1
|
Scheithauer S, Karasimos B, Manamayil D, Häfner H, Lewalter K, Mischke K, Heintz B, Tacke F, Brücken D, Lüring C, Heidenhain C, Tewarie L, Hilgers RD, Lemmen SW. A prospective cluster trial to increase antibiotic prescription quality in seven non-ICU wards. GMS HYGIENE AND INFECTION CONTROL 2023; 18:Doc14. [PMID: 37405250 PMCID: PMC10316282 DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Aim To evaluate general shortcomings and faculty-specific pitfalls as well as to improve antibiotic prescription quality (ABQ) in non-ICU wards, we performed a prospective cluster trial. Methods An infectious-disease (ID) consulting service performed a prospective investigation consisting of three 12-week phases with point prevalence evaluation conducted once per week (=36 evaluations in total) at seven non-ICU wards, followed by assessment of sustainability (weeks 37-48). Baseline evaluation (phase 1) defined multifaceted interventions by identifying the main shortcomings. Then, to distinguish intervention from time effects, the interventions were performed in four wards, and the 3 remaining wards served as controls; after assessing effects (phase 2), the same interventions were performed in the remaining wards to test the generalizability of the interventions (phase 3). The prolonged responses after all interventions were then analyzed in phase 4. ABQ was evaluated by at least two ID specialists who assessed the indication for therapy, the adherence to the hospital guidelines for empirical therapy, and the overall antibiotic prescription quality. Results In phase 1, 406 of 659 (62%) patients cases were adequately treated with antibiotics; the main reason for inappropriate prescription was the lack of an indication (107/253; 42%). The antibiotic prescription quality (ABQ) significantly increased, reaching 86% in all wards after the focused interventions (502/584; nDf=3, ddf=1,697, F=6.9, p=0.0001). In phase 2 the effect was only seen in wards that already participated in interventions (248/347; 71%). No improvement was seen in wards that received interventions only after phase 2 (189/295; 64%). A given indication significantly increased from about 80% to more than 90% (p<.0001). No carryover effects were observed. Discussion ABQ can be improved significantly by intervention bundles with apparent sustainable effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Scheithauer
- Department of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Britta Karasimos
- Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Düren, Düren, Germany
| | - David Manamayil
- Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Helga Häfner
- Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl Lewalter
- Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl Mischke
- Medical Clinic 1, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Bernhard Heintz
- Clinic for Nephrology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM)/Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK, Charité – University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Brücken
- Clinic for Traumatology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Heidenhain
- Clinic for Visceral Surgery, AGAPLESION MARKUS Krankenhaus Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | | | - Sebastian W. Lemmen
- Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de With K, Allerberger F, Amann S, Apfalter P, Brodt HR, Eckmanns T, Fellhauer M, Geiss HK, Janata O, Krause R, Lemmen S, Meyer E, Mittermayer H, Porsche U, Presterl E, Reuter S, Sinha B, Strauß R, Wechsler-Fördös A, Wenisch C, Kern WV. Strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in hospital: a guideline by the German Society for Infectious Diseases. Infection 2017; 44:395-439. [PMID: 27066980 PMCID: PMC4889644 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-016-0885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction In the time of increasing resistance and paucity of new drug development there is a growing need for strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in German and Austrian hospitals. An evidence-based guideline on recommendations for implementation of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programmes was developed by the German Society for Infectious Diseases in association with the following societies, associations and institutions: German Society of Hospital Pharmacists, German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology, Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, The Austrian Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Austrian Society for Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Austrian Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Robert Koch Institute. Materials and methods A structured literature research was performed in the databases EMBASE, BIOSIS, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library from January 2006 to November 2010 with an update to April 2012 (MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library). The grading of recommendations in relation to their evidence is according to the AWMF Guidance Manual and Rules for Guideline Development. Conclusion The guideline provides the grounds for rational use of antibiotics in hospital to counteract antimicrobial resistance and to improve the quality of care of patients with infections by maximising clinical outcomes while minimising toxicity. Requirements for a successful implementation of ABS programmes as well as core and supplemental ABS strategies are outlined. The German version of the guideline was published by the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in December 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K de With
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - F Allerberger
- Division Public Health, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria
| | - S Amann
- Hospital Pharmacy, Munich Municipal Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - P Apfalter
- Institute for Hygiene, Microbiology and Tropical Medicine (IHMT), National Reference Centre for Nosocomial Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - H-R Brodt
- Department of Infectious Disease Medical Clinic II, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - T Eckmanns
- Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Fellhauer
- Hospital Pharmacy, Schwarzwald-Baar Hospital, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | - H K Geiss
- Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infectiology, Sana Kliniken AG, Ismaning, Germany
| | - O Janata
- Department for Hygiene and Infection Control, Danube Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Krause
- Section of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - S Lemmen
- Division of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Meyer
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - H Mittermayer
- Institute for Hygiene, Microbiology and Tropical Medicine (IHMT), National Reference Centre for Nosocomial Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - U Porsche
- Department for Clinical Pharmacy and Drug Information, Landesapotheke, Landeskliniken Salzburg (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - E Presterl
- Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Reuter
- Clinic for General Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Pneumology and Osteology, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - B Sinha
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Strauß
- Department of Medicine 1, Gastroenterology, Pneumology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Wechsler-Fördös
- Department of Antibiotics and Infection Control, Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Wenisch
- Medical Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - W V Kern
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodrigues FD, Bertoldi AD. Perfil da utilização de antimicrobianos em um hospital privado. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2010; 15 Suppl 1:1239-47. [DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000700033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2007] [Accepted: 02/11/2008] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Os antimicrobianos são um dos grupos de medicamentos mais prescritos nos hospitais e que causam uma grande preocupação quanto à adequação do seu uso. Descreveu-se o perfil dos antimicrobianos utilizados num hospital privado do interior do Rio Grande do Sul, analisando a quantidade consumida de cada antimicrobiano. Foram analisadas todas as prescrições de pacientes que utilizaram antimicrobianos enquanto internados no período de março a junho de 2006. O consumo dos antimicrobianos foi expresso em dose diária definida (DDD) por 100 leitos-dia. As análises de utilização de antimicrobianos foram feitas em geral e estratificadas por grupos de idade e por clínicas médicas. Durante o período em estudo, a prevalência do uso de antimicrobianos foi de 52,4% (IC95% 49,2-55,7). As cefalosporinas foram as mais utilizadas (43,4%), seguidas das penicilinas (16,3%), fluorquinolonas (13,0%) e aminoglicosídeos (9,7%). O alto consumo de antimicrobianos durante o período em estudo é resultado da ausência de uma política de controle dos medicamentos prescritos no hospital e da falta de protocolos de uso de antimicrobianos. Para que haja um controle do consumo de antimicrobianos, os hospitais devem assumir uma política de vigilância sobre as prescrições deste grupo de medicamentos.
Collapse
|