Psychological perspectives to early surgery in the management of disorders/differences of sex development.
Curr Opin Pediatr 2019;
31:570-574. [PMID:
31246626 DOI:
10.1097/mop.0000000000000784]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The review focuses on genitoplasty, performed on young children with disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) to 'typify' ambiguous external genitalia and intended to result in either male or female-appearing genitals. Consensus on whether or not early genitoplasty is optimal or appropriate has yet to be achieved. This article reviews arguments in favor of early surgery as well as those disputing their justification.
RECENT FINDINGS
Arguments supporting early genitoplasty include the assumption that a child's genital anatomy should match their gender of rearing for optimal psychosocial development and that outcomes are better physically and psychologically than when surgery is deferred. Those disputing their justification argue that they deny patients the right to participate in irreversible decisions related to anatomy and gender, revoke the possibility of an open future, and violate basic human rights. Clinical management includes recommendations for interdisciplinary care integrating psychologists, and shared decision-making processes to assist families in carefully considering options.
SUMMARY
Early genital surgery in DSD care is controversial with compelling arguments put forth by both proponents and opponents. Relevant issues can be examined from ethical, psychological, cultural and medical perspectives - all of which need to be accounted for in both research and standard of care development.
Collapse