Decentration and Cataract Formation 10 Years Following Posterior Chamber Silicone Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation

Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation

PURPOSE

To introduce a modified procedure of ICL implantation, to summarize the perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment after myopia correction with Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), and to compare the difference of complications between the no-hole ICL and hole ICL.

METHODS

We searched all articles on ICL-related perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment in Scopus, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases for the last 22 years.

RESULTS

ICL implantation is safe, effective, stable and predictable in the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism, but can also cause a series of perioperative problems, including intraoperative and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

There are many kinds of complications related to ICL, but the common intraoperative and postoperative complications mainly include abnormality of arch height, abnormal position of ICL, loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma, cataract and night vision symptoms. Compared with ICL without central pore, the incidence of complications such as loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma and cataract was relatively lower in central hole ICL, while postoperative complications such as night vision symptoms were obvious.

Long-term In Vivo Stability of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens: Properties and Light Transmission Characteristics of Explants

PURPOSE

To evaluate the in vivo durability of the surface and optical properties of the implantable Collamer lens (ICL).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

We included patients who developed cataracts after having undergone ICL implantation from March 2003 to May 2014 and underwent ICL explantation followed by cataract surgery from March 2017 to December 2019 at the Nagoya Eye Clinic. ICL explants were submitted to Chukyo Medical Co, Ltd (Nagoya City, Japan) for laboratory analysis using ultraviolet-visible light spectroscopy, light microscopy (LM), and scanning electron microscopy. Patients' demographic and clinical data were collected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirteen eyes from 10 patients were studied. The average age at ICL explantation was 50.5 ± 8.5 years (range, 34.5-66.3 years). The average length of ICL stay in the eye (from implantation to explantation) was 10.5 ± 2.7 years (range, 4.4-13.7 years). No opacification or coloring of the ICL explants was observed by LM. The ICL explants showed almost the same light transmittance as that of unused ICLs. Scanning electron microscopy revealed no irregularities at the surface of the center and periphery of the optic and haptic footplate. The positioning holes did not show any deposition.

CONCLUSION

The ICLs remained in-eye for >10 years without any deterioration in the surface and optical properties of the ICL, despite their contact with the ciliary body and iris tissues and the continuous interaction with the aqueous humor components. The present study shows long-term in vivo stability of the ICL.

Phakic intraocular lens explantation: causes in 240 cases

PURPOSE

To describe the main causes of explantation of phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs) according to the anatomical site of implantation (angle supported, iris fixated, or posterior chamber).

METHODS

This multicentric, retrospective, and consecutive study sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Health comprised a total of 240 eyes (226 patients) explanted due to PIOL complications. Clinical data of 144 angle-supported lenses, 24 iris-fixated lenses, and 72 posterior chamber lenses explanted were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients at explantation was 46.30 ± 11.84 years (range: 25 to 80 years). The mean time between implantation and explantation was 381.14 ± 293.55 weeks (range: 0.00 to 1,551.17 weeks). It was 422.33 ± 287.81 weeks for the angle-supported group, 488.03 ± 351.95 weeks for the iris-fixated group, and 234.11 ± 4,221.60 weeks for the posterior chamber group. It was 8.10 ± 5.52 years for the angle-supported group, 9.36 ± 6.75 years for the iris-fixated group, and 4.49 ± 4.25 years for the posterior chamber group. This period of time was significantly shorter in the posterior chamber group (P < .001). Overall, the main causes of explantation were cataract formation (132 eyes, 55%), endothelial cell loss (26 eyes, 10.83%), corneal decompensation (22 eyes, 9.17%), PIOL dislocation/decentration (16 eyes, 6.67%), inadequate PIOL size or power (12 eyes, 5%), and pupil ovalization (10 cases, 4.17%). Cataract development was the cause of explantation in 51.39% of angle-supported cases, 45.83% of iris-fixated cases, and 65.28% of posterior chamber cases. Endothelial cell loss was the cause of explantation in 15.97% of angle-supported PIOLs, 8.33% of iris-fixated PIOLs, and 1.39% of posterior chamber PIOLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract is the main cause of PIOL explantation, especially in posterior chamber PIOLs. In the angle-supported group, endothelial cell loss was the second cause of explantation.

Scheimpflug Analysis of Centration and Bending of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to present a novel technique for the assessment of postoperative centration and bending in phakic intraocular lens (PIOL), illustrated through 4 patient examples.

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study.

METHODS

Four patients (7 eyes) who presented with complaints of reduced quality of vision after implantation with a Staar Collamer plate haptic PIOL were recruited for assessment. Scheimpflug images were obtained and analyzed with respect to the apical axis and the crystalline lens by means of an in-house-developed algorithm. The program provides an estimate for the PIOL centration and bending through an analysis of the distance between the PIOL and the crystalline lens.

RESULTS

The algorithm detected PIOL bending in 5 of the 7 eyes and PIOL decentration in 3 eyes. The PIOL bending or decentration detected corresponded, in all cases, with the axis of the astigmatism-like complaints in the patient. In 2 eyes of the same patient, the analysis could not be performed because the distance between PIOL and crystalline lens was too short for reliable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This algorithm is a useful tool to objectively assess the postoperative complaints of patients implanted with a posterior chamber PIOL. Bending and decentration due to anatomical variations of the sulcus lens position can be measured and in many cases correlated with patients' complaints.

Implants phakes de chambre antérieure versus chambre postérieure

At a time when some of the limitations of photoablation have been defined, such as worry concerning secondary ectasia, a renewed interest in phakic implantation has arisen. This is driven by the goal of avoiding correcting high ametropia with LASIK and is based on the development of soft foldable biomaterials. When all phakic IOLs are in front of the natural lens, two varieties of lenses can be distinguished, depending on whether it is located in the anterior or posterior chamber. The various models available in 2006 and those under current evaluation are reviewed. We do not report details of clinical studies that vary in cohort size and follow-up. The advantages and limitations are discussed for each type of phakic IOL. Adequate although not exclusive indications are deduced. There is no phakic lens that has proved to be superior to the others in terms of safety. All have the ability to provide a visual benefit with a gain in best corrected visual acuity. The difference is based on anatomical effects, requiring long-term follow-up in the evaluation of angles, lens, iris, and endothelium.