Intraoperative Assessment of the Stromal Ablation in Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose: To evaluate the difference between planned and measured central ablation depth (CAD) and compare the first and second operated eye in simultaneous bilateral myopic alcohol-assisted PRK. Methods: A retrospective review of patients was performed. Demographic and preoperative data was abstracted. Intraoperative assessment included environmental data, laser-planned algorithm of ablation (L-CAD), and optical coherence pachymetry (OCP) measurements. The true stromal ablation depth (O-CAD) was calculated by subtracting the immediate post-ablation OCP measurement from the OCP measurement before laser ablation. Deviation in pachymetry (DP) between O-CAD and L-CAD was also assessed. Results: The study comprised 140 eyes from 70 consecutive patients. The mean age was 26.91 ± 6.52 years, and 57.1% were females. O-CAD was significantly correlated to preoperative refractive errors and intraoperative laser settings. DP was not correlated to any of the pre- or intraoperative parameters. L-CAD showed a significant underestimation as compared to O-CAD (67.87 ± 25.42 µm and 77.05 ± 30.79 µm, respectively, p < 0.001), which was shown in 74.3% of the cases. A moderate agreement between the two methods was noted, with a mean deviation of 17%. This difference was maintained for each eye individually (p < 0.001). In addition, DP was significantly higher in the first operated eye as compared to the second operated eye (11.97 ± 16.3 µm and 6.38 ± 19.3 µm respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusion: The intraoperative assessment of stromal ablation showed significantly higher central ablation depth values compared to the laser-planned ablation algorithm. The deviation in pachymetry was higher in the first, compared to the second, operated eye. Awareness is warranted as to the discrepancy between preoperative planning and intraoperative assessment.

Comparison of errors in ablation depth calculation after myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with different degrees of myopia: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the difference between the predicted preoperative corneal ablation depth and the measured ablation depth for femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in patients with different degrees of myopia, and to analyze the source of the difference.

METHODS

A total of 55 patients (109 eyes) were included in this study. Multiple logistics regression was applied to analyze the sources affecting postoperative refractive outcomes. The difference between the preoperative predicted corneal ablation depth and the 1-day postoperative ablation depth in patients with different degrees of myopia was explored using linear regression. Corneal biomechanical parameters influencing error in ablation depth calculation were examined using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine eyes were divided into low to moderate myopia (55 eyes, myopia of 6 D or less), high myopia (45 eyes, myopia ranging from 6 D to a maximum of 9 D), and very high myopia group (9 eyes, myopia greater than 9 D) based on preoperative refractive error (spherical equivalent). Postoperative visual outcomes were comparable among the three groups of patients, with no significant difference in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). We did find notable disparities in spherical equivalent (SE) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with different degrees of myopia at 1 day postoperatively (all p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that error in ablation depth calculation was an independent risk factor for refractive outcomes one day after surgery (OR = 1.689, 95% CI: 1.366 - 2.089). There was a substantial discrepancy in error in ablation depth calculation at 1 day postoperatively between the three groups. The measured ablation depth of the laser platform was lower than the predicted ablation depth in the low to moderate myopia and very high myopia groups, but the opposite was true in the high myopia group. Pre-operative SE (p < 0.001) and corneal front minimum radius of curvature (Front Rmin) (p = 0.007) obviously influenced the error in ablation depth calculation.

CONCLUSIONS

Error in ablation depth calculation values vary significantly between patients with different degrees of myopia and correlate highly with preoperative SE and Front Rmin. At the same time, the available evidence suggests that error in ablation depth calculation is an influential factor in postoperative refractive status, so it is imperative to control error in ablation depth calculation.

