Centration on the Cornea Vertex Normal During Hyperopic Refractive Photoablation Using Videokeratoscopy

First European results of a new refractive lenticular extraction procedure-SmartSight by SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions

BACKGROUND

To evaluate vision 3 months after SmartSight lenticule extraction treatments.

DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

This case series of patients were treated at Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost in Zagreb, Croatia. Sixty eyes of 31 patients consecutively treated with SmartSight lenticule extraction were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 33 ± 6 years (range 23-45 years) at the time of treatment with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -5.10 ± 1.35 D and mean astigmatism of 0.46 ± 0.36 D. Monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were assessed pre- and post-operatively. Ocular and corneal wavefront aberrations have been postoperatively compared to the preoperative baseline values. Changes in ocular wavefront refraction, as well as changes in keratometric readings are reported.

RESULTS

At 3 months post-operatively, mean UDVA was 20/20 ± 2. Spherical equivalent showed a low myopic residual refraction of -0.37 ± 0.58 D with refractive astigmatism of 0.46 ± 0.26 D postoperatively. There was a slight improvement of 0.1 Snellen lines at 3-months follow-up. Compared to the preoperative status, ocular aberrations (at 6 mm diameter) did not change at 3 months follow-up; whereas corneal aberrations increased (+0.22 ± 0.21 µm for coma; +0.17 ± 0.19 µm for spherical aberration; and +0.32 ± 0.26 µm for HOA-RMS). The same correction was determined using changes in ocular wavefront refraction, as well as changes in keratometric readings.

CONCLUSION

Lenticule extraction after SmartSight is safe and efficacious in the first 3 months postoperatively. The post-operative outcomes indicate improvements in vision.

The effect of different angle kappa on higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction

This study aimed to compare higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in patients with different angle kappa. This is a retrospective report in which 341 right eyes of 341 patients who were subjected to SMILE, which used coaxially sighted corneal light reflex (CSCLR) as the treatment zone centered, treated by the same experienced surgeon (LHB) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism, preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), angle kappa, total higher-order aberrations (total HOA), spherical aberration (SA), vertical coma (VC), horizontal coma (HC), oblique trefoil (OT), and horizontal trefoil (HT), were compared. SMILE showed outstanding performance in terms of safety, efficacy, and predictability. In addition, a comparison of preoperative and postoperative HOAs exhibited the difference of total HOA (P < 0.01), SA (P < 0.01), VC (P < 0.01), and HC (P < 0.01), which was statistically significant; however, for OT and HT with the longer follow-up time, the statistical difference gradually decreased. For stratification of angle kappa into groups based on decantation, angle kappa was divided into three major groups: r < 0.1 mm, 0.1 ≤ r < 0.2 mm, and r ≥ 0.2 mm; the changes of SA (F = 4.127, P = 0.021) and OT (F = 3.687, P = 0.031) exhibited significant difference after 1 year of SMILE. We performed a correlation analysis of all preoperative and postoperative parameters, and the results indicated that the preoperative total HOA was negatively correlated with preoperative cylindrical diopter (DC), and postoperative total HOA, SA, and coma were affected by spherical diopter (DS) and SE. Moreover, we also found a significant difference of SA and VC in the early postoperative with preoperative. SA was positively correlated with Y values and r of 1 year after SMILE. All of the analyzed parameters in the three groups, except for the trefoil, gradually increased over time; however, the trefoil could gradually stabilize over time. We also divided angle kappa into four groups by quadrants; the result showed that the effects of higher-order aberrations were markedly different from the various quadrants. Patients with large angle kappa were able to increase VC and SA postoperatively, and higher HOAs were more significant in patients with high myopia. The differences in quadrants exhibited a diversity of HOAs; this could be attributed to the corneal surface reestablishment and the alteration of angle kappa, but the trend was not apparent. Although all patients displayed increased HOAs after SMILE, the potential application of CSCLR as the treatment zone centered still showed excellent safety, efficacy, and predictability.

Predictability of the Achieved Lenticule Thickness in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Correction

PURPOSE

To assess the predictability between the SCHWIND ATOS femtosecond laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) read-out and achieved lenticule thickness measured using MS-39 anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT; CSO) at the corneal vertex at postoperative 1 day and 1 and 3 months of follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 130 eyes of 65 consecutive patients who were treated with SmartSight (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) lenticule extraction. Sixty-four percent of patients were women with a mean spherical refraction of -4.98 ± 1.19 diopters (D) and mean astigmatism of 0.53 ± 0.64 D. The measurements were performed using AS-OCT with the Phoenix Software v 4.1.1.5. Lenticule thickness was obtained by the subtraction method between preoperative and postoperative total corneal thickness.

RESULTS

A lower reduction in central corneal thickness (CCT) compared to the laser read-out for all three follow-up visits can be observed. Essentially, the reduction in CCT was identical at 3 months versus 1 month. The reduction in CCT was lowest at postoperative 1 day. Examining the 1- and 3-month data (essentially equivalent), one can see a best fit of y = 0.94 x -7 µm.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in CCT was stable from 1 month of follow-up. The stable reduction in CCT was -6% (-1.5% after accounting for design decisions) and -7 µm lower than the respective laser read-out. The findings are predictable, showing a certain level of the lenticules becoming slightly thinner than their respective laser read-outs. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):728-735.].

