Surface ablation with iris recognition and dynamic rotational eye tracking-based tissue saving treatment with the Technolas 217z excimer laser

Assessment of posture-induced cyclotorsion during cataract surgery using the Verion image-guided system

Background

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to analyse posture-induced cyclotorsion in eyes undergoing conventional phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using the Verion image-guided system.

Methods

Cyclotorsion was assessed in patients who underwent conventional phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation and FLACS between June 2017 and November 2017 with registration of iris architecture, limbal and bulbar conjunctival blood vessels acquired preoperatively using the Verion Reference Unit (the patient in sitting position) and intraoperatively under the microscope using the digital marker of the Verion image-guided system with the patient in supine position.

Results

Forty-four eyes of 30 patients (21 men and 9 women) were included with the mean age of 56.5 ± 17.1 (range, 19-89; median, 62) years. The mean cyclotorsion induced by change in posture from sitting to supine position was 5.84 ± 3.25° (range, 1-17; median, 5). Overall, clockwise (CW) rotation (59.1%) was noted to be more common than counter clockwise (CCW) rotation (40.9%). Furthermore, CW rotation was more common in men than in women, and CCW rotation was significantly more common in women. Patients who underwent bilateral sequential cataract surgery show similar cyclorotation (CW or CCW) in both eyes more often than mixed rotation (85.7% vs 14.3%).

Conclusion

Significant cyclotorsion can occur in supine position during cataract surgery. Accurate assessment of the amount and direction of cyclotorsion aids in appropriate alignment of the toric IOL for optimal visual outcomes.

Clinical Evaluation of LASEK for High Myopia Correction between the Triple-A Profile and the Zyoptix Tissue Saving Profile

Purpose

To compare the effects of correcting high myopia using the MEL®90 Triple-A profile LASEK at a 500 Hz pulse rate (Triple-A group) versus the Zyoptix tissue-saving ablations of Technolas 217z laser platform at 100 Hz (TS group).

Methods

This retrospective study included 50 eyes in the Triple-A group and 42 eyes in the TS group with manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -6 diopters (D) to -10 D. We compared uncorrected distance visual acuity, MRSE, corrected distance visual acuity, and postoperative complications at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Results

At 6 months after refractive surgery, the efficacy index of Triple-A group was significantly higher than that of the TS group (1.03 ± 0.12 vs 1.00 ± 0.11, P=0.04). The MRSE postoperatively in the Triple-A group was significantly lower than that in the TS group (0.25 ± 0.18 vs 0.38 ± 0.23, P < 0.01). The safety indices in the two groups were almost the same after 6 months of surgery (1.03 ± 0.07 vs 1.04 ± 0.11, P=0.63). The proportion of eyes which achieved ±0.13 D was significantly higher in the Triple-A group than that in the TS group at 1 month (80% vs 59.5%, P=0.03), 3 months (82% vs 61.9%, P=0.03) and 6 months (84% vs 64.3%, P=0.03). The changes in refraction 6 months after surgery comparing with 1 month after surgery were 0.12 ± 0.10 D in the Triple-A group and 0.13 ± 0.08 D in the TS group (P=0.56). All (100%) of the patients in the Triple-A group and 50% of the patients in the TS group had a UDVA of 20/16 at 6 months after surgery (P < 0.01). The induced spherical aberrations and total HOAs in the Triple-A group were significantly lower than those in the TS group (0.17 ± 0.02 μm vs 0.23 ± 0.02 μm, P < 0.01; 0.20 ± 0.04 μm vs 0.39 ± 0.03 μm, P < 0.01) at 6 months after surgery. The mean reduced corneal thickness was 113.06 ± 10.5 μm in the Triple-A profile group and 121.43 ± 23.46 μm in the TS group (P=0.02). No patient in either group had haze and high intraocular pressure 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

For treatment of high-myopia patients, the Triple-A profile was more effective, predictable, and accurate than the Zyoptix tissue-saving profile. Meanwhile, the Triple-A profile had less induced spherical aberrations, total HOAs, and cornea ablation depth than the Zyoptix tissue-saving profile. Patients in the Triple-A group with 500 Hz pulse rate treatment achieved superior results. The two surgical procedures were equivalent in terms of safety and stability.

Excimer Laser Surgery: Biometrical Iris Eye Recognition with Cyclorotational Control Eye Tracker System

A prospective comparative study assessing the importance of the intra-operative dynamic rotational tracking-especially in the treatment of astigmatisms in corneal refractive Excimer laser correction-concerning clinical outcomes is presented. The cyclotorsion from upright to supine position was measured using iris image comparison. The Group 1 of patients was additionally treated with cyclorotational control and Group 2 only with X-Y control. Significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the mean postoperative cylinder refraction (p < 0.05). The mean cyclotorsion can be calculated to 3.75° with a standard deviation of 3.1°. The total range of torsion was from -14.9° to +12.6°. Re-treatment rate was 2.2% in Group 1 and 8.2% in Group 2, which is highly significant (p < 0.01). The investigation confirms that the dynamic rotational tracking system used for LASIK results in highly predictable refraction quality with significantly less postoperative re-treatments.

Femtosecond Laser-assisted Wavefront-guided LASIK Using a Newer Generation Aberrometer: 1-Year Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term outcomes of wavefront-guided LASIK with a new advanced aberrometer.

METHODS

Fifty eyes of 25 LASIK candidates with myopia and/or astigmatism underwent aberrometry (iDesign Advanced WaveScan; Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA), femtosecond laser-assisted flap creation, and excimer ablation. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ), and astigmatism outcomes were measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The sphere, cylinder, and SEQ were -4.29 ± 1.94, -0.75 ± 0.76, and -4.67 ± 2.01 diopters (D), respectively, preoperatively and 0.03 ± 0.13, -0.09 ± 0.13, and -0.02 ± 0.14 D, respectively, 12 months postoperatively (P < .001). The postoperative log-MAR CDVA (-0.07 ± 0.09) and UDVA (-0.04 ± 0.09) were better than the preoperative logMAR CDVA (0.07 ± 0.10) (P < .01). Ninety-four percent achieved a 12-month logMAR UDVA of 0.0 or less (20/20 or better Snellen) and 100% achieved 0.3 or less (20/40 or better Snellen), compared to a preoperative logMAR CDVA of 0.0 or worse in 54% and 0.3 or less in 100%. Postoperative SEQ was within ±0.50 D in 98%. The regression plot for achieved (y) vs intended (x) correction at 12 months was (y = 0.98 × - 0.09, R(2) = 0.99, P < .001). No cases lost CDVA. The target and 12-month surgically induced astigmatisms (TIA and SIA) were 0.91 ± 0.75 and 0.82 ± 0.70, respectively. The regression plot between them was SIA = 0.91 × TIA - 0.01 (R(2) = 0.95, P < .001). The angle of error was -0.29° ± 12.6° and index of success was 0.13 ± 0.25. There was only a mild, nonsignificant increase of higher-order aberrations after surgery, and the postoperative wavefront was stable on follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK with iDesign aberrometry appears to be safe and effective in this long-term, consecutive case series.