Method to determine the centration of a lenticule of tissue extracted from a cornea

A simple and novel method to analyse the centration of a lenticule of tissue extracted from a cornea has been developed, in which the centre of "mass" of the individual differences between post and preoperative maps of several corneal metrics represents the lenticule centration and its spatial distance to a reference point (aimed centration) determines the decentration. Different parameters have been evaluated to weight the centre of "mass". The robustness of the methods has been evaluated using perturbation analysis (adding white-noise to the data) based on realistic uncertainties. A clipped analysis has been performed to prevent large, localised areas of lacking/missing data from affecting the centre of "mass". The method has been tested on a pilot cohort of clinical data showing 30% and 63% of the treatments within 200 µm of decentration for corneal thickness and refractive equivalent power, respectively. Except for anterior elevation with a total standard deviation of 17 µm, all other metrics show excellent precision of ∼5 µm. The method provides a reliable and objective way to determine the centration of a lenticule of tissue extracted from a cornea and it can be applied to any topo- or tomographic derived metric.

Agreement Between Predicted and Actual Measured Ablation Depth After FS-LASIK Using Different Rotating Scheimpflug Cameras and OCT

Purpose

To compare the predicted ablation depth (AD) with the postoperatively measured corneal ablation depth (postop-AD) at central, paracentral, and midperipheral locations using two rotating Scheimpflug analyzers and a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomographer in eyes that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK).

Methods

The values of corneal thickness were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at one and three months. The difference between preoperative and postoperative was defined as postop-AD. Measurements were performed at the corneal vertex and mid-peripheral area. The mid-peripheral corneal thickness was measured at the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal locations at a distance of 1.0 or 2.5 mm from the corneal vertex. The predicted AD was calculated by ORK-CAM software (Schwind eye tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany), and the difference between the predicted AD and postop-AD was defined as Δ-AD. Paired t-test analysis was employed to evaluate the differences, agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method.

Results

Forty-two eyes of 42 patients were investigated. At one month, the predicted AD in the central and paracentral areas was underestimated by the Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), Sirius (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) and RTVue OCT (Optovue Inc., Freemont, CA, United States), whereas Δ-AD was negative as established by all devices and predominantly statistically significant. The Δ-AD values approximated zero at three months. The mean difference of Δ-AD at three months at the corneal vertex was 0.67 ± 9.39 mm, −7.92 ± 9.05 mm and −1.36 ± 8.31 mm, respectively. The mid-peripheral measurements had positive values at one month and even more highly positive at three months (with statistically significant differences in most of the cases). The agreement between the predicted and postop-AD was moderate with all devices, but slightly better with RTVue.

Conclusion

The predicted AD seems to be underestimated in the central and paracentral corneal area and overestimated in the mid-periphery.

Translational Relevance

The study could help to partly explain and prevent the refractive errors after FS-LASIK.

Pentacam versus anterior segment OCT in measuring intended versus achieved ablation depth post-myopic LASIK correction

Background

Accurate quantitative measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) provide valuable, clinical information for preoperative assessment, surgical planning, and follow-up in myopic patients who have undergone LASIK correction. Typically, an ultrasound is used to measure such parameters. However, noncontact devices such as the Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomographer [AS-optical coherence tomography (OCT)] and Pentacam are becoming more popular to measure ocular parameters. It is important to assess the level of similarity between these two optical devices to compare between the intended and achieved ablation depth after LASIK procedures in cases of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Methods

This cross-sectional, prospective study included 80 eyes of 40 patients attending Beni-Suef University Hospital between November 2018 and November 2019. All patients underwent LASIK surgery for the correction of myopia with or without myopic astigmatism with spherical equivalent ranging from − 1.5 to − 12 diopters.

Results

No statistically significant difference was observed between the intended ablation depth and the clinically measured ablation depth calculated by Pentacam and AS-OCT 3 months after surgery (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

When planning corneal refraction surgery, ablation depth readouts calculated by the computer software of the excimer laser used in this study are reliable. Both Pentacam and AS-OCT are accurate, sensitive, and specific in measuring the CCT and calculating ablation depth. Pentacam provides slightly higher accuracy and sensitivity compared with AS-OCT. LASIK is a safe, predictable, and effective procedure in the treatment of simple myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement between the predicted and measured central corneal thickness (CCT) reduction after the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery.

