Distribution of Pupil Offset and Angle Kappa in a Refractive Surgery Preoperative Population of 750 Myopic, Emmetropic, and Hyperopic Eyes

Angle Kappa and angle Alpha agreement between Pentacam Scheimpflug system, swept source optical coherence tomography and ray-tracing aberrometry

PURPOSE

To compare the consistency of Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Pentacam® HR), ray-tracing aberrometry (iTrace), and swept source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700) measurements for Angle Kappa and angle Alpha.

METHODS

A prospective randomized cohort study. 86 individuals (86 eyes) aged 19-45 years with best corrected vision of 4.9 or better were randomly selected from January 2022 to December 2022 in a tertiary-level hospital. Angle Kappa and angle Alpha were measured or calculated using Pentacam, iTrace, and IOLMaster 700, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean difference of angle Kappa between any two instruments was not statistically significant, but the mean difference of angle Alpha between both Pentacam and iTrace, Pentacam and IOLMaster 700, and iTrace and IOLMaster 700 was statistically significant (p value <0.001, 0.003, <0.001). The highest consistency of angle Kappa and the narrowest 95% LoA (-0.20 to 0.21) were found between Pentacam and iTrace according to Bland Altman plots, but between Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 according to Mountain plots. Both Bland Altman plots and Mountain plots showed the highest consistency of angle Alpha and the narrowest 95% LoA (-0.14 to 0.24) between Pentacam and iTrace.

CONCLUSION

The mean angle Kappa among Pentacam® HR, iTrace, and IOLMaster 700 had good agreement, and the value of angle Kappa could be output directly, making it more convenient for clinical application. The measured or calculated angle Alpha had poor agreement, and ophthalmologists could refer to measurements from multiple instruments.

A comparative study of pupil offset measurement using Pentacam and Keratron Scout in myopic young adults

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Assessing the consistency of pupil offset measurements between the Pentacam and Keratron Scout is essential for the refractive surgery design of young myopic patients.

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative measurement of pupil offset is critical to achieving a better quality of vision after refractive surgery. The Pentacam and Keratron Scout are commonly used in hospitals, and evaluating their consistency is essential for accurate measurement of pupil offset.

METHODS

Six hundred eyes (600 subjects) were included in this study. Pupil offset and its X, Y-component were measured by Pentacam and Keratron Scout, respectively. Agreement and repeatability between the two devices were identified by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Paired t-tests and Pearson analysis were used to compare the differences and correlations between the two devices.

RESULTS

The mean age of all subjects was 23 ± 5 years. The mean pupil offset magnitude obtained from Pentacam and Keratron Scout was 0.16 ± 0.08 mm and 0.15 ± 0.07 mm. The 95% limits of agreement (-0.11-0.13, -0.09-0.11, and -0.11-0.12) and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.82, 0.84, and 0.81) demonstrated good agreement and repeatability of the two devices in measuring pupil offset and its X, Y-component. A significant correlation between the two devices was found (r = 0.71, 0.73, and 0.70). The direction of pupil offset measured by the devices was both predominately towards the superonasal quadrant.

CONCLUSION

Pentacam and Keratron Scout showed good agreement in measuring pupil offset and its X, Y-component, which can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Angle Kappa Influence on Multifocal IOL Outcomes

PURPOSE

To characterize angle kappa and study the relationship between preoperative angle kappa and postoperative refractive accuracy, visual outcomes, and patient satisfaction in a large population of eyes with multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) implantation.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic medical record chart review of 26,470 consecutive eyes that underwent immediate sequential bilateral cataract or refractive lens exchange with MIOLs was conducted. The primary outcome measures were postoperative monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction sphere and cylinder, spherical equivalent (SEQ), defocus equivalent (DEQ), subjective quality of vision at near, intermediate, and distance, and the likelihood of recommending the procedure. Relationships between preoperative angle kappa and postoperative outcomes were assessed with Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

Angle kappa followed a right-skewed normal distribution (R2 = 0.99) with a mean ± standard deviation of 0.64 ± 0.27 mm. No clinically meaningful relationship was found between preoperative angle kappa and postoperative sphere, cylinder, SEQ, and DEQ, all with R2 ⩽ 0.0005. Similarly, there was no clinically meaningful relationship between preoperative angle kappa and postoperative UDVA (R2 = 0.001), postoperative satisfaction for near, intermediate, and distance vision (all R2 ⩽ 0.0023), or for recommending the MIOL surgery to friends and relatives (R2 = 0.0000).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative angle kappa does not have a predictive clinical impact on postoperative MIOL visual outcomes, refractive accuracy, or subjective patient satisfaction. Angle kappa as a single variable cannot be used to determine MIOL candidacy. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(12):840-849.].

