Vitreous Biopsy Under Air: Technique, Complications, and Volume Outcomes

Intraoperative Complications With Vitreous Biopsy for Molecular Proteomics

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence of intraoperative complications while collecting a vitreous sample for proteomic biomarker analyses during small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

METHODS

A retrospective case series was assembled from the surgical logs and charts of patients who underwent 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge PPV along with an undiluted vitreous biopsy. Primary surgical indication and detailed operative reports were reviewed. Complications specific to vitreous biopsy were assessed while complications related to vitrectomy in general without biopsy were not tabulated.

RESULTS

In 1190 eyes that underwent vitreous biopsy, the most common indications for PPV were rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (24.2%), epiretinal membrane (ERM) (21.7%), vitreous hemorrhage (11.0%), uveitis (8.3%), and macular hole (7.5%). An adequate sample of 0.5 cc to 1.0 cc was obtained in all cases. There was one sclerotomy break associated with biopsy, but no instances of lens touch, retinal contusion, retinal detachment, or intraocular hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Undiluted vitreous biopsy obtained at the time of small-gauge vitrectomy is a generally safe procedure and may be considered for collection of samples for proteomic analysis. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:32-36.].

Endogenous Endophthalmitis-The Clinical Significance of the Primary Source of Infection

Endophthalmitis is a severe form of ocular inflammation. The source of pathogens in endogenous endophthalmitis is located inside the body, and infection spreads hematogenously. Although rare, endogenous endophthalmitis is a very serious condition, as this type of inflammation is very devastating for ocular tissues. Prognosis is very poor, and the patients are often in a serious general condition, so they require special care and an individual approach in the treatment process. Thanks to the knowledge of the risks associated with infections of individual tissues and organs as well as potential pathogens and the clinical picture, it is possible to make a correct diagnosis faster and implement the correct treatment. In the case of endogenous endophthalmitis, reaction time is absolutely crucial for prognosis. In this review, we focus primarily on the importance of the primary source of infection for the course of the disease and prognosis.

Pars plana vitrectomy in uveitis in the era of microincision vitreous surgery

Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in uveitis is indicated for various diagnostic and therapeutic indications. With the advent of microincision vitreous surgery (MIVS), the use of PPV in uveitis has increased with a wider spectrum of indications due to shorter surgical time, less patient discomfort, less conjunctival scarring, and a decreased rate of complications as compared to standard 20G vitrectomy. Because of faster post-operative recovery in terms of visual improvement and reduction of inflammation, and reduced duration of systemic corticosteroids, MIVS has gained popularity in uveitis as an adjunctive therapy to the standard of care medical therapy. The safety and efficacy of MIVS is related to the emerging vitrectomy techniques with better and newer cutters, illuminating probes, and accessory instruments. Because of the instrumentation and fluidics of MIVS, PPV is emerging as a safe and useful alternative for diagnostic challenges in uveitis, aiding in earlier diagnosis and better outcome of inflammatory disease, even in the presence of severe and active inflammation, which was once considered a relative contraindication for performing vitreous surgery. However, for surgical interventions for therapeutic indications and complications of uveitis, it is advisable to achieve an optimum control of inflammation for best results. The increasing reports of the use of MIVS in uveitis have led to its wider acceptance among clinicians practicing uveitis.

Intraocular biopsy in uveitis

An intraocular biopsy is performed for diagnostic, prognostic and investigational purposes. Biopsies help to confirm or exclude malignancies and differentiate inflammatory from infectious processes. Histopathological analysis is the final verdict in unresponsive uveitis, atypical inflammation, metastases and masquerade syndromes. Advances and refinement of techniques in cytopathology, immunohistochemistry, microbiological and molecular biologic study offer much more than just diagnosis. They provide prognosis based on cell characteristics and are helpful in planning treatment and intervention. Many biopsy procedures have evolved to provide more safety and minimise complications thus improving the quality of specimens or samples available for analysis. The type of biopsy and technique adopted varies based on the clinical suspicion, size and location of lesions. In uveitis, a working diagnosis of intraocular inflammation is made on clinical examination and laboratory investigations and ancillary tests. Malignancy and uveitis is interlinked and masquerade syndromes are among the commonest indications for biopsy and analysis of specimen. The various types of intraocular biopsies include aqueous tap, fine needle aspiration biopsy, vitreous biopsy, iris and ciliary body, and retinochoroidal biopsy. They will be reviewed in this article with respect to current perspective