Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the parameters in the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display built in Pentacam, which is designed for the screening of subclinical keratoconus (SKC) built in Pentacam, and the parameters in Corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST).

METHODS

A retrospective study: The fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus cases were diagnosed with SKC. Patients presented to Shanxi Eye Hospital with SKC from October 2020 to November 2021 were included as the SKC group, and myopic patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery at the Refractive Surgery Department in our hospital within the same period were included as the control group. The Belin/Ambrósio and Corvis ST parameters were extracted from the system and analyzed using independent samples t test. Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were also created to test the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter.

RESULTS

There were 70 patients (70 eyes) in the SKC group and 137 patients (137 eyes) in the control group. For Corvis ST parameters, Radius (P = 0.021), PachySlope (P = 0.040), SP-A1 (P = 0.002), A2 Deformation Amp. (P = 0.028), A2 Deflection Length (P < 0.001), Max ICR (P = 0.005), DA Ratio Max (1 mm) (P = 0.023), IR (P = 0.016), CBI (P = 0.003) and TBI (P < 0.001) were statistically different between the two groups. For Belin/Ambrósio parameters, PPI min. Axis, ART min, ART max, ART avg, Pachy min, Front K2, Astig, BAD-Df, BAD-Db, BAD-Dp, BAD-Dt, BAD-Da, BAD-D, PPI min, PPI max, PPI max. Axis, PPI avg and Dist.Apex-Thin.Loc. were significantly different between the two groups (all p < 0.001). TBI and BAD-D showed the best diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of 0.944 and 0.965, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Some Belin/Ambrósio and Corvis ST parameters differed between SKC eyes and eyes with normal cornea. TBI and BAD-D showed the ideal diagnostic performance for SKC. In clinical practice, conventional corneal topography could not be replaced by Corvis ST.

Evaluation of the percentage tissue altered as a risk factor for developing post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia

PURPOSE

To assess the currently recommended percentage tissue altered (PTA) metric for its ability to screen for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, California, USA, and Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

The study used a LASIK database created by 1 surgeon for LASIK cases with normal preoperative topography that had a minimum follow-up of 24 months with complete preoperative and intraoperative data to permit the calculation of PTA values to detect eyes at risk for developing ectasia.

RESULTS

Of the eyes, 593 eyes had complete data and met the inclusion criteria. Based on measured flap thickness, 126 eyes (21%) had a PTA value of 40% or more (mean 44) and a percentage of that flap thickness accounted for the PTA (mean 66.7%; range 34% to 92%). The mean attempted laser ablation was 79.8 μm ± 29.2 (SD), and the mean residual bed thickness was 304.4 ± 29.2 μm (range 212 to 369 μm). No eye developed ectasia over a mean follow-up of 30 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The current PTA calculation when applied to a LASIK population with normal preoperative topography and flap thickness measured with ultrasound did not predict the risk for ectasia. Differences between study populations and assumptions might have accounted for the different outcomes obtained in the initially published PTA study.

Corneal Ectasia Risk And Percentage Tissue Altered In Myopic Patients Presenting For Refractive Surgery

Purpose

A percentage tissue altered (PTA) score of ≥40% has been advocated as an independent indicator of post-operative ectasia risk following laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). This study was performed to test the hypothesis that refractive procedures, such as laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK) or small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), may alter the range of PTA, within which refractive corneal surgery can be safely performed.

Setting

Refractive department, tertiary ophthalmic hospital.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Methods

Review of case notes was performed for patients who presented for refractive surgeries, other than LASIK. To determine the risk of corneal ectasia for each patient prior to refractive surgery, we estimated what each patient’s PTA would have been if they had undergone LASIK. The Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS) was also calculated.

Results

114 eyes (66 patients) were included. 94 eyes underwent SMILE. 20 eyes underwent LASEK. A significant proportion of eyes had PTA ≥40% – SMILE eyes: up to 31.9%, LASEK eyes: up to 60.0% (at presumed LASIK flap of 120 μm). The maximum calculated PTA was up to 47.9% in the SMILE group and up to 51.5% in the LASEK group. Using ERSS, 12.8–16% of SMILE eyes and 15.0–80.0% of LASEK eyes would have been considered to have moderate-to-high ectasia risk. No post-surgical ectasia was observed at 3 years.

Conclusion

SMILE and LASEK alter the range of PTA, within which corneal refractive surgery may be performed with a lower risk of developing post-operative corneal ectasia; a safe PTA threshold needs to be determined for these procedures before recommendations for clinical practice can be made.

Posterior corneal surface differences between non-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and 10-year post-LASIK myopic eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the posterior corneal surface differences between non-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and 10-year post-LASIK myopic eyes.

