Conventional Versus Inverted Side-cut Flaps for Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: Laboratory and Clinical Evaluation

Relifting Flap Enhancement Procedure After Primary Allogenic Refractive Lenticule Implantation

PURPOSE

To describe the results of a relifting flap enhancement procedure for correction of residual refractive error after primary lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (LIKE).

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

One year after a LIKE procedure in the left eye, the patient (uncorrected distance visual acuity [UDVA]: 20/25; corrected distance visual acuity [CDVA]: 20/20; manifest refraction: -1.00 +1.00 × 105°) underwent flap relifting. The WaveLight EX500 excimer laser platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) was used for the topography-guided enhancement procedure to correct the residual refractive error and corneal irregularities. During the 1-year follow-up period, the cornea remained clear, the UDVA increased to 20/20 (reaching the level of preoperative CDVA), and manifest refraction was -0.25 +0.75 × 90°.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhancement procedure described in this case report was effective for correction of residual refractive error and improvement of visual acuity following the LIKE procedure. The enhancement was stable for at least 15 months after the procedure. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):715-719.].

Comparison of healing patterns of different side-cut angulations after FS-LASIK

AIM

To investigate and evaluate healing patterns around flaps made with different side-cut angulations after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

Thirty-four patients (68 eyes) received a 90° side-cut (n=34) or a 120° side-cut flaps (n=34) made with a femtosecond laser. One day, 1wk, 1 and 3mo postoperatively, side-cut scar was evaluated under slit-lamp photography according to a new grading system (Grade 0=transparent scar, 1=faint healing opacity, and 2=evident healing opacity). In vivo corneal confocal microscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were used to observe wound-healing patterns around flap margin in the two groups. Sirius Scheimpflug Analyzer was also used to analyze higher order aberrations 3mo after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in flap wound-healing patterns at each follow up between the two groups (P>0.05). Three months after surgery, the flap edge scar classified as Grade 0 had excellent apposition and rapid nerve regeneration. At 3 mm and 5 mm pupil diameters, there were significant differences in trefoil aberrations between the two groups (P<0.05), but no statistically significant differences were found in total higher order aberrations (HOAs), spherical aberrations or coma in any of the pupil size conditions (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Flap edge scars classified as Grade 0 have excellent apposition and rapid nerve regeneration, and 120° side-cut angle flaps induce less trefoil aberrations after FS-LASIK.

Risk Factors for Epithelial Ingrowth Following Microkeratome-Assisted LASIK

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence and risk factors associated with epithelial ingrowth following uncomplicated microkeratome-assisted LASIK.

METHODS

All patients who underwent microkeratome-assisted LASIK between January 2006 and December 2014 in a single surgical center were reviewed. Epithelial ingrowth cases were identified and associated factors were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 149 (0.49%) of 30,574 cases developed epithelial ingrowth. The epithelial ingrowth group was older compared to controls (35.3 ± 12.3 vs 31.7 ± 10.3 years, P = .001) and had a higher percentage of moderate to high hyperopia (13.7% vs 5.3%, P < .001), early postoperative flap slippage requiring flap repositioning (9.4% versus 2.8%, P < .001), or flap lifting for enhancement (48.6% vs 4.3%, P < .001), were treated with a smaller optic zone (6 mm) (37.7% vs 15.2%, P < .001), with a Moria M2 microkeratome (Moria SA, Antony, France) (70.1% vs 55.5%, P = .02), by low volume surgeons (n < 1,000) (5.8% vs 1.3%, P < .001), in a lower operating room temperature (22.3 ± 1.8 vs 22.8 ± 1.6, P = .005), and with a greater maximum ablation depth (67.3 ± 29.7 vs 57.3 ± 30.3, P < .001). There was a high incidence of epithelial ingrowth in the enhancement group compared to primary LASIK (4.8% vs 0.2%, P < .001). The time between treatments (primary and enhanced LASIK) was significantly greater in the epithelial ingrowth group (mean: 1,110 ± 870 vs 626 ± 662 days, P < .001). There was a significant rise in epithelial ingrowth rates as time between primary and enhancement LASIK increased, peaking at 4 to 5 years (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, flap lifting for enhancement (odds ratio [OR] = 19.5, P < .001), 6-mm optic zone (OR = 2.2, P < .001), moderate to severe hyperopia (OR = 2.4, P = .005), greater ablation depth (OR = 1.005, P < .001), and low volume surgeon (OR = 3.9, P = .01) were associated with epithelial ingrowth (total R² = 15.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The potential risk factors described above may forewarn surgeons as to which individuals merit closer observation for this complication. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(2):100-105.].

Corneal biomechanics after laser refractive surgery: Unmasking differences between techniques

The hypothesis that small-incision lenticule extraction provides better preservation of corneal biomechanics than previous laser refractive techniques has led to a growth in the interest in clinical and experimental research in this field. This hypothesis is based on the fact that corneal layers with greater stiffness are preserved with this new technique. However, this hypothesis is controversial because clinical research has shown a great disparity in the outcomes. In this review, we performed an in-depth analysis of the factors that might affect corneal biomechanics in laser refractive surgery procedures from a macrostructural to a microstructural viewpoint. New advances in algorithms with current devices or the introduction of new devices might help unmask the possible advantages of small-incision lenticule extraction in corneal biomechanics.

Epithelial ingrowth following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): prevalence, risk factors, management and visual outcomes

The number of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures is continuing to rise. Since its first application for correcting simple refractive errors over 25 years ago, the role of LASIK has extended to treat other conditions, including postkeratoplasty astigmatism/ametropia, postcataract surgery refractive error and presbyopia, among others. The long-term effectiveness, predictability and safety have been well established by many large studies. However, due to the creation of a potential interface between the flap and the underlying stroma, interface complications such as infectious keratitis, diffuse lamellar keratitis and epithelial ingrowth may occur. Post-LASIK epithelial ingrowth (PLEI) is an uncommon complication that usually arises during the early postoperative period. The reported incidence of PLEI ranged from 0%–3.9% in primary treatment to 10%–20% in retreatment cases. It can cause a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from asymptomatic interface changes to severe visual impairment and flap melt requiring keratoplasty. PLEI can usually be treated with mechanical debridement of the affected interface; however, additional interventions, such as alcohol, mitomycin C, fibrin glue, ocular hydrogel sealant, neodymium:yttriumaluminum garnet laser and amniotic membrane graft, may be required for recurrent or refractory cases. The aims of this review are to determine the prevalence and risk factors of PLEI; to describe its pathogenesis and clinical features and to summarise the therapeutic armamentarium and the visual outcome of PLEI.