METHODS

A total 165 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Eighty patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.72 ± 1.80 Diopters (D) were treated with the FS-LASIK procedure and Eighty-five patients with a mean SE of -4.78 ± 1.63 D were treated with SMILE procedure. One eye for each patient was randomly selected and included for statistical analysis. Ultrasound pachymetry measurement and Scheimpflug camera corneal topography were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The measured CCT reduction was calculated by comparing the preoperative examinations with postoperative examinations. Comparative statistics and linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The mean predicted CCT reduction was 95.02 ± 21.39 μm in FS-LASIK group and 103.49 ± 22.87 μm in SMILE group (P = .015). The prediction of laser platform was found to overestimate the measured CCT reduction for both FS-LASIK group (ultrasound 13.20 ± 9.34 μm) and SMILE group (ultrasound 13.12 ± 8.68 μm). The prediction of laser platform was found to systematically overestimate the measured CCT reduction in FS-LASIK group. In SMILE group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction were found significantly related with the predicted CCT reduction (P < .001 for ultrasound; and P = .004 for Pentacam).

CONCLUSION

A systematic overestimation of measured CCT reduction in FS-LASIK group did not influence the refractive precision of FS-LASIK. Due to the different biomechanical distributions in post-SMILE cornea, the measured CCT reduction was influenced as the changes in refractive correction. Nomogram adjustment for high myopic correction needs further research.

On-line pachymetry outcome of ablation in aberration free mode TransPRK

PURPOSE

There are many independent factors that influence the outcome of refractive surgeries, consisting of patient characteristics and environmental factors. We studied the accuracy of central ablation depth compared to online pachymetry results.

METHODS

A total of 153 eyes that underwent TransPRK at Bina Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were evaluated from November 2010 to January 2012 in a retrospective cross-sectional study. The relevant data were registered and bivariate correlations and linear regression association were investigated statistically.

RESULTS

The mean age was 29 ± 5 years. Distribution of refractive errors was as follows: compound myopic astigmatism 123 (80.4%), simple myopia 24 (15.7%), and mixed astigmatism 6 (3.9%). Mean ambient temperature and humidity levels intraoperatively were 23.49 ± 1.16°C and 28.91 ± 6.16%, respectively. There was a significant difference (p<0.001) between the preassumed central ablation depth (131.68 ± 32.72 µm) and the net level of ablation depth (measured by online pachymetry, 168.04 ± 41.47 µm). Temperature and humidity levels were not in any statistically significant correlation with the net amount of difference found. The backward linear regression was done to reveal the association between ablation depth and several variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that there is deviation in optical coherence pachymetry online measurements done with SCHWIND AMARIS laser. Ambient temperature and humidity levels intraoperatively do not influence the outcome. However, basic structural characteristics of patients along with change in refractive index and corneal shrinkage because of corneal dehydration are associated with the differences.

[Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis]

BACKGROUND

Laser in situ keratomileusis is a safe and accepted method for correcting myopia. The operational results in terms of accuracy as well as the subjective acceptance of patients for corrections to - 8 D are now considered to be promising (Seiler, Refraktive Chirurgie der Hornhaut, 2000); however, postoperative results show individual patient problems in long-term stability. It is believed that the preoperative condition of the cornea (e.g. thickness, biomechanical properties) could have an influence on postoperative problems such as myopic regression.

METHOD

This study included a total of 46 eyes from 25 patients. At 3 months postoperatively, 15 patients (19 eyes) showed a SEQ of -0.50 D or more. Within this group, 11 patients (15 eyes) developed a regression (regression group) within the first 3 postoperative months. The remainder of the total group did not show any regression (stability group). The subjects of this study were on average 33 ± 8 years (stability group) and 31 ± 7 years old (regression group). The corneal thickness was tested and refractive error, visual acuity (BCVA/UCVA) and intraocular pressure was measured. In addition, the corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were determined.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.14 D ± 1.41 D (SE) in the stability group and - 6.47 D ± 1.40 D (p = 0.001)in the regression group. Also, the postoperative spherical equivalents were statistically significant different (p < 0.05). In contrast, the mean preoperative corneal thickness showed no differences in both groups (p = 0.96) (stability group 563 ± 36 µm and regression group 563 ± 28 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of the study to detect a possible causal relationship between myopia regression after LASIK and the biomechanical properties of the cornea and corneal thickness could not be clearly identified.

