Posterior corneal elevation after LASIK with three flap techniques as measured by Pentacam

Corneal remodeling after SMILE for moderate and high myopia: short-term assessment of spatial changes in corneal volume and thickness

PURPOSE

To evaluate the early corneal remodeling and its influencing factors after Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Pre- and post-operative (1 week and 1, 3, 6 months) corneal volume (CV), mean keratometry (Km), and corneal thickness (CT) were measured by Scheimpflug tomography. CT at the central, thinnest point, and on concentric circles of 2, 4, and 6 mm diameter was recorded to assess corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP) and percentage of thickness increase (PTI) in the moderate and high myopia groups, and to explore possible influencing factors.

RESULTS

After SMILE, the peripheral CT decreased in the moderate myopia group and central corneal thickness (CCT) increased in the high myopia group at 1 month compared to 1 week (all P < 0.05). The CV, Km and CT were significantly increased at 3 months compared to 1 month (all P < 0.05), but there was no significant change at 6 months compared to 3 months for both groups (all P > 0.05). Patients with high myopia showed greater corneal thickness changes (△CT) and higher PTI than moderate myopia (all P < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that in addition to refraction, peripheral PTI was negatively correlated with CCT in the moderate myopia group (4 mm: β = -0.023, P = 0.001; 6 mm: β = -0.050, P < 0.001), as well as in the high myopia group (4 mm: β = -0.038, P < 0.001; 6 mm: β = -0.094, P < 0.001). Moreover, peripheral PTI in the moderate myopia group was negatively correlated with age (4 mm: β = -0.071, P = 0.003; 6 mm: β = -0.162, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After SMILE, the CV, Km, and CTSP showed dynamic changes in the early stage, which stabilized after 3 months. Compared to the moderate myopia group, the high myopia group experienced slower corneal stabilization. The change in PTI at 6 months after SMILE may be related to higher preoperative refraction, thinner CCT and younger age.

Two-year stability of posterior corneal surface after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with a residual stromal thickness less than 350 μm

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the stability of posterior corneal surface 2 years after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) in patients with a residual stromal thickness less than 350 μm.

METHODS

In total, 408 eyes of 212 patients (160 women, 52 men) who underwent TPRK were enrolled in this retrospective study. All surgeries were performed in the Amaris 750S excimer laser platform with smart pulse technology. The posterior corneal elevation, anterior chamber depth, Q value, and curvature were measured using Pentacam preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The relationship between percent tissue altered (PTA), age, and changes in posterior corneal surface was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was - 6.80 ± 1.18 D (range: - 9.00 to - 2.63 D). The mean residual stromal thickness was 336.46 ± 7.25 μm (range: 310-348 μm). The mean PTA was 30.93 ± 2.03% (range: 24.29-35.28%). At 2 years after surgery, the elevation of six points in the central area decreased by 1.91 ± 2.97 μm, 2.98 ± 3.23 μm, 1.17 ± 3.85 μm, 1.70 ± 2.88 μm, 1.36 ± 3.19 μm, and 1.65 ± 3.18 μm, compared with the preoperative value (P < 0.05). The elevation of three points in the peripheral area increased by 1.87 ± 6.34 μm, 0.68 ± 6.00 μm, and 0.95 ± 5.50 μm (P < 0.05). There was no significant linear relationship between PTA, age, and changes in posterior corneal surface, anterior chamber depth, and K2 (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Within 2 years after TPRK, the posterior corneal surface remained stable in patients with a residual stromal thickness between 310 and 350 μm. There was no sign of iatrogenic ectasia during the follow-up period.

Correlation between the ablation ratio and posterior corneal stability after small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate changes in posterior corneal elevation and their correlations with the ablation ratio 3 years after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia.

METHODS

Eighty eyes underwent SMILE were enrolled in this study. Eyes were classified into two groups based on the ablation ratio (AR, lenticule thickness from SMILE machine/thinnest corneal thickness): group A (< 25%, 40 eyes) and group B (≥ 25%, 40 eyes). Pentacam was used to measure the posterior corneal elevation at the central point, thinnest point, and posterior maximum elevation (PME) and the mean posterior elevation in the central 2-mm area (MPE-2 mm), 4-mm area, and 6-mm area at the 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

More than 85% of the eyes had an AR of less than 27%, and no cases of iatrogenic keratectasia developed. In both groups, for central region, posterior elevation decreased implying backward displacement; for peripheral region, it increased indicating forward trend. There was no significant difference in changes in all determined parameters between the two groups (P ≥ 0.07). Moreover, no significant correlation was noted between AR and posterior elevation changes. In group A, decreasing changes in PME (r =  - 0.42, P = 0.01) and MPE-2 mm (r = 0.40, P = 0.01) demonstrated negative correlations with residual bed thickness.

