Effect of Optical Zone Ablation Diameter on LASIK-induced Higher Order Optical Aberrations

Comparison of visual quality after SMILE correction of low-to-moderate myopia in different optical zones

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of different optical zones for small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on postoperative visual quality in low-to-moderate myopia.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study involved patients who underwent SMILE using two optical-zone diameters: 6.5 mm (50 patients, 100 eyes) and 6.8 mm (50 patients, 100 eyes). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and subjective visual-quality questionnaire scores were assessed.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, UCVA and SE did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma significantly increased at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), while trefoil was unchanged after surgery (P > 0.05). Corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma significantly differed between the groups at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.05), while trefoil did not (P > 0.05). Visual-quality scores were higher in the 6.8 mm group than in the 6.5 mm group at 1 month (P = 0.058), but not at 3 months (P > 0.05). In both groups, subjective scores significantly decreased at 1 month (P < 0.05) and gradually returned to the preoperative level at 3 months (P > 0.05). The subjective visual-quality scores were negatively and positively correlated with pupillary and optical-zone diameter, respectively (P < 0.05 for both). Objective visual-quality indicators (HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma) were negatively correlated with optical-zone diameter (P < 0.05) but not pupillary diameter (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SMILE in different optical zones effectively corrected low-to-moderate myopia. The larger the optical-zone diameter, the better the early postoperative visual quality.

Symmetric offset versus asymmetric offset ablation with transepithelial refractive keratectomy

BACKGROUND

In eyes with hyperopia, astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a modality of surface ablation surgery. We center on the corneal vertex for all our treatments (all have an offset to the center of the pupil) and wanted to compare the visual results of symmetrical profile treatments versus asymmetrical profile treatments (the center of the treatment on the vertex and the boundaries with the pupil center) using TransPRK as corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed two consecutive groups of eyes treated with TransPRK in the Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum Recklinghausen: 47 eyes treated with symmetrical offset and 51 eyes treated with asymmetrical offset. The intergroup comparisons were assessed using unpaired Student's T-tests, whereas preoperative to postoperative changes were assessed using paired Student's T-tests.

RESULTS

Refractive outcomes were good for both groups. 83 and 88% of eyes were within the spherical equivalent of 0.5 D from the target in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively. 85 and 84% of eyes had a postoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or lower in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We have not found a significant difference in the refractive outcomes between the symmetric group and the asymmetric group of eyes treated both with TransPRK for preoperatively hyperopic or mixed astigmatism.

Comparison of 6.0 mm versus 6.5 mm Optical Zone on Visual Outcomes after LASIK

Previous studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy using 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zones in the WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System but have not evaluated if differing optical zone sizes influence refractive outcomes. This study examines visual outcomes between two study populations undergoing LASIK with either a 6.0 mm (1332 patients) or 6.5 mm (1332 patients) optical zone. Outcomes were further stratified by severity of myopia (low, moderate, and high) and astigmatism (low and high). Patients were matched by age and preoperative manifest sphere and cylinder. Postoperative measurements were then compared. The 6.5 mm group demonstrated better postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), manifest sphere, and absolute value of the difference in actual and target spherical equivalent refraction (|∆ SEQ|), within the total population, moderate myopia, and low astigmatism groups, but this did not lead to improved postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) or best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Though astigmatic correction and postoperative angle of error were similar between optical zone sizes, they were significantly worse with high myopia. Overall, this study demonstrates differences in visual outcomes between the 6.0 and 6.5 mm optical zone sizes that may warrant consideration; however, essentially, the results are comparable between them.

Quantitative Assessment of the Pupil: An Underrecognized Yet Important Factor Related to Orbital Blowout Fracture Repair

PURPOSE

To investigate dynamic pupil changes after orbital blowout fracture repair. To compare postoperative changes in under photopic and mesopic pupil size and center position after orbital blowout fracture repair surgery.

METHODS

The study evaluated 19 eyes. Pupils were imaged for pupil size and center position before and 3 months after orbital blowout fracture repair surgery. Pupil size changes were measured, and the correlation between preoperative and postoperative pupil centroid shift was evaluated.

RESULTS

After repair, operative eyes exhibited a growth of 9.3% ± 8.6% in pupil size, and contralateral eyes showed a growth of 8.6% ± 8.2% (P = 0.011, P = 0.007). Similar findings were noted in mesopic conditions. Under mesopic conditions, the pupil of operative eyes in medial orbital wall fracture deviated 0.030 ± 0.019 mm towards the nasal side along the X-axis (P = 0.031). The postoperative orbital floor fracture group demonstrated statistical significance at a spatial frequency of 5 (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Orbital blowout fracture repair surgery affects pupil size and center position.

Effect of Corneal Cross-linking on Epithelial Hyperplasia and Myopia Regression After Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) on epithelial thickness change and refractive outcome after myopic transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK).

METHODS

This study compared epithelial thickness changes in 49 patients undergoing TPRK-CXL with 49 patients undergoing TPRK who were matched for age and refractive error. Corneal epithelial thickness, obtained using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, was compared between the groups. Regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between changes in epithelial thickness and keratometric power. Factors affecting myopic regression (> 0.50 diopters] were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

For TPRK, the mean epithelial thickness of the center (2-mm diameter), paracenter (2- to 5-mm diameter), and pericenter (5- to 6-mm diameter) increased by 6.5 ± 3.1, 7.0 ± 2.9, and 4.9 ± 2.9 µm, respectively; increases of 4.8 ± 3.0, 5.9 ± 2.8, and 4.8 ± 2.7 µm were observed following TPRK-CXL, indicating a significant difference in the center (P = .013). Epithelial thickness increased linearly to the magnitude of myopic correction and was negatively correlated with the optical zone diameter of ablation. Change in epithelial thickness showed a linear correlation with the change in keratometric power between 1 and 12 months postoperatively, indicating regression in eyes following TPRK. Corneal epithelial thickening was significantly associated with myopic regression and simultaneous CXL tended to reduce the risk of regression.

