Association of myopia and astigmatism with postoperative ocular high order aberration after small incision lenticule extraction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between higher-order aberrations (HOA) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the severity of myopia and astigmatism, along with the relevant factors. These findings will provide valuable insights for decreasing the occurrence of HOA after SMILE and enhancing visual quality.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients (150 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism who underwent SMILE were categorized into four groups based on the severity of myopia and astigmatism: Myopia Group 1 (Group M1, spherical diopter ranged from -1.00 D to -4.00 D), Myopia Group 2 (Group M2, spherical diopter ranged from -4.10 D to -10.00 D), Astigmatism Group 1 (Group A1, cylindrical diopter ranged from 0 D to -1.00 D), and Astigmatism Group 2 (Group A2, cylindrical diopter ranged from -1.10 D to -3.00 D). A comprehensive assessment was performed to examine the association between HOA and various relevant factors, including a detailed analysis of the subgroups.

RESULTS

Group M1 had significantly lower levels of total eye coma aberration (CA), corneal total HOA (tHOA), internal tHOA, and vertical CA ( Z 3 - 1 ) after SMILE than Group M2 (P < 0.05). Similarly, Group A1 had significantly lower levels of total eye tHOA, CA, trefoil aberration (TA), corneal tHOA, TA, and vertical TA ( Z 3 - 3 ) after SMILE than Group A2 (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between the severity of myopia/astigmatism and most HOA (P < 0.05). Subgroup evaluations demonstrated a notable increase in postoperative HOA associated with myopia and astigmatism in Groups M2 and A2 compared with the control group. Lenticule thickness, postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and postoperative corneal Km and Cyl were strongly correlated with most HOA. Age, eyes, and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) were only associated with specific HOA.

CONCLUSION

HOA positively correlated with the severity of myopia and astigmatism after SMILE. However, this relationship was not linear. HOA after SMILE was influenced by various factors, and additional specialized investigations are required to establish its clinical importance.

Effect of Cyclotorsion Compensation in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery for the Correction of Myopic Astigmatism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) has made notable advancements in addressing myopic astigmatism. Nevertheless, the potential impact of cyclotorsion on surgical outcomes cannot be overlooked. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of cyclotorsion compensation technology in SMILE surgery for the correction of myopic astigmatism, examining its influence on postoperative visual quality.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. A comprehensive literature search was performed using databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Scopus, CNKI, VIP, and Wan Fang. Studies meeting the criteria were selected and included. Data were independently extracted by three authors. Clinical outcome parameters were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.3.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included ten studies. The results showed that, compared with the control group (cyclotorsion compensation was not performed in SMILE), the following indicators in the cyclotorsion compensation group were: residual astigmatism (RA) [weighted mean difference (MD) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) + 0.26 to + 1.19, P = 0.002], spherical equivalent (SE) (MD = 1.99, 95% CI + 0.77 to + 3.21, P = 0.001), coma (MD = -0.06, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.04, P < 0.00001), higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (MD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.02, P < 0.0001), follow-up 6-month angle of error (AE) (MD = -2.67, 95% CI -3.71 to -1.63, P < 0.00001), and follow-up 6-month uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (MD = -0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.01, P = 0.005), and the differences in results were statistically significant. However, the differences among correction index, index of success (IOS), targeted induced astigmatism (TIA), magnitude of error (ME), and spherical aberration (SA) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Cyclotorsion compensation proves to be effective and predictable for correcting myopic astigmatism. The cyclotorsion compensation group demonstrated advantages over the control group in terms of postoperative residual astigmatism, and it induced fewer coma aberrations. Whether cyclotorsion compensation can lead to better visual quality remains to be seen, and further research on correcting myopic astigmatism through cyclotorsion compensation is warranted.

Differences in ocular high order aberrations before and after small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To examine the causes and factors that lead to high order aberration (HOA) during the treatment of myopia using small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), as well as the differences between SMILE and other corneal refractive surgeries through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted from January 2015 to February 2023 in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to gather relevant studies on SMILE and HOA. Studies meeting specific criteria were chosen, and clinical data was retrieved for analysis.