CONCLUSION

Region-dependent changes were demonstrated in the eyes that underwent SMILE. The central area showed a subtly declining posterior elevation, and the peripheral area showed a slightly increasing elevation. The limited ablation ratio had no impact on the changes in posterior corneal elevation.

Five-year stability of posterior corneal surface after small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia

Background

To study the 5-year changes in the posterior corneal surface after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia.

Methods

Eighty eyes received SMILE was included in this prospective study. They were allocated into two groups based on the spherical equivalent: high myopia (40eyes, -7.49 ± 0.70D) and moderate myopia (40eyes, -4.43 ± 0.87D). Certain points of posterior corneal elevation (the central point (PCE), thinnest point (PTE), maximal point (PME), and in various corneal areas) were evaluated using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus GmbH, Germany) preoperatively and at 6 months and 5 years after surgery.

Results

All surgeries were completed uneventfully and no ectasia was developed throng the observation. The safety index and efficacy index were 1.14 and 1.03 in the high myopia group, and 1.16 and 1.06 in the moderate myopia group, respectively. Most of the calculated values in the high myopia group showed a slight increase at 6 months but decreased at 5 years. At 5 years postoperatively, the value of the PTE was significantly lower than at baseline in both groups (P ≤ 0.047); a statistical difference was also revealed in the PME in the moderate group with slight changes (10.15 ± 3.01 μm vs. 11.60 ± 4.33 μm, P = 0.002); no statistical significance was observed in other calculated values (P ≥ 0.067). Similarly, no significant linear correlation was noted between changes in all values and the residual bed thickness either (P ≥ 0.057).

Conclusions

SMILE causes no protrusion in posterior corneal surface for correction of high myopia at the follow-up visit of 5 years.

Three-Year Follow-Up of Posterior Corneal Elevation in Thin Corneas After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in posterior corneal elevation in thin corneas after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

In this prospective study, 97 eyes of 97 patients undergoing SMILE were recruited. Eyes were categorized into the following groups based on the preoperative minimum central corneal thickness (CCT): group A (37 eyes, 480–499 μm), group B (30 eyes, 500–529 μm), and group C (30 eyes, 530–560 μm). The posterior corneal surface was measured with a Pentacam over a 3-year follow-up period. Changes in the posterior corneal elevation at the central point (PCE), thinnest point (PTE), and predetermined area were measured.

Results

No iatrogenic keratectasia was observed during the follow-up period. The mean changes in PCE, PTE, and the inferior area in group A were 1.14 ± 3.40 μm, −0.11 ± 3.20 μm, and −0.26 ± 1.23 μm, respectively (P ≥ 0.125). Although statistically significant change in the central-4 mm area was noted, the value was quite small (0.98 ± 1.67 μm) and was not higher than that in the other two groups (P = 0.003). For all three groups, the elevation remained stable or showed a backward change in the central annulus, while there was a small forward displacement in the 6-mm optical zone. In group A, changes in elevation values yielded negative statistical correlations with residual bed thickness and CCT (P ≤ 0.006) (except for the inferior area, the 4-mm and 6-mm optical zone).

Conclusions

With a strict preoperative assessment, SMILE achieved good safety and efficacy in correcting myopia in thin corneas and enabled a stable posterior corneal surface over a 3-year follow-up period.

Synopsis

Careful preoperative assessment and suitable surgical design should be taken to ensure posterior corneal stability after SMILE in thin corneas.

Comparison of posterior corneal elevation after SMILE and FS-LASIK in correcting myopia over -9.0 diopters

Background

To compare the changes in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in correcting myopia over -9 diopters (D).

Methods

In this prospective comparative study, 82 eyes of 82 patients scheduled for refractive correction were recruited. Eyes were randomly assigned to the SMILE group (45 eyes, -10.43±0.92 D) or FS-LASIK group (37 eyes, -10.97±1.37 D). The posterior corneal surface was measured using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany) preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Posterior corneal elevation in the central point and central 4-mm area, and in various optical zones above the best-fit sphere, was analyzed. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

All surgeries were completed successfully. The safety index and efficacy index were 1.20 and 1.00, respectively, in the SMILE group, and was 1.10 and 0.90, respectively, in the FS-LASIK group. No significant difference existed in all analyzed data before and at 6 months after surgery in both the SMILE group and the FS-LASIK group. Changes in posterior corneal elevation after FS-LASIK were greater than after SMILE, with no statistical significance (P≥0.07). In the SMILE group, residual bed thickness was found to be moderately negatively correlated with changes in the elevation in the central area (P≤0.045); whereas it was positively correlated in the peripheral area (P=0.002).