CONCLUSIONS

TPRK-CXL induces less epithelial hyperplasia than does TPRK, presumably owing to the effect of CXL, and the magnitude of epithelial thickening seemed to be associated with myopic regression. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(6):354-361.].

Stability of corneal topography and aberrometry after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with a 500-Hz excimer laser platform: A 3-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term stability of the corneal topography, the functional optical zone, and the refractive stability throughout 3 years following laser in situ keratomileusis surgery for hyperopia using a 500-Hz excimer laser system.

METHODS

This retrospective consecutive observational case series study comprised 66 eyes that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis to correct hyperopia with a postoperative follow-up of 3 years. Laser in situ keratomileusis procedures were performed using the SCHWIND Amaris 500-Hz excimer laser. Main outcomes measured were stability of the functional optical zone at corneal topography and corneal aberrometry.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found in simulated keratometry (K2 (steep meridian) and Km (mean keratometry)) between 3 and 36 months postoperatively (p ⩽ 0.01); these differences disappeared at 12 and 36 months (p ⩾ 0.18). No statistically significant changes were observed in the horizontal and vertical diameter of the functional optical zone throughout the whole follow-up (p ⩾ 0.07). A statistically significant difference was found in the spherical aberration between 3 and 36 months (p = 0.02); this difference disappeared when compared between 12 and 36 months (p = 0.72). Statistically significant correlations were detected between the vertical functional optical zone and coma root mean square (r = -0.510, p < 0.01) and between the vertical functional optical zone and spherical aberration (r = 0.441, p = 0.02) 36 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Following 3 years of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with a 500-Hz Amaris excimer laser, keratometry, functional optical zone, and corneal aberrations remain stable from 1 year after surgery. Topographical regression is not observed in hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with this excimer laser technology from 1 year after surgery.

The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman's layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism

Background

This study compares the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism greater than − 10 D, and − 10 D or less respectively.

Methods

60 eyes/patients were equally selected into group 1 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of − 10 D or less) and group 2 (myopia and myopic astigmatism of over − 10 D), both of which were treated with SMILE. Visual and refractive outcomes, corneal higher-order aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions were evaluated preoperatively, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of group 1 and group 2 was − 0.069 ± 0.047 and − 0.053 ± 0.073 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.48). 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 were within 1 D of targeted correction (P = 0.45). Meanwhile, 100% eyes in group 1 and 97% in group 2 had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (P = 0.20). Changes in corneal higher-order aberrations root mean square, coma, and trefoil were similar between the two groups but spherical aberration was higher in group 2 (P < 0.01). Micro-distortions were observed in 53% in group 1 and 77% in group 2. More micro-distortions were observed in group 2 (3.40 ± 2.66) than in group 1 (2.07 ± 2.29) (P = 0.041). The total number of micro-distortions was not correlated with postoperative CDVA (P = 0.77).

Conclusions

Visual outcomes showed similar results of SMILE for myopic correction of > − 10 D and ≤ − 10 D. Refractive outcomes showed slightly under-correction in higher myopic eyes. Higher myopic treatment tends to induce more spherical aberrations. Micro-distortions had no impact in visual and refractive outcomes.

Clinical study on combining femtosecond thin- flap and LASIK with the Triple-A profile for high myopia correction

BACKGROUND

Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) can make ultra-thin corneal flap accurately. MEL 90 excimer laser provides Triple-A ablation mode, which significantly reduces the amount of corneal tissue cutting. This study aimed to investigate the visual and refractive outcomes in patients with high myopia after thin-flap FS-LASIK using the 500 Hz pulse rate of the Triple-A profile.

METHODS

This prospective study included 90 eyes from 90 patients received thin-flap FS-LASIK using the 500 Hz pulse rate of the Triple-A profile. According to the pre-operative spherical equivalence (SE), the treated eyes were divided into two groups: the first group (ranged from - 9.0D to - 6.0D) and the second group (ranged from - 11.15D to - 9.0 D). The parameters evaluated pre-operatively and 6 month post-operatively included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), SE, efficacy and safety index, posterior central elevation, and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

RESULTS

The efficacy indexes were 1.149 ± 0.150 for the first group and 1.173 ± 0.136 for the second group (P > 0.05), whereas safety indexes were 1.135 ± 0.154 and 1.158 ± 0.137 (P > 0.05) respectively. Moreover, 93.8 and 90.6% of patients had an UDVA of 20/20, 51.2 and 49.8% had a UDVA of 20/16 for the first and second groups, respectively; yet, there were no significant differences between both groups at the 20/20 and the 20/16 levels (P > 0.05). 84 and 100% of the firse group patients had a SE within ±0.5 D and ± 1.0 D, and 82 and 100% of the second group patients. There was no significant myopia regression in both groups after 6 months follow-up. At 1, 3 and 6-month after surgery, there were no significant differences in the posterior central elevation between the two groups (P > 0.05). The induction of total HOAs, spherical aberration, and horizontal coma in the first group were significantly less than that in the second group at the 6- month follow-up (P < 0.05), while the differences of the RMS value of vertical coma between both groups were not significant (P > 0.05). The ablation was significantly associated with the post-operative increase in total HOAs, spherical aberration and horizontal coma (P < 0.05),but not with vertical coma (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that using the Triple-A ablation profile of the MEL 90 excimer laser associated with thin-flap is a safe, efficient, and predictable method to correct SE up to - 11.15D. However, for patients with high myopia, under the premise of ensuring a certain optical zone diameter, the ablation depth should be minimized to reduce the increase of the post-operative HOAs so as to improve the visual quality.

