Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients during and after Prophylaxis

Immunopathology of lung transplantation: from infection to rejection and vice versa

Lung transplantation offers a lifesaving option for patients with end-stage lung disease, but it is marred by a high risk of post-transplant infections, particularly involving multidrug-resistant bacteria, Cytomegalovirus, and fungal pathogens. This elevated infection rate, the highest among solid organ transplants, poses a significant challenge for clinicians, particularly within the first year post-transplantation, where infections are the leading cause of mortality. The direct exposure of lung allografts to the external environment exacerbates this vulnerability leading to constant immune stimulation and consequently to an elevated risk of triggering alloimmune responses to the lung allograft. The necessity of prolonged immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection further complicates patient management by increasing susceptibility to infections and neoplasms, and complicating the differentiation between rejection and infection, which require diametrically opposed management strategies. This review explores the intricate balance between preventing allograft rejection and managing the heightened infection risk in lung transplant recipients.

Rarely Encountered Gram-Negative Rods and Lung Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review

The respiratory tract of lung transplant recipients (LTR) is likely to be colonized with non-fermentative Gram-negative rods. As a consequence of the improvements in molecular sequencing and taxonomy, an increasing number of bacterial species have been described. We performed a review of the literature of bacterial infections in LTR involving non-fermentative Gram-negative rods with exclusion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia spp. Overall, non-fermenting GNR were recovered from 17 LTR involving the following genera: Acetobacter, Bordetella, Chryseobacterium, Elizabethkinga, Inquilinus, and Pandoraea. We then discuss the issues raised by these bacteria, including detection and identification, antimicrobial resistance, pathogenesis, and cross-transmission.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Mold Diseases

Although invasive fungal diseases are relatively less common than superficial diseases, there has been an overall increase in their incidence. Here, I review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of invasive mold diseases (IMDs) such as aspergillosis, mucormycosis, hyalohyphomycosis, and phaeohyphomycosis. Histopathologic demonstration of tissue invasion by hyphae or recovery of mold by the culture of a specimen obtained by a sterile procedure provides definitive evidence of IMD. If IMD cannot be confirmed through invasive procedures, IMD can be diagnosed through clinical criteria such as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Instituteof Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions. For initial primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis, voriconazole or isavuconazole is recommended and lipid formulations of amphotericin B are useful primary alternatives. Echinocandins are representative antifungal agents for salvage therapy. Treatment of invasive mucormycosis involves a combination of urgent surgical debridement of involved tissues and antifungal therapy. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are the drug of choice for initial therapy. Isavuconazole or posaconazole can be used as salvage or step-down therapy. IMDs other than aspergillosis and mucormycosis include hyalohyphomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis, for which there is no standard therapy and the treatment depends on the clinical disease and status of the patient.

Bring it on: Top five antimicrobial stewardship challenges in transplant infectious diseases and practical strategies to address them

Antimicrobial therapies are essential tools for transplant recipients who are at high risk for infectious complications. However, judicious use of antimicrobials is critical to preventing the development of antimicrobial resistance. Treatment of multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and potentially leads to therapies with higher toxicities, intravenous access, and intensive drug monitoring for interactions. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are crucial in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance, though balancing these strategies with the need for early and frequent antibiotic therapy in these immunocompromised patients can be challenging. In this review, we summarize 5 frequently encountered transplant infectious disease stewardship challenges, and we suggest strategies to improve practices for each clinical syndrome. These 5 challenging areas are: asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients, febrile neutropenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, antifungal prophylaxis in liver and lung transplantation, treatment of left-ventricular assist device infections, and Clostridioides difficile infection in solid-organ and hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. Common themes contributing to these challenges include limited data specific to transplant patients, shortcomings in diagnostic testing, and uncertainties in pharmacotherapy.

High-throughput next-generation sequencing for identifying pathogens during early-stage post-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

High-throughput next-generation sequencing (HT-NGS) has the potential to detect a large variety of pathogens; however, the application of HT-NGS in lung transplant (LTx) recipients remains limited. We aimed to evaluate the value of HT-NGS for pathogen detection and diagnosis of pulmonary infection during early-stage post-lung transplantation.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 51 LTx recipients who underwent lung transplantation between January 2020 and December 2020. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected for the detection of pathogens using both HT-NGS and conventional microbiological testing. The detection of pathogens and diagnostic performance of HT-NGS were compared with that of conventional methods.

RESULTS

HT-NGS provided a higher positive rate of pathogen detection than conventional microbiological testing (88.24% vs. 76.47%). The most common bacteria detected via HT-NGS during early-stage post-lung transplantation were Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas and Klebsiella, while all fungi were Candida and all viruses were Herpesvirus. Uncommon pathogens, including Strongyloides, Legionella, and Mycobacterium abscesses were identified by HT-NGS. The sensitivity of HT-NGS for diagnosing pulmonary infection was significantly higher than that of conventional microbiological testing (97.14% vs. 68.57%; P < 0.001). For three LTx recipients, treatment regimens were adjusted according to the results of HT-NGS, leading to a complete recovery.

CONCLUSION

HT-NGS is a highly sensitive technique for pathogen detection, which may provide diagnostic advantages, especially in LTx recipients, contributing to the optimization of treatment regimens against pulmonary infection during early-stage post-lung transplantation.