Influence of a multifocal intraocular lens centration and eye angles on light distortion and ocular scatter index

PURPOSE

To assess how eye axes and multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) centration may impact the light distortion index (LDI) and ocular scatter index (OSI).

METHODS

Fifty-eight subjects implanted with the trifocal MIOL Q-Flex M 640PM or Liberty 677MY (Medicontur) were included in this retrospective analysis. The following variables were collected with the Pentacam Wave (Oculus) considering the vertex normal as the coordinates center: chord-mu to the center of the pupil, chord-alpha to the geometrical center of the cornea, and chord-MIOL to the center of the diffractive ring. These measurements were correlated with OSI (HD Analyzer, Visiometrics) and LDI (light distortion analyzer, CEORLab).

RESULTS

Chord-MIOL centroid was 0.12 mm at 62°, chord-mu was 0.09 mm at 174°, and chord-alpha was 0.38 mm at 188°. A relationship was found between OSI and LDI, rho = 0.58, p < 0.0005). No relationships were found between chord-mu or chord-alpha and the LDI or OSI, neither for the total magnitude, nor the decomposition in orthogonal components (p > 0.05). The LDI was significantly correlated with the temporal centration of the MIOL versus the vertex normal (rho = 0.32, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

As opposed to what has been previously described, the temporal centration of the MIOL was related to a decrease in the LDI. Future studies with extreme values of the included variables are required to establish cut-offs for considering these variables as exclusion criteria in the implantation of a MIOL.

Effect of preoperative pupil offset on corneal higher-order aberrations after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between multiple higher-order aberrations (HOAs) subgroups and pupil offset, as well as to analyze the factors affecting postoperative corneal HOAs in patients with different degrees of refractive errors.

METHODS

We enrolled 160 patients (316 eyes) aged ≥ 18 years who had undergone femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) treatment. Based on the relationship between the preoperative pupil offset and the postoperative ΔHOAs, all patients were divided into two groups: group I (pupil offset ≤ 0.20 mm) and group II (pupil offset > 0.20 mm). All of the eyes had low to high myopia with or without astigmatism (manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) < -10.00 D). Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, MRSE, pupil offset, central corneal thickness, corneal HOAs, vertical coma (Z₃^-1), horizontal coma (Z₃¹), spherical aberration (Z₄⁰), trefoil 0° (Z₃³), and trefoil 30° (Z₃^-3) over a 6 mm diameter central corneal zone diameter were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Our result revealed significant differences in postoperative corneal total root mean square (RMS) HOAs, RMS vertical coma, RMS horizontal coma, RMS spherical aberration, and RMS trefoil 30° between group I and group II. ΔMRSE was found to be an effective factor for ΔRMS HOAs (R² = 0.383), ΔRMS horizontal coma (R² = 0.205), and ΔRMS spherical aberration (R² = 0.397). In group II, multiple linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between preoperative pupillary offset and Δtotal RMS HOAs (R² = 0.461), ΔRMS horizontal coma (R² = 0.040), and ΔRMS trefoil 30°(R² = 0.089). The ΔRMS vertical coma effect factor is the Y-component, and the factor influencing ΔRMS spherical aberration was ΔMRSE (R² = 0.256).

CONCLUSION

A small pupil offset was associated with a lower induction of postoperative corneal HOAs. Efforts to optimize centration are critical for improving surgical outcomes in patients with FS-LASIK.

Symmetric offset versus asymmetric offset ablation with transepithelial refractive keratectomy

BACKGROUND

In eyes with hyperopia, astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is a modality of surface ablation surgery. We center on the corneal vertex for all our treatments (all have an offset to the center of the pupil) and wanted to compare the visual results of symmetrical profile treatments versus asymmetrical profile treatments (the center of the treatment on the vertex and the boundaries with the pupil center) using TransPRK as corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed two consecutive groups of eyes treated with TransPRK in the Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum Recklinghausen: 47 eyes treated with symmetrical offset and 51 eyes treated with asymmetrical offset. The intergroup comparisons were assessed using unpaired Student's T-tests, whereas preoperative to postoperative changes were assessed using paired Student's T-tests.