Early visual outcomes and optical quality after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction of over -10 dioptres

PURPOSE

To investigate early visual and refractive outcomes, corneal stability and optical quality after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for treating myopia and myopic astigmatism over -10 D.

METHODS

Thirty eyes (30 patients) with myopia and myopic astigmatism of over -10 D were treated with VisuMax^® femtosecond laser (version 3.0; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Six months postoperative safety, efficacy and predictability were evaluated. Corneal Scheimpflug topography was measured preoperatively, 1 day, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Wavefront aberrations were measured preoperatively, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Six months postoperatively, LogMAR uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were -0.013 ± 0.086 and -0.073 ± 0.069, respectively. 73% (97%) of eyes were within 0.5 (1) D of target refraction. No eyes lost CDVA, 43% (13 eyes) gained one line and 7% (two eyes) gained two lines. Mean corneal back curvature (KMB) and posterior central elevation (PCE) did not change significantly comparing preoperative and 6 months postoperative data (p = 0.91 and 0.77, respectively). Comparing 1 day with 6 months postoperative data, central corneal thickness (CCT), mean corneal front curvature (KMF), KMB and PCE did not change significantly (p = 0.27, 0.07, 0.52, 0.71, respectively). Total higher-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration and coma increased significantly (p < 0.01) but trefoil remained stable (p = 0.49).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that SMILE can correct myopia and myopic astigmatism of over -10 D predictably. No early ectasia was observed. Long-term changes in visual quality and corneal stability require further investigation.

Corneal functional optical zone under monocular and binocular assessment

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective randomized case series, we compared bilateral symmetry between OD and OS eyes, intercorneal differences and Functional Optical Zone (FOZ) of the corneal aberrations.

METHODS

Sixty-seven normal subjects (with no ocular pathology) who never had any ocular surgery were bilaterally evaluated at Augenzentrum Recklinghausen (Germany). In all cases, standard examinations and corneal wavefront topography (OPTIKON Scout) were performed. The OD/OS bilateral symmetry was evaluated for corneal wavefront aberrations, and FOZ-values were evaluated from the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) of High-Order Wavefront-Aberration (HOWAb). Moreover, correlations of FOZ, spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatism power, and cardinal and oblique astigmatism for binocular vs. monocular, and binocular vs. intercorneal differences were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean FOZ was 6.56 ± 1.13 mm monocularly, 6.97 ± 1.34 mm binocularly, and 7.64 ± 1.30 mm intercorneal difference, with all strongly positively correlated, showing that the diameter of glare-free vision is larger in binocular than monocular conditions. Mean SE was 0.78 ± 1.30 D, and the mean astigmatism power (magnitude) was 0.46 ± 0.52 D binocularly. The corresponding monocular values for these metrics were 0.78 ± 1.30 D and 0.53 ± 0.53 D respectively. SE, astigmatism magnitude, cardinal astigmatism component, and FOZ showed a strong correlation and even symmetry; and oblique astigmatism component showed odd symmetry indicating Enantiomorphism between the left and right eye.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm OD-vs.-OS bilateral symmetry (which influences binocular summation) of HOWAb, FOZ, defocus, astigmatism power, and cardinal and oblique astigmatism. Binocular Functional Optical Zone calculated from corneal wavefront aberrations can be used to optimize refractive surgery design.

Comparing aspheric ablation profile with standard corneal ablation for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism, a contralateral eye study

The purpose of this study is to compare visual outcomes of myopic refractive surgery, using tissue saving (TS), a standard ablation profile by a Technolas 217z100, and aberration smart ablation (ASA), an aspheric algorithm by a MEL 80 excimer laser in two eyes of one patient. In this prospective interventional paired-eye controlled study, a total of 100 eyes of 50 participants with myopia with or without astigmatism underwent thin-flap Femto-LASIK, using a Femto LDV femtosecond laser (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland). For each patient, one eye was randomly treated with tissue-saving algorithm (TS group) by the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser and the other eye was treated with optimized smart ablation profile (ASA group) by the MEL 80 excimer laser. Outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVAs), corrected distance visual acuities (CDVAs), manifest refraction, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction 12 months after surgery. At 12 months postoperative, "45 subjects returned with mean" UDVA was - 0.02 ± 0.08 Logarithm of mean angle of resolution (LogMAR) for TS group and - 0.02 ± 0.09 LogMAR for ASA group (P = 0.91). Of the TS eyes, 42/45 (93.3%) and 32/45 (71.1%) were within ± 0.5 D and ± 0.25 D of target refraction, respectively, and of the ASA eyes, 41/45 (91.1%) and 30/45 (66.6%) were within ± 0.5 D and ± 0.25 D of target refraction, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in HOAs changes and contrast sensitivity function. Aspheric and non-aspheric LASIKs using the two different excimer lasers provide similar results in myopic and myopic astigmatism patients.

