Simulation in Pediatrics: A Learning Lab for Education, Quality Improvement, and Patient Safety

Trends in patient safety education research for healthcare professional students over the past two decades: a bibliometric and content analysis

Research and practice in patient safety education have garnered widespread attention; however, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis is lacking. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research focus and research trends in the globalization of the field of patient safety education and to describe the general characteristics of publications. Data on articles and reviews about student safety education were extracted from Web of Science. Microsoft Excel 2019, CiteSpace 6.1.R3, VOSviewer 1.6.18, SATI 3.2, Scimago Graphica, and Pajek were used for quantitative analysis. Collaboration networks of countries, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords were visualized based on publications from January 2000 to September 2022. A total of 573 papers were published between 2000 to 2022, showing an overall increasing trend. The USA, England, and Australia are the top three most prolific countries; Johns Hopkins University, the University of Technology Sydney, and the University of Toronto are the top three most productive institutions; Nurse Education Today, Journal of Nursing Education, and BMC Medical Education are the most productive journals; Based on content analysis five research hotspots focused on: (1) Quality Improvement of Patient safety Teaching and Learning; (2) Patient safety Teaching Content; (3)Specialized Teaching in Patient Safety; (4) Integrating Patient Safety and Clinical Teaching; (5)Patient Safety Teaching Assessment Content. Through keyword clustering analysis, five research hotspots and relevant contents were identified. According to this study, simulation, communication, collaboration, and medication may attract more attention from researchers and educators, and could be the major trend for future study.

From Simulation to Bedside: The Journey to Provide Equitable Patient Care

Simulation-based education (SBE) has revolutionized health care training by enhancing skills and addressing systemic issues. This article explores how SBE can bridge the gap between recognizing health care disparities and implementing actionable steps to address them. The immersive nature of SBE, combined with structured debriefing, sets the foundation for a "brave space" that fosters critical discussions on crucial topics, such as health equity. SBE enables health care professionals to develop cultural humility, confront biases, and practice upstander skills. This approach not only addresses hidden curricula but also integrates equity into clinical practice through practical scenarios and community engagement. Despite the potential benefits, challenges such as unintentional harm and the need for thoughtful implementation persist. To maximize effectiveness, SBE initiatives must be aligned with organizational goals and include interdisciplinary team commitment. Ongoing research and robust evaluation are essential to measure SBE's impact on health equity and patient outcomes. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(11):e414-e419.].

[Construction of a methodology for clinical evaluation of medical devices using simulation tools and illustration through three studies]

INTRODUCTION

European regulations have recently moved towards more stringent requirements for demonstrating the safety and performance of medical devices (MDs).

OBJECTIVE

To apply an innovative testing method using medical simulation to the evaluation of three medical devices at different stages of their life cycle.

METHOD

The methodology for evaluating DMs using simulation is based on seven stages: definition of the context, training, construction of a scenario to test the DM, validation of the scenario, realization of the scenario, evaluation of the scenario by the players and validation and exploitation of the results.

RESULTS

Our evaluation methodology enabled us to assess three DMs at different stages of their development: a respiratory protection device at the initial stage (prototype definition), a respiratory protection mask (prototype optimization) and bottle adapters (post-marketing).

CONCLUSION

Simulation is a valuable tool for evaluating DM. The proposed methodology enables it to be used and adapted to different contexts. It responds to the specificities of clinical evaluation of this class of products, and helps to better anticipate certain risks.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a simulation-based educational curriculum for pediatric hospitalists

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimal published simulation-based educational training exists for practicing pediatric hospitalists. Our aim was to determine specific pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) knowledge, skill, and competency needs aligned with our scope of practice and evaluate the impact of a simulation-based training curriculum.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Baseline and post-training surveys were administered to 48 physicians providing self-ratings on a 5-point scale from Novice to Expert on published PHM competencies. Results were used to develop a targeted simulation curriculum. Participants were considered competent in a domain if their mean score was 3 or greater. We categorized participant responses to individual questions into nine domain scores on survey self-assessments. Score analysis was performed using the signed-rank test and McNemar's test. Post-training evaluations solicited curriculum acceptance and perceived clinical value.

RESULTS

The baseline response rate was 98% and the post-training response rate was 85%. Areas with the lowest competency on baseline self-assessment included advanced airway management (38%), vascular access and emergency medications (38%), code cart skills (19%), team communication (51%), and medically complex care (49%). Post-training scores improved significantly for five of nine domains, with the largest gains in the "not competent" at baseline group. Percent competent (% with mean score >3) increased significantly in three domains (advanced airway management, code cart skills, and complex care). Participants rated educational sessions favorably (98%) and most (95%) reported using knowledge/skills learned for patient care.

CONCLUSION

Baseline self-assessment results were instrumental in curriculum design. Post-training analysis revealed gains in multiple domains and identified opportunities for future interventions. Most hospitalists reported participation positively impacted patient care with high learner satisfaction.