Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser

Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism

BACKGROUND

To find out the incidence and risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism following femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

A total of 1076 eyes from 569 patients who had FS-LASIK or SMILE were included in the retrospective research. For each kind of surgery, eyes were separated into two groups: "OBL" groups and "no OBL" groups. In the FS-LASIK group, eyes that developed OBL were split into "hard OBL" and "soft OBL" groups. The incidence and size of OBL were analyzed after watching the surgical procedure videotaped during the operation and taking screenshots. Surgical parameters, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, corneal thickness, flap thickness, cap thickness, lenticule thickness, and visual acuity, were compared.

RESULTS

In the FS-LASIK surgery, the incidence of OBL was 63.2% (347 eyes). A thicker central corneal thickness (CCT) was the only independent risk factor affecting the OBL area (β = 0.126, P = 0.019). One hundred and thirty of these eyes had hard OBL, and the flap thickness of these eyes was thinner than that of those with soft OBL (P = 0.027). In the SMILE group, 26.6% (140 eyes) developed OBL. A higher flat keratometry (K) and a thicker residual stromal thickness (RST) were risk factors affecting the OBL area (β = 0.195, P = 0.024; β = 0.281, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of OBL differs between the FS-LASIK surgery and the SMILE surgery. There are differences in the factors influencing OBL between the two surgeries.

Effect of corneal flap thickness on opaque bubble layer formation in Visumax FS-LASIK using GEE analysis

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate two types of corneal flap thickness on opaque bubble layer (OBL) formation in Visumax femtosecond laser-assisted stromal for situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 203 eyes of 103 patients (32 men and 71 women) who underwent Visumax FS-LASIK between January 2020 and June 2020, and according to corneal flap thickness, they were divided into the 100-μm group (64 eyes) and the 110-μm group (139 eyes). Anterior-segment examination revealed no abnormal findings. Preoperatively, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), residual stromal thickness (RST), spherical power, cylindrical power, flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and biomechanical parameters including deformation amplitude (DA) ratio, Integrated Radius, stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), and Ambrosio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh) were evaluated. Primary outcomes were the incidence of OBL formation in the two groups compared by the Chi-square test and the correlation between the incidence of OBL and the above preoperative data by Spearman's Rho test. Secondary outcomes were the comparisons corrected by the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model.

Results

The incidence of OBL formation in the 100-μm group was 59.4 %, which was higher than that in the 110-μm group (23.0 %) with a significant difference (χ2 = 25.635, P < 0.001). The thinner corneal flap thickness (r = -0.355, P < 0.001) and higher spherical power (r = -0.142, P < 0.05) correlated with OBL formation. Higher K1 (r = 0.217, P < 0.01) and K2 (r = 0.198, P < 0.01) also correlated with OBL formation. The results of the GEE correction analysis showed higher rates of OBL formation in the 100-μm group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.704, 95 % CI 1.681-13.161, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

OBL was more likely to occur with the 100-μm corneal flap than with the 110-μm corneal flap in Visumax FS-LASIK. The risk of OBL formation in the 100-μm group was 4.704 times higher than that in the 110-μm group.

VisuMax Flap 2.0: a flap plus technique to reduce incidence of an opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser–assisted LASIK

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence of an opaque bubble layer (OBL) in femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) flaps created with VisuMax Flap 2.0 as a result of a modification in the parameters of the flap programming.

Methods

This retrospective study was comprised of 1400 eyes of 715 patients who received FS-LASIK surgery. OBLs were measured and reported as a percentage of the flap area to identify the incidence and extent. Flap creation, which is a modification technique, was performed with 8.1-mm flap diameters plus 0.3-mm enlarged interlamellar photodisruption (group Flap 2.0). The same flap diameters without extra photodisruption as the previous standard setting were also implemented (group Flap 1.0). The preoperative measurements, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, and intraoperative characteristics such as flap size and thickness, were documented. Possible risk factors for the occurrence of OBLs were investigated in this study.