Comparison of ReLEx SMILE and PRK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes for the correction of low myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the objective and subjective quality of vision after femtosecond laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low myopia.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty eyes from 60 patients (34 females, 26 males) undergoing bilateral correction of low myopia (≤-4 D SE) with either ReLEx SMILE or PRK were included. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberrations were recorded preoperatively and compared postoperatively. A quality of vision questionnaire was scored and analyzed 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 3 months, the SMILE group had significantly better uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), compared to PRK group (p = 0.01). Post-op spherical equivalent (SE) was comparable in both groups (SMILE = -0.15 ± 0.19 D, PRK = -0.14 ± 0.23 D, p = 0.72). However, SE predictability was better in SMILE group with 97% eyes within ±0.05 D compared to 93% eyes in the PRK group. Total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were significantly higher in PRK compared to the SMILE group (p = 0.022). The SMILE group demonstrated slightly better contrast sensitivity, which was significant at spatial frequency of 12 cpd (p = 0.03). Four eyes in the PRK group had loss of CDVA by one line due to mild haze.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SMILE and PRK were effective procedures for correction of low myopia. However, SMILE offered superior quality of vision and patient satisfaction due to better postoperative comfort and lower induction of aberrations at 3 months.

Centration axis in refractive surgery

The human eye is an asymmetric optical system and the real cornea is not a rotationally symmetrical volume. Each optical element in the eye has its own optical and neural axes. Defining the optimum center for laser ablation is difficult with many available approaches. We explain the various centration approaches (based on these reference axes) in refractive surgery and review their clinical outcomes. The line-of-sight (LOS) (the line joining the entrance pupil center with the fixation point) is often the recommended reference axis for representing wavefront aberrations of the whole eye (derived from the definition of chief ray in geometrical optics); however pupil centration can be unstable and change with the pupil size. The corneal vertex (CV) represents a stable preferable morphologic reference which is the best approximate for alignment to the visual axis. However, the corneal light reflex can be considered as non-constant, but dependent on the direction of gaze of the eye with respect to the light source. A compromise between the pupil and CV centered ablations is seen in the form of an asymmetric offset where the manifest refraction is referenced to the CV while the higher order aberrations are referenced to the pupil center. There is a need for a flexible choice of centration in excimer laser systems to design customized and non-customized treatments optimally.

Effect of anterior corneal surface asphericity modification on fourth-order zernike spherical aberrations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the theoretical influence of the change in corneal asphericity (ΔQ) on the change in fourth-order Zernike spherical aberration coefficient (ΔC(4)0) with customized aspheric refractive correction of myopia and hyperopia.

METHODS

The initial anterior corneal surface profile was modeled as a conic section of apical radius of curvature R0 and asphericity Q₀. The postoperative corneal profile was modeled as a conic section of apical curvature R1 and asphericity Q1, where R1 was computed from defocus D, and Q₁ selected for controlling the postoperative asphericity. The corresponding change in fourth-order spherical aberration (ΔC(0)4) was computed within a 6-mm optical zone using inner products applied to the incurred optical path changes. These calculations were repeated for different values of D, R₀, Q₀, and various intended ΔC(4)0 values.

RESULTS

Increasing negative spherical aberration (ΔC(4)(0) < 0) requires a change toward more negative values of asphericity (increased prolateness; ΔQ < 0) for hyperopic and low myopic corrections, but more positive values (ΔQ < 0) for high myopic correction. The larger the intended change in corneal spherical aberration (ΔC(4)(0)), the more myopic the threshold value for which the required change in asphericity, ΔQ, becomes positive. The influence of the magnitude of paraxial defocus correction is less pronounced when larger changes in C(4)(0) are intended.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a basis for controlling the direction (sign) and the magnitude of spherical aberration changes when using customized aspheric profiles of ablation.

Risk factors associated with night vision disturbances after phakic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and severity of night vision disturbances after implantable collamer lens surgery and to analyze the risk factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative study.

METHODS

Medical charts from 50 eyes of 25 patients who underwent implantable collamer lens implantation were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence and severity of night vision disturbances were evaluated using questionnaires administered 6 months after surgery. Univariate simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to detect risk factors associated with postoperative night vision disturbances. Potential risk factors included in the analysis were keratometric value, anterior chamber depth, postoperative residual refractive error, higher-order aberrations, preoperative and postoperative mesopic pupil size, the difference between preoperative and postoperative mesopic pupil size, the difference between mesopic pupil size and implantable collamer lens optic zone diameter, white-to-white diameter, sulcus-to-sulcus diameter, and postoperative implantable collamer lens vaulting. The power, size, optic zone diameter, and toricity of the implantable collamer lens were also included as variables.

RESULTS

The incidence of night vision disturbances was 34.0% for halos and 26.0% for glare. Halos were found to be significantly related to the difference between mesopic pupil size and implantable collamer lens optic zone diameter (P = .013), white-to-white diameter of the cornea (P = .028), and implantable collamer lens optic zone diameter (P = .030). For glare, toricity of the implantable collamer lens was revealed as a significant risk factor (P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

Although not severe, the incidence of night vision disturbances after implantable collamer lens implantation was not negligible. Possible risk factors for night vision disturbances include implantable collamer lens optic zone diameter, the difference between mesopic pupil size and implantable collamer lens optic zone diameter, and white-to-white diameter of the cornea for causing halos, and the toricity of the implantable collamer lens for causing glare.