Conclusions

SMILE and FS-LASIK presented stable posterior corneal surface in correction of myopia over -9.0 D at the follow-up visit of 6 months.

Impact of ablation ratio on 5-year postoperative posterior corneal stability after refractive surgery: SMILE and FS-LASIK

BACKGROUND

To investigate the impact of the ablation ratio on 5-year postoperative posterior corneal stability in myopic eyes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study: 80 eyes of 43 patients underwent SMILE surgery and 63 eyes of 32 patients underwent FS-LASIK surgery at the EYE & ENT Hospital, Fudan University. Ablation ratio was defined as lenticule thickness (SMILE cases) or ablation depth (FS-LASIK cases) divided by central corneal thickness (CCT). Posterior corneal elevation changes were recorded as posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior corneal surface at thinnest point (PTE) and posterior corneal mean elevation (PME). Patients were followed up at 6-month and 5-year interval to investigate the impact of the ablation ratio on posterior corneal elevation after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery.

RESULTS

PCE dropped at the 6-month follow-up for both SMILE (decreased by -1.11 ± 2.93 μm, P < 0.05) and FS-LASIK groups (decreased by -0.46 ± 3.72 μm, P < 0.05). PTE also dropped in SMILE (reduced by -2.04 ± 3.02 μm, P < 0.05) and FS-LASIK group (reduced by -1.28 ± 4.21 μm, P < 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Stable PCE (elevation change: SMILE -0.28 ± 4.03 μm; FS-LASIK 0.79 ± 4.13 μm, P > 0.05) and PTE (elevation change: SMILE -0.08 ± 4.28 μm; FS-LASIK 1.42 ± 3.85 μm, P > 0.05) for both groups were recorded at the 5-year follow-up compared to the 6-month visit. Ablation ratio was strongly correlated with 5-year postoperative PCE (β = 2.68 ± 1.05, P < 0.01) and PTE (β = 2.35 ± 1.17, P < 0.05). Cut-off value for 5-year postoperative raised PCE and PTE was 27.3 and 27.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation ratio was strongly correlated with postoperative posterior corneal elevation in a 5-year follow-up in both SMILE and FS-LASIK groups. PCE and PTE underwent slight backward displacement 6-month postoperatively and remain stable at the 5-year follow-up. Threshold of the ablation ratio for resisting forward displacement of posterior corneal surface was 27.3 and 27.1% for SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively.

Longitudinal evaluation of posterior corneal power by anterior segment optical coherence tomography 18 months following photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the change in anterior, posterior, and net corneal power more than 18 months after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) by RTVue anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).

SETTING

Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

PRK was performed using Technolas TENEO 317 laser platform. Anterior, posterior, and net corneal power was measured by the RTVue-XR anterior segment OCT system with the Pachymetry + Cpwr scan pattern at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and more than 18 (up to 27) after PRK.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-six eyes of 163 patients (61 men [37.4%], 102 women [62.6%]; mean age 29.71 years; range 18.5 to 46.5 years) were enrolled in this study. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -3.15 ± 1.50 diopter (D) (range -8.37 to -0.62 D). The mean change in net corneal power was 3.052 D, 3.281 D, 3.324 D, 3.114 D, 3.446 D, and 3.972 D at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and more than 18 postoperatively compared with baseline, respectively (P < .001 for all comparisons). The mean change in posterior corneal power at postoperative visits compared with baseline was not statistically significant (P > .1) except for 1 month postoperatively, which increased by 0.13 D (P < .001). Changes in posterior corneal power were not correlated with any of the preoperative clinical and Scheimpflug variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior corneal power did not change for more than 18 months after PRK, except for an early small increase at 1 month postoperatively.

