Therapeutic refractive surgery

Repeatability of OCT Anterior Surface and Bowman's Layer Curvature and Aberrations in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes

PURPOSE

To study the repeatability of anterior surface and Bowman's layer curvature in normal and keratoconic eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

In this study, 96 normal and 96 keratoconic eyes underwent corneal imaging using Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) and OCT (Triton, Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The elevation data from segmented air-epithelium (A-E) and epithelium-Bowman's layer (E-B) interfaces in OCT scans were used to quantify curvature and aberrations. The wavefront aberrations were evaluated with the ray tracing method and 6th order Zernike polynomials. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject standard deviation (Sw), and coefficient of variation (CoV) were used to assess repeatability.

RESULTS

For curvatures, the Sw was less than 0.25 diopters (D) for the normal and keratoconic eyes. The Sw was highest for root mean square of lower order aberrations (0.14 µm) in keratoconic eyes. The CoV for curvatures was well below 0.5% for both groups. For some aberrations irrespective of groups, the CoV was greater because some individual aberrations (mean of three successive measurements) tended to be smaller in magnitude and even a small Sw resulted in a high CoV. For all variables, the ICC ranged between 0.80 and 0.99 for both the OCT and Pentacam measurements. Most variables were similar between the A-E and E-B interfaces (P > .05) for both groups. However, both differed significantly from all Pentacam variables (P < .05) in normal and keratoconic eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The repeatability of OCT curvatures and aberrations compared well with the Pentacam indices for normal and keratoconic eyes. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(4):247-252.].

Primary Topography-Guided LASIK: Refractive, Visual, and Subjective Quality of Vision Outcomes for Astigmatism ⩾2.00 Diopters

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of primary topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with subjective refractive astigmatism of 2.00 diopters (D) or greater.

METHODS

This was a prospective study in consecutive eyes with cylinder of 2.00 D or greater that had LASIK using the Alcon WaveLight EX500 excimer laser and T-CAT/Contoura software (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). The accuracy, efficacy, safety, cylinder vector analysis, higher order aberrations, and patients' subjective quality of vision were assessed. Eyes with naturally occurring topographic irregular astigmatism were not excluded.

RESULTS

The mean cylinder was -2.55 D preoperatively and -0.34 D postoperatively; 81% and 95% of eyes were within ±0.50 and ±0.75 D of intended cylinder after LASIK, respectively. The correction index and index of success were 1.00 and 0.13, respectively. The efficacy and safety indexes were 0.98 and 1.04, respectively. The preoperative corneal topography irregularity index, anterior corneal higher order aberrations, and refractive astigmatism magnitude were mildly correlated to postoperative residual astigmatism. Mean ocular and corneal coma were not increased postoperatively. Patients had significant improvements after LASIK in both subjective uncorrected quality of vision and night vision disturbances compared to spectacle- and contact lens-corrected vision before LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

Topography-guided ablation using the Alcon WaveLight EX500 excimer laser and T-CAT/Contoura software results in excellent accuracy, efficacy, and safety, with improved postoperative subjective quality of vision and reduced night vision disturbances in virgin eyes with refractive astigmatism of 2.00 D or greater, including eyes with topographic naturally occurring irregular astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(2):78-86.].

Noncontact Quantification of Topography of Anterior Corneal Surface and Bowman's Layer With High-Speed OCT

PURPOSE

To quantify keratometry and wavefront aberration of the anterior corneal surface and epithelium-Bowman's layer interface using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

Twenty-five normal eyes and 25 eyes with keratoconus were retrospectively analyzed. The anterior corneal edge and epithelium-Bowman's layer interface were segmented from 12 distortion-corrected OCT B-scans. Axial tangential curvatures and wavefront aberration were calculated by ray tracing and 6th order Zernike analyses. All eyes underwent simultaneous imaging with Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The Pentacam elevation data were used for aberration analyses using the same ray-tracing method. The paired t test was used to compare the variables.