Results

The incidence of an OBL was reduced when using the Flap 2.0 program (31.4%) compared to the Flap 1.0 program (63.7%). The area of hard and soft OBLs created by the Flap 2.0 program is smaller than those created by the Flap 1.0 program (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a thinner flap (P = 0.038) and a higher sphere (P = 0.001) affected the chance of hard OBLs occurring.

Conclusion

The VisuMax Flap 2.0 program promotes gas venting by enlarging the interlamellar photodisruption size. The incidence and extent of OBLs appear to be reduced significantly when the Flap 2.0 program is applied.

Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis

Background

Opaque bubble layer (OBL), which generates from photo-disruptive procedures on the cornea, has been a common phenomenon during femtosecond laser-assisted refractive surgeries and it would potentially impact eye tracking and flap lifting. And we have observed that an updated flap-making pattern could form less OBL clinically than the traditional pattern, which needed further approval. Thus, the purpose of this study is to prove our observation and investigate the possible risk factors related to the occurrence and type of OBL in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps using the Visumax laser system.

Methods

This prospective study included 167 eyes of 86 patients (mean age: 27.5 ± 6.1 years) undergoing bilateral femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia/myopic astigmatism by the same surgeon from April 2020 to August 2020. Preoperative data on refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), and keratometry as well as intraoperative data were included for analysis. A new flap-making pattern creating an offset between flap-cut and side-cut was adopted to compare with the traditional pattern. The operation video of flap formation was analyzed to identify the existence and type of OBL. The area covered by OBL and the ratio of OBL to flap were calculated using Image J software.

Results

Among 167 eyes, 54 eyes (32.3%) developed OBLs, consisting of 31 as hard OBL coexisting with soft OBL, and 23 as soft OBL alone. The OBL incidence was significantly reduced in eyes with the new flap-making pattern compared with the traditional pattern (13.8% vs. 52.5%, P < 0.001). Hard OBLs had larger area ratios than soft OBLs (14.3 ± 8.3% vs. 1.1 ± 1.8%, P < 0.001). Univariate analyses revealed that eyes with more myopia, thicker CCT, and traditional flap-making patterns were more likely to develop OBLs. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that more myopia, thicker CCT, and traditional flap-making pattern were risk factors for OBLs. A Larger corneal diameter was associated with a higher incidence of hard OBL when applying the traditional flap-making process.

Conclusion

More myopia, thicker CCT, and larger corneal diameter were risk factors for OBL development during flap creation, whereas a flap-making pattern with an offset between flap-cut and side-cut could reduce the incidence of OBL.

Objective and Subjective Quality of Vision After SMILE for High Myopia and Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To report subjective and objective quality of vision (QoV) results for high myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) between -9.00 and -13.00 diopters (D).

METHODS

This was a prospective study recruiting 114 patients undergoing SMILE with attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) correction from -9.00 to -13.00 D, and cylinder up to 5.00 D. Patients were informed before surgery of the increased risk of QoV symptoms. Patients completed the Rasch validated QoV questionnaire. Objective QoV was assessed by corneal and whole eye aberrations, HD Analyzer Objective Scatter Index (OSI) (Keeler), and contrast sensitivity. Patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Individual item and total Rasch-scaled scores for the three subscales (frequency, severity, and bothersomeness) of the QoV questionnaire were calculated before and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.27 ± 1.18 (range: 2 to 10), 8 or higher in 93%, and 7 or higher in 98% of patients. One patient with a satisfaction score of 2 had a simple refractive error re-treatment and then reported a satisfaction score of 10. The total mean ± standard deviation Rasch-scaled QoV score for the frequency, severity, and bothersomeness subscales before surgery was 24 ± 19, 20 ± 16, and 19 ± 18, respectively. Scores increased after surgery to 41 ± 18, 32 ± 16, and 30 ± 21, respectively (P < .001). Corneal aberrations (6 mm, OSI) increased on average by 0.39 µm for spherical aberration, 0.41 µm for coma, and 0.56 µm for higher order aberrations root mean square. OSI increased on average by 0.58. There was a small but statistically significant improvement in contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree. There were no statistically significant correlations found between subjective scores for starbursts and objective measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction was high following SMILE for high myopia. As expected, there was an increase in QoV symptoms, mainly glare and starbursts. The acceptance of QoV symptoms for high myopic SMILE was high, indicating that residual refractive error and visual acuity are the major drivers for patient satisfaction with appropriate preoperative informed consent. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):404-413.].

