Intrasubject repeatability of internal aberrometry obtained with a new integrated aberrometer

Higher order aberrations and visual function in a young Asian population of high myopes

Purpose

To examine the associations between higher order aberrations (HOAs), visual performance, demographics, and ocular characteristics in a young Asian population with high myopia.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of military pre-enlistees conducted between March 2014 to September 2018. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were tested under photopic, mesopic and simulated night conditions. Ocular, corneal and internal HOAs were measured with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer (KR-1W, Topcon Co., Tokyo, Japan).

Results

522 eyes of 263 consecutive subjects with severe high myopia (defined as spherical equivalent refraction [SER] ≤ -10.00D) in at least one eye, and high myopia (SER ≤ -6.00D) in the fellow eye, [mean (SD) SER -11.85 (2.03D)] were analysed. The mean (SD) age of subjects was 18.5 (1.6) years. Chinese eyes had significantly greater internal total HOA root-mean-square (RMS) compared to Malay eyes [mean difference (SD) 0.0246 (0.007) μm, p < 0.001). More negative SER was associated with greater ocular total HOA (p = 0.038), primary coma (p = 0.003) and tetrafoil (p = 0.025) RMS, as well as more positive ocular (p = 0.003) and internal primary spherical aberration (p = 0.009). Greater ocular total HOAs was associated with reduced visual acuity in simulated night conditions and low contrast, decreased contrast sensitivity under mesopic and simulated night conditions (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Greater HOAs were associated with Chinese ethnicity and more negative SER in a young Asian population with high myopia. Greater HOAs were associated with poorer visual performance in low luminance and reduced contrast conditions.

Comparison of anterior corneal aberrations measured by Scheimpflug and Placido Disc System for myopes

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the agreement of corneal aberrations obtained from the Pentacam and the KR-1W in myopic populations and to investigate the influence of the level of myopia as well as the laterality on the agreement.

METHODS

In this observational study, a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam AXL) and a Hartmann-Shack wavefront analyzer with Placido-disc topographer (KR-1W) were used to measure the aberrations of myopes in the anterior corneal surface by one experienced operator. All examinations were computed across a 6 mm diameter. Six subgroups were generated according to the degree of myopia (mild, moderate, and severe myopia) and the laterality of eyes (right and left eyes).

RESULTS

The study included 245 eyes of 170 participants. For certain anterior corneal aberrations, statistically significant differences existed between the Pentacam and the KR-1W (all P < .05). The values of Zernike (Z)(2,0), Z(2,2), Z(3,1), and Z(4,0) varied in all levels of myopia regardless of the laterality, with the values of the Pentacam constantly larger than the KR-1W in the measurement of Z(2,0), Z(2,2), and Z(4,0). For 2nd to 6th aberrations, both instruments correlated poorly to moderately. The width of limits of agreement between the two instruments was clinically too wide (> 0.1 μm) for aberrations closely correlated with visual quality, including Z(3, ± 3), Z(3, ± 1), and Z(4,0), and almost all aberrations, indicating poor agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, the Pentacam based on Scheimpflug technology and the KR-1W based on Placido Disc System are not interchangeable in measuring anterior corneal aberration for myopes regardless of myopia degree and the laterality, suggesting that a consistent instrument should be selected for surgical design as well as follow-up.

Repeatability and Agreement of Wavefront aberrations of Pentacam AXL Wave- a new hybrid topographer and aberrometer with ITrace in healthy eyes

PURPOSE

To assess repeatability and agreement of Pentacam AXL Wave, with iTrace aberrometer.

SETTING

Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.

DESIGN

Prospective ,cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred eyes of 100 patients underwent three sets of measurements, at a single visit, using Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus, Germany) and iTrace (Tracey Technologies, USA).Lower-order aberration (LOA), higher-order aberration (HOA), Coma and Spherical Aberrations (SA) were analyzed. Repeatability was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest variability (TRT), within-subject coefficient of variation (COV) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and the correlation coefficient (r) to determine strength of relationship between measurements.

