Scoping review of nonsurgical treatment options for macular holes

Macular holes (MH) are full-thickness retinal defects affecting central vision. While vitrectomy with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peel is the conventional MH treatment, non-surgical alternatives are gaining interest to mitigate surgical risks. This study conducted a comprehensive literature review and analysis of nonsurgical MH management. A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1973, to September 13, 2023. Treatments included laser therapy, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), steroids (topical, subtenons, peribulbar, intravitreal), intravitreal gas, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors and ocriplasmin injections. Data extraction covered study details, patient characteristics, MH features, treatment outcomes, and recurrence rates. The initial search yielded 3352 articles, refined to 83 articles that met inclusion criteria following screening. Overall reported anatomical closure rates were 36% with laser photocoagulation, 37% with intravitreal ocriplasmin, 55% with intravitreal gas. Closures were more frequently observed with topical NSAIDs (79%), steroids (84%) and CAIs (73%). Closures were more often observed in patients with smaller MH and in the presence of cystic macular oedema. Although non-surgical MH management approaches show potential for conservative therapy, evidence is limited to support routine use. Stage 1 and traumatic MH may benefit from a short period of observation, but the gold standard approach for full-thickness MH remains to be vitrectomy with ILM peel.

A Literary Pediatric Retina Fellowship With Michael T. Trese, MD

Michael T. Trese, MD (1946-2022), a vitreoretinal surgeon, made significant contributions to the field of retina. Although most known for his work in pediatric retina surgery, he was a pioneer in areas such as medical retina, translational research, and telemedicine. This article reviews his major contributions to spread his knowledge more widely to vitreoretinal trainees and specialists. We discuss six areas where Trese made a lasting impact: lens-sparing vitrectomy, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, congenital X-linked retinoschisis, autologous plasmin enzyme, regenerative medicine, and telemedicine. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:701-712.].

Effect of Ocriplasmin on objectively assessed retinal function after treatment of vitreomacular diseases

BACKGROUND

The scope of the study was the functional assessment of possible effects of intravitreally injected ocriplasmin using electroretinographical (ERG) examinations.

METHODS

Seven subjects suffered from pathologies within the label of ocriplasmin (Jetrea^® ) were examined in the study. An extended international society for clinical electrophysiology of vision ERG protocol was used for baseline recordings (before treatment) and was repeated for comparison 3 months after treatment with intravitreally injected ocriplasmin. All subjects were examined using 6 steps and a 9 Hz flicker protocol as scotopic flicker response under dark-adapted conditions. Under light-adapted conditions, two single-flash responses (standard flash and On/Off protocol) and a 31 Hz flicker response was used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of amplitudes was found for the lowest stimulation intensity (0.0001 cd.s/m²) under dark-adapted conditions after treatment (p = 0.027). All other parameters were not significantly different after treatment including the scotopic flicker response. Under light-adapted state, the a- and b-wave amplitudes were not significantly altered after treatment for single-flash and flicker responses. The On- and Off-responses were not significantly different between baseline and after the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

One single significant difference of all examined parameters mirrors a difference due to chance, even if a negative effect of proteolytic enzymes on laminin and fibronectin of retinal cells cannot be entirely excluded. Nevertheless, this result should be respected in order to ensure a safe use of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreoretinal disorders.

Comparison of the horizontal diameter to a modeled area of traction in eyes with vitreomacular traction: is the diameter close enough to the truth?

PURPOSE

In daily practice, vitreomacular traction (VMT) is described by the horizontal diameter of its attachment site implying a regular round shape of VMT. We investigated the deviation from this circular area of vitreous traction in patients with VMT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans was performed. The area of vitreomacular attachment was determined using six radial OCT scans (A_measured). The assumed circular area of traction was calculated based on measuring the maximal horizontal diameter for comparison (A_circular).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients with pure VMT were included. Patients' mean age was 72.8 ± 8.2 years. Mean horizontal VMT diameter was 400.8 ± 230.5 μm (median 361 μm; range 44-991 μm). While there was no difference between mean areas of traction for A_circular and A_measured (P = 0.93), the individual difference (|A_circular - A_measured|) was 0.042 (± 0.044) mm² in mean or relative 73.0% (± 135.8%). A difference of ≥ 30% of A_measured to A_circular was found in 16 eyes (43.2%) and ≥ 100% in 7 eyes (18.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Vitreous attachment sites possess an irregular non-circular shape in a significant number of eyes with VMT. Consequently, the area of traction appears inaccurately described by its horizontal VMT diameter alone. As the area of traction is important for therapeutic recommendation, our results emphasize the need for a more precise description of the area of traction in eyes with VMT.