Results

This meta-analysis resulted in the inclusion of 19 studies involving 1,503 eyes. Pooled results showed significant induction of total HOA (tHOA, d = -0.21, p < 0.001), spherical aberration (SA, d = -0.11, p < 0.001) and coma aberration (CA, d = -0.18, p < 0.001) after SMILE compared to pre-SMILE, while no significant change in trefoil aberration (TA) was observed (d = -0.00, p = 0.91). There was a significantly lower induction of tHOA after SMILE compared to femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK, d = 0.04, p < 0.001), and no significant difference was observed compared to wavefront aberration-guided (WFG) refractive surgery (d = 0.00, p = 0.75). There was also a significant association between different levels of myopia and astigmatism, duration of follow-up, lenticule thickness, and preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) on the induction of tHOA after SMILE (p < 0.05), while the higher preoperative myopia group (sphere > -5D), lower preoperative astigmatism group (cylinder ≤ -1D), larger lenticule thickness group (lenticule thickness > 100 μm), shorter follow-up group (follow-up 1 month postoperatively) and the thicker CCT group (CCT > 550 μm) brought a significant induction of tHOA compared to the opposite comparison group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While SMILE can induce HOA significantly, it induces less HOA than FS-LASIK. Postoperative HOA following SMILE can be affected by factors such as myopia, astigmatism, lenticule thickness, CCT, and duration of follow-up. Future research should continue to explore techniques to decrease the induction of HOA by using this methodology.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Comparative Analysis of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Correlations to Change in Myopic Q-Value and Spherical Equivalent with and without Astigmatism

Background: This retrospective chart review compared the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) among photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) alongside changes in spherical equivalent (SEQ) and corneal shape (Q-value). Methods: Analyzing 371 myopic eyes, including 154 LASIK, 173 PRK, and 44 SMILE cases, Pentacam imaging was utilized pre-operatively and at one-year post-operative visits. Results: All procedures resulted in 100% of patients achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 or better, with 87% of LASIK and PRK, and 91% of SMILE patients having 20/20 or better. Significant increases in HOAs were observed across all procedures (p < 0.05), correlating positively with SEQ and Q-value changes (LASIK (0.686, p < 0.05), followed by PRK (0.4503, p < 0.05), and SMILE (0.386, p < 0.05)). Vertical coma and spherical aberration (SA) were the primary factors for heightened aberration magnitude among the procedures (p < 0.05), with the largest contribution in SMILE, which is likely attributed to the centration at the corneal apex. Notably, PRK showed insignificant changes in vertical coma (-0.197 µm ± 0.0168 to -0.192 µm ± 0.0198, p = 0.78), with an increase in oblique trefoil (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings underscore differences in HOAs among PRK, LASIK, and SMILE, helping to guide clinicians.

Method to determine the centration of a lenticule of tissue extracted from a cornea

A simple and novel method to analyse the centration of a lenticule of tissue extracted from a cornea has been developed, in which the centre of "mass" of the individual differences between post and preoperative maps of several corneal metrics represents the lenticule centration and its spatial distance to a reference point (aimed centration) determines the decentration. Different parameters have been evaluated to weight the centre of "mass". The robustness of the methods has been evaluated using perturbation analysis (adding white-noise to the data) based on realistic uncertainties. A clipped analysis has been performed to prevent large, localised areas of lacking/missing data from affecting the centre of "mass". The method has been tested on a pilot cohort of clinical data showing 30% and 63% of the treatments within 200 µm of decentration for corneal thickness and refractive equivalent power, respectively. Except for anterior elevation with a total standard deviation of 17 µm, all other metrics show excellent precision of ∼5 µm. The method provides a reliable and objective way to determine the centration of a lenticule of tissue extracted from a cornea and it can be applied to any topo- or tomographic derived metric.

Comparing high and low energy outcomes on day one for SmartSight myopic-astigmatism treatments with the SCHWIND ATOS: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Impact of low energy asymmetric spacings vs. high energy symmetric spacings on the immediate/early (postoperative day 1 (POD1)) outcomes of SmartSight lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism with a new femtosecond laser system.