RESULTS

All measurements with Pentacam AXL Wave had repeatability with an ICC for total ocular aberrations ranging from 0.84 for HOAto 0.92 for LOA and corneal from 0.76 for HOA to 0.86 for LOA The Sw, TRT, COV of all aberrations were significantly lower (better) than those of iTrace (p < 0.001). The mean differences between 2 devices were insignificant for the comparison of all parameters, except for spherical aberration (0.011(0.002571 to 0.02008; P= 0.01). Both devices showed excellent corelations for ocular aberrations (tHOA (P=0.12,LoA= -0.52 to 0.025; r= 0.89); LOA (P=0.14, LoA = -2.71 to 2.61  ; r= 0.96) coma (P=0.27, LoA = -0.11 to 0.12; r= 0.89) and in SA (P=0.01,  LoA = -0.09 to 0.07;r=0.97)).

CONCLUSIONS

The repeatability estimates for wavefront aberrations using Pentacam AXL Wave were significantly better than that using iTrace. Both devices showed excellent corelations for total ocular aberrations.

Bias of near-infrared light in evaluation of patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To compare visual quality between subjective tests and optical devices using near-infrared (NIR) light in patients implanted with monofocal, multifocal and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study enrolling patients aged between 55 and 75 (axial length between 22 and 25 mm) bilaterally implanted with Tecnis IOLs (Johnson & Johnson) four months previously: 40 patients (80 eyes) with monofocal ZCB00, 41 patients (82 eyes) with bifocal diffractive ZMB00 and 48 patients (96 eyes) with EDoF Symfony. They were examined using subjective and objective tests. The subjective tests comprised visual acuity (VA) with ETDRS charts, contrast sensitivity (CS) with Pelli-Robson and CSV-1000E tests, and clear vision range (CVR). The objective tests using NIR light were performed with the KR-1 W wavefront analyzer and the OQAS.

RESULTS

In the subjective tests, the monofocal group achieved the best outcomes in some of the VA and CS sections, while the bifocal group obtained the worst outcomes in some of the CS sections. In the objective tests, the bifocal group achieved the best results for VA and CS. Discrepancies between pseudoaccommodation range and CVR were found in the bifocal and EDoF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of visual quality using NIR light implies greater bias for diffractive lenses than for EDoF lenses. This bias may be even greater with devices using longer light wavelengths or Hartmann-Shack technology. The difference in wavelength between NIR and visible light leads to dimming of near-vision focus and magnification of distance focus.

Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform

PURPOSE:

To compare internal optical aberrations between three different intraocular lenses (IOL) of the same Tecnis platform: monofocal ZCB00, multifocal ZMB00, and enlarged depth-of-focus (EDoF) Symfony ZXR00.

METHODS:

We included in this study 236 eyes of 118 patients who had been bilaterally implanted either with the monofocal, the multifocal, or the EDoF IOL. They were examined with the K1-RW wavefront analyzer (Topcon Medical Systems) 2 months after surgery. Patients with any ocular pathology were excluded from the study. Only high-order aberrations (HOA) of the third and fourth orders of the Zernike polynomials were considered.

RESULTS:

Forty-three patients (86 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL, 45 patients (90 eyes) with the ZMB00 IOL, and 30 patients (60 eyes) with the EDoF Symfony IOL. Mean age was 62.42 ± 7.38, 63.60 ± 6.01, and 64.74 ± 5.84 years, respectively. Mean axial length was 23.37 ± 1.00, 23.49 ± 1.00, and 23.54 ± 0.73 mm, respectively. For a 6-mm pupil, internal total HOA in the monofocal group was 1.01 ± 1.75 μm; in the bifocal group was 1.35 ± 2.12 μm; and in the Symfony group was 0.72 ± 0.63 μm. No optical aberration differences were found among the three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

There are no differences regarding internal optical aberrations between these three IOLs when analyzing them with optical aberrometry. Patients’ pupil size should be considered for the selection of the most appropriate IOL to be implanted, because despite a same optical platform, every IOL implies a different increase of HOA with larger pupil sizes.