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism

BACKGROUND

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a surgical procedure that corrects refractive errors. This technique creates a flap of the outermost parts of the cornea (epithelium, bowman layer, and anterior stroma) to expose the middle part of the cornea (stromal bed) and reshape it with excimer laser using photoablation. The flaps can be created by a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser in LASIK for adults with myopia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We used no date or language restrictions. We searched the reference lists of included trials. We searched the electronic databases on 22 February 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome compared to a femtosecond laser in people aged 18 years or older with more than 0.5 diopters of myopia or myopic astigmatism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 records from 11 trials enrolling 943 adults (1691 eyes) with spherical or spherocylindrical myopia, who were suitable candidates for LASIK. Five hundred and forty-seven participants (824 eyes) received LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and 588 participants (867 eyes) with a femtosecond laser. Each trial included between nine and 360 participants. In six trials, the same participants received both interventions. Overall, the trials were at an uncertain risk of bias for most domains. At 12 months, data from one trial (42 eyes) indicates no difference in the mean uncorrected visual acuity (logMAR scale) between LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and LASIK with a femtosecond laser (mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06 to 0.04; low-certainty evidence). Similar findings were observed at 12 months after surgery, regarding participants achieving 0.5 diopters within target refraction (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.11; 1 trial, 79 eyes; low-certainty evidence) as well as mean spherical equivalent of the refractive error 12 months after surgery (MD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19; 3 trials, 168 eyes [92 participants]; low-certainty evidence). Based on data from three trials (134 eyes, 66 participants), mechanical microkeratome was associated with lower risk of diffuse lamellar keratitis compared with femtosecond laser (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.78; low-certainty evidence). Thus, diffuse lamellar keratitis was a more common adverse event with femtosecond laser than with mechanical microkeratome, decreasing from an assumed rate of 209 per 1000 people in the femtosecond laser group to 56 per 1000 people in the mechanical microkeratome group. Data from one trial (183 eyes, 183 participants) indicates that dry eye as an adverse event may be more common with mechanical microkeratome than with femtosecond laser, increasing from an assumed rate of 80 per 1000 people in the femtosecond laser group to 457 per 1000 people in the mechanical microkeratome group (RR 5.74, 95% CI 2.92 to 11.29; low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the two groups for corneal haze (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.96; 1 trial, 43 eyes) and epithelial ingrowth (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.42; 2 trials, 102 eyes [50 participants]). The certainty of evidence for both outcomes was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the visual acuity outcomes, there may be no difference between LASIK with mechanical microkeratome and LASIK with femtosecond laser. Dry eye and diffuse lamellar keratitis are likely adverse events with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser, respectively. The evidence is uncertain regarding corneal haze and epithelial ingrowth as adverse events of each intervention. The limited number of outcomes reported in the included trials, some with potentially significant risk of bias, makes it difficult to draw a firm conclusion regarding the effectiveness and safety of the interventions investigated in this review.

Two-year observation of posterior corneal elevations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia higher than -10 dioptres

Aim

To investigate the change in posterior corneal elevations (PCEs) of eyes with extremely high myopia 2 years after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

We evaluated 39 eyes of 39 patients with spherical equivalent higher than −10.00 dioptres (D). Using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), we measured change in PCEs at 1 day, 3 months, 6 months and 2 years after SMILE. Another 34 eyes of 34 patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) were examined before, at 1 day and long-term after surgery as the control group. For each eye, elevations at central, thinnest, maximal points and 24 other predetermined points were measured.

Results

No significant forward displacements of PCEs were observed in both surgeries. The maximal but not significant forward displacement occurred around 3–6 months following SMILE, and all returned to original levels 6 months postoperatively except superior area. The peripheral area tended to displace backward, while the central area tended forwardly. In both procedures, elevations along horizontal meridians, inferior and temporal hemispheres were significantly higher than those along vertical meridians, superior and nasal hemispheres, respectively (p<0.05). Elevation on the 4 mm, 6 mm diameters at 1 day and on the 6 mm diameter and temporal hemisphere at long-term follow-up postoperatively were significantly higher in FS-LASIK than SMILE (p<0.05). Change in elevations on the 6 mm diameter circle correlated with residual bed thickness (p=0.047).

Conclusions

SMILE is a safe way to correct for myopia higher than −10 D, with PCEs remaining stable 2 years after surgery.