RESULTS

Refractive outcomes were good for both groups. 83 and 88% of eyes were within the spherical equivalent of 0.5 D from the target in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively. 85 and 84% of eyes had a postoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or lower in the symmetric and asymmetric offset groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We have not found a significant difference in the refractive outcomes between the symmetric group and the asymmetric group of eyes treated both with TransPRK for preoperatively hyperopic or mixed astigmatism.

Swept-source optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy study of anterior segment parameters in primary angle-closure glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement between swept-source OCT (CASIA2) and UBM in primary angle-closure glaucoma.

METHODS

Eighty eyes of 40 participants diagnosed with primary angle-closure glaucoma were examined. Parameters measured included angle opening distance (AOD), angle recess area (ARA), trabecular iris space area (TISA), trabecular iris angle (TIA), lens vault (LV), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and anterior chamber width (ACW). Angle images of nasal, temporal, superior, and inferior were acquired by the anterior segment mode of CASIA2 and UBM. One-way analysis of variance and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis, and the agreement was analyzed by internal correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA pairwise comparison showed that CASIA2 or UBM had the narrowest superior chamber angle and the widest temporal chamber angle in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma. The paired t-test showed that inter-device AOD, TIA, ARA, and TISA of superior chamber angle had significant differences (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the measured values of LV, ACD, and ACW (p > 0.05). The agreement of all parameters is good through the Bland-Altman method comparison. ICC result showed moderate agreement in other angle parameters except for superior ARA500 (0.739).

CONCLUSION

In the anterior chamber angle measurement process, we should pay more attention to the superior chamber angle covered by eyelids. Although the agreement is acceptable between CASIA2 and UBM, the measurements could not be considered interchangeable due to the tremendous statistical difference between the two devices.

Distribution of angle lambda and pupil offset as measured by combined Placido Scheimpflug Topography

BACKGROUND

Angle lambda is the angle between the pupillary axis and the line of sight. It is important for accurate centration during anterior segment surgery. The purpose of this study is to identify the distribution of angle lambda and pupil center offset as measured by a combined placido disc Scheimpflug topography system.

METHODS

A prospective non-randomized study was performed on 2178 eyes in Eye World Hospital, Giza, Egypt. Sirius device (CSO, Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy, version 3.2.1.60) was used to measure average keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID), pupil radius (PR), pupil center intercept x-component (PCI-x), and pupil center intercept y-component (PCI-y). Axial length (AL) was measured by immersion A-scan Eyecube Ultrasonography device (Ellex, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia). Angle lambda was calculated by a trigonometrical equation. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between angle lambda and age and refraction.

RESULTS

Average angle lambda in all eyes was 3.32° ± 1.99. Mean angle lambda was significantly smallest in myopia and largest in hyperopia. Age correlation to angle lambda was insignificant. Average PCI-x and PCI-y in all eyes was - 0.047 mm and + 0.091 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Angle λ is significantly larger in hyperopia than myopia, and the effect of age is insignificant. Pupil center offset was horizontally greater in hyperopia than in myopia. We therefore encourage the preoperative assessment of angle λ to avoid decentered ablation, especially when treating hyperopia.

Angle κ and its effect on the corneal elevation maps in refractive surgery candidates

PURPOSE

To assess the associations of angle κ and Pentacam decentration indices with elevation maps in normal refractive surgery candidates.