Programmed genome rearrangements in ciliates

Ciliates are a highly divergent group of unicellular eukaryotes with separate somatic and germline genomes found in distinct dimorphic nuclei. This characteristic feature is tightly linked to extremely laborious developmentally regulated genome rearrangements in the development of a new somatic genome/nuclei following sex. The transformation from germline to soma genome involves massive DNA elimination mediated by non-coding RNAs, chromosome fragmentation, as well as DNA amplification. In this review, we discuss the similarities and differences in the genome reorganization processes of the model ciliates Paramecium and Tetrahymena (class Oligohymenophorea), and the distantly related Euplotes, Stylonychia, and Oxytricha (class Spirotrichea).

Clinical evaluation of the repeatability of ocular aberrometry obtained with a new pyramid wavefront sensor

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intrasubject repeatability of the ocular aberrometry obtained with a new ocular pyramidal aberrometer technology in a sample of normal eyes.

METHODS

A total of 53 healthy eyes of 53 subjects with ages ranging from 18 to 45 years were included in this study. In all cases, three consecutive acquisitions were obtained. Intrasubject repeatability of the measurements with a pyramidal aberrometer was calculated. Intrasubject repeatability for 4.0- and 6.0-mm pupils was evaluated within the subject standard deviation (S_w) and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Low values of the S_w and intraclass correlation coefficient outcomes close to 1 were observed for the sphere and cylinder at 3.0-mm pupil size. Most low S_w and intraclass correlation coefficient values close to 1 were observed for total, low-order aberrations and higher-order aberrations root mean square and for each Zernike coefficient analysis (intraclass correlation coefficient ⩾0.798) at 4.0-mm pupil size, with more limited outcomes for the aberrometric coefficient of Z(4, 4) with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.683. For a 6.0 mm pupil diameter, low S_w and intraclass correlation coefficient values close to 1 were observed for all aberrometric parameters or Zernike coefficients analyzed (intraclass correlation coefficient ⩾0.850).

CONCLUSION

The new pyramidal aberrometer Osiris provides repeatable and consistent measurements of ocular aberrometry measurements in normal eyes.

Ocular residual and corneal astigmatism in a clinical population of high school students

Purpose

Total refractive astigmatism is usually the first consideration that guides the selection of contact lens type (e.g., spherical or toric), while the ocular source of the astigmatism is a second, but more important consideration, for the final clinical decision. This study was conducted to provide detailed data on this topic by evaluating astigmatic components in Chinese adolescents.

Methods

Participants were recruited from healthy high school students undergoing an annual ocular examination at a local hospital. Total astigmatism (TA), corneal astigmatism (CA), and ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) were determined by a Hartmann-Shack wavefront analyzer system (KR-1W, Topcon) with the natural pupil. The axis relationship between CA and ORA was placed into three categories: on-axis, defined as an axis with a difference of 0 ± 10°; opposite-axis, a difference of 90 ± 10°; and the rest defined as oblique-axis.

Results

The study consisted of 1,466 students (57.84% girls, age: 16.49 ± 1.05 years). ORA was present in 83.97%, 66.64%, and 45.23% of participants, according to the various criteria for astigmatism (≥ 0.50 D, ≥ 0.75 D, and ≥ 1.00 D, respectively). While with-the-rule was the most common axis orientation for both TA (76.28%) and CA (89.94%), against-the-rule predominated in ORA (93.82%; χ² = 1688.544, p < 0.001). Opposite-axis was the major type of axis difference (90.96%) of clinical significance (i.e., ≥ 1.00 D) between CA and ORA, which also prevailed in all levels of TA (range: 56.25–82.26%).

Conclusions

ORA is common in high school students and usually demonstrates a compensation relationship with CA, which should be taken into consideration when determining the design of contact lenses to correct refractive error.

Precision and agreement of higher order aberrations measured with ray tracing and Hartmann-Shack aberrometers

BACKGROUND

To assess the precision and agreement of measurements of higher order aberrations (HOAs) obtained with a ray tracing aberrometer (iTrace) and a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (Topcon KR-1 W).

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of the diagnostic test. Data from the right eyes of 92 normal subjects obtained using the two devices were included in this study. Two observers performed 3 consecutive scans to determine the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. About one week later, one observer performed an additional 3 consecutive scans to obtain the intersession reproducibility. The within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest repeatability (TRT) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the precision, while Bland-Altman plots were performed to assess the agreement.