Symmetric offset versus asymmetric offset ablation with transepithelial refractive keratectomy

BACKGROUND

In eyes with hyperopia, astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a modality of surface ablation surgery. We center on the corneal vertex for all our treatments (all have an offset to the center of the pupil) and wanted to compare the visual results of symmetrical profile treatments versus asymmetrical profile treatments (the center of the treatment on the vertex and the boundaries with the pupil center) using TransPRK as corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed two consecutive groups of eyes treated with TransPRK in the Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum Recklinghausen: 47 eyes treated with symmetrical offset and 51 eyes treated with asymmetrical offset. The intergroup comparisons were assessed using unpaired Student's T-tests, whereas preoperative to postoperative changes were assessed using paired Student's T-tests.

RESULTS

Refractive outcomes were good for both groups. 83 and 88% of eyes were within the spherical equivalent of 0.5 D from the target in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively. 85 and 84% of eyes had a postoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or lower in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We have not found a significant difference in the refractive outcomes between the symmetric group and the asymmetric group of eyes treated both with TransPRK for preoperatively hyperopic or mixed astigmatism.

Influence of the Reference Center on the Calculation of Corneal Higher Order Aberrations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in corneal wavefront measurements in myopic and hyperopic eyes when calculated using three different reference centers and explore possible influencing factors for such differences.

METHODS

Corneal wavefront measurements were performed in myopic and hyperopic eyes using a GALILEI Placido Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG). Corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), including total, vertical, and horizontal coma-like aberrations, spherical aberrations, and total corneal HOAs through a 6-mm pupil size, were calculated over three different reference center positions: pupil center, corneal vertex, and limbus to limbus. Values were then compared between the myopic and hyper-opic eyes, and correlations with kappa distance and spherical equivalent were tested.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in the level of total corneal HOAs (-0.04 ± 0.05 and -0.12 ± 0.09), total corneal coma (-0.07 ± 0.09 and -0.18 ± 0.12), and horizontal coma (-0.07 ± 0.11 and -0.22 ± 0.11) in myopic and hyperopic eyes, respectively, was found when recalculating from pupil center to corneal vertex centration, whereas a significant increase in the same aberrations was observed from pupil center or corneal vertex to limbus to limbus. Significant correlations were found between the kappa distance and changes in total corneal HOAs, total corneal coma, and horizontal coma from the pupil center to the corneal vertex in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal vertex centration generated the lowest level of corneal wavefront error in both groups. The differences in corneal aberrations between the reference centers for calculation were highly correlated with the kappa distance in hyperopic eyes. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(5):340-346.].

Dynamic distribution and correlation analysis of the angle kappa in myopia patients undergoing femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To explore the offset distribution of pupillary centres, the offset between the pupil centre and the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex (P-Dist) and their correlation in femtosecond laser combined with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis.

METHODS

Randomly selected 194 patients (398 eyes) who underwent femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis with preoperative use of WaveLight Allegro Topolyzer Corneal Topography (WaveLight Laser Technologies AG, Erlangen, Germany) to measure the pupil size and centre position. The P-Dist of the patients was recorded by the X and Y axis eyeball tracking adjustment program of the WaveLight Eagle Vision EX500 excimer laser system.

RESULTS

The P-Dist was 0.214 ± 0.092 mm in the right eyes and 0.228 ± 0.105 mm in the left eyes (P = .041). Under scotopic conditions, the pupil centre of left eye X-axis was -0.046 ± 0.091 mm, the right eye was -0.152 ± 0.084 mm, with significant differences (P = .015), and the Y-axis direction showed no significant changes (P = .062). The white to white was positively correlated with changes of pupil diameter (scotopic pupil diameter-photopic pupil diameter) (r = 0.270, P < .001). The equivalent spherical mirror and measured centroid shift were negatively correlated (r = -0.214, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

The angle kappa of the right eye is smaller than that of the left eye and from scotopic to photopic condition, the pupil centroid shift of both eyes to the nasal inferior side. If the cornea is too large, the low illumination environment should be maintained during the operation to improve the efficiency of pupil matching.

Preoperative Factors Affecting Visual Acuity Following the Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE

To investigate the preoperative factors affecting visual acuity after the implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

METHODS

This study evaluated 774 eyes of 774 patients who underwent cataract surgery with TECNIS Multifocal ZLB00 lens (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision) implantation. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2; Tomey Corporation) was performed as a part of the preoperative eye examination. Sex, age, axial length, and CASIA2 parameters, such as crystalline lens diameter and lens tilt relative to the corneal topographic axis, were investigated. The eyes considered were classified into good (20/20 or better) or poor (worse than 20/20) far vision groups based on corrected distance visual acuity, and good (20/25 or better) or poor (worse than 20/25) near vision groups based on distance-corrected near visual acuity, respectively. Preoperative characteristics of both groups were compared to determine factors affecting postoperative visual acuity.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (P < .001), a short axial length (P = .010), and a large lens tilt (P < .001) were associated with poor near vision. There was no significant difference between the two far vision groups. There was a significant negative correlation between lens tilt and axial length (r = -0.513, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that age, axial length, and lens tilt to the corneal topographic axis may predict poor visual acuity after the implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Eyes with a short axial length tended to have a large degree of lens tilt and should be considered particularly carefully. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):674-679.].