RESULTS

In normal eyes, mean steep axis and maximum keratometry of OCT of the anterior corneal surface and epithelium-Bowman's layer interface were significantly greater than the same of the Pentacam anterior corneal surface (P < .05). Mean root mean square of higher order aberrations of the OCT surfaces was greater than the same of the Pentacam surface by a factor of 4. In eyes with keratoconus, mean steep axis and maximum keratometry of the OCT epithelium-Bowman's layer interface was the greatest (P < .05). Mean root mean square of the higher order aberrations and vertical coma of the OCT epithelium-Bowman's layer interface was the greatest (P < .05). In general, the aberrations of the OCT epithelium-Bowman's layer interface were significantly greater than those of the Pentacam anterior corneal surface.

CONCLUSIONS

A noncontact method to quantify the topography and aberrations of corneal surfaces with OCT was presented. OCT measurements yielded greater curvature and aberrations than Pentacam in both normal and keratoconic eyes. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(5):330-336.].

Application of corneal tomography before keratorefractive procedure for laser vision correction

Ectasia after refractive surgery represents a major concern among refractive surgeons. Corneal abnormalities and preexisting corneal ectasia are the most important risk factors. Corneal topography and central corneal thickness are the factors traditionally screening for in refractive surgery candidates. Study of the anterior surface by Placido topography allows for identification of keratoconus before biomicroscopy. However, this is insufficient for the evaluation of pre-operative refractive surgery. There are cases of ectasia after laser in situ keratomilusis (LASIK) without identifiable risk factors such that there is a need to go beyond the corneal surface. A key requirement is quantifying susceptibility to corneal biomechanical instability and progression to ectasia. Tomographic indices derived from elevation maps and pachymetry spatial variation produce a Belin Ambrosio display final D index (BAD-D index), which has shown better results compared to surface curvature indices for detecting very mild forms of ectasia. A logistic regression formula, integrating age, residual stromal bed, and BAD-D (Ectasia Susceptibility Score, ESS) resulted in a significant improvement in accuracy, leading to 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity for detecting susceptible cases. A comprehensive corneal structural analysis based on corneal segmental tomography can detect susceptible corneas, which increases safety for refractive surgery patients.

Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Measurement Between Fourier-Domain OCT and Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound

PURPOSE

To compare measurements of corneal epithelial thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and very high-frequency digital ultrasound (VHFDU).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 189 virgin corneas and 175 post-laser refractive surgery (LRS) corneas that had corneal epithelial thickness measurement with RTVue Fourier-domain OCT (Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA) (tear film included) and Artemis VHFDU (ArcScan Inc., Morrison, CO) (tear film excluded). Averages were calculated for the central 2-mm diameter zone and for two further concentric annuli of 1.5- and 0.5-mm width, each divided into eight sectors. Agreement was analyzed by mean difference (OCT - VHFDU), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) (1.96 standard deviation of the difference), and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In virgin epithelium, mean central thickness was 53.4 ± 3.20 µm (range: 46 to 62 µm) with OCT and 54.1 ± 2.96 µm (range: 48 to 61 µm) with VHFDU; OCT measured thinnest in 70% with a mean difference of -0.71 µm (95% LoA of ± 3.94 µm, P < .001). In post-LRS epithelium, mean central thickness was 57.9 ± 6.08 µm (range: 42 to 77 µm) with OCT and 60.5 ± 6.47 µm (range: 42 to 79 µm) with VHFDU; OCT measured thinnest in 88%, with a mean difference of -2.48 µm (95% LoA of ± 5.33 µm, P < .001). A larger difference between methods was more common with thicker epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal epithelial thickness measurements using OCT were found to be slightly thinner than for VHFDU. In contrast to VHFDU, OCT measurement includes the tear film, so the true difference is probably approximately 4 µm more than reported. The difference was greatest inferiorly and higher for post-LRS eyes and in thicker epithelium.