METHODS

The first 112 eyes of 56 patients consecutively treated using low energy asymmetric spacings (Group A; Study group) were compared at POD1 to the last 112 eyes of 56 patients consecutively treated using high energy symmetric spacings (Group S; Controls). Mean age of the patients was 28 ± 5 years with a mean spherical equivalent of -4.41 ± 1.76 diopters (D) and a mean magnitude of refractive astigmatism of 0.89 ± 0.82 D.

RESULTS

Laser Energy was -25 ± 1nJ lower for asymmetric treatments (p < .0001); Spot and Track distances were + 0.7 ± 0.1 µm larger and -0.8 ± 0.1 µm tighter for asymmetric treatments, respectively (p < .0001 for both). At POD1, astigmatism was -0.08 ± 0.02D lower for asymmetric treatments (p < .0003); uncorrected and corrected visual acuities (UDVA and CDVA, respectively) were -0.03 ± 0.01logMAR better for asymmetric treatments (p < .0007); differences between postop UDVA and preop CDVA along with change in CDVA were + 0.3 ± 0.1lines better for asymmetric treatments (p < .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Lenticule extraction treatment using SmartSight is safe and efficacious already at POD1. Findings suggest that low energy asymmetric spacings may further improve the immediate and short-term outcomes of SmartSight lenticule extraction in the treatment of myopic astigmatism compared to conventional settings (high energy symmetric spacings).

Symmetric offset versus asymmetric offset ablation with transepithelial refractive keratectomy

BACKGROUND

In eyes with hyperopia, astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a modality of surface ablation surgery. We center on the corneal vertex for all our treatments (all have an offset to the center of the pupil) and wanted to compare the visual results of symmetrical profile treatments versus asymmetrical profile treatments (the center of the treatment on the vertex and the boundaries with the pupil center) using TransPRK as corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed two consecutive groups of eyes treated with TransPRK in the Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum Recklinghausen: 47 eyes treated with symmetrical offset and 51 eyes treated with asymmetrical offset. The intergroup comparisons were assessed using unpaired Student's T-tests, whereas preoperative to postoperative changes were assessed using paired Student's T-tests.

RESULTS

Refractive outcomes were good for both groups. 83 and 88% of eyes were within the spherical equivalent of 0.5 D from the target in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively. 85 and 84% of eyes had a postoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or lower in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We have not found a significant difference in the refractive outcomes between the symmetric group and the asymmetric group of eyes treated both with TransPRK for preoperatively hyperopic or mixed astigmatism.

Refractive and Visual Outcomes of SMILE for Compound Myopic Astigmatism With the VISUMAX 800

PURPOSE

To report the first refractive and visual outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the VISUMAX 800 femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive eyes treated by SMILE using the VISUMAX 800 femtosecond laser at London Vision Clinic, EuroEyes Group, London, United Kingdom. Inclusion criteria were patients aged younger than 45 years, a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better, and the 3-month postoperative timepoint data being available for analysis. Standard outcomes analysis and vector analysis by the Alpins method were performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 128 eyes of 66 consecutive patients were treated. Three-month data were available for 118 eyes (92%), and 10 eyes (8%) were lost to follow-up. The mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -4.65 ± 1.91 diopters (D) (range: -1.90 to -10.05 D) and the mean cylinder was -0.98 ± 0.78 D (range: 0.00 to -4.00 D). The mean age was 30 ± 5 years (range: 20 to 43 years), with 54% women and 46% men. Postoperative SEQ was within ±0.50 D in 86% and ±1.00 D in 100% of eyes. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 91% of eyes. One line of CDVA was lost in 8% of eyes, and no eyes lost two or more lines. There was a small but statistically significant increase in contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd.

CONCLUSIONS

Early outcomes data for SMILE with the second generation VISUMAX 800 femtosecond laser demonstrated an effective and safe option equivalent to published first generation VisuMax outcomes for the treatment myopia and astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(5):294-301.].