Comparison of Refractive and Visual Outcomes after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) in Low versus Moderate Myopia

Is it possible to obtain good results in myopia of 2 or fewer diopters (D) with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness? We retrospectively analyzed two groups of 296 eyes with a minimum follow-up of 4 months. Group A had 2 or less D, treated with an optical zone (OZ) 0.2 mm bigger than recommended, and a central epithelium thickness of 60 microns, and group B had 2 D to 5 D, with the recommended optical zone, and a 55-micron epithelium ablation at the center. The outcomes were not different between the two myopic ranges; the postop uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 ± 4 in both groups (p = 0.2), which was −0.3 ± 0.8 lines worse than the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity in both groups (p = 0.5). The safety of the treatments resulted in a change of 0.0 ± 0.7 lines in the low myopia group, versus a gain of +0.1 ± 0.8 lines in the moderate myopia group (p = 0.1). The deviation from the intended target was −0.04 ± 0.33 D in the low myopia group and +0.07 ± 0.32 D in the moderate myopia group (p < 0.0001); the postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.00 ± 0.33 D in the low myopia group and +0.10 ± 0.31 D in the moderate myopia group (p < 0.0001). The postop refractive astigmatism was 0.32 ± 0.16 D in both groups (p = 0.5). In conclusion, the refractive and visual outcomes after TransPRK are comparable in low myopia changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness versus moderate myopia with standard optical zone and epithelium thickness.

Centration of myopic refractive ablation: should we center treatment on the pupil or the visual axis?

The purpose of this study is to compare pupil versus corneal vertex-centered ablation for myopic laser refractive surgery. This study is a retrospective case series of right eyes of consecutive myopic patients undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with pupil or corneal vertex-centered ablation from January 2018 to April 2018. Overall 258 eyes of 258 patients were included. Of the 104 that underwent LASIK, 52 were treated centered on the corneal vertex (50%), and of the 154 that underwent PRK, 77 were treated centered on the corneal vertex (50%). There were no significant differences in baseline age, gender, spherical equivalence, sphere, cylinder, or angle kappa between both groups in either LASIK or PRK. There were no significant differences between the corneal vertex-centered and pupil-centered groups in terms of efficacy index (LASIK: 1.02 ± 0.14 vs 1.01 ± 0.13, p = 0.86; PRK: 1.00 ± 0.13 vs 0.99 ± 0.15, p = 0.61), safety index (LASIK: 1.02 ± 0.12 vs 1.01 ± 0.13, p = 0.70; PRK:1.02 ± 0.12 vs 1.02 ± 0.09, p = 0.97), and residual astigmatism (LASIK: 0.26 ± 0.25 vs 0.23 ± 0.28, p = 0.65; PRK:0.37 ± 0.41 vs 0.39 ± 0.31, p = 0.78). In mixed effect models, there were no significant differences between the corneal vertex-centered and pupil-centered groups when accounting for angle kappa (p > 0.05). Patients with large angle kappa (> 300 μm) eyes yielded similar results (p > 0.05). For conclusion, in myopic refractive surgery, performing ablation centered on the corneal vertex or on the pupil leads to similar outcomes regardless of the amount of angle kappa.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratektomy after a Clear Lens Exchange

PURPOSE

We evaluated the refractive visual outcomes and efficacy of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) using Smart Pulse Technology with static and dynamic cyclotorsion and the AMARIS 1050 Hz RS laser platform from Schwind in the eyes after a refractive lens exchange. Setting/Venue: Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum, Recklinghausen.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data of 552 consecutive eyes treated with refractive lens exchange between 2016 and 2019. A total of 47 eyes (8.5%) required a touch up after the clear lens exchange. From 43 eyes of 43 patients, we obtained a minimum follow up of 3 months. In all cases, we performed a TransPRK with a minimum optical zone of 7.2 mm, centering the ablation on the vertex of the cornea.

RESULTS

The average age of the treated eyes was 57 years old, with a range between 48 and 68 years. The mean treated sphere was 0.42 diopters (D), with a range between -1.0 and +1.75 D. The mean astigmatism was 1.06 D. Postoperatively, after laser vision correction, we reduced the sphere to a mean of 0.11 D (range -0.5 to +0.75 D), and, postoperatively, the mean astigmatism was 0.25 D (range -0.75 to 0 D). The predictability for a spheric equivalent (SEQ) of 0.5 D was 91%, and for 1 D it was 100% of the cases. No eye lost more than one Snellen line.

CONCLUSIONS

TransPRK with smart pulse was predictable for correcting ametropia after Clear Lens Surgery.

Comparison of the Distribution of Lenticule Decentration Following SMILE by Pupil Center or Tear Film Mark Centration

PURPOSE

To investigate lenticule decentration following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) via the pupil center or tear film mark centration method and compare induction of corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) between the two methods.

METHODS

This study analyzed decentration values obtained from tangential topography difference maps of 100 eyes (100 patients) undergoing SMILE with the pupil center (n = 50) or tear film mark (n = 50) centration method. Total HOAs and component aberrations were measured preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Relationships between the magnitudes of decentration and induced corneal HOAs were assessed.

RESULTS

Both vertical and total decentered displacement were significantly different (P < .001) between the two centration groups. A significant relationship between the preoperative pupillary offset and decentration was noted in the pupil center group (P < .001), but not in the tear film mark group (P = .530). Significantly greater induction of total HOAs, coma, and vertical coma (all P < .001), as well as horizontal coma (P = .001) and spherical aberration (P = .023), were observed in the pupil center group. Association between the total decentered displacement and induced total HOAs (P < .001), as well as all other significantly increased phenomena, was also significant in the pupil center group. Differences in decentered displacement and induced corneal HOAs were significant for preoperative pupillary offset (angle kappa) greater than 200 µm, but not for angle kappa less than 200 µm.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE with tear film mark centration can yield improved treatment centration and less induction of total HOAs, coma, and spherical aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(4):239-246.].