RESULTS

For intraobserver repeatability of the ocular, corneal and internal HOAs, Topcon KR-1 W showed a 2.77Sw of 0.079 μm or less and ICCs of 0.761 or more; and iTrace showed a 2.77Sw of 0.105 μm or less and ICCs of 0.805 or more. The ICCs of the internal HOAs of interobserver reproducibility were less than 0.75 except for spherical aberration (SA) (0.862), and interobserver reproducibility of the counterpart showed similar but lower results. For the ocular, corneal and internal HOA measurements, statistically significant differences existed between the Topcon KR-1 W and iTrace (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the ocular SA and internal coma.

CONCLUSIONS

The ray tracing and Hartmann-Shack method aberrometers provided excellent repeatability but less reliable reproducibility in the measurement of HOAs (except for SA). The two aberrometers should not be interchangeable in clinical application because of the significant differences in HOA measurements between them.

Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes

Background

To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), white-to-white diameter (WTW), and irido-corneal angle (IA) measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

Methods

A total of 107 eyes of 107 patients ranging in age from 23 to 65 years were examined with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies). Three consecutive measurements were obtained with this device to assess the intrasession repeatability of ACD, CCT, PCT at different nasal and temporal locations, WTW, and nasal and temporal IA. Data analysis included the calculation of within-subject standard deviation (S_w), intrasubject precision (1.96xS_w), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

The S_w and CV for ACD was 0.03 mm and 1.16%, respectively, with an ICC of 0.992. The S_w values for central and peripheral pachymetric measurements were below 9 μm, with CV of less than 1.6% and ICC of 0.976 or higher. For IA measurements, S_w values of 0.84 or lower were found, with a CV between 1 and 2%, and an ICC of more than 0.970. The S_w for WTW was 0.24 mm and the CV was 1.95%. No statistically significant correlations were found between any anatomical parameter evaluated and their S_w and CV values associated (−0.220 ≤ r ≤ 0.204, p ≥ 0.125).

Conclusions

The VX120 system is able to provide repeatable measurements of anatomical parameters in healthy eyes. Inter-observer repeatability should be evaluated in future studies.

Changes in meibomian gland morphology and ocular higher-order aberrations in eyes with chalazion

PURPOSE

To examine the changes in meibomian gland morphology and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with chalazion and its excision.

METHODS

Seven male patients with previous history of chalazion excision and seven control male subjects were enrolled. Changes in meibomian gland morphology (meiboscores, gland dropout, and shortening) were evaluated by using meibography equipped in a wavefront analyzer KR-1W and in a slit-lamp device BG-4M. Ocular HOAs were measured sequentially with KR-1W. The tear film breakup time (BUT) was measured.

RESULTS

Both KR-1W and BG-4M visualized meibomian gland as clear similar images. The tear film BUT (mean ± SD, 5.6±3.0 vs 9.4±2.3 seconds, P=0.025), the total meiboscore (median [interquartile range], 2 (2-3) vs 0 (0-1), P=0.007) as well as the meibomian gland dropout rate (86% vs 14%, P=0.008) and shortening rate (100% vs 29%, P=0.031) differed significantly between the patient and control groups. The first total ocular HOAs (0.142±0.063 vs 0.130±0.015, P=0.80) were similar in both groups, whereas the stability index of the total HOAs over time (0.0041±0.0048 vs -0.0012±0.0020, P=0.030) differed significantly between the patient and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Chalazion and its excision were associated with dropout and shortening rate of meibomian glands. The morphological changes of meibomian glands in chalazion may be associated to instability of the tear film, which was suggested by the tear film BUT and the stability of ocular HOAs.

