Comparisons of intraocular lens power calculation methods for eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery: Bayesian network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of the methods for calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery.

SETTING

EENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to July 2019 was conducted for studies that evaluated methods of calculating IOL power in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery. Outcomes measurements were the percentages of prediction error within ±0.50 diopters (D) and ±1.00 D of the target refraction (% ±0.50 D and % ±1.00 D). Traditional and network meta-analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Nineteen prospective or retrospective clinical studies, including 1217 eyes and 13 calculation methods, were identified. A traditional meta-analysis showed that compared with the widely used Haigis-L method, the Barrett True-K formula, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Masket methods showed significantly higher % ±0.50 D, whereas no difference was found in the % ±1.00 D. A network meta-analysis revealed that compared with the Haigis-L method, the OCT, Barrett True-K formula, and optiwave refractive analysis (ORA) methods performed better on the % ±0.50 D, whereas the Barrett True-K formula and ORA methods performed better on the % ±1.00 D. Based on the performances of both outcomes, the Barrett True-K formula, OCT, and ORA methods showed highest probability to rank the top 3 among the 13 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The Barrett True-K formula, OCT, and ORA methods seemed to offer greater accuracy than others in calculating the IOL power for postrefractive surgery eyes.

Correction of irregular astigmatism with excimer laser assisted by sodium hyaluronate

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the usefulness of excimer laser surgery assisted by sodium hyaluronate for the correction of irregular astigmatism after previous corneal refractive surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty eyes with surgically induced irregular astigmatism. All the patients had been subjected previously to one or more of the following: laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), incisional keratotomy, photorefractive keratotomy, phototherapeutic keratotomy, laser thermokeratoplasty, and corneal trauma. Irregular astigmatism developed thereafter.

METHODS

Stability of the corneal topography pattern before surgical decision was observed for at least 6 months with the C-SCAN corneal topography with Ray Tracing (Technomed GmbH, Germany) and the Eye-Sys 2000 Corneal Analysis System (Eye Sys Co., Houston, TX). The lowest pachymetry value was 310 microm in the thinnest portion of the cornea. Ablation was performed with the Technolas 217 C-LASIK excimer laser (Bausch and Lomb Chiron Technolas GmbH, Dornach, Germany), in phototherapeutic keratectomy mode, assisted by a mask of 0.25% sodium hyaluronate. We performed our ablation either on the surface or under a flap, whether elevated or newly cut.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, superficial corneal surface quality, image distortion, and predicted corneal visual acuity.

RESULTS

At 3 months of follow-up, the irregular corneal surface was significantly improved in all cases (n = 50). The superficial corneal surface quality improved from 70.5% +/- 9.16% to 75.6% +/- 10.38 (P < 0.0001). Six eyes lost 1 line of best-corrected visual acuity, three eyes lost 2 lines, and five eyes lost 3 or more lines. The real corneal ablation depth obtained was equal to 63% of that programmed because of the influence of masking substance. Mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/80 +/- 20/125 to 20/63 +/- 20/100 (P = 0.01). Predicted corneal visual acuity improved from a mean of 20/32 +/- 20/80 to 20/25 +/- 20/63 (P = 0.004). Image distortion improved from a mean of 13.95 +/- 3.64 to 12.16 +/- 3.92 (P < 0.0001). We obtained a hyperopic shift in 56% and myopic shift in 40% of eyes. After 6 months of follow-up the irregular corneal surface continued to improve in all cases (n = 32). The superficial corneal surface quality improved from 69.38% +/- 9.48% to 73.13% +/- 8.87 (P = 0.002). Two eyes lost 2 lines of best-corrected visual acuity, and 3 eyes lost 1 line. Ray tracing was significantly improved in all cases at the end of follow-up regarding superficial corneal surface quality (P = 0.002) and the image distortion (P = 0.05). Improvement of predicted corneal visual acuity was not significant (P = 0.11). The procedure proved to be safe, with a safety index of 1.1. Differences between the surface and stromal treatments and between pattern and nonpattern irregular astigmatism were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to produce a more regular corneal surface and to improve best-corrected visual acuity in patients with irregular astigmatism using plano-scan excimer laser assisted by viscous masking solution of 0.25% sodium hyaluronate.

Neural network computer program to determine photorefractive keratectomy nomograms

PURPOSE

To evaluate a commercially available neural network program for calculation of photorefractive keratectomy treatment nomograms.

SETTING

University referral refractive surgery clinic.

METHODS

PRK/LASIK Brain, a commercial neural network computer program, was trained using the demographics, preoperative clinical data, surgical parameters, and 1 year postoperative clinical data of 44 patients treated with a Summit Technology excimer laser using a 5.0 mm optical zone. The neural-network derived nomogram was compared with the standard treatment nomogram for each patient. The relative contribution of age, sex, keratometry, and intraocular pressure (IOP) to the predicted nomograms was also assessed.

RESULTS

Nomograms produced by the neural network were qualitatively similar to the standard nomogram. The sequence of data entry during training affected the network's predictions. Entry ordered by outcome (as opposed to entry by chronological order) yielded a nomogram that was more consistent with the standard nomogram. However, both outcome- and chronologically ordered network-derived nomograms diverged from the standard nomogram in individual patients, including a subset for whom use of the standard nomogram yielded desired refractive results (within 0.25 diopter of emmetropia). Further analysis of the neural-network-derived nomograms revealed marked sensitivity to sex, age, keratometry readings, and IOP.

CONCLUSIONS

Neural networks offer a potential means of individualizing treatment nomograms, to account for patient demographics, preoperative examination, surgeon style, and equipment bias. However, a data set of 44 patients was not sufficient to train the PRK/LASIK Brain network to accurately predict treatment parameters in individual cases in the training set. A larger training set or a different learning algorithm may be required to improve the neural network's performance.

Permanent glaucomatous visual loss after photorefractive keratectomy

A 41-year-old man who had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia developed corneal haze. After intensive treatment with topical corticosteroids, he developed elevated intraocular pressure and optic nerve damage. Because of an inadequate response to steroid discontinuation and medical treatment, the patient required a glaucoma filtering procedure. Corticosteroid-induced glaucoma is a possible complication of the treatment often associated with PRK. Careful patient screening and disclosure of this risk are imperative.

Radial keratotomy for residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and complications of radial keratotomy (RK) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia.

SETTING

Laser Ultravision Institute. Montreal, Canada.

METHODS

Surgically induced refractive and visual acuity changes were retrospectively evaluated in 14 eyes of 10 patients treated with RK after PRK. All patients had simple myopia or compound myopic astigmatism. Minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Three eyes (21%) had one PRK, 7 (50%) had two treatments, and 4 (29%) had three. Eleven eyes (79%) required four-incision RK and 3 (21%), eight-incision RK. All patients had improved uncorrected visual acuity. Six months after the RK retreatment, there was a significant reduction in spherical equivalent of 2.93 diopters +/- 1.53 (SD) (P < .05). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred except overcorrection (two cases).

CONCLUSION

Radial keratotomy is an effective, safe method for treating undercorrected myopia after PRK. Further study and analysis of this series of patients are planned.