METHODS

The study included 130 eyes from 65 patients, who were treated with myopic LASIK 10 years ago. In addition, 130 eyes from 65 unoperated myopic patients of matching present age and preoperative refraction were divided into control group. Data on the posterior corneal surface and anterior chamber were obtained from Pentacam software and compared between the groups. Postoperative visual acuity (VA) and refractive error were also analysed.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.99 ± 1.78 dioptre (D) in the LASIK group. Ten years after surgery, the mean SE was -0.45 ± 1.22 D, the efficacy index was 0.98, and the safety index was 1.01. The posterior corneal elevations of the LASIK group at 2 mm corneal diameter were significantly lower than those of the control group. However, posterior corneal elevations at 6 mm corneal diameter were higher in the LASIK group than the controls (p < 0.01 for all). The mean Q-values of posterior corneal surface demonstrated significant positive direction compared to that of control eyes at 6 and 7 mm corneal diameters (p < 0.05 for both). At the thinnest point of the cornea, the anterior chamber depths were shallower in the LASIK group than in controls. Meanwhile, the anterior chamber volumes (ACV) were smaller in the LASIK group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that the posterior corneal surface tends to show signs of central flattening and peripheral steepening 10 years after myopic LASIK surgery compared to that of non-operated myopic eyes.

Screening of refractive surgery candidates for LASIK and PRK

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate exclusion criteria in screening patients for refractive surgery.

METHODS

Patients screened for initial refractive surgery by a single surgeon at the Cole Eye Institute (Cleveland Clinic) between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria for patients who were not offered refractive surgery based on history and/or examination parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1067 refractive candidates were enrolled in the study. Five hundred nineteen (48.6%) were male and 548 (51.4%) were female with a mean age of 39 ± 12 (range, 17-78) years. Refractive surgery was performed in 657 (61.6%) patients, and photorefractive keratectomy was considered the best option for 106 (9.9%) patients. Four hundred ten (38.4%) of all screened patients did not have refractive surgery, and 134 of these patients (12.6%) were considered to have contraindications for laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Among the excluded patients, 69 (51.5%) were male and 65 (48.5%) were female with a mean age of 40 ± 14 (range, 18-78) years. Abnormal corneal topography (34.3%) and low or insufficient corneal thickness (23.1%) were the most common reasons for exclusion. High myopia (10.5%) and (insipient or definite) cataract (9.7%) were also common reasons for exclusion. Other common factors for exclusion were high hyperopia (3.7%), need to wear reading glasses after surgery (3.7%), and severe dry eye unresponsive to treatment (3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal corneal topography and low, or insufficient, corneal thickness remain the most common exclusion factors for corneal refractive surgery. Factors such as cataract, too high of correction, and severe dry eye are also common reasons for exclusion of patients.

Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices

PURPOSE

To compare objective and subjective metrics from regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug devices (Pentacam) to determine their equivalence and interchangeability for refractive surgery screening.

SETTING

Emory Vision at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative case series.

METHODS

Eyes of consecutive screened refractive surgery patients were evaluated with high-resolution and regular Scheimpflug devices. Objective parameters evaluated included keratometry (K) values, central corneal thickness (CCT), and device-generated keratoconus screening indices. Masked expert reviewers subjectively graded images as normal, suspicious, or abnormal.

RESULTS

One hundred eyes of 50 patients were evaluated. The mean K values were not significantly different (anterior K: high resolution 1.21 diopters [D] ± 1.13 (SD) versus regular 1.15 ± 1.16 D, P = 0.73; posterior K: 0.34 ± 0.23 D versus regular 0.35 ± 0.23 D, P = .67). The mean CCT was significantly thinner in the high-resolution group (514.7 ± 26.6 μm versus 527.6 ± 27.6 μm (P < .0001) with limits of agreement of -12.9 to +17.5 μm. Most keratoconus screening indices were more suspicious with the high-resolution device than with the regular device except the indices of height asymmetry and height deviation. Subjectively, 60% of cases received the same score, high resolution was more suspicious in 28% of cases, and regular was more suspicious in 12% of cases; there was only slight subjective agreement between technologies (κ = 0.26 to 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices generated different objective values and significantly different subjective interpretations with poor inter-reviewer agreement. The high-resolution device provided a more conservative overall output. For refractive surgical screening, the 2 devices are not interchangeable.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references.

Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of a novel metric, percent tissue altered, with the occurrence of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with normal corneal topography and to compare this metric with other recognized risk factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

The study included 30 eyes from 16 patients with bilateral normal preoperative Placido-based corneal topography that developed ectasia after LASIK (ectasia group) and 174 eyes from 88 consecutive patients with uncomplicated LASIK and at least 3 years of postoperative follow-up. The following metrics were evaluated: age, preoperative central corneal thickness, residual stromal bed, Ectasia Risk Score System scores, and percent tissue altered, derived from [PTA = (FT + AD)/CCT], where FT = flap thickness, AD = ablation depth, and CCT = preoperative central corneal thickness.

RESULTS

In the ectasia group, percent tissue altered ≥40 was the most prevalent factor (97%), followed by age <30 years (63%), residual stromal bed ≤300 μm (57%), and ectasia risk score ≥ 3 (43%) (P < .001 for all). Percent tissue altered ≥ 40 had the highest odds ratio (223), followed by residual stromal bed ≤ 300 μm (74) and ectasia risk score ≥ 4 (8). Stepwise logistic regression revealed percent tissue altered ≥ 40 as the single most significant independent variable (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Percent tissue altered at the time of LASIK was significantly associated with the development of ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography and was a more robust indicator of risk than all other variables in this patient population.