Corneal Topographic and Aberrometric Measurements Obtained with a Multidiagnostic Device in Healthy Eyes: Intrasession Repeatability

Purpose. To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of corneal curvature, eccentricity, and aberrometric measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes. Methods. This study enrolled 107 eyes of 107 patients ranging in age from 23 to 65 years. All of them underwent a complete anterior segment examination with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies, Chartres, France). Three consecutive measurements were obtained. The within-subject standard deviation (S_w), intrasubject precision (1.96 × S_w), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. Results. All S_w for corneal power measurements were below 0.26 D, with ICC above 0.982. The S_w for corneal astigmatism at different areas (3, 5, and 7 mm) was below 0.21 D, with ICC above 0.913. Concerning the axis of astigmatism, its S_w was below 11.27°, with ICC above 0.975. The S_w and ICC for corneal eccentricity were 0.067 and 0.957, respectively. The S_w and ICC for high-order aberration root mean square (RMS) were 0.048 µm and 0.901, respectively. For 3rd- and 4th-order aberrometric parameters, all S_w were below 0.037 µm and all ICC were higher than 0.84, except for quadrafoil RMS (ICC: 0.689). Conclusions. The multidiagnostic device evaluated is able to provide consistent measurements of corneal power, eccentricity, and third- and fourth-order aberrations in healthy eyes.

Comparison of the Adaptive Optics Vision Analyzer and the KR-1 W for measuring ocular wave aberrations

BACKGROUND

The aim was to assess the agreement in the measurement of ocular aberrations between a new Adaptive Optics Vision Analyzer (AOVA, Voptica, Murcia, Spain) and a commercial aberrometer (KR-1 W, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), both based on the Hartmann-Shack technique.

METHODS

One experienced examiner measured 29 healthy right eyes nine consecutive times with the two instruments. The individual Zernike coefficients and the root mean square (RMS) of each order from the second to the fifth order, the higher-order RMS (RMS_HOA ), the total RMS (RMS_TOT ) and the values of the spherical equivalent (M) and Jackson cross-cylinder (J₀ and J₄₅ ) were compared. All aberrations were computed for a 4.0 mm pupil diameter.

RESULTS

Bland and Altman analysis showed good agreement between instruments and most of the parameters showed no statistically significant differences. Although the largest mean differences were obtained for the defocus coefficient C(2,0) and the spherical equivalent (M) with a mean difference (and standard deviation) of 0.190 ± 0.099 µm and -0.150 ± 0.188 D, respectively, they were clinically acceptable and significant correlations were found between the AOVA and KR-1 W for the major refractive components such as spherical equivalent (r = 0.995, p < 0.001), J₀ (r = 0.964, p < 0.001), J₄₅ (r = 0.901, p < 0.001) and C(4,0) (r = 0.575, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest good agreement between instruments. Accommodation and misalignment of the measurements may play a role in some of the statistically significant differences that were obtained, specifically for defocus C(2,0), vertical coma C(3,-1) and spherical aberration C(4,0) coefficients; however, these differences were clinically irrelevant.

Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations

AIM

To compare the difference and agreement of KR-1W and iTrace for measurement of high order aberrations.

METHODS

KR-1W and iTrace were respectively used in a group of healthy people (40 volunteers, 32 eyes) to measure the high order aberration (HOA) of corneal, internal and total ocular. The clinical difference and agreement of two instruments were respectively evaluated by paired-samples t-test and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The paired-samples t-test showed that the corneal HOA measured by the two instruments had no statistical differences (P>0.05); but the internal and total ocular HOA had significant statistical differences (P<0.05), and the mean results measured by iTrace were higher than that of KR-1W. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the HOA of corneal and internal were all in 95% limits of agreement; and just one point of total ocular HOA was beyond the 95% limits of agreement.

CONCLUSION

KR-1W and iTrace were consistent well in the measurement of corneal, internal and total ocular HOA, especially for the cornea.

Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace

Purpose

To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of corneal power measurements obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace, and assess the agreement with measurements obtained by Allegro Topolyzer and IOLMaster.

Methods

The right eyes of 100 normal subjects were prospectively scanned 3 times using all the 4 devices. Another observer performed additional 3 consecutive scans using the Topcon KR-1W and iTrace in the same session. About one week later, the first observer repeated the measurements using the Topcon KR-1W and iTrace. The steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Km), J0 and J45 were analyzed. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements were evaluated by the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV), test-retest repeatability (2.77Sw), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreements between devices were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and 95% limits of agreement (LoA).

