Wang L, Jiang L, Hallahan K, Al-Mohtaseb ZN, Koch DD. Evaluation of Femtosecond Laser Intrastromal Incision Location Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
Ophthalmology 2017;
124:1120-1125. [PMID:
28412070 DOI:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.022]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
To use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to evaluate the femtosecond laser intrastromal incisions made during cataract surgery to reduce corneal astigmatism.
DESIGN
Retrospective case series.
PARTICIPANTS
Seventy-seven eyes of 77 patients.
METHODS
Paired intrastromal incisions were created using the Catalys femtosecond laser (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA). The planned intrastromal incision parameters were 20% uncut anterior, 20% uncut posterior, midpoint depth of 50%, and 90° side cut angle. Optical coherence tomography scans were obtained 3 weeks or more after surgery to assess these 4 parameters, and actual values were compared with intended values.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Percentages of uncut anterior and posterior tissue, midpoint depth, and degrees of side cut angle.
RESULTS
The mean values were 17.2±5.8% (range, 7.2%-36.9%) for uncut anterior, 32.5±8.8% (range, 6.0%-57.9%) for uncut posterior, and 42.3±6.6% (range, 25.5%-65.4%) for midpoint depth, which all were significantly different from the planned parameters (all P < 0.05). The mean side cut angle was 88.5°±5.6° (range, 71°-114°) and was significantly different from the planned side cut angle of 90° (P < 0.05). In 50 eyes that had paired intrastromal incisions scanned by the OCT, there was no correlation between the paired incisions for midpoint depth and side cut angle (correlation coefficient, r = -0.063 and -0.067, respectively; P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The intrastromal incision midpoint depth was significantly more anterior than the planned depth of 50%. The locations of paired intrastromal incisions in each eye were not correlated. Further improvements are needed to ensure the precise location of the intrastromal incisions made with this device.
Collapse