Relationships Between Spatial Contrast Sensitivity and Parafoveal Cone Density in Normal Subjects and Patients With Retinal Degeneration

Adaptive optics imaging in inherited retinal diseases: A scoping review of the clinical literature

Adaptive optics (AO) imaging enables direct, objective assessments of retinal cells. Applications of AO show great promise in advancing our understanding of the etiology of inherited retinal disease (IRDs) and discovering new imaging biomarkers. This scoping review systematically identifies and summarizes clinical studies evaluating AO imaging in IRDs. Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched on February 6, 2023. Studies describing AO imaging in monogenic IRDs were included. Study screening and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. This review presents (1) a broad overview of the dominant areas of research; (2) a summary of IRD characteristics revealed by AO imaging; and (3) a discussion of methodological considerations relating to AO imaging in IRDs. From 140 studies with AO outcomes, including 2 following subretinal gene therapy treatments, 75% included fewer than 10 participants with AO imaging data. Of 100 studies that included participants' genetic diagnoses, the most common IRD genes with AO outcomes are CNGA3, CNGB3, CHM, USH2A, and ABCA4. Confocal reflectance AO scanning laser ophthalmoscopy was the most reported imaging modality, followed by flood-illuminated AO and split-detector AO. The most common outcome was cone density, reported quantitatively in 56% of studies. Future research areas include guidelines to reduce variability in the reporting of AO methodology and a focus on functional AO techniques to guide the development of therapeutic interventions.

Cone Spacing Correlates With Retinal Thickness and Microperimetry in Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations

Purpose

To determine whether high-resolution retinal imaging measures of macular structure correlate with visual function over 36 months in retinal degeneration (RD) patients and normal subjects.

Methods

Twenty-six eyes of 16 RD patients and 16 eyes of 8 normal subjects were studied at baseline; 15 eyes (14 RD) and 11 eyes (6 normal) were studied 36 months later. Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) was used to identify regions of interest (ROIs) with unambiguous cones at baseline to measure cone spacing. AOSLO images were aligned with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus-guided microperimetry results to correlate structure and function at the ROIs. SD-OCT images were segmented to measure inner segment (IS) and outer segment (OS) thickness. Correlations between cone spacing, IS and OS thickness and sensitivity were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficient ρ with bootstrap analyses clustered by person.

Results

Cone spacing (ρ = 0.57, P < 0.001) and macular sensitivity (ρ = 0.19, P = 0.14) were significantly correlated with eccentricity in patients. Controlling for eccentricity, cone spacing Z-scores were inversely correlated with IS (ρ = −0.29, P = 0.002) and OS thickness (ρ = −0.39, P < 0.001) in RD patients only, and with sensitivity in normal subjects (ρ = −0.22, P < 0.001) and RD patients (ρ = −0.38, P < 0.001). After 36 months, cone spacing increased (P < 0.001) and macular sensitivity decreased (P = 0.007) compared to baseline in RD patients.

Conclusions

Cone spacing increased and macular sensitivity declined significantly in RD patients over 36 months. High resolution images of cone structure correlated with retinal sensitivity, and may be appropriate outcome measures for clinical trials in RD.

Light localization with low-contrast targets in a patient implanted with a suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation retinal prosthesis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the improvement in targeted reaching movements toward targets of various contrasts in a patient implanted with a suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) retinal prosthesis.

METHODS

An STS retinal prosthesis was implanted in the right eye of a 42-year-old man with advanced Stargardt disease (visual acuity: right eye, light perception; left eye, hand motion). In localization tests during the 1-year follow-up period, the patient attempted to touch the center of a white square target (visual angle, 10°; contrast, 96, 85, or 74%) displayed at a random position on a monitor. The distance between the touched point and the center of the target (the absolute deviation) was averaged over 20 trials with the STS system on or off.

RESULTS

With the left eye occluded, the absolute deviation was not consistently lower with the system on than off for high-contrast (96%) targets, but was consistently lower with the system on for low-contrast (74%) targets. With both eyes open, the absolute deviation was consistently lower with the system on than off for 85%-contrast targets. With the system on and 96%-contrast targets, we detected a shorter response time while covering the right eye, which was being implanted with the STS, compared to covering the left eye (2.41 ± 2.52 vs 8.45 ± 3.78 s, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of a reaching movement improved in a patient with an STS retinal prosthesis implanted in an eye with residual natural vision. Patients with a retinal prosthesis may be able to improve their visual performance by using both artificial vision and their residual natural vision.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Beginning date of the trial: Feb. 20, 2014 Date of registration: Jan. 4, 2014 Trial registration number: UMIN000012754 Registration site: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm.