Microcoaxial torsional cataract surgery 1.8 mm versus 2.2 mm: functional and morphological assessment

In vivo and in vitro results of an automated preloaded delivery system for IOL implantation in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the corneal tissue trauma after the use of an automated preloaded injector and a manual injector and assess scanning electron microscope (SEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM) features of both injector cartridges.

SETTING

Ophthalmology Clinic and Laboratory of Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical study METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients for phacoemulsification were divided into two groups: implantation of intraocular lens was performed with AutonoMe automated delivery system (AutonoMe group: 20 eyes) and Monarch III injector system (Monarch group: 20 eyes). In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were performed before surgery, at 1 h, 1 day and 1 month post-operatively. In addition, SEM and AFM were performed on cartridges of both injector systems after injection of the IOL.

RESULTS

A greater increase in central corneal thickness and corneal thickness at the incision site were observed in Monarch group versus AutonoMe group 1 h and 1 day post-operatively (p < 0.05). Endothelial cell count loss was significantly higher in Monarch group compared with AutonoMe group (p < 0.05) at 1 and 24 h. AS-OCT showed less endothelial misalignment at 30 days (p < 0.05), and IVCM showed less tunnel inflammation at all time points (p < 0.05) in AutonoMe group compared with Monarch group; roughness analysis at AFM of the AutonoMe cartridge was significantly lower compared to Monarch D cartridge (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The AutonoMe injector provided less corneal tissue trauma compared with Monarch III injector. The AutonoMe cartridge showed lower roughness at AFM compared to the Monarch D cartridge.

Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract

BACKGROUND

Age-related cataract is the principal cause of blindness and visual impairment in the world. Phacoemulsification is the main surgical procedure used to treat cataract. The comparative effectiveness and safety of different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of smaller versus larger incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract. The primary outcome of this review was surgically induced astigmatism at three months after surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 10), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 28 October 2016), Embase Ovid (1947 to 28 October 2016), PubMed (1948 to 28 October 2016), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database) (1982 to 28 October 2016), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com; last searched 13 May 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov; searched 28 October 2016), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp; searched 28 October 2016). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different-sized incisions in people with age-related cataract undergoing phacoemulsification.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 26 RCTs with a total of 2737 participants (3120 eyes). These trials were conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina, China, France, India, Italy, Korea, Spain, Switzerland, and Turkey. Half of the 26 trials were conducted in China. We judged all trials as mostly at unclear to low risk of bias. The included RCTs compared four different-sized incisions:<= 1.5 mm, 1.8 mm, 2.2 mm, and approximately 3.0 mm. These incisions were performed using three different techniques: coaxial and biaxial microincision phacoemulsification (C-MICS and B-MICS) and standard phacoemulsification. Not all studies provided data in a form that could be included in this review. Five studies had three arms.Fifteen trials compared C-MICS (2.2 mm) with standard phacoemulsification (about 3.0 mm). Very low-certainty evidence suggested less surgically induced astigmatism in the C-MICS group at three months compared with standard phacoemulsification (mean difference (MD) -0.19 diopters (D), 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.30 to -0.09; 996 eyes; 8 RCTs). There was low-certainty evidence that both groups achieved similar best-corrected visual acuity (MD 0.00 logMAR, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; 242 eyes; 3 RCTs). There was low-certainty evidence of little or no difference in endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness comparing C-MICS with standard phacoemulsification (MD -7.23 cells/mm², 95% CI -78.66 to 64.20; 596 eyes; 4 RCTs) and (MD -0.68 μm, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.90; 487 eyes; 5 RCTs).Nine trials compared C-MICS (1.8 mm) with standard phacoemulsification (about 3.0 mm). Very low-certainty evidence suggested less astigmatism at three months in the C-MICS group compared with standard phacoemulsification group (MD -0.23 D, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.13; 561 eyes; 5 RCTs). Low-certainty evidence suggested little or no difference in best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell loss, and central corneal thickness in the two groups at three months (MD -0.02 logMAR, 95% CI -0.03 to -0.00; 192 eyes; 3 RCTs), (MD 7.56 cells/mm², 95% CI -67.65 to 82.77; 380 eyes; 5 RCTs), and (MD -1.52 μm, 95% CI -6.29 to 3.25; 245 eyes; 3 RCTs).Six studies compared C-MICS (1.8 mm) with C-MICS (2.2 mm). There was low-certainty evidence that astigmatism, visual acuity, and central corneal thickness were similar in the two groups at three months (MD 0.04 D, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.16; 259 eyes; 3 RCTs), (MD 0.01 logMAR, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.04; 200 eyes; 3 RCTs), and (MD 0.45 μm, 95% CI -2.70 to 3.60; 100 eyes; 1 RCT). Very low-certainty evidence suggested higher endothelial cell loss in the 1.8 mm group (MD 213.00 cells/mm², 95% CI 11.15 to 414.85; 70 eyes; 1 RCT).Four studies compared B-MICS (<= 1.5 mm) with standard phacoemulsification (about 3.0 mm). Astigmatism was similar in the two groups at three months (MD -0.01 D, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.01; 368 eyes; 2 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence). There was low-certainty evidence on visual acuity, suggesting little or no difference between the two groups (MD -0.02 logMAR, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.00; 464 eyes; 3 RCTs). Low-certainty evidence on endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness also suggested little or no difference between the two groups (MD 55.83 cells/mm², 95% CI -34.93 to 146.59; 280 eyes; 1 RCT) and (MD 0.10 μm, 95% CI -14.04 to 14.24; 90 eyes; 1 RCT).None of the trials reported on quality of life. One trial reported that no participants experienced endophthalmitis or posterior capsule rupture; they also reported little or no difference between incision groups regarding corneal edema (risk ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.63; 362 eyes).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Phacoemulsification with smaller incisions was not consistently associated with less surgically induced astigmatism compared with phacoemulsification with larger incisions. Coaxial microincision phacoemulsification may be associated with less astigmatism than standard phacoemulsification, but the difference was small, in the order of 0.2 D, and the evidence was uncertain. Safety outcomes and quality of life were not adequately reported; these should be addressed in future studies.

