An Evidence Roadmap for Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health under the Affordable Care Act

Preparing residents to practice integrated behavioral health care: Multi-site feasibility study of a competency-based curriculum

OBJECTIVE

Workforce development is essential for the dissemination of team-based integrated behavioral healthcare. There is limited literature on training family medicine residents to function within an integrated behavioral health (IBH) system. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and value of an IBH competency-based curriculum for family medicine residents across multiple programs.

METHODS

Residency programs were recruited using professional listservs and networks to test a competency-based, multi-modal curriculum for preparing residents to practice IBH in primary care. Faculty instructors who led the workshop were invited to complete semi-structured interviews to examine the feasibility and appropriateness of the curriculum. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify, analyze, and report patterns. Residents completed a survey of perceived IBH skill and knowledge before and after training. A paired-sample t-test was used to determine significant differences pre- and post-training.

RESULTS

All five instructors completed interviews. Results suggest IBH training is valuable. Instructors gave specific feedback on online modules, implementation flexibility, and adjusting faculty development to differing levels of experience. Nineteen of forty residents (48%) completed anonymous pre-, post-, and retrospective-training surveys. Residents reported an increase in competence after training.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot suggest that IBH training implementation is feasible, desirable, timely, and may improve resident ability to work on an IBH team. Training should accommodate variations in program structure and faculty expertise.

Role Distinctions and Role Overlap Among Behavioral Health Providers

Integrated behavioral health care (IBHC) models are a growing trend for health care delivery, particularly in the primary setting. Clinicians working within IBHC contexts provide a spectrum of behavioral health services, including screening, prevention and health promotion, assessment, and treatment services. Integration of behavioral health providers into primary and specialty medical settings addresses the significant need for behavioral health services, improves care quality, improves patient experience, and reduces costs of care, access issues, and delays in service provision. While benefits are clear, what type of model to implement and which behavioral health care providers to include in that model remain elusive. This is partly due to the failure of IBHC models to include all behavioral health providers in their design, a lack of clarity of the expertise of each provider, and how providers work together. IBHC models are also complicated by contextual issues such as the relative availability of each profession, population health needs in different clinic populations, and financial factors. The purpose of this manuscript is to the clarify roles and responsibilities of different behavioral health professions including similarities and differences in their training, areas of unique expertise (role distinctions), shared responsibilities (role overlap), and relative cost and availability in the United States.

A Multidisciplinary, Family-Oriented Approach to Caring for Parents After Miscarriage: The Integrated Behavioral Health Model of Care

Miscarriage is increasingly gaining recognition, both in scientific literature and media outlets, as a loss that has significant and lasting effects on parents, though often disenfranchised and overlooked by both personal support networks and healthcare providers. For both men and women, miscarriage can usher in intense grief, despair, and difficulty coping, and for women in particular, there is evidence of increased prevalence of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress. Additionally, miscarriage can contribute to decreased relationship satisfaction and increased risk of separation, all while stigma and disenfranchisement create a sense of isolation. Despite this increased need for support, research indicates that many parents experience their healthcare providers as dismissive of the significance of the loss and as primarily focusing only on the physical elements of care. Research exploring the barriers to providers engaging in more biopsychosocial-oriented care has identified time constraints, lack of resources, lack of training in addressing loss, and compassion fatigue as key areas for intervention. This paper will review the biopsychosocial elements of miscarriage and discuss a multidisciplinary, family-oriented approach that can be implemented in healthcare settings to ensure a high quality and holistic level of care for individuals, couples, and families experiencing pregnancy loss.

Improving Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration in an Academic Internal Medicine Practice: 2-Year Follow-Up

This report details ongoing efforts to improve integration in the 2 years following implementation of the Primary Care Behavioral Health model at a general internal medicine clinic of an urban academic medical center. Efforts were informed by a modified version of the validated Level of Integration Measure, sent to all faculty and staff annually. At baseline, results indicated that the domains of systems integration, training, and integrated clinical practices had the greatest need for improvement. Over the 2 years, the authors increased availability of behavioral medicine appointments, improved depression screening processes, offered behavioral health training for providers, disseminated clinical decision support tools, and provided updates about integration progress during clinic meetings. Follow-up survey results demonstrated that physicians and staff perceived improvements in integration overall and in targeted domains. However, the main ongoing barrier to integration was insufficient behavioral health staff to meet patient demand for behavioral health services.

Understanding the Impacts of Caregiver Stress

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

Identifying risk factors associated with caregiver stress and suggesting methods for systematic caregiver screening for caregiver strain, depression, and anxiety.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING

Emergency department, primary care, and other health care settings.

FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver stress can lead to multiple negative outcomes including declines in physical health, increased mental health concerns, and overall decreased quality of life. Caregiver stress also leads to increased financial costs to the person, family, and health care systems, making it a public health issue. Recognizing caregiver stress is the initial step to identifying those in need of support and to providing quality care. Fortunately, caregiver stress can be prevented or reduced using a culturally competent multidimensional approach to addressing social determinants of health and unmet physical, psychological, and social/emotional needs of caregivers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT

Case management plays a critical role in assessing, educating, advocating, creating care plans, and advocating for both the caregiver and the care recipient.

The Effect of Integrating Primary Care and Mental Health Services on Diabetes and Depression: A Multi-site Impact Evaluation on the US-Mexico Border

BACKGROUND

Health care delivery systems are increasingly integrating physical and mental health services to address patients' complex needs, contain costs, and improve satisfaction. Therefore, it is critical to understand whether adoption of integrated care models is effective in diverse settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effect of integrated care on physical and mental health outcomes among low-income Latino participants on the US-Mexico border.

RESEARCH DESIGN

In this quasi-experimental multisite study, individual-level data were pooled from 8 studies of locally adapted integrated care models.

SUBJECTS

Participants were 18 years or older and had 1 or more chronic conditions: diabetes, depression, hypertension, or obesity. The study enrolled 4226 participants with 2254 participants in the intervention group and 1972 in the comparison group.

MEASURES

Primary outcomes were depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score and blood glucose measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Blood pressure, body mass index, and quality of life were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Multivariable linear regression analyses indicated intervention participants had significantly lower Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores (β=-0.39, P=0.03) and HbA1c (β=-0.14, P=0.02) at 12 months compared with comparison group participants. Stratified analyses showed improvements in HbA1c were even greater among intervention participants who had diabetes, depression, severe and persistent mental illness, were older or female compared with their counterparts in the comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care is constantly transforming, making it critical to study these changes across populations and settings. Findings from this study indicate that integrated care can significantly improve mental and physical health in an underserved Latino population.