EVALUATION OF FULL-FIELD ELECTRORETINOGRAM REDUCTIONS AFTER OCRIPLASMIN TREATMENT: Results of the OASIS Trial ERG Substudy

The Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole (OASIS) trial electroretinogram substudy assessed a possible association between vitreomacular adhesion and best-corrected visual acuity with changes to full-field electroretinograms as part of a prospective, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled clinical trial studying the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion.

Purpose:

To explore a possible association between full-field electroretinograms with vitreomacular adhesion resolution and best-corrected visual acuity as part of the prospective, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole (OASIS) trial studying ocriplasmin.

Methods:

The ERG substudy enrolled 62 of 220 OASIS subjects (randomized 2:1) and analyzed full-field electroretinograms and their association with both vitreomacular adhesion resolution and best-corrected visual acuity from baseline through Month 24. Electroretinogram reductions were defined as acute full-field electroretinogram reductions in amplitude of ≥40% from baseline occurring at postinjection Day 7 or Day 28.

Results:

In the ocriplasmin group, 16/40 (40%) subjects developed ERG reductions, compared to 1/21 (4.8%) in the sham group; 13/16 (81.3%) and 1/1 (100%) resolved by study end, respectively. A total of 11/16 (68.8%) ocriplasmin-treated subjects with ERG reductions achieved vitreomacular adhesion resolution, compared to those without (9/24, 37.5%). The ocriplasmin-treated subjects with ERG reductions also gained more letters on average (11.3 vs. 9.3 letters) from baseline and had a difference of 6.7 letters in mean best-corrected visual acuity by study end compared to those without ERG reductions.

Conclusion:

Ocriplasmin-treated subjects with ERG reductions had a higher rate of vitreomacular adhesion resolution and showed better visual improvement than their counterparts without ERG reductions or sham subjects by study end.

Calculating the individual probability of successful ocriplasmin treatment in eyes with VMT syndrome: a multivariable prediction model from the EXPORT study

Background/Aims

To evaluate predictive factors for the treatment success of ocriplasmin and to use these factors to generate a multivariate model to calculate the individual probability of successful treatment.

Methods

Data were collected in a retrospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome without a full-thickness macular hole were included if they received an intravitreal injection (IVI) of ocriplasmin. Five factors (age, gender, lens status, presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation and horizontal diameter of VMT) were assessed on their association with VMT resolution. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to further analyse these factors and calculate the individual probability of successful treatment.

Results

167 eyes of 167 patients were included. Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation to VMT resolution for all analysed factors: age (years) (OR 0.9208; 95% CI 0.8845 to 0.9586; p<0.0001), gender (male) (OR 0.480; 95% CI 0.241 to 0.957; p=0.0371), lens status (phakic) (OR 2.042; 95% CI 1.054 to 3.958; p=0.0344), ERM formation (present) (OR 0.384; 95% CI 0.179 to 0.821; p=0.0136) and horizontal VMT diameter (µm) (OR 0.99812; 95% CI 0.99684 to 0.99941, p=0.0042). A significant multivariable logistic regression model was established with age and VMT diameter.

Conclusion

Known predictive factors for VMT resolution after ocriplasmin IVI were confirmed in our study. We were able to combine them into a formula, ultimately allowing the calculation of an individual probability of treatment success with ocriplasmin in patients with VMT syndrome without FTHM.

ELLIPSOID ZONE MAPPING AND OUTER RETINAL CHARACTERIZATION AFTER INTRAVITREAL OCRIPLASMIN

PURPOSE

To assess outer retinal architectural alterations after intravitreal ocriplasmin with a novel automated ellipsoid zone (EZ) mapping algorithm.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series of image analysis was performed. Quantitative assessment of EZ status imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was performed before and after single intravitreal injection of 0.125 mg of ocriplasmin (Jetrea, Thrombogenics). A novel EZ mapping algorithm was used to assess the EZ retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) central area, EZ-RPE macular volume, and en face EZ integrity based on the percentage of sampling areas with 20 μm or greater EZ-RPE thickness. Longitudinal assessment of these changes with custom optical coherence tomography reading software was completed. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared with these retinal changes.

RESULTS

Nineteen eyes were included in this study. The retinal volume between EZ and RPE was significantly reduced at 1 week after ocriplasmin (P = 0.0036). Seven of 19 patients (36.8%) complained of color abnormalities or brightness reduction after injection. All of these seven patients had increased subretinal fluid after ocriplasmin and EZ attenuation. The EZ-RPE volume was reduced at 1 week (P = 0.0036), 1 month (P = 0.015) after ocriplasmin, and restored by 3 months. The area with EZ-RPE thickness below 20 μm was increased at 1 week (P = 0.046) after ocriplasmin and recovered with time.

CONCLUSION

Mapping of EZ is feasible to assess EZ-RPE volume and overall EZ integrity with en face thickness mapping. Alterations in EZ occur in a significant proportion of eyes after ocriplasmin therapy. The EZ-RPE volume and the EZ-RPE central foveal area typically recover to baseline by 3 months. This effect appears to be panretinal and associated with subjective symptoms.