Anterior Chamber Angle and Volume Do Not Change after Myopic Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Young Patients

Purpose

We aimed to investigate whether anterior chamber angle, depth, and volume change after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in young patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 29 eyes of 29 patients (15 females and 14 males) between the ages of 18 and 39 years who underwent LASIK for the treatment of myopia. In addition to complete ophthalmic examination, anterior chamber angle (ACA), central anterior chamber depth (ACD), and anterior chamber volume (ACV) were measured by using a Sirius rotating Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido disc corneal topography (CSO, Florence, Italy). Preoperative and postoperative values were compared using paired t-tests. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between changes in refraction and changes in ACA, ACD, and ACV as well as between attempted maximum ablation depth and changes in ACA, ACD, and ACV.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 25.5 ± 6.2 years. The mean preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent values were −3.30 ± 1.92 D and −0.18 ± 0.29 D, respectively. ACV and ACA were not significantly changed after surgery; however, central ACD was significantly decreased (preoperatively = 3.366 ± 0.316 mm vs postoperatively = 3.3 ± 0.298 mm) with a mean difference of 0.066 ± 1.121 mm. There were no significant relationships between changes in refraction and anterior segment dimensions or between attempted maximum ablation depth and anterior segment dimensions.

Conclusion

Measurements with Sirius showed that ACA and ACV did not change; however, central ACD significantly decreased after myopic LASIK in young patients, indicating that the preoperative central ACD value should not be used interchangeably with the postoperative central ACD value.

Predictability of the Achieved Lenticule Thickness in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Correction

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictability of the achieved lenticule thickness in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia.

METHODS

In this prospective study, a total of 80 eyes of 45 patients who underwent the SMILE procedure were included. A Scheimpflug camera was used to measure the preoperative and postoperative corneal topography. Achieved lenticule thicknesses at the pupil center and corneal vertex were calculated by subtracting the postoperative corneal thickness at the pupil center and corneal vertex from preoperative corresponding values. Predictability between the achieved and VisuMax readout at different locations (the pupil center and corneal vertex) and postoperative visits (postoperative day 1 and 6 months) were evaluated using a general linear model.

RESULTS

Achieved lenticule thickness at the pupil center and corneal vertex showed good correlation at both postoperative day 1 (pupil center: r=0.914, corneal vertex: r=0.903) and 6 months (pupil center: r=0.886, corneal vertex: r=0.866). The achieved lenticule thickness at postoperative day 1 was 8.5-μm thinner at the pupil center and 9.6-μm thinner at the corneal vertex than the VisuMax readout.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the predictability between the achieved and VisuMax readout is favorable. The lenticule thickness at the pupil center is closer to the VisuMax readout than corneal vertex.

Changes of corneal high-order aberrations after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis

BACKGROUND

Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) has gained widespread popularity as a safe, effective and predictable treatment for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.However, complications such as biomechanical changes, structural weakness, dry eye and induction of high-order aberrations (HOAs) have been associated with FS laser excision. The induction of HOAs has been reported to reduce quality of vision, leading to increased glare, halos, starburst and deterioration of contrast function corneal HOAs play a significant role in whole-eye aberration. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the changes of corneal high-order aberrations after FS-LASIK.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-four eyes from 68 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were enrolled in this study. Corneal topography and visual acuity were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after FS-LASIK. Wavefront errors from the whole cornea, anterior cornea, and posterior cornea were measured by Pentacam.

RESULTS

Corneal aberrations on the posterior surface were less affected by FS-LASIK compared with those on the anterior surface and the whole cornea. The high-order aberrations (HOAs) on the whole and anterior corneal surfaces increased significantly at 1 month after surgery (P = .000, P = .000), while HOAs on the posterior surface did not significantly change (P = 1.000). The spherical aberration on the whole corneal and anterior corneal surfaces were significantly increased at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P = .000 and P = .000, respectively), along with the vertical coma on the whole and anterior corneal surfaces at 1 and 3 months (P = .000 and P = .000, respectively). There was no significant difference in horizontal coma or trefoil on the whole, anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after surgery compared with preoperatively (all P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

After FS-LASIK changes in corneal aberration occurred mainly on the anterior surface, which may have a significant effect on visual quality.

Posterior corneal surface differences between non-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and 10-year post-LASIK myopic eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the posterior corneal surface differences between non-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and 10-year post-LASIK myopic eyes.

METHODS

The study included 130 eyes from 65 patients, who were treated with myopic LASIK 10 years ago. In addition, 130 eyes from 65 unoperated myopic patients of matching present age and preoperative refraction were divided into control group. Data on the posterior corneal surface and anterior chamber were obtained from Pentacam software and compared between the groups. Postoperative visual acuity (VA) and refractive error were also analysed.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.99 ± 1.78 dioptre (D) in the LASIK group. Ten years after surgery, the mean SE was -0.45 ± 1.22 D, the efficacy index was 0.98, and the safety index was 1.01. The posterior corneal elevations of the LASIK group at 2 mm corneal diameter were significantly lower than those of the control group. However, posterior corneal elevations at 6 mm corneal diameter were higher in the LASIK group than the controls (p < 0.01 for all). The mean Q-values of posterior corneal surface demonstrated significant positive direction compared to that of control eyes at 6 and 7 mm corneal diameters (p < 0.05 for both). At the thinnest point of the cornea, the anterior chamber depths were shallower in the LASIK group than in controls. Meanwhile, the anterior chamber volumes (ACV) were smaller in the LASIK group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that the posterior corneal surface tends to show signs of central flattening and peripheral steepening 10 years after myopic LASIK surgery compared to that of non-operated myopic eyes.