Clinical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery comparing centration on the corneal vertex with the pupil center: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes between centration on the corneal vertex and the pupil center in corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes were the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), effectiveness [uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/20, eyes within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of target refraction], and safety [loss ≥ 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)]. Higher-order aberrations were considered secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies describing a total of 1964 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. A statistical significance in postoperative SE was found between the two centration methods for the correction of myopia that favor the CV-centered method (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of eyes with UDVA ≥ 20/20 or loss ≥ 2 lines of CDVA postoperatively. However, the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D was slightly higher (p = 0.02) and the coma aberration was much lower in the corneal vertex-centered method (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preferable visual and refractive outcomes could be achieved with either centering on the corneal vertex or pupil center in corneal refractive surgery; however, the corneal vertex-centered method has shown partial benefits in some clinical indices. In order to obtain higher quality of clinical evidences, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required in further investigations.

Six-Month Outcomes After High Hyperopia Correction Using Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis With a Large Ablation Zone

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to treat high hyperopia using an aberration-neutral profile and large ablation zone.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive observational case series at Helios Ophtalmologie, St. Jean-de-Luz, France. One hundred forty-six consecutive eyes of 77 patients who underwent LASIK with mechanical microkeratome to correct hyperopia with correction in the maximum hyperopic meridian strictly higher than +5 D (mean + 6.6 ± 1.0 D) were included. Procedures were performed with an Amaris 750S excimer laser (Schwind eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany) using an aberration-neutral profile, a 6.7 ± 0.1 mm optical zone, and a 9.2 ± 0.1 mm total ablation zone. Refractive results, predictability, safety, and efficacy were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 6 months postsurgery, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -0.06 ± 0.83 D and the mean cylinder was 0.42 ± 0.35 D. Sixty-six percent of eyes were within ±0.50 D of the attempted spherical equivalent correction. Six months postoperatively, 60% of eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Ten percent of eyes lost 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity and 4% gained a line. No eyes lost more than 2 Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity at any follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

High hyperopia correction with LASIK using an aberration-neutral profile and large ablation zone provides good efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual outcomes.

[Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy : Results and clinical experiences]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and assess the refractive outcome after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The treatment was performed with the AMARIS 1050RS laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany). The method used an aspheric, aberration-neutral ablation profile and a standardized epithelial tissue removal of 55 µm in the center and 65 µm at a radius of 4 mm as well as SmartPulse technology. Only spherical and/or cylindrical refraction values were treated. Only untreated eyes with preoperative best corrected visual acuity equal to or better than 0.8 were included in the cohort. Follow-up examinations were performed after 1 and 4 days, after 1 and 3 months and after 1 year RESULTS: A total of 939 consecutive TransPRK laser treatments performed in the period from December 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The preoperative sphere had a range of -7.75 D up to +3.00 D and cylinders up to 5.00 D. The 3‑month follow-up control was performed in 728 eyes (77.5%). The predictability showed 89% of eyes within the target correction of less than 0.50 D and 99% of eyes less than 1.00 D. The astigmatic correction showed 91% of eyes with less than 0.50 D. In the safety 1% of eyes showed a visual loss of 2 Snellen lines because of haze. In 26 eyes (2.7%) follow-up treatment was performed with renewed TransPRK laser treatment, in the myopic cohort in 1.8% and in the hyperopic cohort in 13.0%. A residual refraction occurred in 20 eyes without haze and 6 eyes showed a residual refraction with signs of haze.

CONCLUSION

The TransPRK led to similar results to intrastromal refractive surgery techniques but with fewer clinical complications.

Optical quality comparison between laser ablated myopic eyes with centration on coaxially sighted corneal light reflex and on entrance pupil center

This paper aims to compare the image quality between centration on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex (CSCLR) and on the entrance pupil center (EPC). Myopic laser ablation was simulated on eye models, and the optical performances were compared. Centration on the EPC leads to higher wavefront aberrations and lower modulation transfer function. The two centration methods give nearly identical retinal images for angle kappa less than 5°. Because of less tissue removal, centration on the EPC is probably preferable for angle kappa less than 5°, but CSCLR centration may be preferable for angle kappa larger than 5°. The degree of tilt of the post-surgery anterior corneal surface explains the differences between the two methods.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy in Moderate to High Astigmatism With a Non-wavefront-Guided Aberration-Neutral Ablation Profile

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefront-guided aberration-neutral ablation profile using SmartPulse allocation.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, myopic patients with a preoperative cylinder of 2.00 diopters (D) or greater were analyzed at 3 months of follow-up. Transepithelial PRK treatments were performed in each patient with the Amaris 1050RS laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) creating aspheric ablation profiles by applying a SmartPulse allocation. Standard examinations and wavefront analyses were included for low and high ocular residual astigmatism subgroups.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight eyes (44 patients) were included in the cohort. The eyes were divided into separate ocular residual astigmatism subgroups: 17 eyes presented with less than 0.50 D (low ocular residual astigmatism) and 24 eyes with greater than 0.75 D (high ocular residual astigmatism). The mean refractive cylinder in the entire cohort was 2.84 ± 0.86 D preoperatively and 0.40 ± 0.39 D postoperatively, with 81% of the eyes within 0.75 D of the target astigmatism. At 3 months of follow-up, significant improvement (P < .05) was seen in terms of sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent, and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity. CDVA improved in 40% of eyes and 3% of eyes lost one line of CDVA. No clinically relevant changes were seen in higher order aberrations. The refractive changes showed an excellent match with the keratometric changes. The difference between the low and high ocular residual astigmatism subgroups was not significant except for the change of Snellen lines of CDVA (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Transepithelial PRK using a non-wavefront-guided aberration-neutral ablation profile performed by applying SmartPulse allocation yielded excellent visual outcomes. The preoperative astigmatism was reduced to subclinical values. Both subgroups were effective in terms of UDVA, CDVA, spherical and astigmatic correction, and preserving higher order aberrations. However, the low ocular residual astigmatism subgroup was slightly more prone to gain lines of CDVA. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(7):466-474.].