Three-month clinical outcomes with static and dynamic cyclotorsion correction using the SCHWIND AMARIS

PURPOSE

To evaluate intraoperative static and dynamic cyclotorsions and postoperative outcomes on astigmatism and high-order aberration in astigmatic or aberrated eyes that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis treatments with advanced cyclotorsion control using the SCHWIND AMARIS.

METHODS

Fifty eyes (30 for aberration neutral and 20 for corneal wavefront) were treated. Treatments were planned with Custom Ablation Manager and ablations were performed using the SCHWIND AMARIS. Laser in situ keratomileusis flaps were cut with an LDV femtosecond laser. Cyclotorsional movements were evaluated for static cyclotorsion component (SCC) for mean and repeatability, and for dynamic cyclotorsion component (DCC) for mean and amplitude. Clinical outcomes were evaluated for predictability, refractive outcome, safety, and wavefront aberration.

RESULTS

Registration rates were 90% for SCC and 98% for DCC. SCC was within ± 5 degrees in 64% of cases. Repeatability of SCC was ± 1 degree in 88% of cases. Mean DCC was within ± 1 degree in 98% of cases, partly compensating for SCC. DCC amplitude was within ± 2 degrees in 84% of cases. At 3-month follow-up, 88% of eyes were within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of astigmatism. Mean defocus was -0.06 ± 0.24 D and astigmatism was 0.27 ± 0.20 D. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved in 42% of eyes versus 2% losing 1 line. In corneal wavefront-customized treatments, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and root mean square high-order magnitudes at 6-mm analysis diameter were reduced by -0.04, -0.13, -0.04, and -0.10 μm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser in situ keratomileusis with advanced cyclotorsion compensation using the SCHWIND AMARIS is safe and predictable and yields superior visual outcomes. Refractions and high-order aberrations were reduced to subclinical values without applying additional nomograms, showing the excellent performance of the system.

Corneal ablation depth readout of the MEL 80 excimer laser compared to Artemis three-dimensional very high-frequency digital ultrasound stromal measurements

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of the ablation depth readout for the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec).

METHODS

Artemis 1 very high-frequency digital ultrasound measurements were obtained before and at least 3 months after LASIK in 121 eyes (65 patients). The Artemis-measured ablation depth was calculated as the maximum difference in stromal thickness before and after treatment. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the MEL 80 excimer laser and the Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb). The Aberration Smart Ablation profile was used in 56 eyes and the Tissue Saving Ablation profile was used in 65 eyes. All ablations were centered on the corneal vertex. Comparative statistics and linear regression analysis were performed between the laser readout ablation depth and Artemis-measured ablation depth.

RESULTS

The mean maximum myopic meridian was -6.66±2.40 diopters (D) (range: -1.50 to -10.00 D) for Aberration Smart Ablation-treated eyes and -6.50±2.56 D (range: -1.34 to -11.50 D) for Tissue Saving Ablation-treated eyes. The MEL 80 readout was found to overestimate the Artemis-measured ablation depth by 20±12 μm for Aberration Smart Ablation and by 21±12 μm for Tissue Saving Ablation profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of ablation depth measurement was improved by using the Artemis stromal thickness profile measurements before and after surgery to exclude epithelial changes. The MEL 80 readout was found to overestimate the achieved ablation depth. The linear regression equations could be used by MEL 80 users to adjust the ablation depth for predicted residual stromal thickness calculations without increasing the risk of ectasia due to excessive keratectomy depth as long as a suitable flap thickness bias is included.