Long-term outcome of epi-LASIK for high myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of epipolis laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (epi-LASIK) for high myopia.

METHODS

High myopic patients who underwent epi-LASIK during 2004 and 2005 were included in this study. Epi-LASIK was performed with an automatically rotational epikeratome (KM-5000D). Postoperative visual acuity, manifest refraction, and haze formation were assessed 3 mo, 6 mo, 1 y, and 3 y after surgery. Results were compared by dividing patients into 2 groups according to preoperative mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE): group A (≥-6 D to -10 D; group B ≥-10 D). The differences within groups were analyzed using mixed model for continuous variables. The differences between groups were analyzed using t test or rank sum test for continuous variables, and Pearson χ² or Fisher exact probabilities for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients (33 eyes) were followed up for more than 3 years with 17 eyes in group A (MRSE -8.15 ± 1.41 D) and 16 eyes in group B (MRSE -12.95 ± 2.91 D). While postoperative refraction regression occurred in both groups, it was more prominent in group B (p<0.05). The long-term predictability is good in group A with 14 eyes (82.35%) within ±1 D of attempted correction at 3 years while the percentage in group B was 18.75%. The efficacy index was significantly different between the 2 groups (p<0.05): 0.84 ± 0.29 for group A and 0.61 ± 0.47 for group B at 3 years. The safety index was above 1.0 at each timepoint in both groups. Haze was at low level and faded with time after epi-LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

Epi-LASIK had a satisfactory long-term effect for high myopia of less than -10 D. Myopic regression limited the satisfaction of epi-LASIK in eyes with myopia of more than -10.0 D.

Contrast sensitivity after zyoptix tissue saving LASIK and standard LASIK for myopia with 6-month followup

This control-matched comparative study evaluated changes in contrast sensitivity after Zyoptix tissue-saving (TS) LASIK and Planoscan standard LASIK (Technolas 217z, Bausch & Lomb) for myopia 6 months postoperatively. 102 TS LASIK-treated eyes were matched with 102 standard LASIK-treated eyes (divided into low, moderate, and high groups). There were no significant differences in refraction outcomes between the groups postoperatively. In high group, a significant reduction in contrast sensitivity after TS LASIK was found at high spatial frequencies (P < .05) under photopic conditions and at middle to high spatial frequencies (P < .05) under mesopic conditions. And significant reduction was also found in standard LASIK at high spatial frequency (P < .05) under mesopic conditions. The reduction was significantly lower in TS LASIK than that in standard LASIK at high spatial frequencies (P < .05) under mesopic conditions. TS LASIK was prone to reduce mesopic contrast sensitivity of high myopia at high spatial frequencies.

Factors influencing the reliability of autorefractometry after LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To study the factors influencing the reliability (accuracy) of autorefractometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

A total of 250 consecutive eyes (132 patients, mean age 37 years) were included from the Department of Ophthalmology, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent of the subjective refraction (SR) was -6.59 diopters (D) (-1.38 to -15.13). The patient data were reviewed before and 1 month after LASIK, including SR, objective automated refraction (AR), and visual acuity. Subgroup analysis was performed with regard to the preoperative myopia and the excimer laser optical zone (OZ). The Holm-Sidak and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between AR und SR is r = 0.98 before LASIK versus r = 0.79 afterwards (P < .001). The mean difference between the spherical equivalents (DSE) is +0.13 ± 0.51 D preoperatively versus -0.30 ± 0.58 D after LASIK (P < .001). With a small optical zone size (5.0-5.5 mm) the postoperative difference is -0.61 D, versus -0.36 D for OZ 5.6-6.0, versus -0.16 for OZ 6.1-7.0 mm. With a rising preoperative amount of myopia, the postoperative AR results become increasingly more myopic than the SR.

CONCLUSIONS

Following LASIK, autorefractometry is less accurate than in nonoperated eyes. The reliability of the AR is influenced by the OZ and the preoperative amount of myopia, with a small OZ and high myopia resulting in a greater difference between AR and SR and with the AR determining more myopic results.

Effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred two eyes.

INTERVENTION

LASIK for mild to moderate myopia or astigmatism (preoperative manifest spherical equivalent, -3.99±1.42 diopters).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaires evaluating specific visual symptoms before and after surgery. Each eye was evaluated before surgery, and 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pupils were stratified according to size: small (≤5.5 mm), medium (5.6-6.4 mm), or large (≥6.5 mm). Mesopic pupil size and preoperative and postoperative variables were evaluated using an analysis of variance. A regression model was also performed to determine the correlation between mean spherical equivalent and cylinder and visual symptoms.

RESULTS

In the early postoperative period, there was no difference between the 3 groups with regard to any of the symptoms. At the final 12-month postoperative visit, patients with medium pupils experienced less glare at night than small pupils (P = 0.02), medium pupils had less halos than small or large pupils (P = 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively), and medium pupils experienced greater satisfaction in visual improvement than small pupils (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve months after wavefront-guided LASIK surgery, large pupil size does not positively correlate with any postoperative visual symptoms.