Efficacy and safety of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was introduced to prevent complications from conventional PRK and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). In the 2-step platform, phototherapeutic keratectomy is followed by PRK. It did not show notable safety or efficacy superiorities over conventional PRK. In the conventional single-step transepithelial PRK, ablation of epithelium and stroma occurs in a single continuous session by an Amaris laser. It showed better comparative safety results. Reverse single-step transepithelial PRK and the platform using smart-pulse technology were recent improvements in the single-step Amaris laser. They provide a smoother postablative stromal bed counter. In the refined single-step platform, a modified nomogram is used for determination of ablation parameters, along with modifications in postablative measures. It yielded better comparative results in hyperopia. Controlled trials comparing reverse, smart-pulse technology-equipped, or refined platforms of single-step transepithelial PRK with other modern laser-assisted methods could provide more robust evidence on the topic. Some key elements with significant roles in post-transepithelial PRK outcomes are discussed.

LASIK for the Correction of High Hyperopic Astigmatism With Epithelial Thickness Monitoring

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of high hyperopic LASIK using the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 830 consecutive high hyperopic LASIK procedures using the MEL 80 excimer laser and either the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or zero compression Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). Inclusion criteria were attempted hyperopic correction of +4.00 diopters [D] or higher in one axis and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better. Patients were observed for a minimum of 1 year. Epithelial thickness monitoring by Artemis very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc., Morrison, CO) was used to evaluate potential for further steepening as a re-treatment.

RESULTS

One-year data were available for 785 eyes. Mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was +4.52 ± 0.84 D (range: +2.00 to +6.96 D) for the primary treatment and mean cylinder was 1.05 ± 0.86 D (range: 0.00 to 5.25 D). Mean age was 50 ± 12 years (range: 18 to 70 years) and 61% were women. Postoperative SEQ was ±0.50 D in 50% and ±1.00 D in 77% of eyes after primary treatment. After re-treatment, 67% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 89% were within ±1.00 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 76% of eyes after final treatment. One line of CDVA was lost in 25% of eyes and two lines were lost in 0.4%. There was a clinically insignificant but statistically significant decrease (P < .05) in contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000) by less than 1 log unit at 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd) and by 1 log unit at 12 and 18 cpd. Diurnal fluctuation in refraction was identified in 2 eyes, proven by VHF digital ultrasound to be due to diurnal epithelial remodeling overnight and unrelated to maximum postoperative keratometry induced.

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK for hyperopia by cumulative treatment of up to +8.33 D with the MEL 80 excimer laser was found to satisfy accepted criteria for safety, efficacy, and stability when applying specialized protocols, including epithelial monitoring. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(5):314-321.].

Presbyopic Correction Using Monocular Bi-aspheric Ablation Profile (PresbyMAX) in Hyperopic Eyes: 1-Year Outcomes

PURPOSE

To present the 1-year outcomes of combining monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile and contralateral monofocal LASIK in hyperopic patients with presbyopia.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, 36 consecutive patients (72 eyes) who underwent simultaneous bi-aspheric ablation (PresbyMAX: SCHWIND Eye-Tech-Solutions GmbH and Co KG, Kleinostheim, Germany) in the non-dominant eye and monofocal regular LASIK in the dominant eye for correction of hyperopia and presbyopia were reviewed for 1 year. Binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), near (UNVA), corrected distance (CDVA), and distance corrected near (DCNVA) visual acuity and manifest refraction were analyzed postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the mean binocular UDVA improved significantly from 0.26 ± 0.25 to 0.039 ± 0.088 logMAR (P < .001). Binocular UNVA also improved from 0.73 ± 0.30 to 0.10 ± 0.22 logRAD (P < .001). Eighty-seven percent of patients achieved UDVA of 20/25 or better and 90% had UNVA of J3 or better. Simultaneous binocular distance and near vision of 20/25 and J2 or better was achieved in 70%. Only 17% of patients had a binocular DCNVA of J2 or better. No patient suffered from a loss of 2 lines of CDVA. Refractive stability was achieved for both eyes from 1 month postoperatively. The re-treatment rate was 14% for improvement of near vision within 6 months to 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Presbyopic correction using monocular PresbyMAX combined with monofocal regular LASIK in the fellow eye is safe and acceptable in hyperopic patients. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(1):37-43.].

Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for High Hyperopia with Corneal Vertex Centration and Asymmetric Offset

Purpose

To investigate refractive outcomes and induction of corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) in eyes that underwent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for high hyperopia correction using an aberration neutral profile with corneal vertex centration and asymmetric offset.