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for the Correction of High Myopia With Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia between -9.00 and -14.00 diopters (D).

METHODS

This was a prospective study of SMILE for high myopia using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Inclusion criteria were attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) between -9.00 and -14.00 D, cylinder up to 7.00 D, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/40 or better, age 21 years or older, and suitable for SMILE. The sub-lenticule thickness was 220 µm or greater, and the total uncut stromal thickness was 300 µm or greater. Patients were to be followed up for 1 year. Standard outcomes analysis was performed using 12-month data where available or 3-month data otherwise.

RESULTS

Of 187 eyes treated, data were available at 12 months for 181 eyes (96.8%) and 3 months for 4 eyes (2.1%), and 2 eyes (1.1%) were lost to follow-up. Mean attempted SEQ was -10.55 ± 1.00 D (range: -9.00 to -12.99 D). Mean cylinder was -1.19 ± 0.83 D (range: 0.00 to -4.00 D). Preoperative CDVA was 20/20 or better in 73% of eyes. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 57% and 20/25 or better in 82% of eyes. Mean SEQ relative to target was -0.22 ± 0.48 D (range: -1.63 to +1.38 D), 66% ± 0.50 D and 93% ±1.00 D. Mean SEQ 12-month change was -0.08 ± 0.34 D (range: -1.75 to +0.88 D). There was loss of one line of CDVA in 4% of eyes, and no eyes lost two or more lines. Contrast sensitivity was unchanged. Patient satisfaction was 8 or more out of 10 in 94% and 6 or more in 99% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of SMILE for myopia greater than -9.00 D at 3 to 12 months showed excellent efficacy, safety, stability, and predictability, with high patient satisfaction. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(5):262-271.].

Comparison of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With 120- and 140-µm Cap Thickness

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and corneal biomechanical changes between 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

This prospective study included 150 eyes (150 patients: 91 eyes in the 120-µm group, and 59 eyes in the 140-µm group) who underwent SMILE. Enhanced correction nomograms were applied for patients according to cap thickness. Clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refraction, and corneal wavefront aberrations, were compared between the two groups. Corneal biomechanics were evaluated using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany).

Results

The mean uncorrected-distance visual acuity, safety and efficacy indices, and refractive predictability were comparable in the 120-µm and 140-µm groups after SMILE. The postoperative total corneal root mean square higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations was 0.48 ± 0.31 and 0.26 ± 0.10 in the 120-µm group, and 0.53 ± 0.16 and 0.34 ± 0.13 in the 140-µm group, which showed significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.027, and <0.001, respectively). Although corneal stiffness decreased after SMILE in both groups, the changes in the deformation amplitude ratio were significantly higher in the 140-µm group than in the 120-µm group (P = 0.022).

Conclusions

SMILE with 120-µm and 140-µm cap thickness provided excellent predictable outcomes according to our enhanced correction nomogram. The amount of tissue removal required to achieve the same amount of refractive correction was greater in the thicker cap group. The induction of corneal HOAs and weakening of corneal biomechanics were less pronounced in the thin-cap group, which may be associated with the thinner cap, lesser lenticule thickness, or thicker residual stromal bed.

Translational Relevance

Although SMILE with different cap thickness was effective, thicker lenticule thickness in the thick-cap group may be associated with induction of HOAs, and corneal stiffness changes.

