1
|
Wang H, Zhu LS, Pang CJ, Fan Q. Repeatability assessment of anterior segment measurements in myopic patients using an anterior segment OCT with placido corneal topography and agreement with a swept-source OCT. BMC Ophthalmol 2024; 24:182. [PMID: 38649848 PMCID: PMC11036772 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03448-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The precision of anterior segment biometric measurements in eyes has become increasingly important in refractive surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the repeatability of the automatic measurements provided by a new spectral-domain optical coherence tomograph (SD-OCT)/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO) and its agreement with a swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) biometer (CASIA SS-1000, Tomey) in patients with myopia. METHODS The right eye of 235 subjects was scanned 3 times with both devices. The evaluated parameters included central corneal radius of the steep meridian, central corneal radius of the flat meridian, mean central corneal radius, thinnest corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, corneal volume and diameter. The intraobserver repeatability of the MS-39 measurements was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within subject standard deviation, coefficient of repeatability, coefficient of variation and repeated-measures analysis of variance of the 3 repeated measurements. The agreement between the two devices was evaluated by 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS The majority of the parameters acquired from MS-39 showed high repeatability. The repeatability of corneal diameter was slightly lower than the other measurements, although the ICC remained high. Agreement with the CASIA SS-1000 was good, indicated by the Bland-Altman plots with narrow 95% LoA values for all parameters assessed. CONCLUSIONS The high repeatability of automatic measurements by the new device supports its clinical application in eyes with myopia, and the good agreement between the two devices indicates they could be used interchangeably for the parameters evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wang
- Department of Refractive Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital Affiliated to Henan University, NO.7 Weiwu Road, 450003, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Li-Shuang Zhu
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Zhengzhou People's Hospital, NO.33 Huanghe Road, 450003, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chen-Jiu Pang
- Department of Refractive Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital Affiliated to Henan University, NO.7 Weiwu Road, 450003, Zhengzhou, China.
| | - Qi Fan
- Department of Refractive Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital Affiliated to Henan University, NO.7 Weiwu Road, 450003, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blehm C, Hall B. Refractive Predictability of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Long and Short Eyes Implanted with Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2023; 17:3525-3530. [PMID: 38026607 PMCID: PMC10676102 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s430535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the refractive predictability of Argos (Movu, a Santec company) measurements and the Barrett Universal II formula in long and short eyes implanted with an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Methods This retrospective, non-interventional study included 86 eyes (55 long and 31 short) of 55 patients. Preoperative biometry was performed using the Argos. Preoperative IOL power formulas were the preprogrammed Barrett Universal II (BUII). Data were collected for refractive outcomes, postoperative prediction error (directional and absolute), and monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, Snellen). Results The mean absolute prediction error for BUII was 0.27 ± 0.26 D overall, 0.24 ± 0.20 D in long eyes, and 0.33 ± 0.33 D in short eyes. Overall, the percentage of eyes with ≤ 0.5 D prediction error was 84% for BUII. In long eyes, the percentage of eyes with ≤ 0.5 D prediction error was 90% for BUII. In short eyes, the percentage of eyes with ≤ 0.5 D prediction error was 74% for BUII. The percentage of eyes with ≤ 0.5 D of MRSE was 89% for long eyes and 94% for short eyes. Visual acuities were excellent in both long and short eyes, with > 90% of eyes 20/25 or better in each group. Conclusion The prediction error of Argos using BUII was low in long and short eyes at one month after EDOF IOL implantation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Multack S, Plummer N, Smits G, Hall B. Randomized Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Two Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers. Clin Ophthalmol 2023; 17:2423-2428. [PMID: 37609646 PMCID: PMC10441632 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s407538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the prediction accuracy of the Argos biometer using standard keratometry to the prediction accuracy of the IOLMaster 700 biometer using Total Keratometry. Methods This was a randomized, prospective, single surgeon study of 80 right eyes of 80 patients that had preoperative biometry with both the Argos and IOLMaster 700 devices, followed by cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Prediction errors (directional and absolute) for each device were determined from the 1 month postoperative manifest refraction. Results The directional prediction error was 0.07 ± 0.32 D for the Argos and 0.08 ± 0.34 D for the IOLMaster 700. The mean of the difference in prediction error (directional) was 0.02 D, which was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The absolute prediction error was 0.21 ± 0.25 D for the Argos and 0.25 ± 0.24 D for the IOLMaster 700. The mean of the difference in absolute prediction error was 0.04 D, which was statistically significant (p < 0.004) but not clinically significant. The percentage of eyes with absolute prediction error ≤ 0.5 D was 91% (73 eyes) for the Argos and 88% (70 eyes) for the IOLMaster 700. This difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion The prediction accuracies were similar between the Argos and IOLMaster 700 in eyes with normal axial length. There was a significant difference in mean absolute prediction error between devices; however, this was not clinically meaningful.