Results

Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver and intersession reproducibility of the Ks, Kf and Km showed a CoV of no more than 0.5%, a 2.77Sw of 0.70 D or less, and an ICC of no less than 0.99. However, J0 and J45 showed poor intraobserver repeatability and interobserver and intersession reproducibility (all ICCs not greater than 0.446). Statistically significant differences existed between Topcon KR-1W and IOLMaster, Topcon KR-1W and iTrace, Topcon KR-1W and Topolyzer, iTrace and Topolyzer, iTrace and IOLMaster for Ks, Kf and Km measurements (all P < 0.05). The mean differences between Topcon KR-1W, iTrace, and the other 2 devices were small. The 95% LoA were approximately 1.0 D to 1.5 D for all measurements.

Conclusions

The Ks, Kf and Km obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace showed excellent intraobserver repeatability and interobserver and intersession reproducibility in normal eyes. The agreement between Topcon KR-1W and Topolyzer, Topcon KR-1W and IOLMaster, iTrace and Topolyzer, iTrace and IOLMaster, Topcon KR-1W and iTrace were not so good, they should not be interchangeable in clinical application. Given that the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver and intersession reproducibility of corneal astigmatism measurements obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace were poor, it should be cautious that Topcon KR-1W and iTrace were applied for the preparation of toric lens implantation.

Repeatability of aberrometric measurements with a new instrument for vision analysis based on adaptive optics

PURPOSE

To evaluate intersession and intrasession repeatability of aberration data obtained with a new visual simulator based on adaptive optics, which includes a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (Adaptive Optics Vision Analyzer; Voptica S.L., Murcia, Spain).

METHODS

Thirty-one healthy right eyes were included in the study. To evaluate intrasession repeatability, three consecutive measurements without repositioning the patient or realigning the eye were obtained. Intersession repeatability was evaluated in three sessions. Aberrometric data computed from the second to the fifth order for a 4-mm pupil were used. Statistical analysis included the repeated measures analysis of variance (or the Wilcoxon signed rank test), the coefficient of repeatability, the Bland-Altman method, and the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the intrasession and intersession repeatability analysis for any of the parameters (P > .05) were found, suggesting a consistent variability of the instrument over time. Similar coefficient of repeatability values were obtained in the three sessions. The Bland-Altman analysis confirmed differences close to zero and the variations were independent of the mean within and between sessions. The intersession intraclass correlation coefficient values were generally above 0.75, suggesting moderate to high repeatability. However, some exceptions were found in the intrasession analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the new instrument provides consistent and repeatable aberrometric data. It is therefore a suitable tool to perform consistent and repeatable visual simulations.

Clinical outcomes with a new microincisional diffractive multifocal IOL

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the refractive outcomes and the optical performance as well as the quality of life in patients implanted with a new diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

Prospective, clinical study including 41 cases of patients who underwent cataract surgery and were divided in two groups: group 1, including 20 eyes implanted with the multifocal IOL SeeLens MF (Hanita Lenses, Israel); group 2, 21 eyes implanted with the Acrysof SA60AT IOL. Visual acuity, defocus curve, intraocular aberrations, contrast sensitivity function and quality of life were assessed during a follow up period of 6 months.

RESULTS

Significant improvement was observed in the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in both groups (p < 0.02). The multifocal group showed better results in terms of uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) (p < 0.01). Comparison of both groups showed better visual acuities for the multifocal IOL group in defocus levels from -3.0 D to -1.50 D (p ≤ 0.01). At 6 months, there was a significant reduction of the internal higher order aberrations (p ≤ 0.04). A significant increase in scotopic contrast sensitivity was detected for 6 cycles/° spatial frequency during follow up (p = 0.04), but no significant changes were observed for the rest of spatial frequencies (p ≥ 0.06). Visual Functioning Index (VF-14) questionnaire showed that patients reported high levels of satisfaction when performing daily tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

The SeeLens MF IOL is able to successfully restore distance, near and intermediate visions after cataract surgery. It also provides functional intermediate vision with optimal intraocular optical quality.