Influence of Cap Thickness on Opaque Bubble Layer Formation in SMILE: 110 Versus 140 µm

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of cap thickness on the formation of an opaque bubble layer (OBL) during small incision lenticule extraction procedures.

METHODS

In total, 100 eyes from 50 patients were prospectively examined. One of two corneal cap thicknesses was randomly assigned to each eye and differed in the contralateral eye: 110 µm in one eye and 140 µm in the other. OBL area and density were quantitatively assessed.

RESULTS

The proportion of OBL areas in the anterior lenticule plane was 11.70% ± 7.35% in the 110-µm group, which was significantly higher than the 140-µm group (6.64% ± 4.68%, P < .001). For OBL areas located in the posterior lenticule plane, mean areas for the 110-µm group were also higher than those for the 140-µm group (1.32% ± 1.20% and 0.94% ± 0.59%, respectively; P = .002). Mean gray values of the OBL in the posterior lenticule plane were slightly different between the two groups (P < .001), but no significant difference in OBL of the anterior lenticule plane was observed (P = .055). Eyes with a 110-µm cap thickness had more focal OBLs, revealed by cap scanning (chi-square = 10.256, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal cap thickness is predictive of opaque bubble layer during small incision lenticule extraction procedures. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(9):592-596.].

Incidence and Risk Factors of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation According to Flap Thickness During 500-kHz FS-LASIK

PURPOSE

To present the incidence, risk factors, and effect of opaque bubble layer (OBL) formation during flap creation in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a 500-kHz femtosecond laser on visual performance.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, preoperative characteristics (age, sex, keratometric value, spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness) and intraoperative surgical factors (used energy, docking type, and flap thickness) were compared between eyes with and without OBL formation during flap creation. Possible risk factors for specific types of OBLs were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five eyes of 71 patients underwent LASIK, and OBL developed in 98 eyes (72.59%). In the univariate analysis, the greater than 80-µm flap group was associated with a lower OBL occurrence than the 80-µm flap group (P = .0424, odds ratio [OR] = 0.481) and hard docking was associated with increased OBL formation (P = .0001, OR = 6.859). In the multivariate analysis, hard docking was a risk factor for OBL development (P = .0003, OR = 6.329). In the subgroup analysis, hard docking had a marginal effect on OBL occurrence in the 80-µm flap group (P = .086, OR = 3.564), but it had a strong effect in the greater than 80-µm flap group (P = .0018, OR = 10.210).

CONCLUSIONS

Hard docking is a risk factor for OBL development. However, hard docking had a small effect on OBL occurrence in the 80-µm flap group during LASIK. OBL formation did not affect visual performance. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(9):583-589.].

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout compared to change in axial length measurements with the IOLMaster

PURPOSE

To compare theoretical values from the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout with change in axial length measurements taken with the IOLMaster.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 214 eyes from 107 patients undergoing bilateral SMILE surgery for myopia or myopic astigmatism between December 2014 and May 2017 at an ophthalmological practice in Singapore. All eyes were examined pre-operatively and 1 and 3 months post-operatively with the IOLMaster following SMILE surgery. Achieved lenticule thickness was taken as the change in axial length after surgery. A linear mixed-effects model was used to examine changes in axial length, spherical equivalent and acuity over time. The relationships between change in axial length and theoretical lenticule thickness and spherical equivalent were examined with multiple linear regression analyses, and model prediction was assessed with adjusted R² statistics.

