Quantitative OCT subanalysis of eyes with choroidal neovascularization switched from multiple injections of bevacizumab or ranibizumab to intravitreal aflibercept

Quantitative assessment of retinal fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration under anti-VEGF therapy

The retinal world has been revolutionized by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. The numbers of intravitreal injections are on a constant rise and management in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is mainly driven by the qualitative assessment of macular fluid as detected on OCT scans. The presence of macular fluid, particularly subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF), has been used to trigger re-treatments in clinical trials and the real world. However, large discrepancies can be found between the evaluations of different readers or experts and especially small amounts of macular fluid might be missed during this process. Pixel-wise detection of macular fluid uses an entire OCT volume to calculate exact volumes of retinal fluid. While manual annotations of such pixel-wise fluid detection are unfeasible in a clinical setting, artificial intelligence (AI) is able to overcome this hurdle by providing real-time results of macular fluid in different retinal compartments. Quantitative fluid assessments have been used for various post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, providing novel insights into anti-VEGF treatment regimens. Nonetheless, the application of AI-algorithms in a prospective patient care setting is still limited. In this review, we discuss the use of quantitative fluid assessment in nAMD during anti-VEGF therapy and provide an outlook to novel forms of patient care with the support of AI quantifications.

Two-Year Outcome of Aflibercept in Patients with Pigment Epithelial Detachment due to Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) Refractory to Ranibizumab

Purpose

To evaluate the response of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in eyes with detachment of retinal pigment epithelium (DEP) secondary to nAMD refractory to monthly ranibizumab.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective, multicenter study. All patients received 3 IAI then treated as needed every 4 weeks for 12 months. During the second year, the eyes were treated with a treat- and-extend regimen.

Results

Forty-four eyes were included. Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly after the loading phase (3.1 ± 6.4 letters) and at 6 months (2.8 ± 6.4 letters), but change was not significant at 1 year and 2 years. The height of the DEP was significantly decreased at 3 months and 6 months, but the difference did not reach statistical difference at 1 and 2 years. Rate of eyes with complete resolution of exudation was 59% after the loading phase and 34.3% at 2 years. Mean interval of anti-VEGF injection was extended from 31 ± 2.6 days to 61 ± 5 days after conversion.

Conclusions

Aflibercept intravitreal injection in patients with fibrovascular DEP due to nAMD who respond poorly to monthly ranibizumab led to short-term functional and anatomical improvement. Reduction of intravitreal injection frequency was obtained until 2 years of follow-up.

One-year outcome of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept therapy for non-responsive neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Aim

To evaluate 12-month outcome of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) therapy in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) that are non-responsive to bevacizumab and ranibizumab.

Methods

This retrospective study included 16 eyes (14 patients) with nAMD who were on prior treatment with bevacizumab and ranibizumab and were treated with as-needed IVZ (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and secondary outcome measures included mean change in central macular thickness (CMT), retinal pigment epithelial detachment (RPED) heights, longest treatment free interval, presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) and adverse events.

Results

There was no change in the mean logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA at baseline and following treatment with IVZ therapy (p=0.978). The mean number of IVZ injections during 12 months was 5.9±3.3, and the mean number of antivascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) injections prior to switching to IVZ was 8.4±4.7. The mean treatment free interval was longer during IVZ therapy (114.4±67.1 days) compared with 76.3±54.6 days before IVZ therapy (p=0.03). Five (31.25%) eyes had visual gains of at least 0.1 logMAR, 3 (18.75%) eyes had stable BCVA (within 0.1 logMAR) and 8 (50%) eyes had BCVA decline of at least 0.1 logMAR. There was no significant difference in the mean CMT, RPED heights and presence of IRF and SRF at 12 months compared with baseline. No adverse events were noted.

Conclusion

IVZ increased the treatment free interval in non-responders but no significant change in visual and anatomic outcomes.

Switch to aflibercept or ranibizumab after initial treatment with bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular AMD

Background

To evaluate changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and visual outcome in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated initially with bevacizumab and subsequently switched to either aflibercept or ranibizumab.

Methods

Observational clinical study was performed. We measured the structural outcome (CMT on SD-OCT; μm) and the visual outcome (best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); logMAR), as follows: before treatment (at baseline), following bevacizumab treatment (switch follow-up) and after switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept- or ranibizumab treatment (final follow-up, AG/, RG).

Results

From a total of 96 eyes treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (10.5 ± 7.6 (mean ± SD)), 58 eyes switched to aflibercept (6.5 ± 3.9; AG) and 38 eyes switched to ranibizumab (7.1 ± 5.3; RG) (≥ 3 injections, each). In addition, these eyes were compared to 37 eyes under bevacizumab monotherapy.

Primary outcome: In the AG, the CMT decreased slightly from 430 ± 220 μm at baseline to 419 ± 212 μm at switch follow-up (p = 0.86), but decreased significantly to 318 ± 159 μm at final follow-up, AG (p < 0.0001). In the ranibizumab group (RG), the CMT increased from 396 ± 174 μm at baseline to 499 ± 333 μm at switch follow-up (p = 0.012), but decreased significantly to 394 ± 202 μm at final follow-up, RG (p = 0.007).

Secondary outcome: In the AG, the mean BCVA worsened from logMAR 0.57 ± 0.33 at baseline to 0.63 ± 0.30 at switch follow-up and improved slightly to 0.53 ± 0.71 at final follow-up, AG (p = 0.46). In the RG, mean BCVA worsened from 0.57 ± 0.28 at baseline to 0.64 ± 0.31 at switch follow-up and improved slightly to 0.60 ± 0.36 at final follow-up, RG (p = 0.64).