SETTING

Salouti Cornea Research Center, Salouti Eye Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

METHODS

In this research, the right eyes of 173 refractive surgery candidates were assessed. Data of front and back corneal elevation maps, keratometric data, decentration indices, and corneal astigmatism obtained by Pentacam HR system and angle κ obtained by Orbscan IIz were extracted. Maximum elevation (or depression) for each of the 4 quadrants was recorded. Correlations of elevation values with angle κ, Pentacam decentration indices, keratometry, and astigmatism were examined by Pearson correlation coefficient. 148 age- and sex-matched cases with keratoconus grade 1 were selected as a positive control group, and Pentacam variables were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Overall, data from 173 eyes of 173 normal refractive surgery candidates and 148 eyes of 148 patients with keratoconus were recorded and analyzed. In normal refractive surgery candidates, the mean of angle κ was 5.32 ± 1.36 (SD) degrees. Angle κ had a positive correlation with front and back temporal elevations based on a best-fit sphere (BFS) ( r = 0.339, P = .001; r = 0.300, P < .001, respectively). Front and back keratometric astigmatisms were positively correlated with front and back nasal and temporal elevations ( r ≥ 0.543, P < .001) and negatively correlated with superior and inferior elevations ( r ≤ -0.547, P < .001). These associations no longer existed when using best-fit toric ellipse (BFTE) for calculating elevation data. The thinnest point to vertex decentration was significantly associated with the back temporal elevation (based on the BFTE) in both normal ( r = 0.311, P < .001) and keratoconus ( r = 0.190, P = .021) eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that elevation maps obtained by the Pentacam system using BFS might be affected by both the large angle κ and corneal astigmatism, confounding the preoperative assessment of refractive surgery candidates. Using BFTE as a reference for calculating elevation data should eliminate most diagnostic issues and thus is encouraged in this context.

Angle Kappa Measurement and Its Correlation to Other Ocular Parameters in Normal Population by a New Imaging Modality

SIGNIFICANCE

This study obtained normative database for angle kappa using Orbscan 3. The average angle kappa was 2.3° ± 1.34 in the whole sample, 2.23° ± 1.36 in myopic eyes, and 3.3° ±1.5 in hyperopic eyes. This is very important for optimization of refractive surgery outcome.

PURPOSE

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to obtain the value of mean angle kappa in normal eyes of patients seeking laser vision correction, by the Orbscan 3.

METHODS

The study was conducted on healthy eyes of people seeking laser refractive surgery. 1815 eyes of 908 of candidates were included. These were examined as a part of preoperative assessment. Orbscan 3 was used to measure Angle kappa and its XY intercepts, keratometry readings, central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest location (TL), white to white (WTW), and corneal asphericity of front surface (Qf) and back surface (Qb).

RESULTS

Mean angle kappa in all eyes was 2.3° ± 1.34. The value was 2.23° ± 1.36 in myopic eyes, 3.3° ±1.5 in hyperopic eyes, and 2.9° ±1.6 in emmetropic eyes. Positive correlation was found between angle kappa and age, spherical equivalent, subjective sphere, and WTW. On the other hand, axial length, average k, CCT, pupil diameter and asphericity Q front were negatively correlated to angle kappa.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean angle kappa value measured by the orbscan 3 was 2.3° ± 1.34. This could be attributed to different software used, in addition to the relatively high axial length in the studied eyes.

Characteristics of Pupil Offset in Young Asian Adults With Mild-Moderate and High Myopia

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics of pupil offset in young Asian adults with myopia.

Methods

In total, 1200 eyes (600 young adults, 18–35 years old) were divided into mild-moderate and high groups according to equivalent spherical diopters (SEQ). The pupil offset and its X and Y components were compared between the groups. Linear correlation was analyzed among pupil offset, X and Y components, and SEQ. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted for pupil offset and eye parameters.

Results

The mean age of all subjects was 22.5 ± 4.8 years. The mean magnitude of the pupil offset (0.18 ± 0.09 mm vs. 0.15 ± 0.08 mm) and Y component (0.12 ± 0.08 mm vs. 0.10 ± 0.07 mm) were larger in the high group than in the mild-moderate group (P < 0.05). The magnitude of pupil offset, X and Y components, and SEQ were positively correlated. The pupil center (PC) of the right eye in the mild-moderate group was mainly superotemporal to the corneal vertex and mainly superonasal for the left eye and both eyes in the high group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the magnitude of pupil offset correlated with central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and mean corneal curvature (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The magnitude of the pupil offset that correlated with partial eye parameters and its X and Y components increased as the SEQ increased, and the PC gradually shifted toward the superonasal direction in young Asian adults with myopia.

Translational Relevance

Subjects with high myopia with a larger pupil offset should be considered for better postoperative visual quality during refractive surgery.