Coma Influence on Manifest Astigmatism in Coma-Dominant Irregular Corneal Optics

Corneal and Whole-Eye Higher Order Aberrations Do Not Correlate With Ocular Residual Astigmatism in Prepresbyopic Refractive Surgery Candidates

PURPOSE

Ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) is the proportion of manifest astigmatism that is not explained by anterior corneal astigmatism. The role of higher order aberrations (HOAs) in the level of ORA has not been profoundly studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different corneal and whole-eye HOAs on levels of ORA using a multivariate modeling approach.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analytical study including a sample of healthy refractive surgery candidates. One eye of every patient was randomly selected. A total of 294 eyes from an equal number of patients were included. Corneal and whole-eye HOAs were measured with a Pentacam AXL Wave, and subjective manifest refraction was taken. Astigmatism values were converted into power vectors and ORA was calculated. The Spearman rank-order correlation was initially used to explore correlation between HOA and ORA. All variables with a P value under 0.10 were included into a multiple linear regression model to explore this correlation adjusting for confounding variables.

RESULTS

The mean age was 28.81 ± 5.40 years. Simple bivariate correlation was significant for root mean square (RMS) total, RMS lower order aberrations, RMS HOAs, defocus, and vertical astigmatism. After being included into a multivariate regression model adjusting for confounding variables, the only variable that was significant was RMS total [F(3, 282) = 78.977; P < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 0.451]. For every μm increase in corneal RMS total, ORA increases by 0.135 diopters. About 45% of variability in ORA can be explained by corneal RMS total, corneal J0, and manifest J0. No individual HOA correlated with ORA in the multivariate regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

ORA increases with general corneal irregularity, especially regular astigmatism. Irregular astigmatism expressed by corneal and whole-eye HOAs does not seem to be a significant contributor of ORA in healthy refractive surgery candidates.

The Impact of Epithelial Remodeling on Surgical Techniques Used in Topography-guided Surface Ablation in Irregular Corneas

PURPOSE

To analyze the optical consequences of epithelial remodeling in irregular corneas and their impact on the choice of different surface ablation techniques.

METHODS

Anterior corneal and stromal surface topographies and epithelial thickness maps were analyzed in 24 eyes with irregular corneal optics. On two of the eyes, four different surface ablation techniques were simulated: (1) conventional anterior topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), (2) transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK), (3) transepithelial anterior topography-guided PRK, and (4) stromal topography-guided PRK.

RESULTS

Stromal surface topographies showed higher keratometric values, astigmatism, asphericity, and corneal higher order aberrations compared to topographies of anterior corneas covered by epithelium. Transepithelial anterior topography-guided PRK and stromal topography-guided PRK both resulted in regularized stromal surface, transepithelial PTK achieved partial regularization corresponding to the smoothing effect of the epithelial remodeling, and conventional anterior topography-guided PRK delivered after epithelial removal resulted in residual stromal surface irregularities.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in optical landscapes between the stromal and anterior surfaces in irregular corneas will represent a source of error when anterior topography-guided treatments are delivered on the deepithelialized stroma, as in conventional PRK. In contrast, anterior topography-guided ablations performed as transepithelial PRK and stromal topography-guided PRK delivered after epithelial removal address the full stromal irregularity, whereas transepithelial PTK alone may be used when topography-guided treatments are not possible. The authors conclude topography-guided PRK of irregular corneas should lead to significantly improved regularization only if it includes the effect of epithelial remodeling. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):529-537.].

Corneal Topographic versus Manifest Refractive Astigmatism in Patients with Keratoconus: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

To compare the subjective manifest astigmatism to the corneal topographic astigmatism in patients with keratoconus.

Methods

This retrospective study included data of 230 keratoconic eyes of 115 patients. Topographic corneal astigmatism (TA), which was measured by pentacam, was compared and correlated to manifest refractive cylinder (MRC) in terms of power, axis, vector components, and mean vector. The difference between TA and MRC was correlated to the maximum keratometric reading (Kmax) and the thinnest pachymetry location (TL), as indicators of keratoconus severity.

Results

There was a significant positive correlation between MRC power and TA power (p < 0.001; r = 0.58). TA power was significantly higher than MRC power (p < 0.001). A significant correlation was present between the axis of TA and MRC (r = 0.73; p < 0.001) with the axis of the MRC tending to be more vertical (more against the rule) than the axis of TA. The vector difference between TA and MRC is correlated to the Kmax (p < 0.001; r = 0.62) and TL (p < 0.001; r = 0.3).

Conclusions

A significant difference is present between TA and MRC in keratoconic eyes, the power of MRC tends to be less and the axis tends to be more vertical than those of TA; this difference increases as keratoconus becomes more advanced.

Large Axis Difference Between Topographic Anterior Corneal Astigmatism and Manifest Refractive Astigmatism: Can Topography-Guided LASIK Target the Manifest Axis?

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the degree of astigmatism axis discrepancy between preoperative manifest refractive astigmatism and anterior corneal astigmatism impacts refractive and visual outcomes of primary topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) targeting the refractive astigmatism, and to provide guidance on treating eyes with very large axis discrepancy.

METHODS

Comparative retrospective analysis of 25,396 consecutive eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK on the manifest refractive astigmatism. Standard outcomes of the 14,534 eyes with small axis discrepancy (SAD) (Δ in axis ⩽ 10°) were compared to the 2,222 eyes with very large axis discrepancy (VLAD) (Δ in axis ⩾ 45°). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess relationships between selected variables.

RESULTS

The mean axis discrepancy was 4.47 ± 2.92° in SAD eyes, and 65.0 ± 13.4° in VLAD eyes. An equivalent number of eyes achieved a cumulative postoperative unilateral uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 in both the SAD and VLAD groups (93.02% vs 93.42%; P = .4892). The efficacy index (0.98 ± 0.13 vs 0.98 ± 0.07; P = .3931) and the safety index (1.00 ± 0.11 vs 1.00 ± 0.03; P = .4757) were identical between groups. There was no clinically meaningful correlation between the preoperative axis discrepancy and preoperative total root mean square anterior corneal coma, postoperative refractive astigmatism, defocus equivalent, spherical equivalent, and angle of error, all with weak correlation coefficients (R = -0.02, -0.03, -0.02, 0.01, and 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Large preoperative axis discrepancy (45° to 90°) between refractive astigmatism and topography-measured anterior corneal astigmatism does not negatively impact topography-guided LASIK, having identical refractive and visual outcomes compared to eyes with small (0° to 10°) discrepancy. There is no basis to exclude eyes with large axis discrepancy from topography-guided LASIK, and these eyes should be treated on the manifest refractive astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):662-673.].