Methods of Corneal Vertex Centration and Evaluation of Effective Optical Zone in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Inappropriate small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) centration methods can affect the decentration of the effective optical zone (EOZ) after operation, which can subsequently lead to the decline of postoperative visual quality. We aimed to provide an overview of corneal vertex (CV) centration methods and an evaluation of the size and decentration of the EOZ in SMILE. We described the CV centration methods for patients with myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle. The measurement methods of the EOZ were evaluated from the aspects of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power. Additionally, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of measuring decentration based on topographic mapping and intraoperative video-captured images. Finally, we discussed the relationship between the EOZ and visual quality. Based on our review, clinicians should consider the following when choosing CV centration methods and evaluating EOZ postoperatively. First, the tear film mark center or topographic map comparison method is preferred for the correction of myopia, low myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle (>0.2 mm). Triple marking centration is recommended for high myopic astigmatism (-3.5 diopters). Second, the total corneal power better reflects the change in refractive power than the topographic method. The measurement of the area rather than the diameter of the total corneal refractive power is more suitable for the evaluation of noncircular EOZs after high myopia astigmatism (<-2.0 diopters). Third, for the evaluation of decentration, the tangential curvature difference map method is preferred as it is not influenced by offset pupils. Finally, a large EOZ after SMILE may improve patient tolerance to decentration.

Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations Measurements: Precision of SD-OCT/Placido Topography and Comparison with a Scheimpflug/Placido Topography in Eyes After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurements of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) obtained by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) technique combined with a Placido topographer (the MS-39 device) in eyes with prior small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and compare them to the measurements obtained by a Scheimpflug camera combined with a Placido topographer (the Sirius device).

METHODS

A total of 56 eyes (56 patients) were included in this prospective study. Corneal aberrations were analyzed for the anterior, posterior, and total cornea surfaces. Within-subject standard deviation (S_w), test-retest repeatability (TRT), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. The differences were evaluated by paired t-test. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) were used to evaluate the agreement.

RESULTS

High repeatability was observed for anterior and total corneal parameters, with S_w value < 0.07, TRT ≤ 0.16, and ICCs > 0.893, but not trefoil. For the posterior corneal parameters, ICCs varied from 0.088 to 0.966. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, all S_w values were ≤ 0.04 and TRT ≤ 0.11. ICCs ranged from 0.846 to 0.989, from 0.432 to 0.972, and from 0.798 to 0.985 for the anterior, total, and posterior corneal aberrations parameters, respectively. The mean difference in all aberrations was ≤ 0.05 μm. All parameters showed a narrow 95% LoA.

CONCLUSION

The MS-39 device achieved high precision in both anterior and total corneal measurements; the precision of posterior corneal higher-order RMS, astigmatism II, coma, and trefoil was lower. The two technologies used by the MS-39 and Sirius devices can be used interchangeably for measuring corneal HOAs after SMILE.

Twelve-month outcomes of a new refractive lenticular extraction procedure

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the 12-month refractive and visual outcomes of Small Incision Guided Human-cornea Treatment (SmartSight®, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) in the treatment of myopia corrections with low to moderate astigmatism with the use of a new femtosecond laser system.

METHODS

221 eyes of 114 patients consecutively treated with SmartSight lenticule extraction were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 28±6 years at the time of treatment with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -6.26±2.17D and mean astigmatism of 0.92±0.68D. Monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were assessed pre- and post-operatively. Refractive changes have been determined in terms of changes in refraction, as well as changes in keratometric readings. The changes in central epithelial thickness have been determined.

RESULTS

At twelve months post-operatively, mean UDVA was 20/21±2. Spherical equivalent showed a residual refraction of +0.48±0.31D with refractive astigmatism of 0.13±0.18D postoperatively. There was a slight decrease of -0.1 Snellen lines at 12-months follow-up. The same correction was determined using changes in refraction, as well as changes in keratometric readings. The central epithelial thickness increased by +3±2µm. Spherical equivalent correction within ±0.50D was achieved in 199 eyes (90%), and cylindrical correction in 221 (100%). Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 or better in 213 eyes (96%), and postoperative uncorrected (UDVA) was 20/20 or better in 205 eyes (93%). No eye had lost two or more Snellen lines of CDVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopic astigmatism correction with SmartSight provided good results for efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual outcomes at the twelve months of follow up. The central epithelial thickness barely increased by 3±2µm.