Aspheric Optical Zones: The Effective Optical Zone with the SCHWIND AMARIS

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effective optical zone (the part of the ablation that receives full correction) among eyes that underwent laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK)/epi-LASEK treatments for myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Twenty LASEK/epi-LASEK treatments with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of -5.49±2.35 diopters (D) performed using the SCHWIND AMARIS system were retrospectively evaluated at 6-month follow-up. In all cases, pre- and postoperative corneal wavefront analyses were performed with the Keratron Scout (OPTIKON 2000). Effective optical zone values were evaluated from the changes of root-mean-square (RMS) of higher order wavefront aberration (ΔRMSho), spherical aberration (ΔSphAb), and RMS of the change of higher order wavefront aberration (RMS[ΔHOAb]). Correlations of effective optical zone with planned optical zone and SE correction were analyzed using a bilinear function as well as calculations of the isometric lines for which effective optical zone equals planned optical zone and of the nomogram planned optical zone to achieve an intended effective optical zone.

RESULTS

At 6 months, SE was -0.05±0.43 D, with 90% of eyes within ±0.50 D. Mean higher order wavefront aberration RMS increased 0.12 μm, spherical aberration 0.09 μm, and coma 0.04 μm after treatment (6-mm diameter). Mean planned optical zone was 6.76±0.25 mm, whereas mean EOZ(ΔRMSho) was 6.74±0.66 mm (bilinear correlation P<.005), EOZ(ΔSphAb) was 6.83±0.58 mm (bilinear correlation P<.0001), and EOZ(RMS(ΔHOAb)) was 6.42±0.58 mm (significantly smaller, P<.05; bilinear correlation P<.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The EOZ(ΔRMSho) and EOZ(ΔSphAb) were similar to the planned optical zone, whereas EOZ(RMS(ΔHOAb)) was significantly smaller. Differences between effective optical zone and planned optical zone were larger for smaller planned optical zone or larger SE corrections. Planned optical zones >6.75 mm result in effective optical zones at least as large as planned optical zones. For optical zones <6.75 mm, a nomogram should be applied.

Higher-order aberrations after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To analyze the changes in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) that occur after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Emory Eye Center and Emory Vision, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprised eyes that had PRK or LASIK from June 2004 through October 2005. Postoperative outcome measures included 3-month uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), changes in the root mean square (RMS) and grouped coefficient HOAs (microns) measured with a corneal analyzer, and subjective assessment of visual aberrations.

RESULTS

One hundred consecutive eyes of 54 patients had PRK, and 100 contemporaneous consecutive eyes of 71 patients had LASIK. The PRK and LASIK populations were similar in general demographics, preoperative HOAs, and postoperative UCVA and BSCVA. The mean MRSE was slightly hyperopic after PRK (mean +0.11 diopters [D]) and slightly myopic after LASIK (mean -0.19 D) (P< .0001). There were no statistically significant changes in RMS or grouped coefficient HOA values after PRK or LASIK, nor were there significant differences in postoperative RMS or grouped coefficient HOA values between PRK and LASIK. One percent of PRK and LASIK patients reported a subjective increase in postoperative visual aberrations; 5% reported a subjective improvement postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-optimized excimer laser surgery did not induce significant HOAs after PRK or LASIK. The 2 techniques were equally efficacious and had equivalent postoperative HOA profiles.

Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform

PURPOSE

To examine changes in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after PlanoScan laser in situ keratomileusis and (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative study.

METHODS

Myopic patients undergoing LASIK (65 eyes of 36 patients) and LASEK (50 eyes of 28 patients) at a private practice were selected randomly. Surgery was performed using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb, Surrey, United Kingdom). Main outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and aberrometry (Zywave; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) and were recorded before surgery and at three and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between both groups in terms of MRSE (P = .91), ablation depth (P = .47), scotopic pupil size (P = .38), or optical zone (P = .07). Before surgery, there was no statistical difference in root mean square (RMS) of total (P = .70), third- (P = .79), fourth- (P = .23), and fifth- (P = .33) order aberrations and individual terms. Three months after surgery, RMS of total HOA was raised significantly more (P = .03) after LASIK (1.46-factor increase) than LASEK (1.25-factor increase). One year after surgery, a reduction in total HOAs was observed in 13.8% of LASIK- and 48.5% of LASEK-treated eyes compared with preoperative levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative increases in total HOA and vertical coma were significantly greater in LASIK- than in LASEK-treated eyes. Postoperative reduction in total HOAs was observed in a number of eyes with high preoperative levels and occurred more frequently in LASEK-treated eyes.

Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight platform

PURPOSE

To investigate patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided LASIK.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled study comprised 200 eyes of 100 young patients who underwent LASIK for myopia and astigmatism. Patients were randomly divided into two different treatment groups: standard ablation using wavefront-optimized profiles (wavefront-optimized group) and aberration customized aspheric treatment ablation (customized group) using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO platform. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding reasons for surgery, satisfaction, and visual symptoms. Patients were followed for 6 months.

RESULTS

The most frequent motivating factor for surgery was to improve uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in the wavefront-optimized and customized groups (both 100%), followed by freedom from spectacles (86.9% vs 96.3%). At 6 months postoperatively, over 95% of patients in both groups reported their UCVA was as good as anticipated and they were satisfied with the surgery and would recommend the operation to a friend or family member. Satisfaction was not correlated with age, attempted refractive error, residual refractive error, postoperative UCVA, or root-mean-square higher order aberration. The rate of postoperative overall visual symptoms was reduced and the mean analog scores of the symptoms in both groups did not change significantly postoperatively (P > .05). The rate of visual symptoms such as glare (8.7% vs 7.4%), halo (0% vs 7.4%), and night driving difficulty (8.7% vs 3.7%) decreased after LASIK at 6 months postoperatively in the wavefront-optimized and customized groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction was achieved in young myopic patients who underwent wavefront-guided and standard ("wavefront-optimized") LASIK. The rate of visual symptoms such as glare, halo, and night driving difficulty decreased postoperatively after both treatment protocols.