Three-Year Stability of Posterior Corneal Elevation After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia

PURPOSE

To investigate long-term changes in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Thirty-six eyes of 20 patients (7 male, 13 female) who underwent SMILE were recruited for this prospective consecutive study. The mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent was -6.24 ± 1.47 diopters (D) (range: -3.88 to -8.75 D). Posterior corneal surfaces were measured by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery. Posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior maximal elevation (PME), and posterior elevation at the thinnest corneal point (PTE) in the central 4-mm area above the best-fit sphere (BFS) were analyzed. The BFS was the same across all follow-up periods and determined by the preoperative data. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

All surgeries were executed without complications and no case of keratectasia was observed during the follow-up. An uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 100% of eyes at the last visit. The mean change of PCE, PME, and PTE at 3 years after the operation was -2.39 ± 2.85, 0.50 ± 3.33, and -2.33 ± 2.90 µm, respectively. There were significant differences in the measurements of PCE and PTE before surgery and 3 years after surgery (P ≤ .009); however, there was no significant difference in PME before surgery and 3 years after surgery (P = 1.000). No correlation was found between changes in posterior corneal elevation and residual bed thickness, ablation depth, and preoperative thinnest corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior corneal surface, measured using the Pentacam, was stable after SMILE in the long-term follow-up. The cause of the slight backward change of PCE and PTE needs further study. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(2):84-88.].

Corneal Thickness Profile Changes After Femtosecond LASIK for Hyperopia

Purpose:

To compare changes in the corneal thickness profile before and 6 months after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia.

Methods:

In a prospective noncomparative case series study, 24 eyes of 20 hyperopic patients undergoing femtosecond LASIK were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Corneal profile was measured using Pentacam HR device. Paired t test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative values. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the central corneal thickness changes and attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SER).

Results:

The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity significantly improved after surgery (P<0.001). Significant differences in central, midperipheral, ablative annular, and peripheral corneal thicknesses were observed from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (all P<0.001). There was no significant correlation between the changes in the central corneal thickness and attempted SER (P=0.23).

Conclusions:

The corneal thicknesses across the whole ablation zone including central corneal thickness, significantly decrease postoperatively compared with preoperatively.

Posterior Corneal Elevation after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Moderate and High Myopia

Purpose

To investigate the changes of posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia.

Methods

In this prospective study, fifty consecutive eyes of thirty patients (10 male, 20 female) who underwent SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism were included. Eyes were divided in two groups based on the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction: high myopia group (32 eyes, range -6.25D to -10.00D) and moderate myopia group (18 eyes, range -3.00D to -6.00D). Posterior corneal surfaces were measured by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam, Oculus Germany) preoperatively and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Posterior central elevation (PCE) and posterior mean elevation (PME) at 17 predetermined points in the central-4mm area above the best-fit sphere were analyzed.

Results

No significant difference in the amount of posterior corneal elevation changes in the high myopia group was noted over time (P = 0.23 and P = 0.94 for PCE and PME, respectively). Similarly, the changes in the moderate myopia group before and after SMILE were not significant either (P = 0.34 and P = 0.40 for PCE and PME). A statistically significant correlation was found between the residual bed thickness and the shift of the PCE in the high myopia group at 12 months postoperatively (r = 0.53, P = 0.01).

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that the posterior corneal surface remain stable within one year after SMILE for both moderate and high myopia. The changes of PCE correlate to the residual bed thickness for high myopia. Long-term changes of posterior corneal surface need further investigation.

No change in anterior chamber dimensions after femtosecond LASIK for hyperopia

Objective:

To compare the changes in anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and anterior chamber angle (ACA) before and 6 months after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia using the Pentacam HR device.