The relationship between higher-order aberrations and amblyopia treatment in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and amblyopia treatment in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.

METHODS

The medical records of hyperopic amblyopia patients with both spherical anisometropia of 1.00 diopter (D) or more and astigmatic anisometropia of less than 1.00 D were reviewed retrospectively. Based on the results of the amblyopia treatment, patients were divided into two groups: treatment successes and failures. Using the degree of spherical anisometropia, subjects were categorized into mild, moderate, or severe groups. Ocular, corneal, and internal HOAs were measured using a KR-1W aberrometer at the initial visit, and at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

The results of the 45 (21 males and 24 females) hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia patients who completed the 12-month follow-up examinations were analyzed. The mean patient age at the initial visit was 70.3 months. In total, 28 patients (62.2%) had successful amblyopia treatments and 17 patients (37.8%) failed treatment after 12 months. Among the patient population, 24 (53.3%) had mild hyperopic anisometropia and 21 (46.7%) had moderate hyperopic anisometropia. When comparing the two groups (i.e., the success and failure groups), ocular spherical aberrations and internal spherical aberrations in the amblyopic eyes were significantly higher in the failure group at every follow-up point. There were no significant differences in any of the HOAs between mild and moderate cases of hyperopic anisometropia at any follow-up. When the amblyopic and fellow eyes were compared between the groups there were no significant differences in any of the HOAs.

CONCLUSIONS

HOAs, particularly ocular spherical aberrations and internal spherical aberrations, should be considered as reasons for failed amblyopia treatment.

Intraocular optical quality of phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of angle-supported, iris-fixated, and posterior chamber lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate internal aberrometric profiles following phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective and consecutive case series.

METHODS

One hundred and five eyes of 65 patients were included. The optical aberrations were measured with the Topcon KR-1W aberrometer. Comparisons of internal aberrations for different models were made. Comparisons at 4 and 6 mm were made also within the same model for all the lenses. Comparisons regarding the implantation site were also performed: angle-supported (AS) anterior chamber (AC) (n = 47), iris-fixated (IF) (n = 27), and posterior chamber (PC) (n = 31).

RESULTS

Root mean square (RMS) of internal optical higher-order aberrations (HOAs) changed significantly to higher values from 4-6 mm aperture diameter in each PIOL, as should be expected. However, this significant change was not detected in spherical aberration for Kelman Duet (P = .753) and in trefoil for Acrysoft (P = .059). Kelman lens showed significantly lower values of spherical aberration compared to Acrysoft at 4 mm (P = .022) and at 6 mm (P = .042). Acrysoft showed the lowest values at central zone for trefoil (P = .043) and tetrafoil (P = .002) in AC group. In the IF group, Artisan and Artiflex showed similar results for all internal aberrations. In the comparison between Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL; STAAR Surgical Co, Monrovia, California, USA) and phakic refractive lens (PRL), both for posterior chamber, significantly lower values of coma were observed for ICL (P = .033). IF lenses showed clinical evidence, but not significant, of better centering capability than AS lenses (P = .096).

CONCLUSIONS

The study of intraocular aberrations is an adequate method to identify the clinical optical behavior and could help the surgeon to identify the most frequent problems related with each model.

Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer

PURPOSE

To compare repeatability of internal eye aberrations derived from aberrometry and corneal topography (CT) measured simultaneously by the Innovative Visual Systems Discovery, against time displaced but same instrument measurement (Nidek OPD-Scan 3), and time displaced different instrument measurement (Medmont E300 and Imagine Eyes irx3).

