Pathophysiology and Treatment of Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis

PURPOSE

To review cytokine- and chemokine-mediated mechanisms of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after lamellar corneal surgical procedures.

METHODS

Review of the basic science and clinical literature.

RESULTS

DLK can occur early or late (months to decades) after all lamellar corneal surgeries, including laser in situ keratomileusis, small incision lenticule extraction, anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. It is most commonly triggered by epithelial injury during or after lamellar surgery, which leads to the release of interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α from the epithelium and into the stroma. These chemokines directly attract inflammatory cells into the cornea from the limbal blood vessels and also bind to receptors on keratocytes and corneal fibroblasts where myriad chemokines are upregulated that also chemotactically attract monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and other bone marrow-derived cells into the corneal stroma. Other factors that can trigger DLK include retained blood in the interface, endotoxins and other toxins, and excessive keratocyte necrosis caused by femtosecond lasers. Infiltrating cells show a preference to enter any lamellar interface in the cornea, regardless of the time since surgery, because of the ease of movement toward the chemotactic attractants relative to the surrounding stroma with intact collagen lamellae and stromal cells that serve as relative barriers impeding motility. The mainstay of treatment is topical corticosteroids, but severe cases may also be treated with flap lift irrigation and systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

DLK can occur early or late after any lamellar corneal surgical procedure and is most commonly triggered by epithelial-stromal-bone marrow-derived cellular interactions mediated by corneal cytokines and chemokines. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(2):124-130.].

Incidence and Outcomes of Sterile Multifocal Inflammatory Keratitis and Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis After SMILE

PURPOSE

To report the incidence outcomes of sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis and diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in a large population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of a population of 4,000 consecutive eyes treated by SMILE at the London Vision Clinic using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). The inclusion criterion was to have presented with inflammatory keratitis after SMILE. In some cases after SMILE, the inflammatory keratitis presented as sterile multifocal interface keratitis uncharacteristic of classic DLK. The incidence was measured and categorized as primary or secondary by presenting appearance, grade, and time to presentation. Patients were observed for 1 year after surgery and standard outcomes analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 4,000 eye population, there were 18 cases (0.45%) of DLK grade 1 or 2. All cases were managed and resolved with topical steroid therapy. Of these, 12 cases (67%) were of classic appearance and 6 cases (33%) presented as sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis. DLK was primary in nature in 11 cases (61%) and secondary in 7 cases (39%). Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 93% of eyes. No patients lost any lines of corrected distance visual acuity and there was no change in contrast sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

DLK occurred after SMILE with an incidence of 0.45% in this population. Topical steroid therapy resolved the DLK in all cases with no sequelae and no adverse effect on refractive or visual outcome at 1 year postoperatively. A unique type of DLK presentation can occur after SMILE, characterized by multiple focal sterile inflammatory spots. Management is the same as for classic DLK, but with a lower threshold for performing an interface washout. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(11):751-759.].

Incidence, Indications, and Outcomes of Eyes Needing Early Flap Lifting After LASIK

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence, indications, and outcomes associated with early flap relifting after uncomplicated laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

All LASIK cases from a single surgical center between 2007 and 2015 were reviewed. Early postoperative flap lift cases (<15 d after surgery) were identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 25,712 eyes were included, of which 366 (1.42%) underwent early postoperative flap lifting. There was a significant reduction in early postoperative flap lifting rates from 2006 (2.46%) to 2015 (0.92%) (P = 0.001). Reasons for early flap lifting included striae (n = 301, 1.17%), diffuse lamellar keratitis (n = 62, 0.24%), flap dislocation (n = 20, 0.08%), epithelial ingrowth (n = 18, 0.07%), and interface debris (n = 15, 0.06%). There was a significant difference in rates and outcomes of flap relifting among high-volume surgeons (P < 0.001). The flap lift group had a significantly lower final safety index (0.95 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0.15, P < 0.001), efficacy index (0.85 ± 0.26 vs. 0.94 ± 0.26, P < 0.001), and a higher distance from target refraction (0.39 ± 0.61 vs. 0.21 ± 0.46 D). In unilateral cases, the study eye had a lower safety index (P < 0.001), efficacy index (P < 0.001), and greater distance from target refraction (P = 0.003) compared with the fellow eye. After intervention, 81.1% of cases achieved full resolution, 10.1% achieved partial resolution, 4.1% required additional flap relifting, and 4.7% were nonresolved by the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The main indication for early flap relifting after LASIK was striae, and most cases achieved full resolution. Although refractive and visual outcomes are lower in this group, they are, nevertheless, satisfactory.

LASIK interface complications: etiology, management, and outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the etiology, diagnosis, clinical course, and management of LASIK interface complications.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

Primary interface complications include infectious keratitis, diffuse lamellar keratitis, central toxic keratopathy, pressure-induced stromal keratopathy (PISK), and epithelial ingrowth. Infectious keratitis is most commonly caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (early onset) or atypical Mycobacterium (late onset) postoperatively, and immediate treatment includes flap lift and irrigation, cultures, and initiation of broad-spectrum topical antibiotics, with possible flap amputation for recalcitrant cases. Diffuse lamellar keratitis is a white blood cell infiltrate that appears within the first 5 days postoperatively and is acutely responsive to aggressive topical and oral steroid use in the early stages, but may require flap lift and irrigation to prevent flap necrosis if inflammation worsens. In contrast, PISK is caused by acute steroid response and resolves only with cessation of steroid use and intraocular pressure lowering. Without appropriate therapy PISK can result in severe optic nerve damage. Central toxic keratopathy mimics stage 4 diffuse lamellar keratitis, but occurs early in the postoperative period and is noninflammatory. Observation is the only effective treatment, and flap lift is usually not warranted. Epithelial ingrowth is easily distinguishable from other interface complications and may be self-limited or require flap lift to treat irregular astigmatism and prevent flap melt.

CONCLUSIONS

Differentiating between interface entities is critical to rapid appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and ultimate visual outcome. Although initial presentations may overlap significantly, the conditions can be readily distinguished with close follow-up, and most complications can resolve without significant visual sequelae when treated appropriately.

Refractive outcomes and quality of vision related to an outbreak of diffuse lamellar keratitis

PURPOSE

To report the impact on visual function and corneal aberrations during an epidemic of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK).

METHODS

A retrospective, comparative, and consecutive case-control study was performed, involving 418 eyes operated between March and October 2007 in the refractive surgery unit of one center. Eyes were separated into groups: group 1 (DLK group) included 209 eyes that presented with DLK after LASIK and group 2 (control group) included 209 unaffected, consecutive eyes operated from the beginning of the outbreak. Refractive variables and corneal aberrations were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Visual outcomes were significantly different when comparing control eyes and eyes with DLK grades 3 and 4, but not for eyes with DLK grades 1 and 2. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) significantly improved from the third month after DLK was diagnosed (Kruskal-Wallis, P=.02). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) did not decrease significantly with DLK grades 1 and 2 (preoperative CDVA vs 1, 3, and 6 months after diagnosis; Mann-Whitney, P>.05, respectively). At the end of follow-up, UDVA and CDVA were not significantly different between the two groups. Eyes suffering from DLK had significantly increased corneal aberrations, except for spherical and astigmatism aberrations, 3 months after being diagnosed (Kruskal-Wallis, P<.05); however, corneal aberrations were not significantly different between the DLK and control groups (Mann-Whitney, P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The outbreak of DLK did not induce a significant decrease in global visual outcomes, except in severe cases, and postoperative corneal aberrations were not affected.