Primary Care Office Preparedness for Pediatric Emergencies

Frequency and management of emergencies in primary care offices: A cross-sectional study in northwestern Germany

BACKGROUND

Little literature exists on emergencies within primary care offices.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to study the occurrence of emergencies and confidence in dealing with them among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Germany.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study among all PCPs with licences to practice with an own office (n = 915) in a northwestern region in Germany in 2019. Participants were asked to estimate the frequency and type of emergencies that occurred in the last 12 months in their office and about their confidence in managing emergency situations.

RESULTS

Answers from 375 PCPs could be analysed (response: 41.0%); 95.7% reported at least one emergency in their office within the last 12 months (mean 12.9). PCPs from rural offices reported more emergencies (on average 13.7 vs. 9.6). Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac arrhythmia and dyspnoea were the most common emergencies. A greater likelihood of feeling more confident in managing medical emergencies was found among male physicians, general internists, PCPs additionally qualified as emergency physicians and those with previous training in the emergency department and intensive care unit. In contrast, more general practitioners felt secure treating paediatric emergencies than general internists (highest level of confidence 22.1% vs. 16.3%).

CONCLUSION

In Germany, emergencies in primary care offices occur on average once a month and more often in rural than urban areas. While most PCPs are confident in managing medical emergencies, some differences related to the training path became apparent. Ongoing training programmes may be tailored to improve emergency skills.

Types of Primary Healthcare Emergencies in Muscat, Oman: A retrospective cross-sectional study of five primary care centres

Objectives

Emergencies can occur at any time and be life-threatening or cause permanent damage. Accordingly, the management of emergency cases is an integral part of primary healthcare (PHC). This study aimed to estimate the proportion and types of emergency cases presented to PHC centres in Muscat, Oman.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2016 at five PHC centres in the Muscat Governorate. A total of 800 emergency cases (i.e. those labelled in the health information system as an accident and emergency) of Omani patients aged ≥5 years presented during this period. Every second case, based on arrival to the registration desk, was selected for analysis. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect data regarding demographic features, presenting complaints, time and season of presentation, management provided and method of transportation if referred to tertiary care.

Results

The proportion of emergency cases was <2.5% (range: 1–2.5%). The most common type of emergency was musculoskeletal issues/trauma (34.3%) followed by gastroenterological (15.1%) and genitourinary (10.0%) emergencies. Most patients were either 21–39 or 5–12 years old (35.0% and 21.6%, respectively). The majority (59.6%) were treated directly at the health centre, while the remaining patients (40.4%) were referred to tertiary care. At referral, only 12.1% were transported by ambulance and the rest via private transport.

Conclusion

Musculoskeletal issues/trauma was the most common type of emergency seen at the selected PHC centres in Muscat. Further research is needed to determine whether PHC centres have the capability and resources necessary to appropriately manage emergency cases.