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted SMILE and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c; STAAR Surgical) implantation for moderate to high myopia.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Chinese databases (Wan-fang data and CNKI) were comprehensively searched to identify studies comparing SMILE and ICL V4c implantation. Data of interest were extracted and analyzed by Stata V.16.0 software (StataCorp). The weighted mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the strength of the association.

RESULTS

Twelve studies incorporating 1,390 eyes of 822 patients were included. The analysis revealed ICL V4c implantation had a significantly higher safety index and lower high order aberrations, coma, and spherical aberration than SMILE in treating moderate to high myopia (P < .05). Subgroup analysis revealed such differences were more prominent in patients with high myopia who had shorter follow-up duration. When follow-up was longer than 6 months, the differences in safety index and total HOAs became nonsignificant (P > .05). The two procedures had no difference in efficacy index, postoperative visual acuity, spherical equivalent, trefoil, Objective Scatter Index, or modulation transfer function cut-off frequency (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both SMILE and ICL V4c implantation were safe and efficient for moderate to high myopia. Compared with SMILE, ICL V4c implantation might provide better postoperative visual quality in patients with high myopia in the early postoperative period. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(6):332-338.].

Three-Month Outcomes of Myopic Astigmatism Correction With Small Incision Guided Human Cornea Treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of small incision guided human cornea treatment (SmartSight; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with the use of a new femtosecond laser system.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational case series study included 104 eyes of 56 patients who underwent SmartSight to correct myopic astigmatism and completed the 3-month follow-up. Procedures were performed with a SCHWIND ATOS femtosecond laser.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was -6.12 ± 1.99 diopters (D) (range: -3.00 to -11.50 D) and astigmatism was 1.02 ± 0.56 D (range: 0.25 to 2.75 D). Three months postoperatively, it was +0.47 ± 0.32 D (range: -0.75 to +1.00 D) and 0.27± 0.22 D (range: 0.00 to 0.75 D), respectively (both P < .05). Spherical equivalent correction within ±0.50 D was achieved in 62 eyes (60%), and cylindrical correction in 90 eyes (87%). Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 or better in 94 eyes (90%) and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 96 eyes (92%). No eye lost two or more Snellen lines of CDVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopic astigmatism correction with Smart-Sight provided good results for efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual outcomes in the first 3 months of follow-up. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(5):304-311.].

Complications of small incision lenticule extraction

The procedure of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was introduced in 2011, and since then there has been an increase in the number of cases undergoing this procedure worldwide. The surgery has a learning curve and may be associated with problems in the intraoperative and postoperative periods. The intraoperative problems during SMILE surgery include the loss of suction, the occurrence of altered or irregular opaque bubble layer and black spots, difficulty in lenticular dissection and extraction, cap perforation, incision-related problems, and decentered ablation. Most of the postoperative problems are similar as in other laser refractive procedures, but with decreased incidence. The identification of risk factors, clinical features, and management of complications of SMILE help to obtain optimum refractive outcomes.

Initial Single-Site Experience Using SMILE for the Treatment of Astigmatism in Myopic Eyes and Comparison of Astigmatic Outcomes with Existing Literature

Purpose

To assess a single site’s initial experience with SMILE for the treatment of myopic astigmatism and compare outcomes and vector analysis results with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) results and published literature.

Patients and Methods

Forty-eight eyes (29 patients) with mean preoperative sphere of −5.11 ± 1.31 diopters (D) and cylinder of −1.12 ± 0.60 D underwent SMILE. Visual acuity, refractive, and vector analysis outcomes as well as subjective measures were reported at three and twelve months postoperatively and compared with FDA results and the published literature between 2014 and 2020 involving treatment of patients with mean cylinders of >−0.50 to ≤−3.00 D.

Results

At three and twelve months, 43 and 32 eyes were evaluated, respectively. At twelve months, mean cylinder power was reduced to −0.38 ± 0.38 D with 78.1% achieving ≤±0.50 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 was achieved in 77.4% of eyes by twelve months with 100% achieving ≥20/30 UDVA. No loss of corrected distance visual acuity was observed in eyes seen at twelve months. Correction index (CI) at twelve months was 0.90 indicating overall undercorrection of 10%. Twelve-month CI was 0.96, 0.90, and 0.83 in eyes with preoperative cylinders of <−1.00 D, ≥−1.00 to <−2.00 D, and ≥−2.00 D, respectively. Mean angle of error was −1.58 ± 11.61° ranging from −24.22° to 37.75°.