Methods:

A total of 24 eyes of 24 consecutive hyperopic patients undergoing femtosecond LASIK were examined preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Anterior chamber volume; ACDs in the central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants; and ACA were measured using the Pentacam HR device. Comparisons of preoperative versus postoperative values were performed using paired Student t test. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate correlations between ACV change, central ACD change, age, and attempted maximum ablation depth.

Results:

Preoperative and postoperative mean ACVs were 153.6 and 158.2 μL, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative mean ACDs were 2.81, 2.28, 2.53, 2.16, and 2.61 mm, and 2.84, 2.31, 2.54, 2.16, and 2.65 mm, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative mean ACAs were 33.3° and 32.0°, respectively. There were not statistically significant differences in ACV, ACDs, and ACA from preoperatively to 6 months after femtosecond LASIK (all P>0.05). The change of central ACD was correlated significantly with age at 6 months postoperatively (R²=0.18, P=0.039).

Conclusions:

Anterior chamber profiles, including ACV, ACA, and central and peripheral ACDs did not significantly change after femtosecond LASIK for hyperopia.

Posterior Corneal Surface Stability after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratomileusis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate posterior corneal surface variation after femtosecond laser-assisted keratomileusis in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism. Patients were evaluated by corneal tomography preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months. We analyzed changes in the posterior corneal curvature, posterior corneal elevation, and anterior chamber depth. Moreover, we explored correlation between corneal ablation depth, residual corneal thickness, percentage of ablated corneal tissue, and preoperative corneal thickness. During follow-up, the posterior corneal surface did not have a significant forward corneal shift: no significant linear relationships emerged between the anterior displacement of the posterior corneal surface and corneal ablation depth, residual corneal thickness, or percentage of ablated corneal tissue.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Cornea With Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Imaging Before and After Lasik

Swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the latest advancement in anterior segment imaging. There are limited data regarding its performance after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). We compared the reliability of swept-source OCT and Scheimpflug imaging for evaluation of corneal parameters in refractive surgery candidates with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Three consecutive measurements were obtained preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively using swept-source OCT and Scheimpflug imaging. The study parameters included central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), keratometry at steep (Ks) and flat (Kf) axes, mean keratometry (Km), and, anterior and posterior best fit spheres (Ant and Post BFS). The main outcome measures included reliability of measurements before and after LASIK was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and reproducibility coefficients (RC). Association between the mean value of corneal parameters with age, spherical equivalent (SEQ), and residual bed thickness (RBT) and association of variance heterogeneity of corneal parameters and these covariates were analyzed. Twenty-six right eyes of 26 participants (mean age, 32.7 ± 6.9 yrs; mean SEQ, -6.27 ± 1.67 D) were included. Preoperatively, swept-source OCT demonstrated significantly higher ICC for Ks, CCT, TCT, and Post BFS (P ≤ 0.016), compared with Scheimpflug imaging. Swept-source OCT demonstrated significantly smaller RC values for CCT, TCT, and Post BFS (P ≤ 0.001). After LASIK, both devices had significant differences in measurements for all corneal parameters (P ≤ 0.015). Swept-source OCT demonstrated a significantly higher ICC and smaller RC for all measurements, compared with Scheimpflug imaging (P ≤ 0.001). Association of variance heterogeneity was only found in pre-LASIK Ant BFS and post-LASIK Post BFS for swept-source OCT, whereas significant association of variance heterogeneity was noted for all measurements except Ks and Km for Scheimpflug imaging.This study reported higher reliability of swept-source OCT for post-LASIK corneal measurements, as compared with Scheimpflug imaging. The reliability of corneal parameters measured with Scheimpflug imaging after LASIK was not consistent across different age, SEQ, and RBT measurements. These factors need to be considered during follow-up and evaluation of post-LASIK patients for further surgical procedures.

Longitudinal evaluation of posterior corneal elevation after laser refractive surgery using swept-source optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To investigate the change in posterior corneal elevation up to 1 year after myopic femtosecond-assisted LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal, comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing femtosecond-assisted LASIK or PRK.