RESULTS

Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) spherical equivalent pre-operatively was - 5.25 (95% CI - 5.38 to - 5.12) diopters (D), at 1 month was 0.04 (95% CI - 0.09 to 0.17) D (p < 0.001), and at 3 months was - 0.02 (95% CI - 0.15 to 0.11) D (p < 0.001). Mean (95% CI) pre-operative axial length was 27,726 (95% CI 25,595 to 25,857) μm. Post-operative axial length at 1 month was significantly shorter at 25,595 (95% CI 25,464 to 25,726) μm (p < 0.001) with no change thereafter (p = 0.647). Pre-operative mean ± standard deviation (SD) refractive target was 0.24 (± 0.3) D, and mean difference between target and post-operative spherical equivalent at 1 month was 0.20 D (95% CI 0.16 to 0.25 D, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that change in axial length at 1 month was, on average, 5% lower than theoretical lenticule thickness, indicating an average difference of 5.4 μm (95% CI 5.2 to 5.6 μm). Preoperative spherical equivalent predicted negative association with change in axial length at 1 month (β = - 14.8, 95% CI - 18.2 to - 11.3, adjusted R² = 0.457, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Calculated lenticule thickness values were less than expected, and post-operative refractive outcomes at 1 month showed a slight under-correction. Further research in this area is needed to validate these findings.

Refractive regression after laser in situ keratomileusis

Uncorrected refractive errors are a leading cause of visual impairment across the world. In today's society, laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become the most commonly performed surgical procedure to correct refractive errors. However, regression of the initially achieved refractive correction has been a widely observed phenomenon following LASIK since its inception more than two decades ago. Despite technological advances in laser refractive surgery and various proposed management strategies, post-LASIK regression is still frequently observed and has significant implications for the long-term visual performance and quality of life of patients. This review explores the mechanism of refractive regression after both myopic and hyperopic LASIK, predisposing risk factors and its clinical course. In addition, current preventative strategies and therapies are also reviewed.

Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

Long-term Visual and Refractive Outcomes After LASIK for High Myopia and Astigmatism From -8.00 to -14.25 D

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of high myopic LASIK using the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 479 consecutive high myopic LASIK procedures (318 patients) using the MEL 80 excimer laser and VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) in 77% of cases or zero compression Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) in 23% of cases. Inclusion criteria were preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) of between -8.00 and -14.25 diopters (D) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better. Patients were observed for a minimum of 1 year. Flap thickness was between 80 and 160 µm and optical zone was between 5.75 and 6.50 mm. Standard outcomes analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Mean attempted SEQ was -9.39 ± 1.22 D (range: -8.00 to -14.18 D) and mean cylinder was -1.03 ± 0.84 D (range: 0.00 to -4.50 D). Mean age was 37 ± 9 years (range: 21 to 60 years) with 54% female patients. Postoperative SEQ was ±0.50 D in 55% and ±1.00 D in 83% of eyes after primary treatment. After re-treatment, 69% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 95% were within ±1.00 D. UDVA was 20/20 or better in 89% of eyes after final treatment. One line of CDVA was lost in 3% of eyes and no eyes lost two or more lines. Statistically significant increases (P < .001) were measured in contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000) at 12 and 18 cycles per degree.

CONCLUSIONS

The MEL 80 excimer laser was found to achieve high efficacy and safety for treatment of high myopia between -8.00 and -14.25 D and up to -4.50 D of cylinder. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(5):290-297.].

Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to review and meta-analyze whether there are differences between reported femtosecond (FS) lasers for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of efficacy, predictability, and safety as primary outcomes and corneal flap thickness measurements and pre- and postoperative complications as secondary outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL Trials Library databases was conducted to identify the relevant prospective randomized controlled trials of FS lasers for LASIK. Thirty-one articles describing a total of 5,404 eyes were included.

Results

Based on efficacy, IntraLase FS 10 and 30 kHz gave the best results. Based on predictability and safety, there were no differences between various FS lasers. FEMTO LDV and IntraLase FS 60 kHz produced the most accurate flap thicknesses. IntraLase and Wavelight SF200 had the fewest intraoperative complications. IntraLase, Visumax, and Wavelight FS200 had the most seldom postoperative complications.

Conclusion

There were dissimilarities between different FS lasers based on efficacy and intraoperative and postoperative complications. All FS lasers were predictable and safe for making corneal flaps in LASIK.

