Moria LSK One microkeratome and a Summit Technology SVS Apex Plus excimer laser fitted with an Axicon.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, corneal transparency, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

At 5 years, for treatments between +1.00 to +3.00 D, 71.0% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of the intended correction, and for treatments between +3.5 to +6.0 D, 37.5% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of intended correction. From 12 to 54 months after surgery for all patients, there was a hyperopic shift of +0.53 D (range, -0.13 to +3.13 D), with 51.1% of eyes experiencing an increase of +0.50 D or more and 27.7% of eyes showing a hyperopic shift of more than +1.00 D. This hyperopic shift was +0.67 D (range, 0 to +1.125 D) for patients younger than 40 years of age and +0.44 D (range, -1.33 to +1.50 D) for patients between 43 and 55 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK was moderately effective for the correction of low degrees of hyperopia. However, there was regression throughout the 5-year follow-up that was greater than would be expected as a result of aging. Long-term stability of hyperopic LASIK refractive corrections, therefore, is uncertain.

Laser in situ keratomileusis after conductive keratoplasty

We present a patient in whom laser in situ keratomileusis was used to treat residual hyperopia with astigmatism after conductive keratoplasty (CK). Previous CK did not affect initial flap creation, the ability to lift the flap manually 3 weeks after its initial preparation, or the refraction, topography, and refractive stability after the flap was created.

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia: Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.

METHODS

This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Hyperopia and Hyperopic and Mixed Astigmatism With LADARVision Using 7 to 10-mm Ablation Diameters

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed to correct hyperopia, and hyperopic and mixed astigmatism using wider ablation diameters (optical zone diameter and overall ablation diameter) than those commonly used with the same and other lasers.

METHODS

After flap creation using an Alcon SKBM microkeratome set for a 10-mm flap diameter, 53 eyes (33 patients) with a mean spheroequivalent attempted correction of +2.34 +/- 2.09 D underwent LASIK (Alcon LADARVision 4000) using a 7-mm optical zone diameter and a 3-mm transition zone for an overall 10-mm total ablation diameter. The nasal hinge was prevented from undesired ablation by the use of proprietary hinge protector software. Eyes were followed for 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, mean spheical equivalent refractive error was -0.22 +/- 0.41 D. There were 79.2% of eyes within +/- 0.50 D, and 98.1% within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved by 28 eyes (53%) and 20/40 or better by 50 eyes (94.3%). No meaningful visual complaints during nighttime hours, such as haloes or glare, were subjectively reported by patients.

CONCLUSION

The use of larger ablation diameters in LASIK for hyperopia, and hyperopic and mixed astigmatism produced accurate results, early refractive stability, and good visual performance.

Evaluation of the corneal endothelium after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To evaluate corneal endothelial changes after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) considering overestimation and underestimation of the cell count measurement.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

METHODS

The data were from the clinical trial of the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser for hyperopic LASIK. The mean correction was 3.59 diopters (D) +/- 1.54 (SD) (range 2.0 to 6.0 D). Using noncontact specular microscopy, the corneal endothelial changes in 25 eyes of 15 patients who had hyperopic LASIK were measured. Follow-up ranged from 6 months (n = 25) to 1 year (n = 21). The overestimation and underestimation of the corneal endothelial cell count that would occur after +5.0 D hyperopic LASIK was hypothetically calculated.

RESULTS

The measured endothelial cell count per 1.0 mm(2) did not significantly decrease up to 1 year after hyperopic LASIK (preoperatively, 2508 +/- 395; at 1 year, 2814 +/- 349). The hypothetical calculation revealed that a +5.0 D hyperopic correction corresponded to a 0.1% underestimation of the corneal endothelial cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

Underestimation of the corneal endothelial cell count after hyperopic LASIK was negligible. Hyperopic LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser did not significantly decrease corneal endothelial cells up to 1 year after surgery.

Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery

As the number and types of keratorefractive procedures increase and as the baby boomer population moves into the "cataractous decades," the number of patients requiring cataract surgery following refractive surgery grows larger each year. While technological advances in surgical instrumentation and intraocular lens (IOL) design allow us to perform cleaner, faster, and more reliable cataract extractions, the ultimate postoperative refraction depends primarily on calculations performed before surgery. Third-generation IOL formulas ( Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, or SRK/T) provide outstanding accuracy when used for eyes with physiologic, prolate corneas. In addition, most instruments used today for measuring corneal curvature and power were designed before the era of refractive surgery. These formulas and instruments make assumptions about the anatomy and refractive properties of the cornea that are no longer valid following most keratorefractive procedures. These breakdowns in IOL calculation often result in a "refractive surprise" after cataract surgery, which may require subsequent surgical correction. This article examines recent publications of modeling studies of various methods for estimating effective K values for IOL calculation, cataract surgery case series following refractive surgery, new corneal topography technologies and methods for correcting "refractive surprises" postoperatively.