Posterior corneal astigmatism in refractive lens exchange surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the anterior, posterior and total corneal spherical and astigmatic powers in patients undergoing refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery.

METHODS

In 402 consecutive patients planned for RLE at Koskelas Eye Clinic, Luleå, Sweden, right eye data from pre- and postoperative subjective refraction, preoperative IOLMaster(®) biometry and Pentacam HR(®) measurements were collected. Postoperative Pentacam HR(®) data were collected for 54 of the patients. The spherical and astigmatic powers of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and for the total cornea were assessed and compared, and surgically, induced astigmatism was calculated using vector analysis.

RESULTS

The spherical power of the anterior corneal surface was 48.18 ± 1.69D with an astigmatic power of 0.83 ± 0.54D. The corresponding values for the posterior surface were -6.05 ± 2,52D and 0.26 ± 0.15D, respectively. The total corneal spherical power calculated with ray tracing was 42.47 ± 2.89D with a 0.72 ± 0.48D astigmatic power, and the corresponding figures obtained by estimating the posterior corneal surface were 43.25 ± 1.51D (p < 0.001) with a 0.75 ± 0.49D astigmatic power (p = 0.003). In eyes with anterior astigmatism with-the-rule, the total corneal astigmatism is overestimated if the posterior corneal surface is estimated; in eyes, with against-the-rule astigmatism it is underestimated. Had the posterior corneal surface been measured in this material, 14.7% of the patients would have received a spheric instead of a toric IOL, or vice versa.

CONCLUSION

Estimating the posterior corneal surface in RLE patients leads to systematic measurement errors that can be reduced by measuring the posterior surface. Such an approach can potentially increase the refractive outcome accuracy in RLE surgery.

Quality of image of grating target placed in vitreous of isolated pig eyes photographed through different implanted multifocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To determine the quality of the image of a grating target placed in the vitreous of isolated pig eyes and photographed through implanted refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL).

METHODS

Refractive multifocal (NXG1, PY60MV), diffractive multifocal (ZM900, SA60D3) and monofocal (SA60AT, ZA9003) IOL were implanted in the capsular bag of isolated pig eyes. A grating target was placed in the vitreous and photographed through a flat or a wide-field viewing contact lens. The contrast of the grating targets of different spatial frequencies was measured.

RESULTS

With the flat corneal contact lens, the gratings appeared clear and not distorted when viewed through the optics of the NXG1 and PY60MV for far vision but were distorted with reduced contrast when viewed through the optical zone for near vision. The images through the diffractive zone of the ZM900 and SA60D3 were more defocused than with the monofocal IOL (p < 0.005). Ghost images oriented centrifugally of the original image were seen with the ZM900 resulting in lower contrast at higher spatial frequencies than with the SA60D3 with less defocused images only in the central area. With the wide-field viewing contact lens, the images were less defocused and the contrast was comparable to both refractive and diffractive multifocal IOL.

CONCLUSION

Both refractive and diffractive multifocal IOL reduced the contrast of the retinal image when viewed through a flat corneal contact lens but less defocused when viewed through a wide-field viewing contact lens.