Longitudinal comparison of outcomes after sub-Bowman keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis: randomized, double-masked study

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (100-μm flap) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (120-μm flap) using 150-kHz femtosecond laser.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, contralateral clinical trial.

METHODS

One hundred patients (200 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. Postoperative examinations were performed at week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Main outcome measures included postoperative uncorrected (UCVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA); manifest refraction spherical equivalent; efficacy and safety indices; corneal thickness; and complications.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 33.9 ± 7.9 years. Overall, the preoperative UCVA, BCVA, and manifest refraction spherical equivalent were 1.349 ± 0.332, -0.022 ± 0.033, and -5.81 ± 1.61 diopters, respectively. No significant difference was observed in preoperative (P ≥ .226) or intraoperative parameters (P ≥ .452) between both groups, except residual stromal thickness (P < .001). The UCVA, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness stabilized by 1 week, while the thinnest corneal thickness stabilized by 3 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference between both groups for any parameter during all follow-up visits (P ≥ .132) except the 3-month safety index, which was better in the sub-Bowman keratomileusis group (P = .007). Soft opaque bubble layer was noted intraoperatively in 12 cases (7, 100-μm group; 5, 120-μm group; P = .577). No postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not find any differences in the visual and refractive outcomes between femtosecond-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis and LASIK. Both surgeries resulted in quick visual recovery as early as 1 week postoperatively.

Advances in Refractive Surgery: May 2013 to June 2014

PURPOSE

The field of refractive surgery is changing quickly in the areas of screening, treatment, and postoperative management. The objective of this study was to review advances in the field of refractive surgery as reported in the peer-reviewed literature during the previous year.

DESIGN

This was a literature review.

METHODS

In this article, we highlight the progression in the field from May 2013 to the end of June 2014. This article is organized as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations.

RESULTS

The growing use of newer modalities of treatment, such as small-incision lenticule extraction (SmILE) and phakic intraocular lenses, and their safety and efficacy add to the armamentarium in treating refractive error. This past year has seen many studies, which show these procedures to be safe and effective. Also, structurally, SmILE may result in a more biomechanically stable cornea, so that we may be able to safely treat higher refractive errors.

CONCLUSIONS

While laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis is the predominant surgical procedure, photorefractive keratectomy is still an appropriate choice in certain scenarios (higher risk for ectasia postrefractive surgery and patient choice) with safe, predictable results, and patient satisfaction. Many of the new developments in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis have focused on flap creation with femtosecond lasers. Histopathology and in vivo optical coherence tomography studies have shown that the stromal bed is smoother, the side cuts are vertical, and the flap has predictable thickness. New surgical modalities, such as femtosecond lenticule extraction and SmILE, are increasingly being used.

Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To compare central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-masked clinical trial of 35 patients treated for moderate to high myopia with FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging (Heidelberg Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to measure central corneal thickness (CCT) and epithelial, flap/cap, and residual stromal bed thickness centrally. The Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) was used to assess corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean decrease in CCT was 105 μm in FLEX-treated eyes and 106 μm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .70), which is equivalent to approximately 14 μm/diopters corrected. Mean central epithelial thickness increased 7 ± 6 μm in FLEX-treated eyes and 6 ± 5 μm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .64). Achieved mean flap/cap thickness was 4 ± 6 μm from the expected thickness in FLEX-treated eyes and 4 ± 9 μm in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .37). CH was reduced 2.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg in FLEX-treated eyes and 3.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .08). CRF was reduced 4.5 ± 1.2 mm Hg in FLEX-treated eyes and 4.6 ± 1.2 mm Hg in SMILE-treated eyes (P = .71). CH and CRF were highly correlated with CCT, but not patient age.

CONCLUSIONS

In this paired-eye study, the flap-based FLEX and cap-based SMILE resulted in almost identical changes in central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties for moderate to high myopia 6 months after treatment.