Primal-size neural circuits in meta-periodic interaction

Experimental observations of simultaneous activity in large cortical areas have seemed to justify a large network approach in early studies of neural information codes and memory capacity. This approach has overlooked, however, the segregated nature of cortical structure and functionality. Employing graph-theoretic results, we show that, given the estimated number of neurons in the human brain, there are only a few primal sizes that can be attributed to neural circuits under probabilistically sparse connectivity. The significance of this finding is that neural circuits of relatively small primal sizes in cyclic interaction, implied by inhibitory interneuron potentiation and excitatory inter-circuit potentiation, generate relatively long non-repetitious sequences of asynchronous primal-length periods. The meta-periodic nature of such circuit interaction translates into meta-periodic firing-rate dynamics, representing cortical information. It is finally shown that interacting neural circuits of primal sizes 7 or less exhaust most of the capacity of the human brain, with relatively little room to spare for circuits of larger primal sizes. This also appears to ratify experimental findings on the human working memory capacity.

Probabilistically segregated neural circuits and subcritical linguistics

Early studies of cortical information codes and memory capacity have assumed large neural networks, which, subject to evenly probable binary (on/off) activity, were found to be endowed with large storage and retrieval capacities under the Hebbian paradigm. Here, we show that such networks are plagued with exceedingly high cross-network connectivity, yielding long code words, which are linguistically non-realistic and difficult to memorize and comprehend. Noting that the neural circuit activity code is jointly governed by somatic and synaptic activity states, termed neural circuit polarities, we show that, subject to subcritical polarity probability, random-graph-theoretic considerations imply small neural circuit segregation. Such circuits are shown to represent linguistically plausible cortical code words which, in turn, facilitate storage and retrieval of both circuit connectivity and firing-rate dynamics.

Circuit Polarity Effect of Cortical Connectivity, Activity, and Memory

Experimental constraints have traditionally implied separate studies of different cortical functions, such as memory and sensory-motor control. Yet certain cortical modalities, while repeatedly observed and reported, have not been clearly identified with one cortical function or another. Specifically, while neuronal membrane and synapse polarities with respect to a certain potential value have been attracting considerable interest in recent years, the purposes of such polarities have largely remained a subject for speculation and debate. Formally identifying these polarities as on-off neuronal polarity gates, we analytically show that cortical circuit structure, behavior, and memory are all governed by the combined potent effect of these gates, which we collectively term circuit polarity. Employing widely accepted and biologically validated firing rate and plasticity paradigms, we show that circuit polarity is mathematically embedded in the corresponding models. Moreover, we show that the firing rate dynamics implied by these models are driven by ongoing circuit polarity gating dynamics. Furthermore, circuit polarity is shown to segregate cortical circuits into internally synchronous, externally asynchronous subcircuits, defining their firing rate modes in accordance with different cortical tasks. In contrast to the Hebbian paradigm, which is shown to be susceptible to mutual neuronal interference in the face of asynchrony, circuit polarity is shown to block such interference. Noting convergence of synaptic weights, we show that circuit polarity holds the key to cortical memory, having a segregated capacity linear in the number of neurons. While memory concealment is implied by complete neuronal silencing, memory is restored by reactivating the original circuit polarity. Finally, we show that incomplete deterioration or restoration of circuit polarity results in memory modification, which may be associated with partial or false recall, or novel innovation.