Methods

A total of 24 consecutive patients (38 eyes) who underwent LASIK by one surgeon using AMARIS 750S excimer laser and a Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome for flap creation were retrospectively analyzed. Eyes targeted for plano and with correction in the maximum hyperopic meridian strictly higher than +4D were included in the retrospective analysis. Patients were reviewed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, and corneal wavefront aberrations were compared with respective preoperative metrics.

Results

Mean preoperative spherical equivalent and refractive astigmatism was +4.07 ± 0.90 D and 1.37 ± 1.26 D, respectively, reducing to +0.28 ± 0.58D (p<0.0001) and 0.49 ± 0.47 D (p = 0.0001) at the last postoperative visit. Six months postoperatively, 78% of eyes achieved a UDVA of 20/25 or better. No eye lost more than 2 Snellen lines of CDVA at any follow-up. There was a statistically significant induction of vertical trefoil (+0.104 ± 0.299 µm, p<0.05), vertical coma (-0.181 ± 0.463 µm, p<0.01), horizontal coma (+0.198 ± 0.663 µm, p<0.05), spherical aberration (-0.324 ± 0.281 µm, p<0.0001), secondary vertical trefoil (+0.018 ± 0.044 µm, p<0.01), and secondary horizontal coma (+0.026 ± 0.083 µm, p<0.05)

Conclusions

Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for high hyperopia using corneal vertex centration with asymmetric offset results in significant improvement in refraction and visual acuity although affected by significant induction of some higher order aberrations.

Excimer laser 6(th) generation: state of the art and refractive surgical outcomes

After nearly three decades of innovation in excimer laser, today we are presented with a state of the art generation targeting minimally invasive refractive surgery with high speed laser, faster trackers, pupil monitoring systems and better customization profiles. These systems are capable of delivering better treatments with less induced postoperative high order aberrations. The results reported by many authors had confirmed the superiority in efficiency and safety profiles of this generation compared to previous generations. Still, current technology is facing major challenges in the correction of high hyperopic errors and in presbyopic treatments, with upgrades in ablation centration and thermal control needed, which will ensure better biomechanical results, as a step closer to perfection in refractive surgery.

Centration axis in refractive surgery

The human eye is an asymmetric optical system and the real cornea is not a rotationally symmetrical volume. Each optical element in the eye has its own optical and neural axes. Defining the optimum center for laser ablation is difficult with many available approaches. We explain the various centration approaches (based on these reference axes) in refractive surgery and review their clinical outcomes. The line-of-sight (LOS) (the line joining the entrance pupil center with the fixation point) is often the recommended reference axis for representing wavefront aberrations of the whole eye (derived from the definition of chief ray in geometrical optics); however pupil centration can be unstable and change with the pupil size. The corneal vertex (CV) represents a stable preferable morphologic reference which is the best approximate for alignment to the visual axis. However, the corneal light reflex can be considered as non-constant, but dependent on the direction of gaze of the eye with respect to the light source. A compromise between the pupil and CV centered ablations is seen in the form of an asymmetric offset where the manifest refraction is referenced to the CV while the higher order aberrations are referenced to the pupil center. There is a need for a flexible choice of centration in excimer laser systems to design customized and non-customized treatments optimally.

Comparison of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser in treatment of high astigmatism

Purpose

To compare functional outcomes of Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S excimer laser for astigmatism between 2 and 7 diopters(D).

Methods

Prospective comparative non-randomized case series of 480 eyes assigned in two laser groups and further divided into myopic and mixed astigmatism subgroups. All treatments were centered on corneal vertex. One-year results were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using z-test.

Results

Both Allegretto and Amaris postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved in comparison to preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The difference was significant in the Allegretto group for myopic astigmatism (p = 0.017). There was no difference in postoperative UDVA between lasers. Average sphere decreased in all groups for both lasers (p < 0.001) without difference in effectiveness of spherical correction between lasers for both groups. In Allegretto, average cylinder decreased from −3.30D to −0.55D in myopic astigmatism (p < 0.001) and from −3.84D to −0.85D in mixed astigmatism (p < 0.001). In Amaris average cylinder decreased from −3.21D to −0.43D in myopic astigmatism (p < 0.001) and from −3.66D to −0.58D in mixed astigmatism (p < 0.001). Amaris group had less residual astigmatism (myopic astigmatism p = 0.023, mixed astigmatism p < 0.001). Mean spherical aberration shifted from positive to negative in mixed astigmatism for both lasers.

Conclusion

Both lasers are effective in terms of UDVA, CDVA, spherical correction, and preservation of high-order aberrations. However, Amaris was more effective in cylinder correction.

AcuTarget measurements: repeatability and comparison to OPD-Scan III

PURPOSE

To evaluate repeatability of the AcuTarget (SensoMotoric Instruments, Teltow, Germany) measurements and compare them to those obtained with the OPD-Scan III (NIDEK, Inc., Fremont, CA).

METHODS

Measurements were taken with the AcuTarget and OPD-Scan III in 62 eyes of 31 patients. Results were compared using paired Student's t tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and 95% limits of agreement.

RESULTS

Repeatability of the AcuTarget was good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.773, 0.777, and 0.780 for Purkinje-versus-pupil along the x-axis, y-axis, and chord length measurements, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the AcuTarget and OPD-Scan III for Purkinje-versus-pupil measurement along the x-axis (P = .061) and chord length (P = .950). Conversely, a statistically significant difference was observed between the two systems for measurements along the y-axis (P < .001). No statistical difference was found between the mean of the first three acquisitions and the best acquisition obtained with the AcuTarget.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements provided by the AcuTarget have good repeatability and are close to those obtained with the OPD-Scan III. Although controversies remain on where to best center refractive procedures, this may help in analyzing the importance of refractive surgery centration in relation to visual acuity and visual symptoms.