Conclusion

Switching from bevacizumab to either aflibercept, or ranibizumab, has a strong anatomical effect in eyes with neovascular AMD. Nevertheless, even if the switch to aflibercept shows a minimal functional benefit over that to ranibizumab, visual prognosis remains limited.

Switching to aflibercept among patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Purpose

To systematically review anatomical and functional outcomes subsequent to switching from bevacizumab/ranibizumab to aflibercept monotherapy in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 2016 for available scientific literature which met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies reported visual and anatomical outcomes with at least 6 months of follow-up among patients with nAMD and persistent or resistant exudative fluid despite previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab) and were switched to aflibercept monotherapy. Mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were pooled using random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Of 82 papers reviewed, 28 studies met inclusion criteria of this review. Pooled results showed a small mean improvement in BCVA at 6 and 12 months following switching (1.11 letters, 95% CI −0.25 to 2.46, P=0.17 and 0.63 letters, 95% CI −0.26 to 1.52, P=0.17, respectively). There was a significant improvement in mean CRT following switching (−61.90 µm, 95% CI −77.10 to −46.80, P<0.001 and −50.00 µm, 95% CI −63.20 to −36.80, P<0.001 at 6 and 12 months, respectively).

Conclusion

Pooled analysis demonstrated significantly improved anatomical outcomes; however, visual function remained stable, having a comparable effect to other anti-VEGF agents in preservation of vision. These patients had poorly responsive chronic disease with limited potential for visual recovery. Switching to aflibercept with frequent monitoring may be a suitable option for patients who have developed treatment resistance.

PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT RESPONSE TO AFLIBERCEPT IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION REFRACTORY TO RANIBIZUMAB: Time Course and Drug Effects

PURPOSE

To investigate the time course of pigment epithelium detachment (PED) height and its change after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor switch from ranibizumab to aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 60 eyes of 50 consecutive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who showed refractory intraretinal or subretinal fluid (≥9 months) despite monthly ranibizumab treatment and an associated PED (height ≥150 μm). The treatment was switched to aflibercept, and patients were followed-up for at least 9 months. Data on the height and type of PED, exudative fluid, and best-corrected visual acuity were collected at four different time points (two before and two after the drug switch).

RESULTS

The maximal PED height was significantly decreased over time, both under ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment. However, the reduction was significantly greater during the 3 months after the switch to aflibercept, due to two outliers. Visual acuity remained stable. Complete resolution of intraretinal or subretinal fluid was observed in 9 cases (15%) at 3 months after switch, allowing for treatment interval extension.

CONCLUSION

Maximal PED height continuously decreased over time. Switching the intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medication from ranibizumab to aflibercept had a significantly stronger short-term effect on PED height reduction, without changes in visual acuity.

Response to Bevacizumab after Treatment with Aflibercept in Eyes with Neovascular AMD

Purpose

To study the visual outcome and change in central macular thickness (CMT) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who were previously treated with aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye, Eylea) and were subsequently switched to bevacizumab (Avastin).

Methods

In this observational analysis, 19 eyes initially treated with at least 3 injections of bevacizumab after initial treatment with at least 3 injections of aflibercept are reported. Outcome measures were Snellen visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CMT measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Results

A total of 19 eyes initially treated with 6.5 ± 2.8 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were switched to 5.4 ± 3.2 injections of bevacizumab. Median BCVA decreased from 20/94 to 20/113 after aflibercept and increased slightly to 20/101 after bevacizumab (p = 0.84, Friedman test). Of all 19 eyes, 36.8% achieved gain in visual acuity of more than 1 line and 21.1% of more than 3 lines. The CMT decreased slightly from 433 ± 229 μm at baseline to 367 ± 198 μm after aflibercept treatment (p = 0.18, Wilcoxon test) and decreased statistically significantly to 335 ± 184 μm after bevacizumab treatment (p = 0.0065, Wilcoxon test).

Conclusions

Switching from aflibercept to bevacizumab treatment has an equivalent anatomical effect in eyes with neovascular AMD as switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept. Therefore, switching back to bevacizumab might represent a reasonable therapy strategy to overcome tachyphylaxis during long-term monotherapy with aflibercept.

Aflibercept in exudative age related macular degeneration refractory to ranibizumab

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness, safety and cost of aflibercept in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) refractory to ranibizumab.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study was conducted on patients diagnosed with wet ARMD, and previously treated with ranibizumab. Efficacy variables assessed were changes in visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical improvements in the most affected eye. Factors associated with improvement of BCVA with aflibercept were also studied. Adverse events related to the aflibercept administration were recorded. Cost analysis data were collected from the hospital perspective, and only taking the direct medical costs into account. Cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated using the aflibercept treatment cost, and effectiveness calculated as BCVA gained.

RESULTS

A total of 50 eyes corresponding to 46 patients were included. The median follow-up period was 4.6 months (range: 1.0-6.0). Improvement in visual acuity after the first 2 doses and at the end of the follow-up period was observed in 32.0 and 28.0% of treated eyes, respectively. None of the variables studied was associated with an improvement in the BCVA after treatment. No significant differences were found in the average monthly cost between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Aflibercept is shown to be an effective treatment in a significant number of patients resistant to treatment with ranibizumab, presenting a cost similar to that generated during the final stages of treatment with ranibizumab.