METHODS

Three aberrometry and CT measurements were captured with each instrument, except for the OPD-Scan 3 where three aberrometry scans were followed by a single CT. Measurements were repeated across 2 days. Corneal surface Zernike coefficients were derived from CT and subtracted from aberrometry to establish internal aberration coefficients. For the OPD-Scan 3, internal Zernike coefficients were derived by the instrument's software. Repeatability for second-order root mean square (RMS), spherical aberration, coma RMS, trefoil RMS, and the refraction components M, J0, and J45 were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Intrasession repeatability was similar between the Discovery and E300/irx3, with the E300/irx3 slightly more repeatable for second-order RMS. Across days, the Discovery was most repeatable for second-order RMS (ICC 0.98) followed by the E300/irx3 (ICC 0.96) and OPD-Scan 3 (ICC 0.88). All instruments were less repeatable for higher order aberrations with only the Discovery moderately repeatable for spherical aberration and trefoil RMS (both ICC ≥ 0.75). The Discovery was highly repeatable for all derived refractive components (ICC ≥ 0.96). The E300/irx3 was highly repeatable for M (ICC 0.98) and moderately repeatable for J0 (ICC 0.89). The OPD-Scan 3 was highly repeatable for the M component (ICC 0.98) but not repeatable for the cylindrical components.

CONCLUSIONS

The Discovery was highly repeatable for second-order RMS and derived refractive components. The lower repeatability for internal higher order aberrations measured with all instruments suggests caution in their use until further work is carried out to investigate sources of error and to develop methods to improve repeatability.

Precision of higher-order aberration measurements with a new Placido-disk topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor

PURPOSE

To assess the intrasession and intersession precision of ocular, corneal, and internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measured using an integrated topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (Topcon KR-1W) in refractive surgery candidates.

SETTING

IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain.

DESIGN

Evaluation of diagnostic technology.

METHODS

To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 experienced examiner measured eyes 9 times successively. To study intersession reproducibility, the same clinician obtained measurements from another set of eyes in 2 consecutive sessions 1 week apart. Ocular, corneal, and internal HOAs were obtained. Coma and spherical aberrations, 3rd- and 4th-order aberrations, and total HOAs were calculated for a 6.0 mm pupil diameter.

RESULTS

For intrasession repeatability (75 eyes), excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained (ICC >0.87), except for internal primary coma (ICC = 0.75) and 3rd-order (ICC = 0.72) HOAs. Repeatability precision (1.96 × S(w)) values ranged from 0.03 μm (corneal primary spherical) to 0.08 μm (ocular primary coma). For intersession reproducibility (50 eyes), ICCs were good (>0.8) for ocular primary spherical, 3rd-order, and total higher-order aberrations; reproducibility precision values ranged from 0.06 μm (corneal primary spherical) to 0.21 μm (internal 3rd order), with internal HOAs having the lowest precision (≥0.12 μm). No systematic bias was found between examinations on different days.

CONCLUSIONS

The intrasession repeatability was high; therefore, the device's ability to measure HOAs in a reliable way was excellent. Under intersession reproducibility conditions, dependable corneal primary spherical aberrations were provided.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Design and validity of a miniaturized open-field aberrometer

PURPOSE

To design and validate a new miniaturized open-field wavefront device that can be attached to an ophthalmic surgical microscope or slitlamp.

SETTING

Solihull Hospital and Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Comparative noninterventional study.

METHODS

The dynamic range of the Aston aberrometer was assessed using a calibrated model eye. The validity was compared with that of a conventional desk-mounted Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (Topcon KR1W) in dilated eyes. The instruments were used in random order, with measurements repeated 5 times to assess intrasession repeatability.

RESULTS

The open-field aberrometer had a large dynamic range of at least +21.0 diopters (D) to -25.0 D. It gave similar measurements to the conventional aberrometer for mean spherical equivalent (SE) (mean difference 0.02 D ± 0.49 [95% confidence interval]; correlation r = 0.995; P<.001), astigmatic components (J0: 0.02 ± 0.15 D; r = 0.977, P<.001; J45: 0.03 ± 0.28, r = 0.666, P<.001), and higher-order aberration (HOA) root mean square (RMS) (0.02 ± 0.20 D, r = 0.620, P<.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient assessments of intrasession repeatability were excellent (SE = 1.000, P<.001; J0 = 0.998, P<.001; J45 = 0.980, P<.01; HOA RMS = 0.961, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The new aberrometer gave valid, repeatable measurements of refractive error and HOAs over a large range. It can measure continuously, thus providing direct feedback on the optical status of the visual system to surgeons during intraocular lens implantation and corneal surgery.