Prospective randomized trial of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with the CustomCornea and CustomVue laser systems

PURPOSE

To compare visual function, safety, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the LadarVision CustomCornea (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) and Star S4 CustomVue (Visx) laser systems.

SETTING

John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

METHODS

Seventy-eight eyes of 39 patients with myopia with or without astigmatism were randomized for LASIK treatment in 1 eye with the CustomCornea laser; the other eye was treated with the CustomVue laser. Patients were followed for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and changes in HOAs.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UCVA was -0.0135 +/- 0.07 (SD) in the CustomVue group and 0.0417 +/- 0.12 in the CustomCornea group (P = .023). Eighty-eight percent of eyes in the CustomVue group had 20/20 or better UCVA compared with 67% in the CustomCornea group (P<.02). At 6 months, 91% of eyes in the CustomVue group and 79% in the CustomCornea group were within +/-0.50 diopter (D) of emmetropia (P<.1); 88% and 50%, respectively, were within +/-0.25 D (P<.001). Both platforms led to a small increase in total HOAs. The CustomVue system reduced trefoil and induced less of an increase in total HOAs, whereas the CustomCornea platform increased trefoil but induced less of an increase in spherical aberrations and coma.

CONCLUSIONS

Both laser systems were effective, safe, and predictable. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the CustomVue system resulted in better visual acuity, with more eyes having 20/20 acuity than in the CustomCornea group.

Changes in contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher order aberration by conventional myopic photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relation between induced changes in ocular higher order aberrations and changes in the contrast sensitivity function in patients undergoing excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Myopic PRK using excimer laser was performed in 31 patients (56 eyes). The preoperative refractive error was -6.2 +/- 2.9 diopters. Before and 1 month after surgery, we measured the ocular higher order aberrations for a 4-mm pupil, and three indices of contrast sensitivity function. From the data collected, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) was calculated.

RESULTS

PRK significantly reduced AULCSF (P = 0.004), low-contrast visual acuity (P = 0.004), and letter-contrast sensitivity (P = 0.013). Coma-like (P < 0.001) and spherical-like (P < 0.001) aberrations were significantly increased by surgery. The change in AULCSF by surgery significantly correlated with the change in coma-like (r = -0.468, P < 0.001) and spherical-like (r = -0.291, P = 0.033) aberrations. The change in low-contrast visual acuity by PRK significantly correlated with the change in coma-like aberration (r = 0.599, P < 0.007), but not with change in spherical-like aberrations (r = 0.136, P = 0.326). There were significant correlations between changes in letter-contrast sensitivity and changes in coma-like (r = -0.450, P < 0.001) and spherical-like (r = -0.255, P = 0.048) aberrations.

CONCLUSIONS

PRK significantly increases ocular higher order aberrations, which compromise contrast sensitivity function after surgery.

Photorefractive keratectomy in the cat eye: biological and optical outcomes

PURPOSE

To quantify optical and biomechanical properties of the feline cornea before and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and assess the relative contribution of different biological factors to refractive outcome.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.

METHODS

Adult cats had 6.0 diopter (D) myopic or 4.0 D hyperopic PRK over 6.0 or 8.0 mm optical zones (OZ). Preoperative and postoperative wavefront aberrations were measured, as were intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal hysteresis, the corneal resistance factor, axial length, corneal thickness, and radii of curvature. Finally, postmortem immunohistochemistry for vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin was performed.

RESULTS

Photorefractive keratectomy changed ocular defocus, increased higher-order aberrations, and induced myofibroblast differentiation in cats. However, the intended defocus corrections were only achieved with 8.0 mm OZs. Long-term flattening of the epithelial and stromal surfaces was noted after myopic, but not after hyperopic, PRK. The IOP was unaltered by PRK; however, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor decreased. Over the ensuing 6 months, ocular aberrations and the IOP remained stable, while central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, and the corneal resistance factor increased toward normal levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Cat corneas exhibited optical, histological, and biomechanical reactions to PRK that resembled those previously described in humans, especially when the OZ size was normalized to the total corneal area. However, cats exhibited significant stromal regeneration, causing a return to preoperative corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor without significant regression of optical changes induced by the surgery. Thus, the principal effects of laser refractive surgery on ocular wavefront aberrations can be achieved despite clear interspecies differences in corneal biology.

Does Dilated Wavefront Aberration Measurement Provide Better Postoperative Outcome after Custom LASIK?

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after custom LASIK based on non-pharmacologically dilated (natural mesopic pupil) and pharmacologically dilated wavefront aberration measurement.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS

The study group included 81 myopic eyes from 81 patients (mean preoperative spherical equivalent [SE], -4.15+/-1.97 diopters [D]). The control group consisted of 87 myopic eyes from 87 patients (mean preoperative SE, -4.98+/-2.00 D).

METHODS

The 81-eye study cohort was treated based on nonpharmacological low mesopic dilated wavefront aberration measurement (Zywave aberrometer), and the postoperative outcome was compared with that of the control group of 87 eyes treated, based on pharmacologically dilated (2.5% neosynephrine) wavefront data, using the Zyoptix platform. The same nomogram was used for both groups, which adjusts sphere based on the amount of preoperative higher-order aberration. All eyes had a low mesopic pupil diameter of > or =6.3 mm without pharmaceutical intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Postoperative 3-month visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, and refractive error.