Collapse
|
4
|
Georgiev S, Ruiss M, Dana-Fisus A, Leitgeb RA, Findl O. Comparison of corneal aberrations from anterior segment swept source OCT versus Placido-topography combined spectral domain OCT in cataract patients. EYE AND VISION (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 10:30. [PMID: 37525287 PMCID: PMC10392018 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-023-00348-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To comprehensively evaluate the agreement of component corneal aberrations from the newly updated wavefront analysis software of a swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT) and a referential Placido-topography combined OCT device in elderly cataract patients. METHODS Retrospective study including 103 eyes from 103 elderly patients scheduled for cataract surgery that were measured on the same day with a SS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) device and a Placido-topography combined OCT device (CSO, Italy). Anterior, total, and posterior corneal wavefront aberrations were evaluated for their mean differences and limits of agreement (LoA) via Bland-Altman plots. Vector analysis was additionally employed to compare corneal astigmatism measurements in dioptric vector space. RESULTS Mean differences of all corneal aberrometric parameters did not exceed 0.05 μm. Total corneal aberrations were not significantly different from 0 except for vertical coma (- 0.04 μm; P = 0.003), spherical aberration (- 0.01 μm, P < 0.001), and root mean square (RMS) higher-order aberration (HOA) (0.03 μm, P = 0.04). The 95% LoA for total corneal aberration parameters between both devices were - 0.46 to 0.42 μm for horizontal astigmatism, - 0.37 to 0.41 μm for oblique astigmatism, - 0.19 to 0.17 μm for oblique trefoil, - 0.33 to 0.25 μm for vertical coma, - 0.20 to 0.22 μm for horizontal coma, - 0.22 to 0.20 μm for horizontal trefoil, - 0.11 to 0.08 μm for spherical aberration, and - 0.22 to 0.28 μm for RMS HOA. Vector analysis revealed no statistically significant mean differences for anterior, total, and posterior corneal astigmatism in dioptric vector space. CONCLUSION In eyes undergoing cataract surgery with a regular elderly cornea, corneal wavefront analysis from the SS-OCT device showed functional equivalency to the reference device. Nevertheless, clinically relevant higher order aberration parameters should be interpreted with caution for surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Georgiev
- VIROS-Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich-Collin-Strasse 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manuel Ruiss
- VIROS-Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich-Collin-Strasse 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreea Dana-Fisus
- VIROS-Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich-Collin-Strasse 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rainer A Leitgeb
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oliver Findl
- VIROS-Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich-Collin-Strasse 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blehm C, Hall B. Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer. Clin Ophthalmol 2023; 17:2125-2131. [PMID: 37521148 PMCID: PMC10386863 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s421504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the refractive accuracy resulting from calculations based on measurements with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer compared to calculations based on measurements with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer at one month postoperatively. Methods This was a retrospective comparative non-interventional study of preoperative biometry and postoperative refraction and visual acuity of 200 eyes. All eyes had preoperative biometry with both the Argos (Movu, a Santec company) and Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit AG) devices. Data were collected for mean postoperative prediction error (directional and absolute), preoperative mean K, delta K (corneal astigmatism), axial length, and anterior chamber depth. Results The mean directional prediction error was -0.15 ± 0.47 D for Argos and -0.31 ± 0.50 D for Lenstar LS900, and there was a statistically significant mean of the differences (0.16 ± 0.24 D; p < 0.001). The mean absolute prediction error was 0.35 ± 0.34 D for Argos and 0.42 ± 0.41 D for Lenstar LS900, and there was a statistically significant mean of the differences (-0.07 ± 0.24 D; p < 0.001). Neither the differences in directional prediction error nor the differences in absolute prediction error were clinically significant. Conclusion The directional and absolute prediction accuracies were statistically significant, but not clinically different between the Argos and Lenstar LS900 devices. In addition, differences between preoperative K, AL, and ACD measurements were not clinically significant.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Wan T, Liu L, Xue Y, Chen X, Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Zhou X, Yu J, Huang J. Agreement between a new optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. EYE AND VISION (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 10:13. [PMID: 36829259 PMCID: PMC9960448 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-023-00330-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess agreement of measurements between a new optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (SW-9000, Suoer, Tianjin, China) and a spectral-domain optical coherence tomographer (SD-OCT)/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO, Florence, Italy) in healthy subjects. METHODS A total of 66 right eyes from 66 healthy subjects were enrolled in this prospective study. Three consecutive measurements were randomly obtained with both devices by the same experienced operator to assess agreement. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to verify the agreement between the devices. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). RESULTS The SD-OCT/Placido tomographer showed high agreement with the OLCR biometer for all parameters included in this study. The mean differences of central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AQD), mean keratometry (Km) and corneal diameter (CD) were 2.21 ± 2.67 μm (P < 0.001), - 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P < 0.001), - 0.10 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001), - 0.01 ± 0.22 D (P = 0.773) and 0.20 ± 0.16 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. This implies that the inter-device difference in Km was not statistically significant, while the differences in CCT, ACD, AQD, CD were statistically but not clinically significant. The 95% LoAs of CCT, ACD, AQD, Km and CD were - 3.01 to 7.44 μm, - 0.16 to - 0.05 mm, - 0.18 to - 0.03 mm, - 0.45 to 0.43 D, and - 0.12 to 0.51 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For CCT, ACD, AQD, Km, and CD in healthy subjects, the new OLCR biometer has high agreement with the SD-OCT/Placido tomographer and can be used interchangeably due to the narrow range of 95% LoAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran Wang
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Medical and Engineering Innovation, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031 China ,grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang China
| | - Ting Wan
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang China
| | - Luze Liu
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang China
| | - Yuyuan Xue
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Medical and Engineering Innovation, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031 China
| | - Xinyao Chen
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Medical and Engineering Innovation, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031 China
| | | | | | - Xingtao Zhou
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Medical and Engineering Innovation, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031 China ,grid.411079.a0000 0004 1757 8722Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinjin Yu
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Medical and Engineering Innovation, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China. .,Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jinhai Huang
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Medical and Engineering Innovation, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China. .,Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|