Results of the 2-Year Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole (OASIS) Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

The Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole (OASIS) trial was designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety profile of ocriplasmin for the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA)/vitreomacular traction, including full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).

DESIGN

Phase 3b, randomized, sham-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Sample size was 220 subjects (146 ocriplasmin, 74 sham) randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravitreal ocriplasmin 0.125 mg or sham injection.

METHODS

The trial involved 12 visits over 24-months. Inclusion criteria included presence of VMA and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/32 or worse in the study eye. Exclusion criteria included FTMH >400 μm, presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM), and aphakia in the study eye.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects with pharmacologic VMA resolution at day 28. Secondary efficacy end points were assessed at month 24 and included proportion of subjects with BCVA gain from baseline, nonsurgical FTMH closure, vitrectomy, and Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25) outcomes.

RESULTS

The OASIS trial met its primary end point with pharmacologic VMA resolution at day 28 being significantly higher in the ocriplasmin group (41.7%) compared with the sham group (6.2%). The treatment effect was maintained until study end. In the ocriplasmin group, pharmacologic VMA resolution at day 28 was higher in subgroups with the following baseline characteristics compared with the complementary subgroups without them: presence of focal VMA, presence of FTMH, absence of ERM, and phakic lens status. In the ocriplasmin group, 50.5% of subjects had a ≥2-line improvement in BCVA from baseline compared with 39.1% of subjects in the sham group. The nonsurgical FTMH closure rate was 30.0% for the ocriplasmin group compared with 15.4% for the sham group. All other secondary end points also favored ocriplasmin over sham. Regarding safety, most adverse events were mild to moderate, had a short onset time, and were transient, with no new safety signals identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The OASIS trial demonstrates the long-term efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin, providing improved resolution of symptomatic VMA compared with previous phase 3 trials with no additional safety signals identified.

From the analysis of pharmacologic vitreolysis to the comprehension of ocriplasmin safety

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacologic vitreolysis is a strategy used to treat anomalous posterior vitreous detachment, by weakening vitreoretinal adhesion with an intravitreal drug. Pharmacologic vitreolysis facilitates surgery, and abnormalities of the vitreoretinal interface including vitreomacular traction (VMT) and early stage macular hole (MH) could be resolved. Ocriplasmin is a recombinant protease, active against fibronectin and laminin, which are important components of the vitreoretinal interface. Ocriplasmin has been approved for symptomatic treatment of VMT and MH with visible traction, and it functions by dissolving the proteins that link the vitreous to the macula, thereby creating a complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD).

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the current knowledge and status of investigations regarding the use of ocriplasmin for pharmacologic vitreolysis and its safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Ocriplasmin is a non-specific enzyme; therefore, it dissolves vitreal proteins as well as possibly proteins associated with visual function in the retina, choroid, and lens. Ocular adverse events (OAEs) of ocriplasmin include transient visual loss, intraocular inflammation, vitreous floaters, lens opacification, zonular instability of the lens, and intraocular hemorrhage. The prevalence of the OAEs is very low; however, on rare occasions, they can result in widespread retinal dysfunction. Research into the acute and long-term safety of ocriplasmin is required.

Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?

Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, "Who is the best candidate?"

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH VITREOMACULAR TRACTION TREATED WITH A SINGLE INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF OCRIPLASMIN

PURPOSE

To report long-term outcomes in patients with vitreomacular traction injected with intravitreal ocriplasmin.

METHODS

Interventional case series.

PATIENTS

A 64-year-old woman and a 46-year-old woman.

RESULTS

In Case 1, a 64-year-old woman with focal vitreomacular traction with impending macular hole presented with a visual acuity of 20/80 +1 and was injected with ocriplasmin 11 days later. Visual acuity continued to improve and stabilized through 60 weeks of follow-up with a final visual acuity of 20/50. Vitreomacular traction release was confirmed by optical coherence tomography 6 weeks after injection.In Case 2, a 46-year-old woman with focal vitreomacular traction presented with a visual acuity of 20/60 and received ocriplasmin treatment the same day. Vitreomacular traction release was confirmed by optical coherence tomography 2 days later. After subsequent worsening of visual acuity, pneumatic retinopexy and pars plana vitrectomy were performed. Visual acuity continued to improve and stabilize throughout the 52-week follow-up with a final visual acuity of 20/25.

CONCLUSION

We present here two patients with focal vitreomacular traction treated with ocriplasmin and followed up long-term for up to one year. In both cases, visual acuity improved compared with baseline and stabilized after ocriplasmin treatment. These cases add to the growing literature demonstrating resolution of symptoms after ocriplasmin treatment over longer follow-up periods.