Influence of stromal refractive index and hydration on corneal laser refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of the stromal refractive index and hydration on postoperative outcomes in eyes that had corneal laser refractive surgery using the Amaris laser system.

SETTING

Augenzentrum Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen, Germany.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

METHODS

At the 6-month follow-up, right eyes were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of the stromal refractive index and hydration on refractive outcomes was assessed using univariate linear and multilinear correlations.

RESULTS

Sixty eyes were analyzed. Univariate linear analyses showed that the stromal refractive index and hydration were correlated with the thickness of the preoperative exposed stroma and was statistically different for laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy treatments. Univariate multilinear analyses showed that the spherical equivalent (SE) was correlated with the attempted SE and stromal refractive index (or hydration). Analyses suggest overcorrections for higher stromal refractive index values and for lower hydration values.

CONCLUSIONS

The stromal refractive index and hydration affected postoperative outcomes in a subtle, yet significant manner. An adjustment toward greater attempted correction in highly hydrated corneas and less intended correction in low hydrated corneas might help optimize refractive outcomes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Mr. Magnago and Dr. Arba-Mosquera are employees of and Dr. Diego de Ortueta is a consultant to Schwind eye-tech-solutions GmbH & Co. KG. Mr. Rüden has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in high mixed astigmatism with optimized, fast-repetition and cyclotorsion control excimer laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual refractive and aberrometric outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery for the correction of high mixed astigmatism using a new-generation excimer laser and optimized aspherical profiles.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Fifty-two eyes of 36 patients (21-53 years) with primary mixed astigmatism over 3.0 diopters (D) were included. All cases underwent LASIK surgery using the sixth-generation excimer laser Amaris with cyclotorsion control and a femtosecond platform for flap creation. Visual, refractive, corneal topographic, and aberrometric outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Refractive astigmatic changes were analyzed by Alpins method.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of refractive sphere and cylinder was observed 3 months postoperatively (P = .001), with an associated improvement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .001). Best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained unchanged in 31 eyes (59.6%), while 3 eyes (5.76%) lost 2 lines of CDVA. Fourteen eyes (26.9%) had spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.5 D of emmetropia and 34 (65.3%) had SE within ±1.0 D of emmetropia. No significant difference was observed when comparing surgically induced and target astigmatism. A significant induction of higher-order aberration attributable to increase of spherical aberration was found (P = .003). Seven eyes (13.4%) required retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK for primary high mixed astigmatism using optimized aspherical profiles and a fast-repetition-rate excimer laser with cyclotorsion control is a safe, effective, and predictable procedure. Induction of higher-order aberrations is still present in the correction of the refraction error of the magnitude included in this study.

A randomized comparison of pupil-centered versus vertex-centered ablation in LASIK correction of hyperopia

PURPOSE

To compare visual and optical outcomes of pupil-centered vs vertex-centered ablation in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, prospective, single-center trial.

METHODS

SETTING

Institutional practice.

STUDY POPULATION

Sixty eyes of 30 patients with low and moderate hyperopia. Intervention procedure: Eyes underwent LASIK (Allegretto excimer laser). In 30 eyes, the ablation was centered on the pupil, while in the 30 other eyes the ablation was centered on the corneal reflex.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure was the safety index. Main secondary outcome measures were efficacy index, manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and ocular high-order aberrations for a 6-mm pupil size.

RESULTS

At 3 months postoperatively, the safety index was 0.99 ± 0.04 in the pupil-centered group and 0.99 ± 0.08 in the vertex-centered group (P = .97). The efficacy index was also similar for both groups: 0.96 ± 0.05 in pupil-centered eyes and 0.93 ± 0.09 in vertex-centered eyes (P = .31). Optical aberrations were similar for pupil-centered and vertex-centered eyes. Considering only eyes showing large pupil decentration, we found a tendency for better visual results in favor of pupil-centered eyes in terms of safety index and a slight but significant increase of coma in vertex-centered eyes.

CONCLUSION

LASIK is an effective procedure for treatment of hyperopia. Pupil-centered and vertex-centered treatments provide similar visual and optical outcomes. However, in eyes showing large temporal pupil decentration, pupil-centered ablation seemed to produce a lower amount of coma and, as a consequence, a reduced loss of BCVA compared with vertex-centered patients.

Analysis of optimized profiles for 'aberration-free' refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To provide a model of an aberration-free profile and to clinically evaluate the impact of treatments based upon these theoretical profiles in the post-operative cornea.

METHODS

Aberration-free profiles were deduced from the Zernike expansion of the difference between two corneal cartesian-ovals. Compensation for the focus-shift effects of removing corneal tissue were incorporated by preserving the location of the optical focus of the anterior corneal surface. Simulation of the surgical performance of the profile was performed by means of simulated ray-tracing through a cornea described by its anterior surface and pachymetry. Clinical evaluation was retrospectively analysed in terms of visual outcomes, corneal wavefront aberration and asphericity changes at 3-month follow-up compared to the baseline on 100 eyes treated for compound myopic astigmatism.

