Is therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin useful?

Treatments and limitations for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A review of current literature

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has remained a major threat to healthcare; in both hospital and community settings over the past five decades. With the current use of antibiotics for a variety of infections, including MRSA, emerging resistance is a major concern. Currently available treatments have restrictions limiting their use. These issues include, but are not limited to, side effects, cross-resistance, lack of understanding of pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacodynamics, gradual increment in minimal inhibitory concentration over the period (MIC creep) and ineffectiveness in dealing with bacterial biofilms. Despite availability of various therapeutic options for MRSA, the clinical cure rates remain low with high morbidity and mortality. Given these challenges with existing treatments, there is a need for development of novel agents for MRSA. Along with prompt infection control strategies and strict implementation of antibiotic stewardship, cautious use of newer anti-MRSA agents will be of utmost importance. This article reviews the treatments and limitations of MRSA management and highlights the future path.

LC-MS for Simultaneous Determination of Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Patient Plasma and its Application to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Background:

Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for patients taking vancomycin and teicoplanin to ensure pharmaceutical efficacy and prevent toxicity. Only few studies were reported regarding the simultaneous determination of vancomycin and teicoplanin in human plasma.

Objective:

The study aimed at developing and validating a Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) method for simultaneous determination and therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients with severe infection.

Method:

Plasma was processed by protein precipitation extraction. The analytes were separated on a C18 column by gradient elution with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile as mobile phase and measured by electrospray ionization source in positive selective ion monitoring mode at m/z 724.7 (vancomycin), 940.7 (teicoplanin) and 329.0 (bergenin). The plasma samples (104) were obtained from patients who were taking vancomycin or teicoplanin for further analysis.

Results:

The calibration curves were linear within the range of 0.25–40 µg/mL for vancomycin, and 0.5-40 µg/mL for teicoplanin. Either inter- or intra-day precision was less than 10.01 %. The extraction recoveries ranged from 89.99 to 94.29% for vancomycin and from 39.83 to 40.16 % for teicoplanin. Vancomycin and teicoplanin in plasma were stable at various storage conditions. The measured mean trough concentrations were 12.313 µg/mL for vancomycin and 8.765 µg/mL for teicoplanin.

Conclusion:

This method was successfully applied to therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients. It is with great clinic value for monitoring and predicting the individual response of patients under treatment.