Conclusion

We found SMILE to be an effective and safe means of achieving spectacle independence and improving visual acuity in patients with myopic astigmatism. SMILE has the potential for improved clinical outcomes with better nomogram guidance and advancements in technique. However, surgeons must be aware of the potential for undercorrection in with-the-rule astigmatism and at higher preoperative cylinders and as well as the potential for overcorrection in against-the-rule and lower preoperative cylinder astigmatism.

Corneal wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after small incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To analyse in depth the associations between objectively measured corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and subjectively perceived visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) as quantified with the standardized and clinically validated quality of vision (QOV) questionnaire.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients after bilateral simultaneous SMILE for the treatment of myopia and/or myopic astigmatism with plano target refraction. Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to objectively quantify corneal HOAs. The standardized and validated QOV questionnaire was employed to gauge patients' subjectively perceived visual quality regarding frequency, severity and bothering effect of visual disturbances.

RESULTS

A total of 394 eyes of 197 patients with a mean age of 32.4 ± 7.7 years and a mean postoperative follow-up of 24.3 ± 14.1 months were included. SMILE induced a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in spherical aberration (0.074 ± 0.131 µm), coma (0.142 ± 0.179 µm), trefoil (0.018 ± 0.067 µm) as well as in total HOAs (0.191 ± 0.176 µm). Surgically induced and postoperative levels of HOA showed no correlation with the three QOV scores representative of overall visual symptom frequency, severity and bothering effect (all R² values ≤ 0.016). In addition, the associations between specific visual symptoms (e.g. starburst) and singular HOA terms (e.g. haloes) were very weak (all Rho values ≤ 0.164).

CONCLUSIONS

Small incision lenticule extraction induced significant amounts of corneal HOAs that, however, showed no clear relationships to patient-reported QOV or specific long-term visual symptoms.

Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (AF t-PRK) in patients with low to moderate myopic astigmatism, including visual acuity, refractive outcomes, astigmatic vector analysis and corneal aberrometric changes.

METHOD

This retrospective comparative case series study involved 110 right eyes of 110 patients who underwent either SMILE (55 eyes) or AF t-PRK (55 eyes). Visual acuity, manifest refractive error and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured and analyzed at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after operation. The safety and efficacy indices, and vector parameters were also compared.

RESULT

1 month postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and spherical equivalent refraction (SE) were better after SMILE than AF t-PRK (logMAR UDVA,  - 0.03 ± 0.07 and  - 0.006 ± 0.07, P = 0.050; logMAR CDVA,  - 0.06 ± 0.07 and  - 0.03 ± 0.07, P = 0.043; SE,  - 0.04 ± 0.25 and 0.15 ± 0.26, P < 0.001). However, these parameters were comparable between the groups at 3 months after surgery. Residual astigmatism ≤ 0.25 diopters was observed in 74.5% and 90.9% (P = 0.023) of the eyes at one month and in 87.3% and 85.5% (P = 0.781) of the eyes at 3 months after SMILE and AF t-PRK, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the vector parameters at 1 month or 3 months after surgery. Coma and total HOAs after SMILE were significantly higher than AF t-PRK (1 month coma, 0.49 ± 0.23 and 0.29 ± 0.15, P < 0.001; 1 month total RMS HOAs, 0.65 ± 0.20 and 0.54 ± 0.14, P = 0.001; 3 months coma, 0.50 ± 0.22 and 0.30 ± 0.17, P < 0.001; 3 months total RMS HOAs, 0.68 ± 0.20 and 0.55 ± 0.17, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, both SMILE and AF t-PRK were effective and comparable for correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism. AF t-PRK group induced less coma and total HOAs than SMILE.

Decentration following femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism and its impact on visual quality

Background

To measure the decentration following SMILE in eyes with high myopic astigmatism and investigate its impact on visual quality.