RESULTS

The proposed 'aberration-free' profiles theoretically preserve aberrations, becoming more oblate asphericity after myopic treatments, and more prolate after hyperopic ones. In the clinical evaluation, 94% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. BSCVA improved significantly (p < 0.001). Induced corneal aberrations at 6-mm were below clinically relevant levels: 0.123 +/- 0.129 microm for HO-RMS (p < 0.001), 0.065 +/- 0.128 microm for spherical aberration (p < 0.001) and 0.058 +/- 0.128 microm for coma (p < 0.01), whereas the rate of induced aberrations per achieved D of correction were -0.042, -0.031, and -0.030 microm D(-1) for HO-RMS, SphAb, and coma (all p < 0.001). Induction of positive asphericity correlated to achieved correction (p < 0.001) at a rate 3x theoretical prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

'Aberration-free' patterns for refractive surgery as defined here together with consideration of other sources of aberrations such as blending zones, eye-tracking, and corneal biomechanics yielded results comparable to those of customisation approaches. Having close-to-ideal profiles should improve clinical outcomes decreasing the need for nomograms, and diminishing induced aberrations after surgery.

Aberration-neutral ablation pattern in hyperopic LASIK with the ESIRIS laser platform

PURPOSE

To analyze refractive power changes, topographical changes, and aberrations induction after aberration-neutral (Aberration-Free") hyperopic LASIK using the SCHWIND ESIRIS laser platform.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive eyes of 19 patients were evaluated retrospectively. The outcomes were analyzed at 3 months. In all cases, standard examinations and pre- and postoperative topographical and corneal wavefront analysis with a Keratron topographer (OPTIKON 2000 SpA) were performed. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction was +2.61 +/- 1.39 diopters (D) (range: +0.75 to +6.00 D) with a mean cylinder of 0.67 +/- 0.74 D (range: 0.00 to 4.00 D). Ablations were performed with the SCHWIND ESIRIS excimer laser system. Topographical changes of Maloney index, simulated keratometry (Sim-K), and K-readings at 5 and 7 mm were evaluated.

RESULTS

Corneal aberrations up to the seventh order (36 Zernike terms) were measured. Corneal spherical aberration was +0.197 +/- 0.144 microm preoperatively and -0.040 +/- 0.206 microm postoperatively at the 6-mm analysis diameter. At 3 months postoperatively, 88% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D manifest refraction. Changes in refraction, Maloney indices, and Sim-K indices postoperatively were correlated with the intended correction. Induction of negative corneal spherical aberrations and increased prolate asphericity were correlated with the achieved defocus correction. No other Zernike mode was significantly correlated. Topographically, a corneal multifocality of <0.25 D was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzing the topographical maps, the corneal power change of the Maloney indices correlated with the intended correction. With the aberration-neutral (SCHWIND Aberration-Free) pattern, patients with hyperopia up to +5.00 D were treated safely and with good predictability. The induced corneal aberrations were less than those calculated with the classical profile and compared to the literature.

Laser in situ keratomileusis for mixed astigmatism using a modified formula for bitoric ablation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of treatment of mixed astigmatism with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by means of a modified Chayet formula for bitoric ablation and personalized nomogram calculations.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in 19 consecutive eyes of 13 patients who underwent LASIK treatment of mixed astigmatism with a mean sphere of +1.63-/+1.23 D and a mean cylinder of -3.55-/+1.17 D. The authors used the Schwind ESIRIS Laser platform. The ablation was shifted from the pupil center to the vertex normal of the cornea.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, the mean sphere was 0.08-/+0.24 D and the mean astigmatism -0.45-/+0.31 D. At 3 months, an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/50 or better could be found in 100% of the eyes, and of 20/25 or better in 59%. All eyes were within -/+0.5 D spherical equivalent (SE) at 3, 6, and 12 months. No eye lost more than one line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). Postoperatively, the corneal wavefront showed a reduction of spherical aberrations and coma, which were analyzed at 4 and 6 mm pupil diameter. The postoperative higher-order aberrations decreased at 4 mm and increased at 6 mm pupil sizes after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified bitoric treatment with the Schwind ESIRIS laser showed an excellent postoperative UCVA and BSCVA with applying external nomogram adjustments. The method demonstrated good predictability, safety, and effectiveness in the treatment of mixed astigmatism.

Topographic changes after hyperopic LASIK with the SCHWIND ESIRIS laser platform

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare refractive power changes with topographic changes after hyperopic LASIK using the ESIRIS laser platform.

METHODS

Sixty-six consecutive eyes of 37 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Outcomes were evaluated at 3 months. In all cases, standard examinations including pre- and postoperative topographic and corneal wavefront analysis with a Keratron topographer were performed. Preoperative mean spherical equivalent was +/- 2.74 diopters (D) with a mean cylinder of 0.67 D. The ESIRIS excimer laser system was used to perform ablations. Topographic changes of Maloney index, simulated keratometry (sim-K), and K-reading at 5 and 7 mm were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent of eyes were within +/- 0.50 D manifest refraction at 3 months postoperatively. Changes in refraction, Maloney indices, and sim-K indices after surgery were strongly correlated with the intended correction. Induction of negative corneal spherical aberrations and increased prolate asphericity was correlated with the achieved defocus correction. No other Zernike mode was significantly correlated. Topographically, an overcorrection within the central 3 mm and a gradual peripheral undercorrection also was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzing the topographic maps, the corneal power change of the Maloney indices correlated with the intended correction. After hyperopic LASIK, an overcorrection was observed in the 3-mm central zone, and progressive undercorrections were observed in the 5- and 7-mm zones.