METHODS

Corneal imaging was performed using swept-source optical coherence tomography at baseline and at each postoperative follow-up. A 2-way analysis of variance model with repeated measures and a linear mixed effect model were used to compare the differences in posterior corneal elevation between LASIK and PRK at different points after adjusting for the preoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ), central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), residual bed thickness (RST), and ablation depth (AD).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The changes in posterior corneal elevation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight eyes of 49 patients (mean age 35.2 ± 8.5 years) (62 LASIK, 36 PRK) were included. The mean change in posterior corneal elevation values after LASIK and PRK were 4.88±0.47 μm versus 3.67±0.48 μm (B-1), 2.42±0.56 μm versus 3.00±0.47 μm (B-3), 3.76±0.46 μm versus 2.76±0.46 μm (B-6), and 2.92±0.46 μm versus 2.72±0.46 μm (B-12), respectively. Significant differences in posterior corneal elevation after LASIK were found from month 1, to month 3, to month 6, to month 12 (P ≤ 0.001), whereas posterior corneal elevation did not change significantly from month 3, to month 6, to month 12 (P ≥ 0.373) after PRK. LASIK and PRK eyes showed significant differences at months 3 and 12 (P ≤ 0.023). A similar pattern was observed for the changes in posterior corneal elevation after LASIK and PRK after adjusting for the effect of SEQ, CCT, TCT, RST, and AD. The adjusted forward displacements of the posterior corneal surface were statistically significant throughout the study period after both refractive surgeries (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study suggested that there was a mild but significant forward protrusion of the posterior cornea after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and PRK. The posterior cornea fluctuated during the first postoperative year after LASIK, whereas it stabilized as early as 3 months after PRK.

Minor influence of sub-bowman keratomileusis on the posterior corneal surface at early stage

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes in posterior corneal surface (Q value and elevation) measured with Pentacam after femtosecond laser assisted Sub-Bowman Keratomileusis (SBK).

METHODS

The Q values and elevation of posterior corneal surface were determined in 166 myopic/myopic astigmatism eyes of 88 patients using Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), which estimates asphericity and elevation for several areas of cornea analysed (Q value: 6, 7, 8 and 9 mm; elevation: 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) before 1 and 3 months after SBK. The correlations between the changes of Q value or elevation and the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), central corneal thickness (CCT), central ablation depth (AD), estimated residual bed thickness (RBT) and RBT/CCT ratio were investigated.

RESULTS

Meridian and area differences in Q of posterior surface have been showed. Two major meridians (horizontal/vertical) present the change of significant negative direction before surgery (all p < 0.001), but the alteration of significant positive direction for all post-SBK follow-up visits (all p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in posterior elevation at 2 mm zone (horizontal meridian: p = 0.439; vertical meridian: p = 0.233). Compared with preoperation, minor but significant forward displacements were found in posterior elevation at 4 and 6 mm areas of cornea analyzed (horizontal meridian: all p < 0.001; vertical meridian: p < 0.001, p = 0.024, respectively). However, posterior elevation in two meridians (horizontal/vertical) at 8 mm region was displayed significant backward shift (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The Pearson correlation test showed no significant correlation between the changes in the Q values and elevation data in vast majority of areas of cornea analyzed and the SE, CCT, AD, RBT, and RBT/CCT ratio at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior corneal surface showed central flattening and peripheral steepening at early stage post-SBK. To combine the asphericity with the elevation of the posterior corneal surface can overall and accurately understand the posterior corneal shape and its variations after refractive surgery.

Anterior and posterior corneal elevation after orthokeratology and standard and customized LASIK surgery

PURPOSE

To quantify the changes in the elevation topography of the front and back corneal surfaces after three different refractive treatments for correcting myopia with standard and custom laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and orthokeratology using corneal refractive therapy.

METHODS

We evaluated 20 eyes undergoing orthokeratology for correction of myopia spherical equivalent (mean±SD=-3.41±0.76 D), 18 eyes undergoing custom LASIK surgery (mean±SD=-4.14±0.89 D), and 23 eyes undergoing standard LASIK (mean±SD=-3.61±0.67 D). The values of front and back corneal surfaces were derived by using Pentacam (Oculus, Inc. GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) before and at least 3 months after each treatment, in the center of the cornea and 4 points to each side of the horizontal meridian at intervals of 1 mm.

RESULTS

Corneal elevation data before treatment were not statistically different between patients in either group (P>0.070, for back and front elevation). After treatment, both surgical procedures significantly increased the positive value of the front elevation beyond an area of 6 mm. The opposite trend was found within the central 5 mm of the cornea, presenting a statistically significant decrease in elevation (P<0.001). In the case of orthokeratology, the elevation experienced a minor but a statistically significant reduction in the central region (P<0.001). On the back surface, the elevation did not undergo statistically significant alterations in any of the procedures and none of the items discussed (P>0.285).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in front corneal elevation changes between LASIK and orthokeratology reveal a much different mechanism for producing corneal power subtraction. The back corneal surface does not suffer significant changes after surgical and nonsurgical treatments for the correction of myopia.