Polynomial curve fitting of the corneal profile in 2.2-mm corneal incision phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To model incisional axis and perpendicular corneal profile pattern changes in 2.2-mm corneal incision phacoemulsification.

METHODS

Sixty-seven eyes of 67 patients were included in this prospective, interventional, before-after paired design study. Power vector components were obtained from keratometry (IOLMaster; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Göttingen, Germany) and topography corneal height data with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Second- to sixth-order curve fitting polynomial functions of the corneal profile in the incisional and perpendicular axes were created using Matlab (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA). Multivariate regression analysis was run to study the influence of potential predictors. Correlation of changes in corneal elevation and corneal radius with astigmatic parameters was also obtained.

RESULTS

Significant changes occurred only in the J(0) (P = .004) and M (P = .001) parameters. R(2) was high with all of the fitted polynomials (0.98 to 0.99) and although the smallest root mean square error was obtained with sixth-degree polynomials (0.63 to 1.13), they were more badly conditioned and redundant than quadratic polynomials. Corneal flattening changes were obtained on axis, which was the most frequent pattern (n = 52, 77%), but were significantly larger in the incisional side than the non-incisional side (P = .001) and only coupled with perpendicular axis steepening in 23 patients. In the non-incisional side on axis, corneal steepening was a relatively frequent pattern (n = 22 patients, 33%). Predictors studied for profile pattern of change were only near significance. Corneal radius of curvature changes were significantly correlated with astigmatic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Polynomial curve fitting is adequate for corneal biomechanical modeling of curvature and profile changes in the incisional and perpendicular axes of a 2.2-mm incision for phacoemulsification.

Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery (MICS) performed with 3 phacoemulsification techniques (phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop) according to cataract density.

SETTING

Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Eyes with nuclear density from grade 2 to 4 were randomly subdivided into 3 groups (phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop). Intraoperative measurements included ultrasound time (UST), mean cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and balanced salt solution use. Clinical measurements included preoperative and 1 day, 1 month, and 2 month postoperative corrected distance visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count.

RESULTS

Intraoperative measurements showed significantly less UST, CDE, and balanced salt solution use with the phaco-chop technique than with the divide-and-conquer and stop-and-chop techniques in the grade 4 cataract density group (P<.05). The percentage of endothelial cell loss was significantly lower in the phaco-chop group than in the divide-and-conquer and stop-and-chop groups in the grade 4 cataract density group 2 months after cataract surgery (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 techniques may be effective for coaxial MICS in mild and moderate cataracts. However, in eyes with hard cataract having coaxial MICS, the phaco-chop technique can be more effective for lens removal, with less corneal endothelial damage, than the divide-and-conquer and stop-and-chop techniques.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.