Methods

The prospective study was conducted to analyze patients who underwent SMILE for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism ≥2.5D (high astigmatism group, HA) at the ophthalmology department, Eye and ENT hospital, Shanghai, China.. Patients with myopic astigmatism < 1.5D served as controls (low astigmatism group, LA). Decentration was measured using a Scheimpflug camera with a difference map of the tangential curvature at 12 months postoperatively. Also the associations between decentration from the coaxial sighted corneal light reflex (CSCLR) and the visual outcomes, correction efficacy of astigmatism, wavefront aberrations and objective scatter index (OSI) were analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the decentered distance between HA and LA in either eyes (OD: HA: 0.18 ± 0.10 mm, LA: 0.20 ± 0.14 mm, P = 0.659; OS: HA: 0.22 ± 0.11 mm, LA: 0.20 ± 0.11 mm, P = 0.637). The analysis across the three levels of decentration (< 0.1 mm, 0.1–0.2 mm, and > 0.2 mm) showed no significant association between decentration and visual outcomes of predictability, efficiency, safety, MTF cutoff, OSI, SR and OVs in both groups. Also no significant association was observed between decentration and postoperative astigmatism in either group. A significant relationship between the magnitude of decentration and induced coma and spherical aberration was observed in HA.

Conclusions

The amount of decentration between HA and LA groups showed no differences. Decentration > 0.20 mm from CSCLR resulted in greater induction of coma and SA after SMILE in eyes with HA.

Decentration measurements using Placido corneal tangential curvature topography and Scheimpflug tomography pachymetry difference maps after small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement of decentration measurements between tangential curvature topography and tomography pachymetry difference maps after a small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure.

SETTING

Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Decentrations and pupillary offset (angle κ) were analyzed and compared using two different methods. A difference map of the tangential curvature was generated with a Placido corneal topographer (Keratron Scout) and a pachymetry difference map was generated with a Scheimpflug tomographer (Pentacam) for each eye, using preoperative and 3-month postoperative scans. Decentrations were also compared using a vector difference plot for the two maps.

RESULTS

The study comprised 155 eyes (155 patients). The magnitude of decentration was 0.27 mm ± 0.17 (SD) (range 0.02 to 0.88 mm) with the tangential curvature difference maps and 0.26 ± 0.20 mm (range 0.00 to 0.91 mm) with the pachymetry difference maps, showing no significant difference in the arithmetic values of decentration (P = .124). However, the vector difference in pupillary offset between preoperative and postoperative measurements from the pachymetry difference map significantly correlated with the magnitude of vector differences of decentration between the two maps (P = .007). The vector difference plot also showed a wide distribution spread to all 4 quadrants, demonstrating a lack of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no significant difference between the scalar magnitude of decentration with the tangential topography difference maps and tomography pachymetry difference maps, the vector differences did not agree and increasing error was present with increasing differences in pupillary offset in the pachymetry difference maps.

Higher-order aberration measurements: Comparison between Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido technology in normal eyes

PURPOSE

To compare higher order aberrations (HOAs) in normal eyes between a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam HR) and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging system (Galilei G4).

SETTING

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Eyes screened for refractive surgery were evaluated sequentially using a Scheimpflug device and a dual Scheimpflug-Placido device. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated.

RESULTS

One hundred five eyes of 105 patients (44 men, 61 women) were evaluated. Total RMS, coma, and trefoil were significantly different between groups (all P < .001), while spherical aberration values were not. There was moderate correlation between devices for trefoil (r = 0.475 to 0.652), coma (r = 0.574 to 0.651), and spherical aberration (r = 0.483) and a strong correlation for total cornea RMS (r = 0.817). There was no directional bias between groups. The 95% limits of agreement for absolute values was 0.039 μm for trefoil at 30 degrees, 0.405 μm for trefoil at 0 degree, 0.553 μm for horizontal coma, 0.545 μm for vertical coma, 0.318 μm for spherical aberration, and 0.617 μm for RMS.

CONCLUSIONS

A Scheimpflug imaging device and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging device generated statistically different values for total cornea HOAs; however, the correlation between devices was moderate to strong and there was reasonable agreement in all measures for normal eyes. Based on these findings, the devices appear functionally equivalent for clinical use, although caution is warranted for outcomes-based research protocols that report HOAs.