RESULTS

Of the non-pharmacologically dilated eyes (study) and pharmacologically dilated (control) eyes, 96.3% and 96.6%, respectively, attained postoperative uncorrected VA of 20/20 or better. Although 96.6% of the eyes were within the target SE of +/-0.50 D in the control group, 100% of the 81 study eyes were within an SE of +/-0.50 D postoperatively. The range of postoperative SE (-0.75 to +1 D) was slightly reduced among the study eyes (+/-0.50 D). Differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

When a low mesopic pupil dilates to > or =6.3 mm, pharmacological dilation with wavefront-guided ablation may provide no additional benefit with regard to spherical accuracy when compared with nonpharmacological wavefront-guided ablation. The use of the Rochester nomogram, which accounts for aberration interaction, provided excellent results with or without pharmacological dilation.

Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system

PURPOSE

To identify factors that affect the change in lower- and higher-order wavefront aberrations after myopic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (wg-LASIK).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

METHODS

Sixty myopic eyes of 32 patients were treated with wg-LASIK (Zyoptix version 3.1, Bausch & Lomb) and had an uneventful follow-up of 12 months. Wavefront errors were measured preoperatively and 12 months after LASIK and were computed for pupil diameters (PDs) of 3.5 mm and 6.0 mm. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of patient age, spherical equivalent (SE), sphere, cylinder, optical zone (OZ) diameter, and the preoperative individual Zernike coefficients on lower- and higher-order aberration (HOA) change.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative SE was -5.59 diopters (D) +/- 2.20 (SD) (range -1.00 to -9.50 D); the mean OZ diameter was 6.70 +/- 0.68 mm (range 5.6 to 8.1 mm). Reduction in almost all Zernike coefficients was influenced significantly by the preoperative amount of the individual coefficient. The effect varied among the coefficients and was lower with the 6.0 mm PD. With the 3.5 mm PD, age, SE, sphere, cylinder, and OZ diameter did not have a significant effect on individual Zernike coefficients. With the 6.0 mm PD, SE and OZ diameter had a significant effect on the induction of Z4(0); the OZ diameter also had an effect on the induction of coma root mean square.

CONCLUSIONS

Three groups of factors influenced the change in HOAs: The negative correlation with the magnitude of preoperative HOA values reflected the effect of the wavefront-guided algorithm. The SE and OZ diameter affected the inadvertent induction of spherical aberrations. Randomly acting effects such as decentration or flap creation, which were not included in the model, affected the induction of HOAs, particularly coma-like terms.

Comparison of LASIK Using the NIDEK EC-5000 Optimized Aspheric Transition Zone (OATz) and Conventional Ablation Profile

PURPOSE

To compare a new ablation algorithm termed the optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) with the conventional laser ablation profile for correction of myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

LASIK using OATz profile #6 or using conventional ablation profile was performed on 98 eyes of 53 patients (OATz #6 group) and 111 eyes of 66 patients (control #6 group), respectively. Further, LASIK using OATz profile #5 or using the conventional ablation profile was performed on 109 eyes of 58 patients (OATz #5 group) and 109 eyes of 75 patients (control #5 group), respectively. The effective optical zone, uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively were compared between the OATz #6 and control #6 groups and between the OATz #5 and control #5 groups.

RESULTS

The effective optical zones in the OATz #6 group (6.45 +/- 0.29 mm) or OATz #5 group (6.40 +/- 0.21 mm) were significantly larger than those in the control #6 group (6.33 +/- 0.27 mm) or control #5 group (6.26 +/- 0.25 mm) (P < .01), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were similar in all groups. The changes in contrast sensitivity were significant and favored the OATz #6 (P < .01) and OATz #5 groups (P < .05). The patient satisfaction survey found no statistical difference at 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with the OATz profiles had better visual quality as measured by contrast sensitivity and also had larger effective optical zones as compared with those treated by the conventional ablation profile.

Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of pupil and optical zone (OZ) diameter on higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after myopic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

Twenty-seven myopic eyes of 19 patients were included. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -6.86 diopters (D) +/- 1.24 (SD) (range -4.25 to -9.5 D); the mean planned OZ diameter was 6.26 +/- 0.45 mm (range 5.7 to 7.1 mm). All patients had uneventful wavefront-guided LASIK (Zyoptix version 3.1, Bausch & Lomb) and an uncomplicated follow-up of 12 months. Wavefront measurements were performed with a Hartmann-Shack sensor in maximum mydriasis preoperatively and 12 months after LASIK. Wavefront errors were computed for pupil diameters (PDs) of 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 mm for the individual OZ diameter and for the individual mydriatic PD (7.93 +/- 0.46 mm). The impact of the relationship between pupil diameter and OZ diameter (fractional clearance [FC]) on HOA was described and quantified using curvilinear regression with a 4th-order polynomial fit.

RESULTS

There was a reproducible relationship between FC and the amount of induced HOA. The change in HOA root mean square and primary spherical aberration (Z(4)0) was significantly correlated with FC. If the OZ was 16.5% larger than the pupil (FC = 1.17), only half the amount of HOA was expected to be induced than if the OZ equaled the pupil. In contrast, an OZ that was 9% smaller than the pupil (FC = 0.91) resulted in an HOA induction 50% higher than at FC = 1.

CONCLUSION

The OZ zone to pupil ratio (fractional clearance) had a significant impact on HOA induction after wavefront-guided LASIK.